journal article·2024-06-15Open access

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Rock Bursts in an Active Coal Mine Dominated by Non-Destructive Tremors

Łukasz Wojtecki, Mirosława Bukowska, Sebastian Iwaszenko, Derek B. Apel

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 12

Abstract

Rock bursts are dynamic phenomena in underground openings, causing damage to support and infrastructure, and are one of the main natural hazards in underground coal mines. The prediction of rock bursts is important for improving safety in mine openings. The hazard of rock bursts is correlated with seismic activity, but rock bursts are rare compared to non-destructive tremors. The five machine learning classifiers (multilayer perceptron, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, K-nearest neighbors, and Gaussian naïve Bayes), along with an ensemble hard-voting classifier composed of these classifiers, were used to recognize rock bursts among the dominant non-destructive tremors. Machine learning models were trained and tested on ten sets of randomly selected data obtained from one of the active hard coal mines in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Poland. For each of the 627 cases in the database, 15 features representing geological, geomechanical, mining, and technical conditions in the opening as well as tremor energy and correlated peak particle velocity were determined. Geological and geomechanical parameters of the coal seams and surrounding rocks were aggregated into a single GEO index. The share of rock bursts in the database was only about 8.5%; therefore, the ADASYN balancing method, which addresses imbalanced datasets, was used. The ensemble hard-voting classifier most effectively classified rock bursts, with an average recall of 0.74.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Mineral Processing and Grinding

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Central Mining Institute—National Research Institute, 1 Gwarków Sqr., 40-166 Katowice, Poland

School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. Dubiński, J., and Konopko, W. (2000). Rock Bursts. Assessment, Forecasting, Combating, Central Mining Institute. (In Polish).
2. Barański, A., Drzewiecki, J., Dubiński, J., Kabiesz, J., Konopko, W., Kornowski, J., Kurzeja, J., Lurka, A., Makówka, J., and Mutke, G. (2012). Principles of Using the Complex Method and Detailed Methods for Assessing the State of Rock Burst Hazard in Hard Coal Mines, Central Mining Institute. (In Polish).
3. Rock burst in the light of mechanics of destressed rock mass
4. Prediction method of stress distribution in areas of completed mining
5. Determination of potential level of rock burst hazard based on the result of analytical predictions of stress distributions and the level of induced seismicity
6. Selected elements of rock burst state assessment in case studies from the Silesian hard coal mines
7. Convergence monitoring as a basis for numerical analysis of changes of rock-mass quality and Hoek-Brown failure criterion parameters due to longwall excavation
8. Powered support in dynamic load conditions—Numerical analysis
9. Regional rock burst indicator for structural units of Upper Silesian Coal Basin10.1515/sgem-2017-0027 ↗
10. Rapid ground deformation corresponding to a mining-induced seismic event followed by a massive collapse10.1007/s11069-018-3552-0 ↗
11. Geophysical and analytical determination of overstressed zones in exploited coal seam: A case study10.1007/s11600-021-00547-z ↗
12. Dynamic elastic properties of the hard coal seam at a depth of around 1260 m
13. Effect of the form of data on the quality of mine tremors hazard forecasting using neural networks10.1007/s10706-005-1136-8 ↗
14. Use of Neural Networks to Forecast Seismic Hazard Expressed by Number of Tremors Per Unit of Surface10.1007/s00024-020-02602-0 ↗
15. Machine learning applied to anthropogenic seismic events detection in Lai Chau reservoir area, Vietnam10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104628 ↗
16. Prediction of underground mining-induced subsidence: Artificial neural network based approach10.33271/mining17.04.045 ↗
17. Bo, H., Lu, G., Li, H., Guo, G., and Li, Y. (2024). Development of a Dynamic Prediction Model for Underground Coal-Mining-Induced Ground Subsidence Based on the Hook Function. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16020377 ↗
18. Pu, Y., Apel, D.B., Szmigiel, A., and Chen, J. (2019). Image Recognition of Coal and Coal Gangue Using a Convolutional Neural Network and Transfer Learning. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12091735 ↗
19. Prediction of geology condition for slurry pressure balanced shield tunnel with super-large diameter by machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.tust.2022.104852 ↗
20. Study on a neutral network model and its application in predicting the risk of rock burst
21. Prediction of rockburst by artificial neural network
22. Classification and prediction of rockburst using AdaBoost combination learning method
23. Rockburst prediction method based on case reasoning pattern recognition
24. Su, G.S., Zhang, K.S., and Chen, Z. (2009, January 11–13). Rock burst prediction using Gaussian process machine learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, Wuhan, China.10.1109/CISE.2009.5364984 ↗
25. Rockburst prediction of underground engineering based on Bayes discriminant analysis method
26. Long-term prediction model of rockburst in underground openings using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.065 ↗
27. Rockburst prediction using particle swarm optimization algorithm and general regression neural network
28. Knowledge-based and data-driven fuzzy modeling for rockburst prediction10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.02.010 ↗
29. Classification of Rockburst in Underground Projects: Comparison of Ten Supervised Learning Methods10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000553 ↗
30. The influence of Bayesian Networks structure on rock burst hazard prediction with incomplete data10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.173 ↗
31. Long-term prediction of rockburst hazard in deep underground openings using three robust data mining techniques
32. A logistic regression classifier for long-term probabilistic prediction of rock burst hazard10.1007/s11069-017-3044-7 ↗
33. Rock burst prediction in kimberlite using decision tree with incomplete data10.1016/j.jsm.2018.07.004 ↗
34. Rockburst prediction model based on entropy weight integrated with grey relational BP neural network10.1155/2019/3453614 ↗
35. Evaluation of rockburst occurrence and intensity in underground structures using decision tree approach10.1007/s00366-018-00695-9 ↗
36. Rock-burst occurrence prediction based on optimized naïve bayes models10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3089205 ↗
37. Prediction and Assessment of Rock Burst Using Various Meta-heuristic Approaches
38. Ullah, B., Kamran, M., and Rui, Y. (2022). Predictive Modeling of Short-Term Rockburst for the Stability of Subsurface Structures Using Machine Learning Approaches: T-SNE, K-Means Clustering and XGBoost. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10030449 ↗
39. Li, J., Fu, H., Hu, K., and Chen, W. (2023). Data Preprocessing and Machine Learning Modeling for Rockburst Assessment. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151813282 ↗
40. Sun, J., Wang, L., Zhang, H., and Shen, Y. (2009, January 18–20). Application of fuzzy neural network in predicting the risk of rock burst. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mining Science & Technology, Xuzhou, China.
41. Classification and prediction of rock burst based on BP neural network
42. Wojtecki, Ł., Iwaszenko, S., Apel, D.B., and Cichy, T. (2021). An attempt to use machine learning algorithms to estimate the rock burst hazard in underground excavations of an active hard coal mine. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14216928 ↗
43. Use of machine learning algorithms to assess the state of rock burst hazard in underground coal mine openings10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.10.011 ↗
44. Miao, D., Yao, K., Wang, W., Liu, L., and Sui, X. (2024). Risk prediction of coal mine rock burst based on machine learning and feature selection algorithm. Georisk Assess. Manag. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards, 1–14.10.1080/17499518.2024.2346653 ↗
45. Directions of increasing the effectiveness of rock burst prevention
46. Bukowska, M. (2012). Rock Mass Proneness to Rock Burst—Geological and Geomechanical Research Methods, Central Mining Institute. (In Polish).
47. Szecówka, Z. (1972). Change in Some Mechanical Properties of Coal Due to Irrigation in the Aspect of Combating Coal Bumps, Statement No. 568, Central Mining Institute. (In Polish).
48. Konopko, W. (1994). Experimental Basis for Qualifying Mining Workings in Hard Coal Mines to the Degree of Rock Burst Hazard, Scientific Works of the Central Mining Institute No. 795. (In Polish).
49. The rock bursts in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin in Poland10.1134/S1062739148030070 ↗
50. Influence of the strength and dynamics of rock breakdown on the rock mass tendency to burst
51. Post-peak failure modulus in problems of mining geo-mechanics10.1134/S1062739149050067 ↗
52. Application of PPV method for the assessment of stability hazard of underground excavations subjected to rock mass tremors
53. New criteria to assess seismic and rock burst hazard in coal mines
54. Peak particle velocity as an indicator of the dynamic load exerted on the support of underground workings
55. Bishop, C.M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer.
56. Sutton, R.S., and Barto, A.G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, MIT Press. [2nd ed.].
57. (2023, March 15). Project Jupyter. Available online: https://jupyter.org/.
58. Loizides, F., and Schmidt, B. (2016). Jupyter Notebooks—A publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, IOS Press.
59. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python
60. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity10.1007/BF02478259 ↗
61. Hebb, D. (1949). The Organization of Behavior, Wiley.
62. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain10.1037/h0042519 ↗
63. Minsky, M.L., and Papert, S. (1969). Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry, MIT Press.
64. Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 ↗
65. Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 ↗
66. Bishop, C.M. (1995). Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 ↗
67. Fausett, L. (1994). Fundamentals of Neural Networks, Prentice Hall.
68. Kingma, D., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv.
69. Kearns, M., and Valiant, L. (1989, January 14–17). Cryptographic limitations on learning Boolean formulae and finite automata. Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/73007.73049 ↗
70. Freund, Y., and Schapire, R.E. (1996, January 3–6). Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Machine Learning, Bari, Italy.
71. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 ↗
72. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
73. Fix, E., and Hodges, J.L. (1951). Discriminatory Analysis. Nonparametric Discrimination: Consistency Properties (Report), USAF School of Aviation Medicine.10.1037/e471672008-001 ↗
74. Nearest neighbor pattern classification10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 ↗