Torsional Capacity Prediction of Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Machine Learning Techniques Based on Ensembles of Trees
Source abstract
Abstract
For the design or assessment of framed concrete structures under high eccentric loadings, the accurate prediction of the torsional capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) beams can be critical. Unfortunately, traditional semi-empirical equations still fail to accurately estimate the torsional capacity of RC beams, namely for over-reinforced and high-strength RC beams. This drawback can be solved by developing accurate Machine Learning (ML) based models as an alternative to other more complex and computationally demanding models. This goal has been herein addressed by employing several ML techniques and by validating their predictions. The novelty of the present article lies in the successful implementation of ML methods based on Ensembles of Trees (ET) for the prediction of the torsional capacity of RC beams. A dataset incorporating 202 reference RC beams with varying design attributes was divided into testing and training sets. Only three input features were considered, namely the concrete area (area enclosed within the outer perimeter of the cross-section), the concrete compressive strength and the reinforcement factor (which accounts for the ratio between the yielding forces of both the longitudinal and transverse reinforcements). The predictions from the used models were statistically compared to the experimental data to evaluate their performances. The results showed that ET reach higher accuracies than a simple Decision Tree (DT). In particular, The Bagging Meta-Estimator (BME), the Forests of Randomized Trees (FRT), the AdaBoost (AB) and the Gradient Tree Boosting (GTB) reached good performances. For instance, they reached values of R2 (coefficient of determination) in the range between 0.982 and 0.990, and values of cvRMSE (coefficient of variation of the root mean squared error) in the range between 10.04% and 13.92%. From the obtained results, it is shown that these ML techniques provide a high capability for the prediction of the torsional capacity of RC beams, at the same level of other more complicated ML techniques and with much fewer input features.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
Department of Environmental Science, College of Energy and Environmental Science, Alkarkh University of Science, Baghdad 10081, Iraq
Tal Projecto Lda., 1350-252 Lisbon, Portugal
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. Torsional strength of normal and high strength reinforced concrete beams10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.005 ↗
2. Teixeira, M.M., and Bernardo, L.F.A. (2021, January 14–16). Torsional strength of reinforced concrete beams—Evaluation of some codes of practice. Concrete structures: New trends for eco-efficiency and performance. Proceedings of the Fib Symposium, Lisbon, Portugal.
3. Bernardo, L.F.A., Teixeira, M.M., De Domenico, D., and Gama, J.M.R. (2022). Improved Equations for the Torsional Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beams for Codes of Practice Based on the Space Truss Analogy. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15113827 ↗
4. Whittle, R. (2013). Failures in Concrete Structures—Case Studies in Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete, Taylor & Francis Group. FL 33487-2742.
5. Hsu, T.T.C. (1968). Torsion of Structural Concrete—Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Rectangular Members; Torsion of Structural Concrete, SP-18, American Concrete Institute.
6. Pure Torsion in Rectangular Sections—A Re-examination
7. ACI Committee 318 (1989). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-89) and Commentary (ACI 318R-89), American Concrete Institute.
8. (2018). Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures (Standard No. SP 63.13330.2018).
9. ACI Committee 318 (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19), American Concrete Institute.
10. (2014). Design of Concrete Structures (Standard No. CAN/CSA-A23.3-14).
11. (2013). Comité Euro-International du Béton (Standard No. CEB-FIP Model Code 2010).
12. (2005). Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1–1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1992-1-1).
13. Rausch, E. (1929). Berechnung des Eisenbetons gegen Verdrehung (Design of Reinforced Concrete in Torsion). [Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Hochschule]. (In German).
14. Elastic Theory for Torsional Strength of Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Beams10.1680/macr.1950.2.4.3 ↗
15. Lampert, P., and Thurlimann, B. (1969). Torsionsversuche an Stahlbetonbalken (Torsion Tests of Reinforced Concrete Beams), Institut fur Baustatik, ETH. (In German).10.1007/978-3-0348-6908-9 ↗
16. Diagonal Compression Field Theory—A Rational Model for Structural Concrete in Pure Torsion
17. Leonhardt, F., and Schelling, G. (1974). Torsionsversuche an Stahl Betonbalken, Deutscher Ausschuss fur Stahlbeton. (In German).
18. A Softened Membrane Model for Torsion in Reinforced Concrete Members10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.038 ↗
19. A Unified Softened Truss Model for RC and PC Concrete Beams under Torsion10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101467 ↗
20. Refined model to estimate torsional strength of reinforced concrete beams
21. Limit analysis of reinforced concrete beams subjected to pure torsion10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(86) ↗
22. Efficient procedure to analyze RC beam sections using the softened truss model10.14359/51689568 ↗
23. Model for RC members under torsion, bending, and shear. I: Theory10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:9(961) ↗
24. Direct design of hollow reinforced concrete beams. Part I: Design procedure10.1680/stco.2004.5.4.139 ↗
25. Shear-bending-torsion interaction in structural concrete members: A non-linear coupled sectional approach10.1007/s11831-007-9007-5 ↗
26. Softened Truss Model for Reinforced Concrete Beams under Torsion Combined with Axial Force10.3390/applmech1010006 ↗
27. Salem, N.M., and Deifalla, A. (2022). Evaluation of the Strength of Slab–Column Connections with FRPs Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14081517 ↗
28. Ebid, A., and Deifalla, A. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict Punching Shear Capacity of Lightweight Concrete Slabs. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15082732 ↗
29. Prediction of Shear Strength of FRP Reinforced Beams with and Without Stirrups Using (GP) Technique10.1016/j.asej.2021.02.006 ↗
30. Shatnawi, A., Alkassar, H.M., Al-Abdaly, N.M., Al-Hamdany, E.A., Bernardo, L.F.A., and Imran, H. (2022). Shear Strength Prediction of Slender Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams Using a Gradient Boosting Regression Tree Method. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12050550 ↗
31. Prediction of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and artificial neural network10.1016/j.scient.2012.02.009 ↗
32. Shear capacity prediction of FRP-RC beams using single and ensemble ExPlainable Machine learning models10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115381 ↗
33. Application of optimization-based estimation analysis for predicting the compressive strength of eco-friendly modified geopolymer concrete
34. Explainable machine learning based efficient prediction tool for lateral cyclic response of post-tensioned base rocking steel bridge piers10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.023 ↗
35. Machine learning-based shear capacity prediction and reliability analysis of shear-critical RC beams strengthened with inorganic composites
36. Explainable machine learning model and reliability analysis for flexural capacity prediction of RC beams strengthened in flexure with FRCM10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113903 ↗
37. Benemaran, R.S., Esmaeili-Falak, M., and Javadi, A. (2022). Predicting resilient modulus of flexible pavement foundtion using extreme gradient boosting based optimized models. Int. J. Pavement Eng.
38. Estimation of splitting tensile strength of modified recycled aggregate concrete using hubrid algorithms
39. Machine learning for structural engineering: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 ↗
40. Lyu, Z., Yu, Y., Samali, B., Rashidi, M., Mohammadi, M., Nguyen, T.N., and Nguyen, A. (2022). Back-Propagation Neural Network Optimized by K-Fold Cross-Validation for Prediction of Torsional Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beam. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15041477 ↗
41. Using a hybrid neural network to predict the torsional strength of reinforced concrete beams
42. Genetic-programming-based modeling of RC beam torsional strength10.1007/s12205-010-0371-6 ↗
43. Predicting of torsional strength of RC beams by using different artificial neural network algorithms and building codes10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.05.009 ↗
44. Deifalla, A., and Salem, N.M. (2022). A Machine Learning Model for Torsion Strength of Externally Bonded FRP- Reinforced Concrete Beams. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14091824 ↗
45. Predicting the torsional strength of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with FRP sheets in terms of artificial neural networks
46. Amini Pishro, A., Zhang, Z., Amini Pishro, M., Liu, W., Zhang, L., and Yang, Q. (2022). Structural Performance of EB-FRP-Strengthened RC T-Beams Subjected to Combined Torsion and Shear Using ANN. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15144852 ↗
47. Henedy, S.N., Naser, A.H., Imran, H., Bernardo, L.F.A., Teixeira, M.M., and Al-Khafaji, Z. (2022). Development of Prediction Models for the Torsion Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Beams Using M5P and Nonlinear Regression Models. J. Compos. Sci., 6.10.3390/jcs6120366 ↗
48. Torsional capacity evaluation of RC beams using an improved bird swarm algorithm 2D convolutional neural network10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115066 ↗
49. Implementing ensemble learning methods to predict the shear strength of RC deep beams with/without web reinforcements10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111979 ↗
50. Data-driven shear strength prediction of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams using machine learning approach10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111743 ↗
51. Reinforced concrete deep beam shear strength capacity modelling using an integrative bio-inspired algorithm with an artificial intelligence model10.1007/s00366-020-01137-1 ↗
52. Prediction of Ultimate Shear Strength of Reinforced-Concrete Deep Beams Using Neural Networks10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:7(818) ↗
53. Predicting the effect of stirrups on shear strength of reinforced normal-strength concrete (NSC) and high-strength concrete (HSC) slender beams using artificial intelligence10.1139/l06-033 ↗
54. Shear strength prediction of HSC slender beams without web reinforcement10.1617/s11527-015-0752-x ↗
55. Kotu, V., and Deshpande, B. (2019). Data Science: Concepts and Practice, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.10.1016/B978-0-12-814761-0.00002-2 ↗
56. Behaviour of reinforced concrete walls subjected to monotonic pure torsion-An experimental study10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.022 ↗
57. Essais de Poutre en Béton Armé sous Torsion Simple et Flexion Combinées (Torsionsversuche und Torsions-Biege-Versuche an Stahlbetonbalken)
58. Torsion in reinforced normal and high-strength concrete beams—Part 1: Experimental test series
59. Torsion of high-strength reinforced concrete beams and minimum reinforcement requirement
60. Torsional behavior of normal- and high-strength concrete beams
61. Behavior of reinforced concrete beams with minimum torsional reinforcement10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.11.004 ↗
62. Torsional strength of RC beams considering tension stiffening effect10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000237 ↗
63. Torsional behavior of high-strength concrete beams with minimum reinforcement ratio10.1155/2019/1432697 ↗
64. Estimation of minimum torsional reinforcement of reinforced concrete and steel fiber-reinforced concrete members10.1155/2019/4595363 ↗
65. Effect of concrete cover on the pure torsional behavior of reinforced concrete beams10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110790 ↗
66. Pure torsional behavior of RC beams in relation to the amount of torsional reinforcement and cross-sectional properties10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119801 ↗
67. Torsion in HSC hollow beams: Strength and ductility analysis
68. Unified softened membrane model for torsion in hollow and solid reinforced concrete members modeling the entire pre- and post-cracking behavior10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001212 ↗
69. Multicollinearity in Regression Analysis: The Problem Revisited10.2307/1937887 ↗
70. Gholamy, A., Kreinovich, V., and Kosheleva, O. (2018). Why 70/30 or 80/20 Relation between Training and Testing Sets: A Pedagogical Explanation, The University of Texas. Technical Report: UTEP-CS-18-09.
71. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.H., and Friedman, J.H. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
72. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
73. Stochastic gradient boosting10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2 ↗
74. Alhakeem, Z.M., Jebur, Y.M., Henedy, S.N., Imran, H., Bernardo, L.F.A., and Hussein, H.M. (2022). Prediction of Ecofriendly Concrete Compressive Strength Using Gradient Boosting Regression Tree Combined with GridSearchCV Hyperparameter-Optimization Techniques. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15217432 ↗
75. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization
76. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python