journal article·2024-07-22Open access

Estimating Urban Traffic Safety and Analyzing Spatial Patterns through the Integration of City-Wide Near-Miss Data: A New York City Case Study

Chuan Xu, Jingqin Gao, Fan Zuo, Kaan Ozbay

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 14

Abstract

City-wide near-miss data can be beneficial for traffic safety estimation. In this study, we evaluate urban traffic safety and examine spatial patterns by incorporating city-wide near-miss data (59,277 near-misses). Our methodology employs a grid-based method, the Empirical Bayes (EB) approach, and spatial analysis tools including global Moran’s I and local Moran’s I. The study findings reveal that near-misses have the strongest correlation with observed crash frequency among all the variables studied. Interestingly, the ratio of near-misses to crashes is roughly estimated to be 1957:1, providing a potentially useful benchmark for urban areas. For other variables, an increased number of intersections and bus stops, along with a greater road length, contribute to a higher crash frequency. Conversely, residential and open-space land use rates show a negative correlation with crash frequency. Through spatial analysis, potential risk hotspots including roads linking bridges and tunnels, and avenues bustling with pedestrian activity, are highlighted. The study also identified negative local spatial correlations in crash frequencies, suggesting significant safety risk variations within relatively short distances. By mapping the differences between observed and predicted crash frequencies, we identified specific grid areas with unexpectedly high or low crash frequencies. These findings highlight the crucial role of near-miss data in urban traffic safety policy and planning, particularly relevant with the imminent rise of autonomous and connected vehicles. By integrating near-miss data into safety estimations, we can develop a more comprehensive understanding of traffic safety and, thus, more effectively address urban traffic risks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, No. 111, the 1st North Section of the 2nd Ring Rd., Chengdu 610031, China

Department of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, 6 MetroTech Center, 4th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA

Funding

C2SMART Center

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. WHO (2023, July 25). Road Traffic Injuries. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries.
2. ASIRT (2023, May 29). ROAD SAFETY FACTS, Available online: https://www.asirt.org/safe-travel/road-safety-facts/.
3. CHEKPEDS (2022, April 20). NYC Crash Mapper. Available online: https://crashmapper.org/.
4. FHWA (2023, May 29). FHWA Strategic Plan 2022–2026, Available online: https://highways.dot.gov/about/fhwa-strategic-plan-2022-2026.
5. NYC Vision Zero (2023, May 29). What It Is, Available online: https://www.nyc.gov/content/visionzero/pages/what-it-is.
6. Estimating safety by the empirical Bayes method: A tutorial10.3141/1784-16 ↗
7. Empirical evaluation of alternative approaches in identifying crash hot spots: Naive ranking, empirical bayes, full bayes methods10.3141/2103-05 ↗
8. Perceived traffic risk for cyclists: The impact of near miss and collision experiences10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.004 ↗
9. A systematic review of traffic conflict-based safety measures with a focus on application context
10. A systematic mapping review of surrogate safety assessment using traffic conflict techniques10.1016/j.aap.2021.106016 ↗
11. Exploring spatial associations between near-miss and police-reported crashes: The Heinrich’s law in traffic safety
12. Crashes and crash-surrogate events: Exploratory modeling with naturalistic driving data10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.002 ↗
13. Tarko, A., Davis, G., Saunier, N., Sayed, T., and Washington, S. (2009). Surrogate Measures of Safety, Transportation Research Board. White Paper.
14. Amundsen, F., and Hyden, C. (1977). Proceedings of First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts, LTH Lund.
15. Integrated traffic conflict model for estimating crash modification factors10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.019 ↗
16. Hyden, C., Linderholm, L., and Swedish traffic-conflicts technique, T. (1984). International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflict Techniques, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-82109-7_12 ↗
17. Assessing the safety of routes in a regional network10.1016/j.trc.2012.10.008 ↗
18. Safety surrogate histograms (SSH): A novel real-time safety assessment of dilemma zone related conflicts at signalized intersections10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.024 ↗
19. Investigating the heterogeneity of postencroachment time thresholds determined by peak over threshold approach10.3141/2601-03 ↗
20. Use of real-world connected vehicle data in identifying high-risk locations based on a new surrogate safety measure10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.002 ↗
21. Modeling driver’s evasive behavior during safety–critical lane changes: Two-dimensional time-to-collision and deep reinforcement learning10.1016/j.aap.2023.107063 ↗
22. Modeling of time-dependent safety performance using anonymized and aggregated smartphone-based dangerous driving event data10.1016/j.aap.2019.105286 ↗
23. The effect of gender, occupation and experience on behavior while driving on a freeway deceleration lane based on field operational test data10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.034 ↗
24. Evaluating the safety impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on motorways10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.019 ↗
25. Cai, P., Wang, S., Wang, H., and Liu, M. (2021). Carl-lead: Lidar-based end-to-end autonomous driving with contrastive deep reinforcement learning. arXiv.
26. Road traffic safety assessment in self-driving vehicles based on time-to-collision with motion orientation10.1016/j.aap.2023.107172 ↗
27. Automated vehicle to vehicle conflict analysis at signalized intersections by camera and LiDAR sensor fusion10.1177/03611981221128806 ↗
28. Freeway rear-end collision risk estimation with extreme value theory approach. A case study10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.183 ↗
29. A novel method of vehicle-pedestrian near-crash identification with roadside LiDAR data10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.001 ↗
30. Exploring the impact of truck traffic on road segment-based severe crash proportion using extensive weigh-in-motion data10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106261 ↗
31. A Bayesian generalised extreme value model to estimate real-time pedestrian crash risks at signalised intersections using artificial intelligence-based video analytics
32. Identification of adequate sample size for conflict-based crash risk evaluation: An investigation using Bayesian hierarchical extreme value theory models
33. AASHTO (2010). Highway Safety Manual, AASHTO.
34. Exploring the spatial dependence and selection bias of double parking citations data10.1177/0361198118792323 ↗
35. Analysis of traffic crashes involving pedestrians using big data: Investigation of contributing factors and identification of hotspots10.1111/risa.12785 ↗
36. Evacuation zone modeling under climate change: A data-driven method10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000369 ↗
37. Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17 ↗
38. The interpretation of statistical maps10.1111/j.2517-6161.1948.tb00012.x ↗
39. The saddlepoint approximation of Moran’s I’s and local Moran’s Ii’s reference distributions and their numerical evaluation
40. GeoDa: An introduction to spatial data analysis10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00671.x ↗
41. Spatial analysis of highway incident durations in the context of Hurricane Sandy10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.015 ↗
42. Goodchild, M.F. (1986). Spatial Autocorrelation, Geo Books.
43. Crash frequency modeling for signalized intersections in a high-density urban road network
44. Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x ↗
45. How drivers respond to visual vs. auditory information in advisory traffic information systems10.1080/0144929X.2019.1667439 ↗
46. Deveaux, D., Higuchi, T., Uçar, S., Wang, C.-H., Härri, J., and Altintas, O. (2021, January 19–22). Extraction of Risk Knowledge from Time to Collision Variation in Roundabouts. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), Indianapolis, IN, USA.10.1109/ITSC48978.2021.9564570 ↗
47. Wilson, T.B., Butler, W., McGehee, D.V., and Dingus, T.A. (1997). Forward-Looking Collision Warning System Performance Guidelines, SAE International.10.4271/970456 ↗
48. Vasudevan, M., O’Hara, J., Townsend, H., Asare, S., Muhammad, S., Ozbay, K., Yang, D., Gao, J., Kurkcu, A., and Zuo, F. (2022). Algorithms to Convert Basic Safety Messages into Traffic Measures, National Academy of Sciences.10.17226/26840 ↗
49. Safety impacts of intervehicle warning information systems for moving hazards in connected vehicle environments10.3141/2424-02 ↗
50. Impact of connected vehicle on work zone network safety through dynamic route guidance10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000490 ↗
51. Kondyli, A., Schrock, S.D., and Tousif, F. (2023). Evaluation of Near-Miss Crashes Using a Video-Based Tool.
52. Development and evaluation of an enhanced surrogate safety assessment framework10.1016/j.trc.2014.10.004 ↗
53. Are collision and crossing course surrogate safety indicators transferable? A probability based approach using extreme value theory10.1016/j.aap.2020.105517 ↗
54. (2023, July 25). GIS Lab at Newman Library of Baruch College, CUNY, NYC Mass Transit Spatial Layers. Available online: https://www.baruch.cuny.edu/confluence/display/geoportal/NYC+Mass+Transit+Spatial+Layers.
55. Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.392 ↗
56. Application of finite mixture of negative binomial regression models with varying weight parameters for vehicle crash data analysis10.1016/j.aap.2012.08.004 ↗
57. Canalys (2023, July 29). Huge Opportunity as only 10% of the 1 Billion Cars in Use Have ADAS Features. Available online: https://www.canalys.com/newsroom/huge-opportunity-as-only-10-of-the-1-billion-cars-in-use-have-adas-features.
58. Krause, R. (2023, July 29). Can Mobileye Extend Its Auto Software Dominance Into Driverless Cars?. Available online: https://www.investors.com/research/the-new-america/mobileye-stock-will-its-auto-software-dominance-extend-to-driverless-cars/.
59. Gettman, D., Pu, L., Sayed, T., Shelby, S.G., and Energy, S. (2008). Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation.
60. Accidents and accessibility: Measuring influences of demographic and land use variables in Honolulu, Hawaii10.3141/2147-02 ↗
61. Macroscopic spatial analysis of pedestrian and bicycle crashes10.1016/j.aap.2011.08.003 ↗
62. Investigating varying effect of road-level factors on crash frequency across regions: A Bayesian hierarchical random parameter modeling approach
63. An evaluation framework for traffic calming measures in residential areas10.1016/j.trd.2013.08.002 ↗
64. Modeling bicycle crash costs using big data: A grid-cell-based Tobit model with random parameters10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102953 ↗
65. Luo, Y., Liu, Y., Xing, L., Wang, N., and Rao, L. (2022). Road safety evaluation framework for accessing park green space using active travel. Front. Environ. Sci., 10.10.3389/fenvs.2022.864966 ↗
66. Extracting horizontal curvature data from GIS maps: Clustering method10.1177/0361198119850789 ↗
67. Traffic safety analysis at interchange exits using the surrogate measure of aggressive driving behavior and speed variation