Numerical Quantification of Controllability in the Null Space for Redundant Manipulators
Source abstract
Abstract
Redundant motion, which is possible when robotic manipulators are over-actuated, can be used to control robot arms for a wide range of tasks. One of the best known methods for controlling redundancy is the null space projection, which assigns a priority while executing desired tasks. However, when the manipulator is projected into null space, its motion would be limited, since the motion is only permitted in the direction that does not interfere with the primary task. In this study, we have analyzed the null space projector matrix to derive the appropriate direction of the redundant motion by quantifying the allowed motion in each direction. As a result, we have found an ellipsoidal boundary, in which the redundant motion is permitted to move. We have named this ellipsoidal boundary as ’null space quality’ in directions. The proposed null space quality shows similar aspects with that of the robot manipulability, but it reveals a decisively different value when the manipulator operates within the null space. The experimental results showed that the robotic manipulator tracked the sinusoidal input trajectory with reduced root mean square (RMS) error by 33.84%. Furthermore, we have demonstrated the obstacle avoidance of a robotic arm utilizing the null space projector while considering the null space quality.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics · Robot Manipulation and Learning · Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Human-Centered Robotics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Chung-Ang University
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Almurib, H.A., Al-Qrimli, H.F., and Kumar, N. (2012, January 12–13). A review of application industrial robotic design. Proceedings of the 2011 Ninth International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering, Bangkok, Thailand.10.1109/ICTKE.2012.6152387 ↗
2. A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation10.1109/JRA.1987.1087068 ↗
3. Task-priority based redundancy control of robot manipulators10.1177/027836498700600201 ↗
4. Slotine, S.B., and Siciliano, B. (1991, January 19–22). A general framework for managing multiple tasks in highly redundant robotic systems. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Pisa, Italy.10.1109/ICAR.1991.240390 ↗
5. Obstacle avoidance for kinematically redundant manipulators in dynamically varying environments10.1177/027836498500400308 ↗
6. Obstacle avoidance control for redundant manipulators using collidability measure10.1017/S0263574799001861 ↗
7. Lee, K.-K., and Buss, M. (November, January 29). Obstacle avoidance for redundant robots using Jacobian transpose method. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, CA, USA.
8. Albu-Schaffer, A., Ott, C., Frese, U., and Hirzinger, G. (2003, January 14–19). Cartesian impedance control of redundant robots: Recent results with the DLR-light-weight-arms. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422), Taipei, Taiwan.
9. Platt, R., Abdallah, M., and Wampler, C. (2011, January 9–13). Multiple-priority impedance control. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China.10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980228 ↗
10. Task-space control of robot manipulators with null-space compliance10.1109/TRO.2013.2291630 ↗
11. Flacco, F., De Luca, A., and Khatib, O. (2012, January 14–18). Motion control of redundant robots under joint constraints: Saturation in the null space. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Saint Paul, MN, USA.10.1109/ICRA.2012.6225376 ↗
12. Control of redundant robots under hard joint constraints: Saturation in the null space10.1109/TRO.2015.2418582 ↗
13. Kinematic control of redundant manipulators: Generalizing the task-priority framework to inequality task10.1109/TRO.2011.2142450 ↗
14. Task space control considering passive muscle stiffness for redundant robotic arms10.1007/s11370-015-0165-2 ↗
15. Whole-body dynamic behavior and control of human-like robots10.1142/S0219843604000058 ↗
16. Park, J. (2000). Analysis and Control of Kinematically Redundant Manipulators: An Approach Based on Kinematically Decoupled Joint Space Decomposition. [Ph.D. Thesis, Pohang University of Science and Technology].
17. Inverse kinematics and control of a 7-DOF redundant manipulator based on the closed-loop algorithm10.5772/10495 ↗
18. Tondu, B. (2006, January 4–6). A closed-form inverse kinematic modelling of a 7R anthropomorphic upper limb based on a joint parametrization. Proceedings of the 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Genova, Italy.10.1109/ICHR.2006.321302 ↗
19. An, H.H., Clement, W.I., and Reed, B. (2014, January 8–11). Analytical inverse kinematic solution with self-motion constraint for the 7-DOF restore robot arm. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Besancon, France.10.1109/AIM.2014.6878266 ↗
20. Position-based kinematics for 7-DoF serial manipulators with global configuration control, joint limit and singularity avoidance10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.10.025 ↗
21. Manipulability of robotic mechanisms10.1177/027836498500400201 ↗
22. Marani, G., Kim, J., Yuh, J., and Chung, W.K. (2002, January 11–15). A real-time approach for singularity avoidance in resolved motion rate control of robotic manipulators. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292), Washington, DC, USA.
23. An overview of null space projections for redundant, torque-controlled robots10.1177/0278364914566516 ↗
24. (2021, June 16). Franka Control Interface Documentation. Available online: Https://frankaemika.github.io/docs/.
25. Khatib, O. (1986). Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. Auton. Robot. Veh., 396–404.10.1007/978-1-4613-8997-2_29 ↗