Perceived Usefulness of a Mandatory Information System
Source abstract
Abstract
This study examines the adoption and implementation of an information system in a mandatory context focusing on an Israeli governmental organization. The system referred to as “Slot” is an online platform for managing educational activities within this organization. The research investigates the impact of the system on its functionality users and the results of its usage. Additionally, the study explores factors that influence the acceptance and utilization of information systems, including whether the willingness to use the system under instruction depends on other variables. The key findings of this study are: perceived ease of use significantly and positively influences perceived usefulness; perceived usefulness significantly and positively affects symbolic adoption; and supervisor influence significantly and positively impacts perceived usefulness. Moreover, the relationship between perceived ease of use and symbolic adoption is entirely mediated by perceived usefulness as is the relationship between supervisor influence and symbolic adoption. The study’s limitations include the relatively small sample size and the specific context of the research, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Future research could explore similar models in different organizational settings to validate and extend the applicability of the results. The findings suggest that enhancing the perceived ease of use and usefulness of mandatory systems can significantly impact their symbolic adoption, with supervisory influence playing a crucial role in shaping user perceptions. These insights can inform strategies for more effective implementation and management of information systems in mandatory settings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Technology Adoption and User Behaviour · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Digital Marketing and Social Media
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Technology Management, HIT—Holon Institute of Technology, Holon 5810201, Israel
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. The challenge of innovation implementation10.2307/259164 ↗
2. Understanding technology acceptance in a mandatory environment: A literature review10.1177/0266666915593621 ↗
3. Effects of the user perception on symbolic adoption and usage in mandatory ATCIS-II use
4. Developing a human-organization-technology fit model for information technology adoption in organizations10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102010 ↗
5. Perceived usefulness, perceivedz ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology10.2307/249008 ↗
6. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable10.1287/isre.3.1.60 ↗
7. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 ↗
8. Development of an adoption model to assess user acceptance of e-service technology: E-Service Technology Acceptance Model10.1080/0144929X.2018.1427793 ↗
9. Park, I., Kim, D., Moon, J., Kim, S., Kang, Y., and Bae, S. (2022). Searching for new technology acceptance model under social context: Analyzing the determinants of acceptance of intelligent information technology in digital transformation and implications for the requisites of digital sustainability. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14010579 ↗
10. Metallo, C., Agrifoglio, R., Lepore, L., and Landriani, L. (2022). Explaining users’ technology acceptance through national cultural values in the hospital context. BMC Health Serv. Res., 22.10.1186/s12913-022-07488-3 ↗
11. Hofstede’s cultural dimensions in technology acceptance models: A meta-analysis10.1007/s10209-022-00930-7 ↗
12. Na, S., Heo, S., Han, S., Shin, Y., and Roh, Y. (2022). Acceptance Model of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Technologies in Construction Firms: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Combination with the Technology–Organisation–Environment (TOE) Framework. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12020090 ↗
13. An overview of patient acceptance of Health Information Technology in developing countries: A review and conceptual model
14. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to predict university students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3 ↗
15. Rosli, M., Saleh, N., Ali, A., Bakar, S., and Tahir, L. (2022). A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model for the Sustainability of Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Identified Research Gaps. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141811389 ↗
16. Menant, L., Gilibert, D., and Sauvezon, C. (2021). The application of acceptance models to human resource information systems: A literature review. Front. Psychol., 12.10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659421 ↗
17. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: A meta-analytic evaluation of UTAUT210.1007/s10796-020-10007-6 ↗
18. Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000438 ↗
19. An empirical study on the integrative pre-implementation model of technology acceptance in a mandatory environment10.1080/0144929X.2017.1306751 ↗
20. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude; Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
21. Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall.
22. The theory of planned behavior10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T ↗
23. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440 ↗
24. Rawstorne, P., Jayasuriya, R., and Caputi, P. (2000, January 10–13). Issues in predicting and explaining usage behaviors with the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior when usage is mandatory. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) 2000, Brisbane, Australia.
25. Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101965 ↗
26. Tao, D., Li, W., Qin, M., and Cheng, M. (2022). Understanding Students’ Acceptance and Usage Behaviors of Online Learning in Mandatory Contexts: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14137830 ↗
27. Accept it or forget it: Mandatory digital learning and technology acceptance in higher education10.1007/s40692-022-00244-w ↗
28. Mandatory adoption of technology: Can UTAUT2 model capture managers’ behavioral intention?10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123087 ↗
29. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View10.2307/30036540 ↗
30. Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., and Stewart, G. (2023). Technology acceptance research: Meta-analysis. J. Inf. Sci.10.1177/01655515231191177 ↗
31. Influencing Factors of College Students’ Use of Sports Apps in Mandatory Situations: Based on UTAUT and SDT
32. Dong, H., Wang, H., and Han, J. (2022). Understanding Ecological Agricultural Technology Adoption in China Using an Integrated Technology Acceptance Model—Theory of Planned Behavior Model. Front. Environ. Sci., 10.10.3389/fenvs.2022.927668 ↗
33. Zhao, Y., Li, Y., and Bandyopadhyay, K. (2023). The Role of Techno-Eustress in Technology-Enhanced IT Learning. J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 1–15.10.1080/08874417.2023.2240723 ↗
34. Willingness of University Students to Continue Using e-Learning Platforms after Compelled Adoption of Technology: Test of an Extended UTAUT Model10.1007/s10639-023-11778-6 ↗
35. Digital Transformation of Healthcare Sector. What is Impeding Adoption and Continued Usage of Technology-Driven Innovations by End-Users?10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.007 ↗
36. Resistance of multiple stakeholders to e-health innovations: Integration of fundamental insights and guiding research paths10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114135 ↗
37. Su, C.-Y., and Chao, C.-M. (2022). Investigating Factors Influencing Nurses’ Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: Using a Modified Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model. Front. Psychol., 13.10.3389/fpsyg.2022.673350 ↗
38. Educational Technology Adoption: A Systematic Review10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7 ↗
39. Review of the Factors Affecting Acceptance of AI-Infused Systems10.1177/00187208211064707 ↗
40. Theories Informing Technology Enhanced Learning in Nursing and Midwifery Education: A Systematic Review and Typological Classification10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105518 ↗
41. User response to mandatory IT use: A coping theory perspective10.1057/s41303-017-0047-0 ↗
42. The effects of information systems quality on nurses’ acceptance of the electronic learning system10.1097/JNR.0b013e31824777aa ↗
43. Virtual Reality Technology in Construction Safety Training: Extended Technology Acceptance Model10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104113 ↗
44. Smart City Technologies from the Perspective of Technology Acceptance10.1049/smc2.12040 ↗
45. The impact of employees motivation, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on employee performance among selected public sector employees
46. Factors affecting the acceptance of information systems supporting emergency operations centres10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.013 ↗
47. Intentions to use information technologies: An integrative model10.4018/joeuc.2006070102 ↗
48. An empirical investigation on end-users’ acceptance of enterprise systems10.4018/irmj.2004070103 ↗
49. Ordered quantile normalization: A semiparametric transformation built for the cross-validation era10.1080/02664763.2019.1630372 ↗
50. Finding optimal normalizing transformations via bestNormalize10.32614/RJ-2021-041 ↗
51. Constructing a covariance matrix that yields a specified minimizer and a specified minimum discrepancy function value10.1007/BF02295424 ↗
52. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 ↗
53. Overall fit in covariance structure models-2 types of sample-size effects10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.256 ↗
54. Comparative fit indexes in structural models10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 ↗
55. Kline, R.B. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Guilford Press.
56. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422 ↗
57. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 ↗
58. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 ↗