journal article·2021-03-26Open access

Regression Diagnostics with Predicted Residuals of Linear Model with Improved Singular Value Classification Applied to Forecast the Hydrodynamic Efficiency of Wave Energy Converters

Kiril Tenekedjiev, Nagi Abdussamie, Hyunbin An, Natalia Nikolova

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 7

Abstract

In the preliminary stages of design of the oscillating water column (OWC) type of wave energy converters (WECs), we need a reliable cost- and time-effective method to predict the hydrodynamic efficiency as a function of the design parameters. One of the cheapest approaches is to create a multiple linear regression (MLR) model using an existing data set. The problem with this approach is that the reliability of the MLR predictions depend on the validity of the regression assumptions, which are either rarely tested or tested using sub-optimal procedures. We offer a series of novel methods for assumption diagnostics that we apply in our case study for MLR prediction of the hydrodynamics efficiency of OWC WECs. Namely, we propose: a novel procedure for reliable identification of the zero singular values of a matrix; a modified algorithm for stepwise regression; a modified algorithm to detect heteroskedasticity and identify statistically significant but practically insignificant heteroscedasticity in the original model; a novel test of the validity of the nullity assumption; a modified Jarque–Bera Monte Carlo error normality test. In our case study, the deviations from the assumptions of the classical normal linear regression model were fully diagnosed and dealt with. The newly proposed algorithms based on improved singular value decomposition (SVD) of the design matrix and on predicted residuals were successfully tested with a new family of goodness-of-fit measures. We empirically investigated the correct placement of an elaborate outlier detection procedure in the overall diagnostic sequence. As a result, we constructed a reliable MLR model to predict the hydrodynamic efficiency in the preliminary stages of design. MLR is a useful tool at the preliminary stages of design and can produce highly reliable and time-effective predictions of the OWC WEC performance provided that the constructing and diagnostic procedures are modified to reflect the latest advances in statistics. The main advantage of MLR models compared to other modern black box models is that their assumptions are known and can be tested in practice, which increases the reliability of the model predictions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wave and Wind Energy Systems · Wind Energy Research and Development · Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Australian Maritime College (National Centre for Maritime Engineering and Hydrodynamics), University of Tasmania, Launceston 7250, Tasmania, Australia

Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy—Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria

Australian Maritime College (National Centre for Ports and Shipping), University of Tasmania, Launceston 7250, Tasmania, Australia

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Numerical prediction of chamber performance for OWC wave energy converter
2. Benreguig, P., Pakrashi, V., and Murphy, J. (2019). Assessment of primary energy conversion of a closed-circuit OWC wave energy converter. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12101962 ↗
3. Numerical simulation of a heave-only floating OWC (oscillating water column) device10.1016/j.energy.2014.08.079 ↗
4. Phase averaged flow analysis in an oscillating water column wave energy converter10.1115/1.4007076 ↗
5. Wave Basin Experiments with Large Wave Energy Converter Arrays to Study Interactions between the Converters and Effects on Other Users in the Sea and the Coastal Area10.3390/en7020701 ↗
6. Ásgeirsson, G.S. (2013). Hydrodynamic Investigation of Wave Power Buoys. [Master’s Thesis, Kungliga Teknishka Hogskolan].
7. The response of a semisubmersible model under focused wave groups: Experimental investigation10.1016/j.joes.2017.07.003 ↗
8. ITTC (International Towing Tank Conference), Recommended Procedures and Guidelines: Wave Energy Converter-Model Test Experiments (7.5-02-07-03.7), Specialist Committee on Testing of Marine Renewable Devices of the 28th ITTC, 1-17, 2017.
9. Stratigaki, V., Troch, P., Stallard, T., Kofoed, J.P., Benoit, M., Mattarollo, G., Babarit, A., Forehand, D., and Folley, M. (2012, January 1–6). Large scale experiments on farms of heaving buoys to investigate wake dimensions, near-field and far-field effects. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Coastal Engineering, Santander, Spain.10.9753/icce.v33.management.71 ↗
10. Efficiency of OWC wave energy converters: A virtual laboratory10.1016/j.apor.2013.11.001 ↗
11. Numerical simulation of an oscillating water column device using a code based on Navier-Stokes equations10.1016/j.energy.2013.08.062 ↗
12. Numerical hydrodynamic analysis of an offshore stationary–floating oscillating water column–wave energy converter using CFD10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.08.002 ↗
13. Air-water two-phase flow modelling of hydrodynamic performance of an oscillating water column device10.1016/j.renene.2011.10.011 ↗
14. Virtual wave flume and Oscillating Water Column modeled by lattice Boltzmann method and comparison with experimental data10.1016/j.ijome.2016.04.001 ↗
15. Investigation of hydrodynamic performance of an OWC (oscillating water column) wave energy device using a fully nonlinear HOBEM (higher-order boundary element method)10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.012 ↗
16. Wave-power absorption by systems of oscillating surface pressure distributions10.1017/S0022112082000263 ↗
17. An investigation into the hydrodynamic efficiency of an oscillating water column10.1115/1.2426992 ↗
18. Investigation on modeling of non-buoyant body typed point absorbing wave energy converter using Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference System10.1016/j.ijome.2016.01.004 ↗
19. ANFIS method for ultimate strength prediction of unstiffened plates with pitting, corrosion10.1080/17445302.2018.1439668 ↗
20. Is there a need for fuzzy logic?10.1016/j.ins.2008.02.012 ↗
21. The Role of Fuzzy Logic to Dealing with Epistemic Uncertainty in Supply Chain Risk Assessment: Review Standpoints10.1007/s40815-020-00846-5 ↗
22. Management of uncertainty in statistical reasoning: The case of regression analysis. Internat10.1016/j.ijar.2007.05.011 ↗
23. Approximation theory of the MLP model in neural networks10.1017/S0962492900002919 ↗
24. Artificial neural networks and their application to assessment of ultimate strength of plates with pitting corrosion10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.06.007 ↗
25. Neural networks in ocean engineering10.1533/saos.2004.0005 ↗
26. Neural rotational speed control for wave energy converters10.1080/00207179.2010.551141 ↗
27. Eigenvalue decay: A new method for neural network regularization10.1016/j.neucom.2013.08.005 ↗
28. Paneiro, G., and Rafael, M. (2020). Artificial neural network with a cross-validation approach to blast-induced ground vibration prop-agation modeling. Undergr. Space.10.1016/j.undsp.2020.03.002 ↗
29. Heat Capacity Prediction of Ionic Liquid Based on Quantum Chemistry Descriptors10.1021/acs.iecr.8b03668 ↗
30. Estimation of heat capacity of ionic liquids using S σ-profile molecular descriptors10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03576 ↗
31. A simple correlation for prediction of heat capacities of ionic liquids10.1016/j.fluid.2012.09.030 ↗
32. Prediction of Heat Capacity of Ionic Liquids Based on COSMO-RS Sσ-Profile10.1016/B978-0-444-63578-5.50037-2 ↗
33. An experimental investigation of hydrodynamics of a fixed OWC Wave Energy Converter10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.107 ↗
34. Abdussamie, N., Ham, M., Ojeda, R., and Penesis, I. (2018, January 10–15). Cost and time effective prediction technique for OWC-WEC devices. Proceedings of the 28th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Sapporo, Japan.
35. Which is better: Holdout or full-sample classifier design?
36. Maddala, G. (1988). Introduction to Econometrics, Macmillan Publishing Company.
37. Selvanathan, E., Selvanathan, S., and Keller, G. (2021). Business Statistics, Cengage Learning. [8th ed.].
38. Lind, D., Marchal, W., and Wathen, S. (2012). Statistical Techniques in Business & Economics, McGraw-Hill Irwin. [15th ed.].
39. Gujarati, D. (2004). Basic Econometrics, Tata McGraw Hill. [4th ed.].
40. How robust standard errors expose methodological problems they do not fix, and what to do about it10.1093/pan/mpu015 ↗
41. Wooldridge, J., Wadud, M., Lye, J., and Jayeux, R. (2021). Introductory Econometrics, Cengage Learning. [2nd Asia-Pacific ed.].
42. Asymptotic inference under heteroskedasticity of unknown form10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00366-3 ↗
43. Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties10.1016/0304-4076(85)90158-7 ↗
44. Press, W., Teukolski, S., Vetterling, W., and Flannery, B. (2007). Numerical Recipes—The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press. [3rd ed.].
45. Nikolova, N., Rodriguez, R., Symes, M., Toneva, D., Kolev, K., and Tenekedjiev, K. (2021). Outlier detection algorithms over fuzzy data with weighted least squares. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., in print.10.1007/s40815-020-01049-8 ↗
46. James, G. (2015). Modern Engineering Mathematics, Pearson International.
47. When BLUE is not best: Non-normal errors and the linear model10.1017/psrm.2018.34 ↗
48. Fox, J. (1997). Applied Regression Analysis, Linear Models, and Related Methods, Sage Publications.
49. Stature estimation from long bone length in Bulgarians10.1078/0018-442X-00030 ↗
50. Numerical procedures for stature estimating according to length of limb long bones in Bulgarian and Hungarian populations
51. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity10.2307/1912934 ↗
52. The information matrix test with Bootstrap-based covariance matrix estimation10.1016/j.econlet.2003.09.002 ↗
53. Golden, R., Henley, S., White, H., and Kashner, M. (2016). Generalized information matrix tests for detecting model misspecification. Econometrics, 4.10.3390/econometrics4040046 ↗
54. The information matrix test for the linear model10.2307/2297515 ↗