AHAC: Advanced Network-Hiding Access Control Framework
Source abstract
Abstract
In the current context of rapid Internet of Things (IoT) and cloud computing technology development, the Single Packet Authorization (SPA) protocol faces increasing challenges, such as security threats from Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. To address these issues, we propose the Advanced Network-Hiding Access Control (AHAC) framework, designed to enhance security by reducing network environment exposure and providing secure access methods. AHAC introduces an independent control surface as the access proxy service and combines it with a noise generation mechanism for encrypted access schemes, replacing the traditional RSA signature method used in SPA protocols. This framework significantly improves system security, reduces computational costs, and enhances key verification efficiency. The AHAC framework addresses several limitations inherent in SPA: users need to know the IP address of resources in advance, exposing the resource address to potential attacks; SPA’s one-way authentication mechanism is insufficient for multi-level authentication in dynamic environments; deploying the knocking module and protected resources on the same host can lead to resource exhaustion and service unavailability under heavy loads; and SPA often uses high-overhead encryption algorithms like RSA2048. To counter these limitations, AHAC separates the Port Knocking module from the access control module, supports mutual authentication, and implements an extensible two-way communication mechanism. It also employs ECC and ECDH algorithms, enhancing security while reducing computational costs. We conducted extensive experiments to validate AHAC’s performance, high availability, extensibility, and compatibility. The experiments compared AHAC with traditional SPA in terms of time cost and performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Access Control and Trust
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China
AI Thrust, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 510000, China
Hangzhou Xianyin Information Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310000, China
Fnetlink Tecnology Co., Ltd., Macau 999078, China
China Telecom Co., Ltd. Sichuan Branch, Chengdu 610000, China
Funding
Macao Science and Technology Development Fund Project
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. A survey on zero trust architecture: Challenges and future trends10.1155/2022/6476274 ↗
2. Toward Zero-Trust 6GC: A Software Defined Perimeter Approach with Dynamic Moving Target Defense Mechanism10.1109/MWC.001.2300358 ↗
3. Intelligent authentication for identity and access management: A review paper
4. Strengthening Enterprise Security through the Adoption of Zero Trust Architecture—A Focus on Micro-segmentation Approach
5. Sheikh, N., Pawar, M., and Lawrence, V. (2021, January 10–13). Zero trust using network micro segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2021—IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/INFOCOMWKSHPS51825.2021.9484645 ↗
6. D’Silva, D., and Ambawade, D.D. (2021, January 2–4). Building a zero trust architecture using kubernetes. Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), Maharashtra, India.10.1109/I2CT51068.2021.9418203 ↗
7. Single packet authorization with fwknop
8. Design and Elevating Cloud Security Through a Comprehensive Integration of Zero Trust Framework
9. Endpoint security reinforcement via integrated zero-trust systems: A collaborative approach10.1016/j.cose.2023.103537 ↗
10. Rash, M. (2007). Single packet authorization. Linux J., 156.
11. Ali, F.H.M., Yunos, R., and Alias, M.A.M. (2012, January 26–28). Simple port knocking method: Against TCP replay attack and port scanning. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Cyber Security, Cyber Warfare and Digital Forensic (CyberSec), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
12. An improved port knocking authentication framework for mobile cloud computing10.22452/mjcs.vol32no4.2 ↗
13. Xu, M., Guo, J., Yuan, H., and Yang, X. (2023). Zero-Trust Security Authentication Based on SPA and Endogenous Security Architecture. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12040782 ↗
14. Rajaboevich, G.S., Bakhadirovna, M.M., and Abdulatipovich, I.A. (2022, January 28–30). Port-Knocking Method for Enhancing Network Security. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT), Tashkent, Uzbekistan.10.1109/ICISCT55600.2022.10146918 ↗
15. Degraaf, R., Aycock, J., and Jacobson, M. (2005, January 5–9). Improved port knocking with strong authentication. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC’05), Tucson, AZ, USA.
16. Implementation of Port Knocking with Telegram Notifications to Protect Against Scanner Vulnerabilities
17. Implementasi Metode Port Knocking pada MikroTik RouterOS untuk Mendukung Keamanan Jaringan
18. The Effectiveness of the Port Knocking Method in Computer Security
19. Fang, W., and Guan, X. (2022, January 4–6). Research on iOS Remote Security Access Technology Based on Zero Trust. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 6th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC), Chongqing, China.10.1109/ITOEC53115.2022.9734455 ↗
20. Zero-Trust-Based Protection Scheme for Users in Internet of Vehicles10.1155/2022/9896689 ↗
21. Jia, Z., Wu, W., Jia, Z., Yang, X., Wang, Q., and Li, H. (2022, January 11–14). Enhanced Mobile IoT Security Protection Method Based on CPK and Zero Trust. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT), Nanjing, China.10.1109/ICCT56141.2022.10073095 ↗
22. Wang, R., Li, H., Chen, Y., Xue, Z., Hao, Y., and Li, Y. (2022, January 21–23). Anonymous Authentication and Application Stealth Scheme for Mobile Network Based on SPA. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Power, Electronics and Computer Applications (ICPECA), Shenyang, China.10.1109/ICPECA53709.2022.9718888 ↗
23. SysFlow: Toward a Programmable Zero Trust Framework for System Security10.1109/TIFS.2023.3264152 ↗
24. Abhiram, D., Harish, R., and Praveen, K. (2022). Zero-Trust Security Implementation Using SDP over VPN. Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies, Springer.10.1007/978-981-16-5529-6_22 ↗
25. Casillo, M., Cecere, L., Colace, F., Lorusso, A., and Santaniello, D. (2024). Integrating the Internet of Things (IoT) in SPA Medicine: Innovations and Challenges in Digital Wellness. Computers, 13.10.3390/computers13030067 ↗
26. A critical analysis of Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA)10.1016/j.csi.2024.103832 ↗
27. Implementation of a Network Security System Using the Simple Port Knocking Method on a Mikrotik-Based Router
28. Krmelj, G.R., Pančur, M., Grohar, M., and Ciglarič, M. (2018, January 15–16). OpenSPA—An Open and Extensible Protocol for Single Packet Authorization. Proceedings of the CECC 2018: Central European Cybersecurity Conference 2018, Ljubljana, Slovenia.10.1145/3277570.3277574 ↗
29. Harden single packet authentication (HSPA)10.7763/IJCTE.2012.V4.564 ↗
30. Jiang, K., Xiao, Y., Yuan, S., and Si, X. (2022, January 11–14). Implementing Continuous Authentication in Network Connection Based on Improved SPA. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT), Nanjing, China.10.1109/ICCT56141.2022.10073198 ↗
31. Garbis, J., and Koilpillai, J. (2022). Software-defined perimeter (SDP) specification v2.0. Cloud Secur. Alliance Tech. Rep., Available online: https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/artifacts/softwaredefined-perimeter-zero-trust-specification-v2/.
32. Butakov, S., Zavarsky, P., and Mirheydari, S. (2019, January 15). Honeykeys: Deception mechanisms in single packet authorization. Proceedings of the 14th Pre-ICIS Workshop on Information Security and Privacy, Munich, Germany.
33. Krawczyk, H. (2010). Cryptographic extraction and key derivation: The HKDF scheme. Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO 2010, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-14623-7_34 ↗
34. Alexopoulos, N., Kiayias, A., Talviste, R., and Zacharias, T. (2017, January 16–18). MCMix: Anonymous Messaging via Secure Multiparty Computation. Proceedings of the 26th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 17), Vancouver, BC, Canada.