journal article·2024-07-17Open access

Advancing Crayfish Disease Detection: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Canonical Machine Learning Techniques

Yasin Atilkan, Berk Kirik, Koray Acici, Recep Benzer, Fatih Ekinci, Mehmet Serdar Guzel, Semra Benzer, Tunc Asuroglu

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 14

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of deep learning and canonical machine learning models for detecting diseases in crayfish from an imbalanced dataset. In this study, measurements such as weight, size, and gender of healthy and diseased crayfish individuals were taken, and at least five photographs of each individual were used. Deep learning models outperformed canonical models, but combining both approaches proved the most effective. Utilizing the ResNet50 model for automatic feature extraction and subsequent training of the RF algorithm with these extracted features led to a hybrid model, RF-ResNet50, which achieved the highest performance in diseased sample detection. This result underscores the value of integrating canonical machine learning algorithms with deep learning models. Additionally, the ConvNeXt-T model, optimized with AdamW, performed better than those using SGD, although its disease detection sensitivity was 1.3% lower than the hybrid model. McNemar’s test confirmed the statistical significance of the performance differences between the hybrid and the ConvNeXt-T model with AdamW. The ResNet50 model’s performance was improved by 3.2% when combined with the RF algorithm, demonstrating the potential of hybrid approaches in enhancing disease detection accuracy. Overall, this study highlights the advantages of leveraging both deep learning and canonical machine learning techniques for early and accurate detection of diseases in crayfish populations, which is crucial for maintaining ecosystem balance and preventing population declines.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Crustacean biology and ecology · Water Quality Monitoring Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey

Department of Software Engineering, Konya Food and Agriculture University, Konya 42080, Turkey

Department of Management Information System, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara 06050, Turkey

Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey

Department of Computer Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey

Department of Science Education, Gazi University, Ankara 06500, Turkey

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 33101 Tampere, Finland

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. People Need Freshwater Biodiversity10.1002/wat2.1633 ↗
2. The Invasive Red Swamp Crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) as a Bioindicator of Microplastic Pollution: Insights from Lake Candia (Northwestern Italy)10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110200 ↗
3. Larramendy, M.L. (2017). The Crayfish Cambarellus montezumae as a Possible Freshwater Non-Conventional Biomonitor. Ecotoxicology and Genotoxicology: Non-Traditional Aquatic Models, Royal Society of Chemistry.
4. Dobrzycka-Krahel, A., and Fidalgo, M.L. (2023). Euryhalinity and Geographical Origin Aid Global Alien Crayfish Invasions. Water, 15.10.3390/w15030569 ↗
5. Effects of Different Diets on Growth and Survival of First Feeding Second-Stage Juvenile Pontastacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823) (Decapoda, Astacidea)10.1163/15685403-bja10306 ↗
6. Đuretanović, S., Rajković, M., and Maguire, I. (2024). Freshwater Crayfish of the Western Balkans: Is it Possible to Use Them Sustainably or Do They Need Prompt Conservation Actions?. Ecological Sustainability of Fish Resources of Inland Waters of the Western Balkans: Freshwater Fish Stocks, Sustainable Use and Conservation, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-031-36926-1_8 ↗
7. An Updated Classification of the Freshwater Crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidea) of the World, with a Complete Species List10.1093/jcbiol/rux070 ↗
8. Towards a Sustainable Human Use of Freshwater Crayfish (Crustacea, Decapoda, Astacidea)10.1051/kmae/2011038 ↗
9. Life Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment of Rice-Crayfish Integrated System: A Case Study10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124440 ↗
10. Habitat Recovery and Restoration in Aquatic Ecosystems: Current Progress and Future Challenges10.1002/aqc.2702 ↗
11. Freshwater Conservation: Lost in Limnology?10.1002/aqc.4049 ↗
12. Hatzilygeroudis, I., Dimitropoulos, K., Kovas, K., and Theodorou, J.A. (2023). Expert Systems for Farmed Fish Disease Diagnosis: An Overview and a Proposal. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.20944/preprints202305.0298.v1 ↗
13. Computer Vision Models in Intelligent Aquaculture with Emphasis on Fish Detection and Behavior Analysis: A Review10.1007/s11831-020-09486-2 ↗
14. Application of Machine Vision Systems in Aquaculture with Emphasis on Fish: State-of-the-Art and Key Issues10.1111/raq.12143 ↗
15. Rachman, F., Akbar, M.N.S., and Putera, E. (2023, January 3). Fish Disease Detection of Epizootic Ulcerative Syndrome Using Deep Learning Image Processing Technique. Proceedings of the International Conference on Fisheries and Aquaculture, Pune, India.10.17501/23861282.2023.8102 ↗
16. Research Progress of Computer Vision Technology in Abnormal Fish Detection10.1016/j.aquaeng.2023.102350 ↗
17. Effect of Polynomial, Radial Basis, and Pearson VII Function Kernels in Support Vector Machine Algorithm for Classification of Crayfish10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101911 ↗
18. Monari, D., Larkin, J., Machado, P., Bird, J.J., Ihianle, I.K., Yahaya, S.W., and Lotfi, A. (2023). UDEEP: Edge-Based Computer Vision for In-Situ Underwater Crayfish and Plastic Detection. arXiv.
19. Synopsis of Freshwater Crayfish Diseases and Commensal Organisms10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00865-1 ↗
20. Crayfish Population Size Under Different Routes of Pathogen Transmission10.1002/ece3.9647 ↗
21. Saberioon, M., Císař, P., Labbé, L., Souček, P., Pelissier, P., and Kerneis, T. (2018). Comparative performance analysis of support vector machine, random forest, logistic regression and k-nearest neighbours in rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss) classification using image-based features. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18041027 ↗
22. A Novel Fault Detection, Identification and Prediction Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Controllers Using SVM10.1007/s42154-021-00138-0 ↗
23. Monteiro, F., Bexiga, V., Chaves, P., Godinho, J., Henriques, D., Melo-Pinto, P., Nunes, T., Piedade, F., Pimenta, N., and Sustelo, L. (2023). Classification of Fish Species Using Multispectral Data from a Low-Cost Camera and Machine Learning. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15163952 ↗
24. IoT and ML approach for ornamental fish behaviour analysis10.1038/s41598-023-48057-w ↗
25. Sujatha, K., and Mounika, P. (2023, January 5–7). Evaluation of ML Models for Detection and Prediction of Fish Diseases: A Case Study on Epizootic Ulcerative Syndrome. Proceedings of the 2023 2nd International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Information and Communication Technologies, ICEEICT, Trichirappalli, India.10.1109/ICEEICT56924.2023.10156914 ↗
26. Zhang, F., Zhang, Y., Casanovas, P., Schattschneider, J., Walker, S.P., Xue, B., Zhang, M., and Symonds, J.E. (2024). Health prediction for king salmon via evolutionary machine learning with genetic programming. J. R. Soc. N. Z.10.1080/03036758.2024.2329228 ↗
27. Rapid screening of tuna samples for food safety issues related to histamine content using fourier-transform mid-infrared (FT-MIR) and chemometrics10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2024.112129 ↗
28. Al-Adhaileh, M.H., and Alsaade, F.W. (2021). Modelling and prediction of water quality by using artificial intelligence. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13084259 ↗
29. Arslantas, M.K., Asuroglu, T., Arslantas, R., Pashazade, E., Dincer, P.C., Altun, G.T., and Kararmaz, A. (2024). Using Machine Learning Methods to Predict the Lactate Trend of Sepsis Patients in the ICU. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Springer Nature. 2084 CCIS.10.1007/978-3-031-59091-7_1 ↗
30. The predictive performances of random forest models with limited sample size and different species traits10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105534 ↗
31. Waseem Sabir, M., Farhan, M., Almalki, N.S., Alnfiai, M.M., and Sampedro, G.A. (2023). FibroVit—Vision transformer-based framework for detection and classification of pulmonary fibrosis from chest CT images. Front. Med., 10.10.3389/fmed.2023.1282200 ↗
32. Fish-TViT: A novel fish species classification method in multi water areas based on transfer learning and vision transformer10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16761 ↗
33. Tu, Z., Talebi, H., Zhang, H., Yang, F., Milanfar, P., Bovik, A., and Li, Y. (2022). MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformer. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-031-20053-3_27 ↗
34. Jareño, J., Bárcena-González, G., Castro-Gutiérrez, J., Cabrera-Castro, R., and Galindo, P.L. (2024). Enhancing Fish Auction with Deep Learning and Computer Vision: Automated Caliber and Species Classification. Fishes, 9.10.3390/fishes9040133 ↗
35. Effects of image data quality on a convolutional neural network trained in-tank fish detection model for recirculating aquaculture systems10.1016/j.compag.2023.107644 ↗
36. Fish age reading using deep learning methods for object-detection and segmentation10.1093/icesjms/fsae020 ↗
37. Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C.-Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T., and Xie, S. (2020). A ConvNet for the 2020s. arXiv.
38. Tan, M., and Le, Q.V. (2021). EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Training. arXiv.
39. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2015). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
40. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. arXiv.
41. Krizhevsky, A. (2014). One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networks. arXiv.
42. Tummala, S., Thadikemalla, V.S.G., Kadry, S., Sharaf, M., and Rauf, H.T. (2023). EfficientNetV2 Based Ensemble Model for Quality Estimation of Diabetic Retinopathy Images from DeepDRiD. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13040622 ↗
43. Prado, E., Abad-Uribarren, A., Ramo, R., Sierra, S., González-Pola, C., Cristobo, J., Ríos, P., Graña, R., Aierbe, E., and Rodríguez, J.M. (2023). Describing Polyps Behavior of a Deep-Sea Gorgonian, Placogorgia sp., Using a Deep-Learning Approach. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15112777 ↗
44. Zhao, H., Mao, R., Li, M., Li, B., and Wang, M. (2023). SheepInst: A High-Performance Instance Segmentation of Sheep Images Based on Deep Learning. Animals, 13.10.3390/ani13081338 ↗
45. Improving the classification accuracy of fishes and invertebrates using residual convolutional neural networks10.1093/icesjms/fsad041 ↗
46. Automated Freshwater Fish Species Classification using Deep CNN10.1007/s40031-023-00883-2 ↗
47. VGG16-based intelligent image analysis in the pathological diagnosis of IgA nephropathy
48. Yang, L., Xu, S., Yu, X., Long, H., Zhang, H., and Zhu, Y. (2023). A new model based on improved VGG16 for corn weed identification. Front. Plant Sci., 14.10.3389/fpls.2023.1205151 ↗
49. Tian, Y., Zhang, Y., and Zhang, H. (2023). Recent Advances in Stochastic Gradient Descent in Deep Learning. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11030682 ↗
50. Abdulkadirov, R., Lyakhov, P., and Nagornov, N. (2023). Survey of Optimization Algorithms in Modern Neural Networks. Mathematics, 11.10.20944/preprints202304.0648.v1 ↗
51. Ali, L., Alnajjar, F., Jassmi, H.A., Gocho, M., Khan, W., and Serhani, M.A. (2021). Performance Evaluation of Deep CNN-Based Crack Detection and Localization Techniques for Concrete Structures. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21051688 ↗