A Demographic Characteristics-Based Study on the Visual Impact Assessment of the External Form of Entrance Pavilions to the Underground Stations of China’s Subway
Source abstract
Abstract
The subway is one of urban residents’ main means of public transportation. The design of entrance pavilions to subway stations has shown a diverse development trend over time. Since most of the subway building space is underground, it is very difficult for subway users or the public to view the structure fully. In this instance, the ground-level entrance pavilion becomes the most eye-catching element in the subway system. From the perspective of the urban spatial environment, the external form of entrance pavilions is one of the components of urban architecture. The design of the external form of entrance pavilions has an important impact on the urban spatial form and affects people’s feelings about the urban space. Therefore, it is essential to study the external form of entrance pavilions. This study investigated 42 subway entrance pavilions in 17 cities in China. The following features were studied: exterior contour, façade permeability, cultural characteristics, decorative materials, and the number of exterior colors. The photostimulation method was adopted to evaluate the influence of the physical features of the external form of the entrance pavilions on respondents’ visual impact assessment. The data analysis showed that respondents with different demographic characteristics provided different visual impact assessments of the external form of the entrance pavilions, and all five physical features influenced their assessment. This study offers a valuable reference for constructing entrance pavilions and urban spaces in Chinese cities in the future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Color perception and design · Urban Green Space and Health · Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Tse, C.H.Y. (2010). A New Metropolitan Cultural Ligament: Toronto Eglinton Crosstown LRT Prototypical Design Proposal. [Master’s Thesis, University of Waterloo].
2. Nam, D.-H., and Lee, J.-H. (2009). ICCC Proceedings of the Korean Contents Association, The Korean Contents Association.
3. (2013). Code for design of urban rail transit of Beijing. Standard No. DB11/995-2013.
4. (2018). Code for design of Zhejiang Province Urban Rail Transit. Standard No. DB33/T1146-2018.
5. (2019). Code for design of urban rail transit of Jiangsu Province. Standard No. DB32/T 3700-2019.
6. (2004). Shanghai Urban rail transit design standard. Standard No. DGJ08-109-2004.
7. Effects of different types of entrances on natural ventilation in a subway station10.1016/j.tust.2020.103578 ↗
8. Zhao, G., Sun, W., and Wang, X. (2014, January 11–12). Regional Studies on Form Design of Metro Station Entrance–Taking Changsha Metro Line 2 Entrance as an Example. Presented at the 2nd International Symposium on Rail Transit Comprehensive Development (ISRTCD) Proceedings, Beijing, China.10.1007/978-3-642-37589-7_31 ↗
9. Li, X., Zhu, C., and Zhong, Y. (2020, January 8). Study on land-use around rail transit stations based on TOD theory Taking Wudaokou subway station in Beijing as an example. Presented at the 56th ISOCARP World Planning Congress in Doha, Qatar International Society of City and Regional Planners, Doha, Qatar.10.47472/ZQDA2215 ↗
10. Lu, H., Zhu, Y., Qi, Y., and Yu, J. (2018). Do Urban Subway Openings Reduce PM2.5 Concentrations? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10114147 ↗
11. The effects of subway openings on air quality: Evidence from China10.1007/s11356-021-15482-1 ↗
12. Li, P., Shi, P., and Yu, C. (July, January 29). Soft Ground Shield Driven Tunnel Defect Analysis. Presented at the 49th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, CA, USA.
13. A Study on the Facade Design of the Underground Entrance at Subway Station Considering the City Shelters’ Functions-Focused on the Subway Station Line 1 in Busan
14. A Study on the Evaluation according to the Situation of Subway Station Canopy-Focused on the Subway Station in Daegu
15. The significance of the underground experience: Selection of reference design cases from the underground public transport stations and interchanges of the European Union10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.015 ↗
16. Torigoe, M. (1998, January 25–30). Construction of metropolitan center subway entrances and exits harmonizing functional requirements with esthetic urban views. Presented at the Tunnels and Metropolises: In Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress’ 98 on Tunnels and Metropolises, São Paulo, Brazil.
17. Study on Urban Design of Luohu Railway Station Area from the Perspective of Integrated Urban Design
18. Mulpramook, S. (2019, January 22–23). The Architectural Aesthetic Design for Subway Station Benefits to Tourism Case Sanam Chai Station mrt Blue Line Bangkok Thailand. Presented at the International Academic Multidisciplinary Research Conference, Bali, Indonesia.
19. Service satisfaction evaluation of each travel section in seoul’s subway junctions
20. Environmental Art Design of Subway Station10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.926-930.1340 ↗
21. Yang, Z., and Cho, J. (2019, January 17–19). Public Art Design in Subway Space Based on Emotional Appeal. Presented at the 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019), Moscow, Russia.10.2991/iccessh-19.2019.203 ↗
22. Li, Z., Lin, X., Han, X., Lu, X., and Zhao, H. (2022). Landscape Efficiency Assessment of Urban Subway Station Entrance Based on Structural Equation Model: Case Study of Main Urban Area of Nanjing. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12030294 ↗
23. Railway landscape design and relationship with form, function and aesthetic
24. Assessment of the visual impact made on the landscape by new buildings: A methodology for site selection10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00116-6 ↗
25. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.029 ↗
26. Aesthetic and visual impact assessment of a quarry expansion
27. A case study on visual impact assessment for wind energy development
28. Aesthetic impact of solar energy systems10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.021 ↗
29. Scenic impacts of electricity transmission towers: The influence of landscape type and observer distance
30. Assessment of the Visual Impact of Existing High-Voltage Lines in Urban Areas10.3390/electricity2030017 ↗
31. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00243-2 ↗
32. Influence of building façade visual elements on its historical image: Case of Kuala Lumpur city, Malaysia
33. A study on visual impact assessment of the external form of unified houses in rural China10.1080/13467581.2021.1941997 ↗
34. Zhang, R., Yuan, Y., Zhai, Y., and Han, C. (2022). Visual appraisal of designed landscapes in high-rise residential areas rendered by residents living at different heights. J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 1–15.10.1080/09640568.2022.2074823 ↗
35. The influence of newly built high-rise buildings on visual impact assessment of historic urban landscapes: A case study of Xi’an Bell Tower10.1080/13467581.2021.1930011 ↗
36. Huang, X., Han, C., and Ma, M. (2022). Visual preferences for outdoor space along commercial pedestrian streets under the influence of plant characteristics. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0264482 ↗
37. Preferences for street configuration and street tree planting in urban Hong Kong10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.002 ↗
38. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4 ↗
39. The contribution of key observation point evaluation to a scientifically rigorous approach to visual impact assessment10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.11.001 ↗
40. Visual evaluation models: Some complicating questions regarding memorable scenes10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00142-6 ↗
41. Dealing with landscape fuzziness in user preference studies: Photo-based questionnaires in the Mediterranean context10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.005 ↗
42. Use of photographs to simulate environments: A meta-analysis10.2466/pms.1990.71.3.907 ↗
43. Landscape preference and personality10.1016/0169-2046(86)90004-6 ↗
44. Kaplan, R., and Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, Cambridge University Press.
45. Public preferences toward shopping mall interior landscape design in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.019 ↗
46. Dimensions underlying local people’s preference of street characteristics for walking10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.264 ↗
47. Aesthetic Judgement and Visual Impact of Architectural Forms: A Study of Library Buildings10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.226 ↗
48. The visual evaluation of rural areas: A methodological approach for the spatial planning and color design of scattered second homes with an example in Hervás, Western Spain10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.001 ↗
49. An exploration of the relationships between urban building façade visual elements and people’s preferences in the city of Gorgan, Iran
50. Building facade study in Lahijan city, Iran: The impact of façade’s visual elements on historical image
51. Kaplan, R. (1975). Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions and Resources, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
52. Aesthetic preferences of laypersons and its relationship with the conceptual properties on building façade design10.1080/13467581.2020.1782209 ↗
53. Identifying the different aesthetic quality of building attributes from architects perspective
54. Reconciling the architectural preferences of architects and the public: The ordered preference model10.1177/0013916507304695 ↗
55. The desirability of views of city skylines after dark10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.007 ↗
56. Assessing the visual impact of physical features of tall buildings: Height, top, color10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.008 ↗
57. Describing the geometric difference of architectural forms in three primary shapes of circle, triangle and square10.1080/13467581.2021.2007103 ↗
58. Physical Determinants of Preferences for Residential Facades10.1177/00139169921972326 ↗
59. Police Station Facades: Searching the Architectural Characteristics that can be Appreciated by all
60. The built environment of Japanese shopping streets as visual information on pedestrian vibrancy
61. Jalali, A., Utaberta, N., and Che-Ani, A.I. (2013). The Effect of Architectural and Urban Elements On City Image in Lahijan’s Historical Area, Iran. J. Des. Built, 6.
62. An evaluation of the elements and characteristics of historical building façades in the context of Malaysia10.1057/udi.2013.18 ↗
63. The effect of window views openness and naturalness on the perception of rooms spaciousness and brightness: A visual preference study
64. Preference for void-to-solid ratio in residential facades10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.003 ↗
65. Pan, J., Yuan, Y., Wang, X., and Han, C. (2022). Research on Visual Preference of Chinese Courthouse Architecture Appearance. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12050557 ↗
66. Nearby nature and long-term care facility residents: Benefits and design recommendations10.1300/J081v19n03_02 ↗
67. The Appraisal Model of Teenagers’ Landscape Preference based on Demographic and Personality Characteristics10.22452/jdbe.vol18no1.2 ↗
68. Employees’ reactions to nearby nature at their workplace: The wild and the tame10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.012 ↗
69. Assessing restorative components of small urban parks using conjoint methodology10.1016/j.ufug.2010.12.003 ↗
70. Demographic groups’ differences in visual preference for vegetated landscapes in urban green space10.1016/j.scs.2016.10.010 ↗
71. Aesthetic preference for a Swiss alpine landscape: The impact of different agricultural land-use with different biodiversity10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.015 ↗
72. Perception and evaluation of water in landscape: Use of Photo-Projective Method to compare child and adult residents’ perceptions of a Japanese river environment10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00093-2 ↗
73. Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general publics’ preferences towards rural landscapes10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.026 ↗
74. Development of Visual Preference for Natural Environments10.1177/0013916582141001 ↗
75. Demographic Correlates of Landscape Preference10.1177/0013916583154005 ↗
76. New wilderness in the Netherlands: An investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.11.006 ↗
77. Cultural variations in landscape preference: Comparisons among Chinese sub-groups and Western design experts10.1016/0169-2046(94)00188-9 ↗
78. The use of latent classes to identify individual differences in the importance of landscape dimensions for aesthetic preference10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.11.002 ↗
79. Weinberger, A.B., Garside, E.W., Christensen, A.P., and Chatterjee, A. (2022). Effects of expertise on psychological responses to buildings and natural landscapes. J. Environ. Psychol., 84.10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101903 ↗
80. An assessment of ordinary landscapes by an expert and by its residents: Landscape values in areas of intensive agricultural use10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.016 ↗
81. A study of demographic difference in external visual preference evaluation of Chinese detached house10.1080/13467581.2020.1723596 ↗
82. Visual preferences for physical attributes of mining and post-mining landscapes with respect to the sociodemographic characteristics of respondents10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.08.007 ↗
83. Demographic Differences in the Visual Preferences for Agrarian Landscapes in Western Norway10.1006/jevp.1996.0002 ↗
84. Activism and Conservation Behavior in an Environmental Movement: The Contradictory Effects of Gender10.1080/716100620 ↗
85. Validating the use of Internet survey techniques in visual landscape assessment—An empirical study from Germany10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.07.005 ↗
86. Testing perceived landscape colour difference using the Internet10.1016/S0169-2046(97)80003-5 ↗
87. Standards for Internet-based experimenting
88. Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation?10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.002 ↗
89. Menard, S. (2002). Longitudinal Research, Sage.10.4135/9781412984867 ↗
90. Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture10.1073/pnas.1301227110 ↗
91. Aesthetic sensitivity to curvature in real objects and abstract designs10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.012 ↗
92. Şen, D.E., Özdemir, İ.M., Candaş Kahya, N., Sarı, R.M., and Sağsöz, A. (2011). The Effects of Transparency-Opacity Concepts in Building on The Perception of Façades. Int. J. Acad. Res., 3.
93. Analysis of facade solutions as an alternative to demolition for architectures with visual impact in historical urban scenes10.1016/j.culher.2021.09.005 ↗
94. A comparison between wishes and status: Gray is not the preference for residents while the city shows neutral colors10.1002/col.22122 ↗
95. Effects of hue, saturation, and brightness on color preference in social networks: Gender-based color preference on the social networking site Twitter10.1002/col.20734 ↗
96. Investigation on factors to influence color emotion and color preference responses10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.02.026 ↗
97. A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part I: Colour emotions for single colours10.1002/col.20010 ↗
98. A lifespan developmental study of landscape assessment10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80151-3 ↗
99. Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapes10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.006 ↗
100. Preference for Case Materials in Smart Devices: A Comparative Study in Korea, USA, and Tanzania10.1007/s12541-019-00022-2 ↗