Large-Language-Model-Enabled Text Semantic Communication Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, achieving near-human levels in multiple language understanding challenges and aligning closely with the core principles of semantic communication Inspired by LLMs’ advancements in semantic processing, we propose LLM-SC, an innovative LLM-enabled semantic communication system framework which applies LLMs directly to the physical layer coding and decoding for the first time. By analyzing the relationship between the training process of LLMs and the optimization objectives of semantic communication, we propose training a semantic encoder through LLMs’ tokenizer training and establishing a semantic knowledge base via the LLMs’ unsupervised pre-training process. This knowledge base facilitates the creation of optimal decoder by providing the prior probability of the transmitted language sequence. Based on this, we derive the optimal decoding criteria for the receiver and introduce beam search algorithm to further reduce complexity. Furthermore, we assert that existing LLMs can be employed directly for LLM-SC without extra re-training or fine-tuning. Simulation results reveal that LLM-SC outperforms conventional DeepSC at signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) exceeding 3 dB, as it enables error-free transmissions of semantic information under high SNRs while DeepSC fails to do so. In addition to semantic-level performance, LLM-SC demonstrates compatibility with technical-level performance, achieving approximately an 8 dB coding gain for a bit error ratio (BER) of 10−3 without any channel coding while maintaining the same joint source–channel coding rate as traditional communication systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topic Modeling · DNA and Biological Computing · Semantic Web and Ontologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Information and Communication, National University of Defense Technology, Wuhan 430000, China
School of Electrical Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430000, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of China
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. A mathematical theory of communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
2. Weaver, W. (1953). Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, Institute of General Semantics.
3. Carnap, R., and Bar-Hillel, Y. (1952). An Outline of a Theory of Semantic Information, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
4. A theory of semantic communication10.1109/TMC.2024.3406375 ↗
5. Deep learning enabled semantic communication systems10.1109/TSP.2021.3071210 ↗
6. Semantic communication with adaptive universal transformer10.1109/LWC.2021.3132067 ↗
7. Task-oriented multi-user semantic communications for VQA10.1109/LWC.2021.3136045 ↗
8. Weng, Z., Qin, Z., and Li, G.Y. (2021, January 14–23). Semantic communications for speech signals. Proceedings of the ICC 2021-IEEE International Conference on Communications, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICC42927.2021.9500590 ↗
9. Huang, D., Tao, X., Gao, F., and Lu, J. (2021, January 7–11). Deep learning-based image semantic coding for semantic communications. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Madrid, Spain.10.1109/GLOBECOM46510.2021.9685667 ↗
10. Wireless deep video semantic transmission10.1109/JSAC.2022.3221977 ↗
11. A survey on evaluation of large language models10.1145/3641289 ↗
12. A Comprehensive Overview and Analysis of Large Language Models: Trends and Challenges10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3573955 ↗
13. Guo, S., Wang, Y., Li, S., and Saeed, N. (2023). Semantic Communications with Ordered Importance using ChatGPT. arXiv.
14. Semantic communications: Outcome of the intelligence era
15. Azzouz, E.E., Nandi, A.K., Azzouz, E.E., and Nandi, A.K. (1996). Modulation recognition using artificial neural networks. Automatic Modulation Recognition of Communication Signals, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-2469-1 ↗
16. Enhanced Modulation Recognition Through Deep Transfer Learning in Hybrid Graph Convolutional Networks10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3388490 ↗
17. Lightweight Joint Source-Channel Coding for Semantic Communications
18. Choi, K., Tatwawadi, K., Weissman, T., and Ermon, S. (2018). NECST: Neural joint source-channel coding. arXiv.
19. Graph Neural Network enabled Propagation Graph Method for Channel Modeling10.1109/TVT.2024.3382650 ↗
20. Yuan, C., Wu, C., Cheng, D., and Yang, Y. (2018, January 25–27). Deep learning in encoding and decoding of polar codes. Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Data Mining, Communications and Information Technology (DMCIT 2018), Shanghai, China.
21. Deep learning-based channel estimation10.1109/LCOMM.2019.2898944 ↗
22. Shannon-kotel-nikov mappings in joint source-channel coding10.1109/TCOMM.2009.0901.070075 ↗
23. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv.
24. Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., and Sutskever, I. (2025, June 23). Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training. Available online: https://cdn.openai.com/research-covers/language-unsupervised/language_understanding_paper.pdf.
25. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., and Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv.
26. Pennington, J., Socher, R., and Manning, C.D. (2014, January 25–29). Glove: Global vectors for word representation. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar.10.3115/v1/D14-1162 ↗
27. Berant, J., Chou, A., Frostig, R., and Liang, P. (2013, January 8–21). Semantic parsing on freebase from question-answer pairs. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Seattle, DC, USA.10.18653/v1/D13-1160 ↗
28. Fellbaum, C. (2010). WordNet. Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-8847-5_10 ↗
29. Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., and Mikolov, T. (2016). Bag of tricks for efficient text classification. arXiv.10.18653/v1/E17-2068 ↗
30. Artificial Intelligence in 6G Wireless Networks: Opportunities, Applications, and Challenges10.1155/2024/8845070 ↗
31. Jiang, F., Peng, Y., Dong, L., Wang, K., Yang, K., Pan, C., and You, X. (2023). Large AI Model Empowered Multimodal Semantic Communications. arXiv.
32. Large AI model-based semantic communications10.1109/MWC.001.2300346 ↗
33. Large language models empowered autonomous edge AI for connected intelligence10.1109/MCOM.001.2300550 ↗
34. Valmeekam, C.S.K., Narayanan, K., Kalathil, D., Chamberland, J.F., and Shakkottai, S. (2023). LLMZip: Lossless Text Compression using Large Language Models. arXiv.
35. LaMoSC: Large Language Model-Driven Semantic Communication System for Visual Transmission10.1109/TCCN.2024.3401712 ↗
36. Chah, N. (2018). OK Google, What Is Your Ontology? Or: Exploring Freebase Classification to Understand Google’s Knowledge Graph. arXiv.
37. Sennrich, R., Haddow, B., and Birch, A. (2015). Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units. arXiv.10.18653/v1/P16-1162 ↗
38. Wu, Y., Schuster, M., Chen, Z., Le, Q.V., Norouzi, M., Macherey, W., Krikun, M., Cao, Y., Gao, Q., and Macherey, K. (2016). Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv.
39. Rust, P., Pfeiffer, J., Vulić, I., Ruder, S., and Gurevych, I. (2020). How good is your tokenizer? on the monolingual performance of multilingual language models. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.243 ↗
40. Farsad, N., Rao, M., and Goldsmith, A. (2018, January 15–20). Deep learning for joint source-channel coding of text. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Calgary, AB, Canada.10.1109/ICASSP.2018.8461983 ↗
41. Koehn, P. (2005, January 13–15). Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. Proceedings of the Machine Translation Summit X: Papers, Phuket, Thailand.
42. Zheng, L., Chiang, W.L., Sheng, Y., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., and Xing, E. (2023). Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena. arXiv.
43. 5G NR User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception; Part 1: Range 1 standalone release 15 V. 15.2. 0 document 3GPP TS 38.101–1
44. Park, S., Simeone, O., and Kang, J. (2020, January 26–29). End-to-end fast training of communication links without a channel model via online meta-learning. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), Virtual.10.1109/SPAWC48557.2020.9154322 ↗