journal article·2024-09-05Open access

Mechanical Assessment of CAD/CAM Fabricated Hybrid Ceramics: An In Vitro Study

Khalid K. Alanazi, Abdulaziz A. Alzaid, Ali A. Elkaffas, Sarah A. Bukhari, Ramzi O. Althubaitiy, Khalid A. Alfaifi, Ibrahim M. Alfahdi, Hussain A. Alqahtani

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 17

Abstract

The current study aimed to compare the mechanical properties of CAD/CAM fabricated hybrid ceramic restorative materials. The current study assessed the mechanical properties of additively and subtractively manufactured CAD/CAM fabricated hybrid ceramic by conducting flexure strength test, compressive strength test, and Vickers hardness test. Flexural samples were subjected to a three-point bending test using a universal testing machine until the samples showed fracture. Moreover, samples for the compressive strength test were subjected to compression tests using a universal testing machine until samples were fractured. Samples for the Vickers hardness was tested using the Vickers hardness testing machine to determine the sample’s hardness values. There were significant differences (p = 0.0001) were observed among the additive and subtractive groups in terms of flexure strength and compressive strength test. Regarding the Vickers hardness test, significant differences (p = 0.0001) were observed between the polished and unpolished groups in additive manufacturing. However, no significant (p = 0.681) differences were observed in the subtractive manufacturing technique. The subtractive group achieved ISO specifications in terms of flexural strength and was superior to additive groups in hardness while exhibiting lower performance in compressive strength. Moreover, printing orientation had a significant influence on the performance of additive groups. Flexural strength and hardness were improved when the printing orientation was in alignment with the direction of load (90°) while compressive strength was improved when the printing orientation was perpendicular to the direction of load (0°).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Dental materials and restorations · Injection Molding Process and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia

Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia

King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia

Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt

Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Rehabilitation, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah 22421, Saudi Arabia

Funding

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 3D printing in dentistry10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914 ↗
2. Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: A review of the available streams10.1155/2014/783948 ↗
3. Moon, W., Kim, S., Lim, B.-S., Park, Y.-S., Kim, R.J.-Y., and Chung, S.H. (2021). Dimensional accuracy evaluation of temporary dental restorations with different 3D printing systems. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14061487 ↗
4. 3D and 4D printing as integrated manufacturing methods of industry 4.010.3844/ajeassp.2023.12.22 ↗
5. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.004 ↗
6. Flexural properties and wear behavior of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing resin blocks10.4012/dmj.2020-381 ↗
7. Stain susceptibility of composite and ceramic CAD/CAM blocks versus direct resin composites with different resinous matrices10.1007/s10266-016-0258-1 ↗
8. A novel polymer infiltrated ceramic for dental simulation10.1007/s10856-011-4350-3 ↗
9. New CAD/CAM materials and blocks for chairside procedures
10. Three-body wear of 3D printed temporary materials10.1016/j.dental.2019.10.005 ↗
11. Applications of three-dimensional printers in prosthetic dentistry10.2334/josnusd.21-0072 ↗
12. Fracture load of CAD/CAM-fabricated and 3D-printed composite crowns as a function of material thickness10.1007/s00784-018-2717-2 ↗
13. Fracture load of three-unit full-contour fixed dental prostheses fabricated with subtractive and additive CAD/CAM technology10.1007/s00784-019-03000-0 ↗
14. Influence of material thickness on fractural strength of CAD/CAM fabricated ceramic crowns10.4012/dmj.2016-296 ↗
15. 3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: A systematic review10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.030 ↗
16. Advances in three dimensional printing–state of the art and future perspectives10.1108/13552540610670717 ↗
17. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.002 ↗
18. Mueller, J., and Shea, K. (2015). The effect of build orientation on the mechanical properties in inkjet 3D printing. UT. Austin, Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/2152/89394.
19. In vitro investigation of the influence of printing direction on the flexural strength, flexural modulus and fractographic analysis of 3D-printed temporary materials10.4012/dmj.2020-147 ↗
20. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.012 ↗
21. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications10.1177/0022034514553976 ↗
22. Block, P.M. (2000). Technical Product Profile, 3M ESPE.
23. Lava Ultimate, C. (2011). CAM Restorative Technical Product Profile, 3M ESPE.
24. A novel CAD/CAM resin composite block with high mechanical properties10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.006 ↗
25. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.019 ↗
26. Zahnfabrik, V. (2019). VITA ENAMIC Technical and Scientific Documentation, VITA Zahnfabrik.
27. Kantaros, A., Petrescu, F.I.T., Abdoli, H., Diegel, O., Chan, S., Iliescu, M., Ganetsos, T., Munteanu, I.S., and Ungureanu, L.M. (2024). Additive Manufacturing for Surgical Planning and Education: A Review. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14062550 ↗
28. Kantaros, A., Soulis, E., Ganetsos, T., and Petrescu, F.I.T. (2023). Applying a combination of cutting-edge industry 4.0 processes towards fabricating a customized component. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11051385 ↗
29. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: Current systems and future possibilities10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0389 ↗
30. A digital process for additive manufacturing of occlusal splints: A clinical pilot study10.1098/rsif.2013.0203 ↗
31. A comparison between customized clear and removable orthodontic appliances manufactured using RP and CNC techniques10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.011 ↗
32. Kantaros, A., Ganetsos, T., and Petrescu, F.I.T. (2024). Transforming object design and creation: Biomaterials and contemporary manufacturing leading the way. Biomimetics, 9.10.3390/biomimetics9010048 ↗
33. Machinable glass-ceramics forming as a restorative dental material10.4012/dmj.2010-154 ↗
34. (2009). Dentistry–Polymer–Based Restorative Materials (Standard No. ISO 4049).
35. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs (2000). American National Standard/American Dental Association Specification No. 32 for Orthodontic Wires, ADA Council on Scientific Affairs.
36. Temizci, T., and Bozoğulları, H.N. (2024). Effect of thermocycling on the mechanical properties of permanent composite-based CAD-CAM restorative materials produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing techniques. BMC Oral Health, 24.10.1186/s12903-024-04016-z ↗
37. Mechanical characteristics of composite resins produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing
38. Comparison of mechanical properties of 3D-printed, CAD/CAM, and conventional denture base materials10.1111/jopr.13175 ↗
39. Pantea, M., Ciocoiu, R.C., Greabu, M., Ripszky Totan, A., Imre, M., Țâncu, A.M.C., Sfeatcu, R., Spînu, T.C., Ilinca, R., and Petre, A.E. (2022). Compressive and flexural strength of 3D-printed and conventional resins designated for interim fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro comparison. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15093075 ↗
40. Clinical evaluation of posterior zirconia-based and porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns with a vertical preparation technique: An up to 5-year retrospective cohort study
41. Abrisham, S.M., Tafti, A.F., Kheirkhah, S., and Tavakkoli, M.A. (2017). Shear bond strength of porcelain to a base-metal compared to zirconia core. J. Dent. Biomater., 4.
42. Chun, K.J., Choi, H.H., and Lee, J.Y. (2014). Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth. J. Dent. Biomech., 5.10.1177/1758736014520809 ↗
43. Farkas, A.Z., Galatanu, S.V., and Nagib, R. (2023). The influence of printing layer thickness and orientation on the mechanical properties of DLP 3D-printed dental resin. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15051113 ↗
44. Amend, S., Seremidi, K., Kloukos, D., Bekes, K., Frankenberger, R., Gizani, S., and Kraemer, N. (2022). Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth: An umbrella review. J Clin. Med., 11.10.3390/jcm11123490 ↗
45. Factors Influencing Dentists’ Choice of Restorative Materials for Single-Tooth Crowns: A Survey Among Saudi Practitioners