journal article·2024-10-22Open access

Emission Factors for Biochar Production from Various Biomass Types in Flame Curtain Kilns

Gerard Cornelissen, Clifton Makate, Jan Mulder, Jente Janssen, Jon Trimarco, Alfred Obia, Vegard Martinsen, Erlend Sørmo

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 21

Abstract

Simple and low-cost flame curtain (“Kon-Tiki”) kilns are currently the preferred biochar technology for smallholder farmers in the tropics. While gas and aerosol emissions have been documented for woody feedstocks (twigs and leaves) with varying moisture contents, there is a lack of data on emissions from other types of feedstocks. This study aims to document the gas and aerosol emissions for common non-woody feedstocks and to compare emissions from finely grained, high-lignin feedstock (coffee husk) with those from coarser, low-lignin feedstocks (maize cobs, grass, sesame stems). Throughout each pyrolysis cycle, all carbon-containing gases and NOx were monitored using hand-held sensitive instruments equipped with internal pumps. Carbon balances were used to establish emission factors in grams per kilogram of biochar. The resulting methane emissions were nearly zero (<5.5 g/kg biochar) for the pyrolysis of three dry (~10% moisture) maize cobs, grass, and a 1:1 mixture of grass and woody twigs. For sesame stems, methane was detected in only two distinct spikes during the pyrolysis cycle. Carbon monoxide (CO) and aerosol (Total Suspended Particles, TSP) emissions were recorded at levels similar to earlier data for dry twigs, while nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions were negligible. In contrast, the pyrolysis of finely grained coffee husks generated significant methane and aerosol emissions, indicating that technologies other than flame curtain kilns are more suitable for finely grained feedstocks. The emission results from this study suggest that certification of biochar made from dry maize, sesame, and grass biomass using low-tech pyrolysis should be encouraged. Meanwhile, more advanced systems with syngas combustion are needed to sufficiently reduce CO, CH4, and aerosol emissions for the pyrolysis of finely grained biomasses such as rice, coffee, and nut husks. The reported data should aid overarching life-cycle analyses of the integration of biochar practice in climate-smart agriculture and facilitate carbon credit certification for tropical smallholders.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes · Biodiesel Production and Applications · Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), 0484 Oslo, Norway

Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resources (MINA), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), 1433 Ås, Norway

Menon Economics, 0369 Oslo, Norway

Export Trading Group (ETG), 1181 LE Amstelveen, The Netherlands

Kijani Forestry, P.O. Box 1259, Gulu 70501, Uganda

Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Gulu University, P.O. Box 166, Gulu 70501, Uganda

Funding

Norwegian Research Council · Kijani Forestry (Gulu, Uganda) · Export Trading Group (Amstelveen, the Netherlands)

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Pyrogenic carbon capture and storage10.1111/gcbb.12553 ↗
2. Lehmann, J., and Rondon, M. (2006). Bio-char soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics. Biol. Approaches Sustain. Soil Syst., 113.10.1201/9781420017113.ch36 ↗
3. Can biochar and designer biochar be used to remediate per-and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) and lead and antimony contaminated soils?10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133693 ↗
4. Kon-Tiki flame curtain pyrolysis for the democratization of biochar production
5. Collins, D., Morduch, J., Rutherford, S., and Ruthven, O. (2009). Portfolios of the Poor: How the World's Poor Live on $2 a Day, Princeton University Press.
6. Scholz, S.B., Sembres, T., Roberts, K., Whitman, T., Wilson, K., and Lehmann, J. (2014). Biochar Systems for Smallholders in Developing Countries: Leveraging Current Knowledge and Exploring Future Potential for Climate-Smart Agriculture, World Bank.10.1596/978-0-8213-9525-7 ↗
7. Cornelissen, G., Pandit, N.R., Taylor, P., Pandit, B.H., Sparrevik, M., and Schmidt, H.P. (2016). Emissions and Char Quality of Flame-Curtain "Kon Tiki" Kilns for Farmer-Scale Charcoal/Biochar Production. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0154617 ↗
8. Systematic evaluation of pyrolysis processes and biochar quality in the operation of low-cost flame curtain pyrolysis kiln for sustainable biochar production10.1016/j.crsust.2023.100213 ↗
9. Kalderis, D., Tsuchiya, S., Phillipou, K., Paschalidou, P., Pashalidis, I., Tashima, D., and Tsubota, T. (2020). Utilization of pine tree biochar produced by flame-curtain pyrolysis in two non-agricultural applications. Bioresour. Technol. Rep., 9.10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100384 ↗
10. Flame curtain pyrolysis of oil palm fronds for potential acidic soil amelioration and climate change mitigation10.1016/j.jece.2020.103982 ↗
11. Namaswa, T., Burslem, D.F., and Smith, J. (2023). Emerging trends in appropriate kiln designs for small-scale biochar production in low to middle income countries. Bioresour. Technol. Rep., 24.10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101641 ↗
12. Producing, Characterizing and Quantifying Biochar in the Woods Using Portable Flame Cap Kilns
13. Tsubota, T., Tsuchiya, S., Kusumoto, T., and Kalderis, D. (2021). Assessment of biochar produced by flame-curtain pyrolysis as a precursor for the development of an efficient electric double-layer capacitor. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14227671 ↗
14. Low tech biochar production could be a highly effective nature-based solution for climate change mitigation in the developing world
15. The indirect global warming potential and global temperature change potential due to methane oxidation10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044007 ↗
16. Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming10.1038/344529a0 ↗
17. On the climate forcing of carbon monoxide10.1029/98JD00822 ↗
18. Clean cooking and the SDGs: Integrated analytical approaches to guide energy interventions for health and environment goals10.1016/j.esd.2017.11.003 ↗
19. Flame curtain kilns produce biochar from dry biomass with minimal methane emissions10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166547 ↗
20. Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change10.1038/ncomms1053 ↗
21. Conversion of biomass to biofuels and life cycle assessment: A review10.1007/s10311-021-01273-0 ↗
22. Priority Species and Management Approaches for Woody Species: A Case Study of Awach Sub-county, Gulu District, Uganda10.1007/s10745-022-00360-2 ↗
23. Pyrolysis kinetics of elephant grass pretreated biomasses10.1007/s10973-014-3884-2 ↗
24. Martin, A.R., and Thomas, S.C. (2011). A reassessment of carbon content in tropical trees. PLoS ONE, 6.10.1371/journal.pone.0023533 ↗
25. Experimental characterization of maize cob and stalk based pellets for energy use10.4186/ej.2019.23.6.117 ↗
26. The influence of torrefaction on the biochar characteristics produced from sesame stalks and bean husk10.1007/s13399-023-03822-9 ↗
27. Evaluate of coffee husk compost
28. Emissions of gases and particles from charcoal/biochar production in rural areas using medium-sized traditional and improved “retort” kilns10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.11.016 ↗
29. Formation and control of nitrogen oxides10.1016/0920-5861(88)80002-6 ↗
30. Modeling climate change mitigation from alternative methods of charcoal production in Kenya10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.07.001 ↗
31. Emissions of greenhouse gases and other airborne pollutants from charcoal making in Kenya and Brazil10.1029/2000JD000041 ↗
32. Modelling biochar long-term carbon storage in soil with harmonized analysis of decomposition data10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116761 ↗
33. Country-level potential of carbon sequestration and environmental benefits by utilizing crop residues for biochar implementation10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116275 ↗
34. Air staging and reburning mechanisms for NOx abatement in a laboratory coal combustor10.1016/0016-2361(94)90231-3 ↗
35. Particulate emissions from different types of biomass burning10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.02.026 ↗
36. Industrially relevant pyrolysis of diverse contaminated organic wastes: Gas compositions and emissions to air10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138777 ↗
37. Waste timber pyrolysis in a medium-scale unit: Emission budgets and biochar quality10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137335 ↗
38. Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels10.1016/j.pecs.2003.10.004 ↗
39. Effects of temperature and particle size on bio-char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues10.1016/j.jaap.2004.07.003 ↗
40. The role of lignin in wood working processes using elevated temperatures: An abbreviated literature survey10.1007/s00107-020-01637-3 ↗
41. Kinetic study on the pyrolysis of hazel nut shell
42. Lignin plays a key role in determining biomass recalcitrance in forage grasses10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.020 ↗
43. Analysis and Evaluation of Chemical Composition of Stem for Different Types of Sesame
44. Litter from a tropical savanna woodland (miombo): Chemical composition and C and N mineralization10.1016/0038-0717(95)00073-N ↗
45. Exploring the Potential of Coffee Husks as a Raw Material for Second-Generation Ethanol Production
46. Turning maize cobs into a valuable feedstock10.1007/s12155-011-9158-y ↗
47. Mbanjo, E.G.N., Rabbi, I.Y., Ferguson, M.E., Kayondo, S.I., Eng, N.H., Tripathi, L., Kulakow, P., and Egesi, C. (2021). Technological innovations for improving cassava production in sub-Saharan Africa. Front. Genet., 11.10.3389/fgene.2020.623736 ↗
48. Farmer-led maize biochar trials: Effect on crop yield and soil nutrients under conservation farming10.1002/jpln.201300590 ↗