AI-Based Smart Monitoring Framework for Livestock Farms
Source abstract
Abstract
Smart farms refer to spaces and technologies that utilize networks and automation to monitor and manage the environment and livestock without the constraints of time and space. As various devices installed on farms are connected to a network and automated, farm conditions can be observed remotely anytime and anywhere via smartphones or computers. These smart farms have evolved into smart livestock farming, which involves collecting, analyzing, and sharing data across the entire process from livestock production and growth to post-shipment distribution and consumption. This data-driven approach aids decision-making and creates new value. However, in the process of evolving smart farm technology into smart livestock farming, challenges remain in the essential requirements of data collection and intelligence. Many livestock farms face difficulties in applying intelligent technologies. In this paper, we propose an intelligent monitoring system framework for smart livestock farms using artificial intelligence technology and implement deep learning-based intelligent monitoring. To detect cattle lesions and inactive individuals within the barn, we apply the RT-DETR method instead of the traditional YOLO model. YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 are representative models in the YOLO series, both of which utilize Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS). NMS is a postprocessing technique used to eliminate redundant bounding boxes by calculating the Intersection over Union (IoU) between all predicted boxes. However, this process can be computationally intensive and may negatively impact both speed and accuracy in object detection tasks. In contrast, RT-DETR (Real-Time Detection Transformer) is a Transformer-based real-time object detection model that does not require NMS and achieves higher accuracy compared to the YOLO models. Given environments where large-scale datasets can be obtained via CCTV, Transformer-based detection methods like RT-DETR are expected to outperform traditional YOLO approaches in terms of detection performance. This approach reduces computational costs and optimizes query initialization, making it more suitable for the real-time detection of cattle maintenance behaviors and related abnormal behavior detection. Comparative analysis with the existing YOLO technique verifies RT-DETR and confirms that RT-DETR shows higher performance than YOLOv8. This research contributes to resolving the low accuracy and high redundancy of traditional YOLO models in behavior recognition, increasing the efficiency of livestock management, and improving productivity by applying deep learning to the smart monitoring of livestock farms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Agriculture and AI · Food Supply Chain Traceability · IoT-based Smart Home Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Engineering, Konkuk University, Chungju 27478, Republic of Korea
Department of Liberal Arts, Konkuk University, Chungju 27478, Republic of Korea
Department of Information and Communication, Baekseok University, Cheonan 31065, Republic of Korea
Funding
Konkuk University
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. A survey on the new generation of deep learning in image processing10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2956508 ↗
2. Dulal, R., Zheng, L., Kabir, M.A., McGrath, S., Medway, J., Swain, D., and Swain, W. (2022, January 20–30). Automatic cattle identification using yolov5 and mosaic augmentation: A comparative analysis. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA), Sydney, Australia.10.1109/DICTA56598.2022.10034585 ↗
3. Yu, Z., Liu, Y., Yu, S., Wang, R., Song, Z., Yan, Y., Li, F., Wang, Z., and Tian, F. (2022). Automatic Detection Method of Dairy Cow Feeding Behaviour Based on YOLO Improved Model and Edge Computing. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22093271 ↗
4. Ge, Z., Liu, S., Wang, F., Li, Z., and Sun, J. (2021). Yolox: Exceeding yolo series in 2021. arXiv.
5. Glenn, J. (2025, March 20). Yolov5 Release v7.0. Available online: https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5/tree/v7.0.
6. Long, X., Deng, K., Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Dang, Q., Gao, Y., Shen, H., Ren, J., Han, S., and Ding, E. (2020). Pp-yolo: An effective and efficient implementation of object detector. arXiv.
7. Wang, C.-Y., Bochkovskiy, A., and Liao, H.-Y.M. (2023, January 18–22). Yolov7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of the-art for real-time object detectors. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00721 ↗
8. Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., and Zagoruyko, S. (2020, January 23–28). End-to end object detection with transformers. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Glasgow, UK.10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13 ↗
9. Shao, D., He, Z., Fan, H., and Sun, K. (2023). Detection of cattle key parts based on the improved Yolov5 algorithm. Agriculture, 13.10.3390/agriculture13061110 ↗
10. Hao, W., Ren, C., Han, M., Zhang, L., Li, F., and Liu, Z. (2023). Cattle body detection based on YOLOv5-EMA for precision livestock farming. Animals, 13.10.3390/ani13223535 ↗
11. Video-based automatic lameness detection of dairy cows using pose estimation and multiple locomotion traits10.1016/j.compag.2024.109040 ↗
12. Yu, R., Wei, X., Liu, Y., Yang, F., Shen, W., and Gu, Z. (2024). Research on Automatic Recognition of Dairy Cow Daily Behaviors Based on Deep Learning. Animals, 14.10.3390/ani14030458 ↗
13. Li, G., Shi, G., and Zhu, C. (2024). Dynamic Serpentine Convolution with Attention Mechanism Enhancement for Beef Cattle Behavior Recognition. Animals, 14.10.3390/ani14030466 ↗
14. Li, F., Zhang, H., Liu, S., Guo, J., Ni, L.M., and Zhang, L. (2022, January 18–24). Dn-detr: Accelerate detr training by introducing query denoising. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orlean, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01325 ↗
15. Liu, S., Li, F., Zhang, H., Yang, X., Qi, X., Su, H., Zhu, J., and Zhang, L. (2021, January 3–7). Dab-detr: Dynamic anchor boxes are better queries for detr. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Vienna, Austria.
16. Meng, D., Chen, X., Fan, Z., Zeng, G., Li, H., Yuan, Y., Sun, L., and Wang, J. (2021, January 11–17). Conditional detr for fast training convergence. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00363 ↗
17. Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Yang, T., and Sun, J. (March, January 22). Anchor detr: Query design for transformer-based detector. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Online.
18. Zhu, X., Su, W., Lu, L., Li, B., Wang, X., and Dai, J. (2020, January 26–30). Deformable DETR: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
19. Zhang, H., Li, F., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Su, H., Zhu, J., Ni, L., and Shum, H.-Y. (2022, January 25–29). Dino: Detr with improved denoising anchor boxes for end-to-end object detection. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Virtual.
20. Zhao, Y., Lv, W., Xu, S., Wei, J., Wang, G., Dang, Q., Liu, Y., and Chen, J. (2024, January 16–22). DETRs beat YOLOs on rReal-time Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01605 ↗