Seismic Performance Assessment of Wide Pile-Supported Wharf Considering Soil Slope and Waveform Duration
Source abstract
Abstract
Pile-supported wharf (PSW) is one of the primary port structures and is often damaged by earthquakes. To mitigate the risk of seismic damage to a PSW, its seismic performance should be thoroughly assessed. This study aimed to examine the impact of ground displacement on the seismic performance of PSW with a mild soil slope. We performed soil-structure system finite element analysis targeting a wide PSW. The analysis is divided into two scenarios. In the first scenario, the PSW was modeled without regard for the soil slope, whereas the second scenario considered the soil slope. Two waveforms that matched the target spectral acceleration were used to study the effects of the waveform duration on the seismic response of PSW. The analysis results revealed substantial influences of soil slope displacement as well as differences in waveforms on PSW’s seismic performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Marine Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
Research Center for Urban Safety and Security, Kobe University, Kobe City 657-8501, Japan
Funding
PT. Inti Teknik Solusi Cemerlang (PT. ITSC)
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Kayen, R.E., Mitchell, J.K., Seed, R.B., and Nishio, S. (2022, July 10). Soil Liquefaction in the East Bay during the Earthquake. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294571172_Soil_liquefaction_in_the_east_bay_during_the_earthquake#fullTextFileContent.
2. Seismic Performance of Port de Port-Au-Prince during the Haiti Earthquake and Post-Earthquake Restoration of Cargo Throughput10.1193/1.3638716 ↗
3. Seismic Performance of a Pile-Supported Wharf: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Simulation10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.009 ↗
4. Fragility Estimation and Sensitivity Analysis of an Idealized Pile-Supported Wharf with Batter Piles
5. The Influence of the Soil Constitutive Models on the Seismic Analysis of Pile-Supported Wharf Structures with Batter Piles in Cut-Slope Rock Dike10.2478/sgem-2019-0050 ↗
6. A Simplified Reliability Estimation Method for Pile-Supported Wharf on the Residual Displacement by Earthquake10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105904 ↗
7. Fatigue Damage Assessment of Mooring Lines under the Effect of Wave Climate Change and Marine Corrosion10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107303 ↗
8. Harbor And Coastal Structures: A Review Of Mechanical Fatigue Under Random Wave Loading10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08241 ↗
9. Liang, Q., Zhao, C., Hu, J., and Zeng, H. (2021). An Analytical Method for Elastic Seismic Response of Structures Considering the Effect of Ground Motion Duration. Appl. Sci, 2021.10.3390/app112210949 ↗
10. Duration Characteristics of Horizontal Components of Strong-Motion Earthquake Records
11. A Study on the Duration and Amplitude Characteristics of Earthquake Ground Motions10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.033 ↗
12. Barbosa, A.R., Ribeiro, F.L.A., and Neves, L.C. (2014, January 21–25). Effects of Ground-Motion Duration on the Response of a 9-Story Steel Frame Building. Proceedings of the 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, AK, USA.
13. Ground Motion Duration Effects on Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000856 ↗
14. Romney, K.T., Barbosa, A.R., and Mason, H.B. (2014, January 21–25). Developing a Soil Bridge-Interaction Model for Studying the Effects of Long-Duration Earthquake Motions. Proceedings of the 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, AK, USA.
15. Effect of Long-Duration Earthquakes on the Low-Cycle Fatigue Damage in RC Frame Buildings10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.013 ↗
16. Chandramohan, R. (2016). Duration of Earthquake Ground Motion: Influence on Structural Collapse Risk And Integration in Design and Assessment Practice. [Ph.D. Thesis, Standford University].
17. Developing Fragility Curves for a Pile-Supported Wharf10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.01.011 ↗
18. Nonlinear Static Analysis of a Pile-Supported Wharf10.1590/s1983-41952019000500003 ↗
19. Pushover Analysis for Flexible and Semi-Flexible Pile-Supported Wharf Structures Accounting the Dynamic Magnification Factors Due to Torsional Effects10.1002/suco.202000137 ↗
20. Chen, Y., Sun, H., Feng, Z., Chen, Y., Sun, H., and Feng, Z. (2022). Study on Seismic Isolation of Long Span Double Deck Steel Truss Continuous Girder Bridge. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12052567 ↗
21. Stehmeyer, E.H. (2011, January 14–16). Seismic Vulnerability Assessments of Marine Structures Using Non-Linear Static Analysis Procedures. Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2011, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1061/41171(401)71 ↗
22. Earthquake Vulnerability of Port Structures in Indonesia10.1088/1755-1315/419/1/012001 ↗
23. Imai, T., and Tonouchi, K. (1982, January 24–27). Correlation of N Value with S-Wave Velocity and Shear Modulus. Proceedings of the 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
24. (2019). Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung Dan Non Gedung (Standard No. SNI 1726:2019).
25. PLAXIS Company (Plaxis B.V.) (2021). PLAXIS CONNECT Edition V21.00 General Information Manual, Plaxis B.V.
26. Toma, M.A. (2017). Earthquake Response Analysis of Pile Supported Structures. [Master’s Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology].
27. PLAXIS Company (Plaxis B.V.) (2021). PLAXIS CONNECT Edition V21.00 Material Models Manual, Plaxis B.V.
28. Dao, T.P.T. (2011). Validation of PLAXIS Embedded Piles for Lateral Loading. [Master of Science Thesis, Delft University of Technology].
29. van der Kwaak, B. (2015). Modelling of Dynamic Pile Behaviour during an Earthquake Using PLAXIS 2D: Embedded Beam (Row). [Master of Science Thesis, Delft University of Technology].
30. Validation and Application of the Embedded Pile Row Feature in PLAXIS 2D
31. Bowles, J.E. (1984). Physical and Geotechnical Properties of Soils, McGraw-Hill Education.
32. Prediction of Initial Void Ratio from the Natural Moisture Content of Cohesive Soils
33. Benz, T. (2007). Small-Strain Stiffness of Soils and Its Numerical Consequences. [Doctor of Engineering Thesis, Universität Stuttgart].
34. Lateral Resistance of Piles in Cohesive Soils10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000611 ↗
35. Décourt, L. (1982). Prediction of the Bearing Capacity of Piles Based Exclusively on N Values of the SPT. Penetration Testing, Routledge.
36. Capacidade de Carga de Estacas a Partir de Valores de SPT
37. Boyke, C., Refani, A.N., and Nagao, T. (2022). Site-Specific Earthquake Ground Motions for Seismic Design of Port Facilities in Indonesia. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12041963 ↗
38. Maximum Credible Earthquake Ground Motions with Focus on Site Amplification Due to Deep Subsurface10.48084/etasr.3991 ↗
39. Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89) ↗
40. Boore, D.M. (2009). TSPP, a Collection of FORTRAN Programs for Processing and Manipulating Time Series.10.3133/ofr20081111 ↗
41. A Winkler Model Approach for Vertically and Laterally Loaded Piles in Nonhomogeneous Soil10.1002/nag.1078 ↗
42. Effects Of Liquefaction-Induced Ground Displacements On Pile Performance In The 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake10.3208/sandf.38.Special_163 ↗