Causation Correlation Analysis of Aviation Accidents: A Knowledge Graph-Based Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Summarizing the causation of an aviation accident is beneficial for improving aviation safety. Currently, accident analysis mainly focuses on causal analysis, while giving less consideration to the correlation between accident causal factors and other accident factors. To clarify accident causal factors and potential patterns affecting aviation safety and to optimize data mining methods for accident causal factors, this work proposes an aviation accident causation correlation analysis model based on a knowledge graph. Firstly, the accident causal factors are identified, and a knowledge graph is constructed. Subsequently, by utilizing multi-dimensional topological analysis metrics, an aviation accident causation correlation analysis model is established, using the relationships within accident causal factors as a foundation, to determine potential patterns among accident causal factors, flight phases, accident types, and consequences and to analyze the key accident causal factors influencing accident occurrences across different flight phases. Finally, preventive measures and recommendations are provided based on the analysis conclusions. Through a case study using 437 global aviation accidents from 2018 to 2022 as samples and employing the knowledge graph-based aviation accident causation correlation analysis model, the causation relationships among accident causal factors can be expressed more clearly, the potential risks of various accident causal factors can be identified, experiences can be gained from historical accident data, and underlying patterns can be unearthed. This work can provide auxiliary decision making and be an effective reference for the prevention of aviation accidents, playing a positive role in enhancing the level of aviation safety management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Occupational Health and Safety Research · Risk and Safety Analysis · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Equipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710051, China
Air and Missile Defence College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710051, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. International Civil Aviation Organization (2024, March 01). ICAO Safety Report 2014 Edition. Available online: https://www.icao.int/safety/Documents/ICAO_2014%20Safety%20Report_final_02042014_web.pdf.
2. International Civil Aviation Organization (2024, March 01). ICAO Safety Report 2023 Edition. Available online: https://www.icao.int/safety/Documents/ICAO_SR_2023_20230823.pdf.
3. Predicting the Number of Fatalities in Extreme Civil Aviation Accidents10.2514/1.D0357 ↗
4. The Development of a Scenario-Based Human-Machine-Environment-Procedure (HMEP) Classification Scheme for the Root Cause Analysis of Helicopter Accidents10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103771 ↗
5. Yusuf, A.B., Kor, A.-L., and Tawfik, H. (2022). Integrating the HFACS Framework and Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping for In-Flight Startle Causality Analysis. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22031068 ↗
6. Research on a New Aviation Safety Index and Its Solution under Uncertainty Conditions10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.001 ↗
7. Wiegmann, D.A., and Shappell, S.A. (2003). A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System, Ashgate.
8. Lyu, T., Song, W., and Du, K. (2019). Human Factors Analysis of Air Traffic Safety Based on HFACS-BN Model. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9235049 ↗
9. Lázaro, F.L., Nogueira, R.P.R., Melicio, R., Valério, D., and Santos, L.F.F.M. (2024). Human Factors as Predictor of Fatalities in Aviation Accidents: A Neural Network Analysis. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14020640 ↗
10. The Impact of Human Factors on Pilots’ Safety Behavior in Offshore Aviation Companies: A Brazilian Case10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105272 ↗
11. A Review of Human Factors Causations in Commercial Air Transport Accidents and Incidents: From to 2000–201610.1016/j.paerosci.2018.03.002 ↗
12. He, P., and Sun, R. (2023). Trend Analysis of Civil Aviation Incidents Based on Causal Inference and Statistical Inference. Aerospace, 10.10.3390/aerospace10090822 ↗
13. Evaluation of Preconditions Affecting Symptomatic Human Error in General Aviation and Air Carrier Aviation Accidents10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.021 ↗
14. Ensemble Machine Learning Models for Aviation Incident Risk Prediction10.1016/j.dss.2018.10.009 ↗
15. What Do Applications of Systems Thinking Accident Analysis Methods Tell Us about Accident Causation? A Systematic Review of Applications between 1990 and 201810.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.016 ↗
16. A Knowledge Graph-Based Approach for Exploring Railway Operational Accidents10.1016/j.ress.2020.107352 ↗
17. Hazards Correlation Analysis of Railway Accidents: A Real-World Case Study Based on the Decade-Long UK Railway Accident Data10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106238 ↗
18. Data Analytics and Optimization for Smart Industry10.1007/s42524-020-0126-0 ↗
19. Jiao, Y., Dong, J., Han, J., and Sun, H. (2022). Classification and Causes Identification of Chinese Civil Aviation Incident Reports. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122110765 ↗
20. Defining a Knowledge Graph Development Process through a Systematic Review
21. Sequential Deep Learning from NTSB Reports for Aviation Safety Prognosis10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105390 ↗
22. Knowledge Graph Construction Based on Ship Collision Accident Reports to Improve Maritime Traffic Safety10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106660 ↗
23. Knowledge Graphs: Opportunities and Challenges10.1007/s10462-023-10465-9 ↗
24. Potential Destination Discovery for Low Predictability Individuals Based on Knowledge Graph10.1016/j.trc.2022.103928 ↗
25. Wang, X., Gan, Z., Xu, Y., Liu, B., and Zheng, T. (2023). Extracting Domain-Specific Chinese Named Entities for Aviation Safety Reports: A Case Study. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131911003 ↗
26. SMAAMA: A Named Entity Alignment Method Based on Siamese Network Character Feature and Multi-Attribute Importance Feature for Chinese Civil Aviation
27. Domain-Specific Knowledge Graphs: A Survey10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103076 ↗
28. A Retrospective of Knowledge Graphs10.1007/s11704-016-5228-9 ↗
29. Wiegmann, D.A., and Shappell, S.A. (2017). The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis, Routledge.10.4324/9781315263878 ↗
30. Commercial Aviation Safety Team/International Civil Aviation Organization (CAST/ICAO) Common Taxonomy Team (CICTT) (2023, December 15). ICAO Phase of Flight Definition and Usage Notes (1.3). Available online: http://www.intlaviationstandards.org/Documents/PhaseofFlightDefinitions.pdf.
31. Commercial Aviation Safety Team/International Civil Aviation Organization (CAST/ICAO) Common Taxonomy Team (CICTT) (2023, December 15). Aviation Occurrence Categories Definition and Usage Notes (4.8). Available online: https://www.wyvernltd.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/OccurrenceCategoryDefinitions2021.pdf.
32. (2023, October 01). Aviation Safety Network. Available online: https://aviation-safety.net/about/.