Tool Wear Classification in Chipboard Milling Processes Using 1-D CNN and LSTM Based on Sequential Features
Source abstract
Abstract
The paper presents the comparative analysis of Long short-term memory (LSTM) and one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1-D CNNs) for tool wear classification in chipboard milling processes. The complexity of sequence data in various fields makes selecting the right model for sequence classification very important. This research aims to show the distinct capabilities and performance nuances of LSTM and 1-D CNN models, leveraging their inherent strengths in understanding temporal dependencies and feature extraction, respectively. Through a series of experiments, the study unveils that while both models demonstrate competencies in handling sequence data, the 1-D CNN model, with its superior feature extraction capabilities, achieved the best performance, boasting an accuracy of 94.5% on the test dataset. The insights gained from this comparison not only help to understand LSTM and 1-D CNN models better, but also open the door for future improvements in using neural networks for complex sequence classification challenges.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Artificial Intelligence, Institute of Information Technology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Stefana Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland
Department of Mechanical Processing of Wood, Institute of Wood Sciences and Furniture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Deep learning for use in lumber classification tasks10.1007/s00226-019-01086-z ↗
2. Classifiers ensemble of transfer learning for improved drill wear classification using convolutional neural network10.22630/MGV.2019.28.1.2 ↗
3. Developing automatic recognition system of drill wear in standard laminated chipboard drilling process
4. Deep learning methods for drill wear classification based on images of holes drilled in melamine faced chipboard10.1007/s00226-020-01245-7 ↗
5. Kurek, J., Antoniuk, I., Świderski, B., Jegorowa, A., and Bukowski, M. (2020). Application of Siamese Networks to the Recognition of the Drill Wear State Based on Images of Drilled Holes. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20236978 ↗
6. Data augmentation techniques for transfer learning improvement in drill wear classification using convolutional neural network10.22630/MGV.2019.28.1.1 ↗
7. Toward a process monitoring and control of a CNC wood router: Development of an adaptive control system for routing white birch
8. Effect of tool material on tool wear and delamination during machining of particleboard10.1007/s10086-016-1555-6 ↗
9. The research progress of machining mechanisms in milling wood-based materials
10. Tool condition monitoring based on numerous signal features10.1007/s00170-011-3504-2 ↗
11. Tool condition monitoring for the chipboard drilling process using automatic, signal-based tool state evaluation10.15376/biores.17.3.5349-5371 ↗
12. The use of process monitoring techniques on a CNC wood router. Part 1. sensor selection
13. The use of process monitoring techniques on a CNC wood router. Part 2. Use of a vibration accelerometer to monitor tool wear and workpiece quality
14. Vibro-acoustic signals as a source of information about tool wear during laminated chipboard milling
15. Diagnostic system of drill condition in laminated chipboard drilling process
16. Multi-sensor integration for on-line tool wear estimation through artificial neural networks and fuzzy neural network10.1016/S0952-1976(00)00008-7 ↗
17. Drill wear monitoring using back propagation neural network10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.10.021 ↗
18. Use of nearest neighbors (K-NN) algorithm in tool condition identification in the case of drilling in melamine faced particleboard
19. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
20. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
21. Deep learning: Methods and applications10.1561/2000000039 ↗
22. Learning deep architectures for AI10.1561/2200000006 ↗
23. Deep learning in assessment of drill condition on the basis of images of drilled holes
24. Kurek, J., Wieczorek, G., Kruk, B.S.M., Jegorowa, A., and Osowski, S. (2017, January 11–13). Transfer learning in recognition of drill wear using convolutional neural network. Proceedings of the 2017 18th International Conference on Computational Problems of Electrical Engineering (CPEE), Kutná Hora, Czech Republic.10.1109/CPEE.2017.8093087 ↗
25. Xu, H., Zhang, C., Hong, G.S., Zhou, J., Hong, J., and Woon, K.S. (2018, January 8–13). Gated Recurrent Units Based Neural Network For Tool Condition Monitoring. Proceedings of the 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1109/IJCNN.2018.8489354 ↗
26. Tool Condition Monitoring with Convolutional Neural Network for Milling Tools and Turning Inserts
27. Zhang, J., and Starly, B. (2019). Recurrent Neural Networks with Long Term Temporal Dependencies in Machine Tool Wear Diagnosis and Prognosis. arXiv.
28. Caggiano, A., Mattera, G., and Nele, L. (2023). Smart Tool Wear Monitoring of CFRP/CFRP Stack Drilling Using Autoencoders and Memory-Based Neural Networks. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13053307 ↗
29. Condition Monitoring and Fault Detection of Wind Turbine Driveline With the Implementation of Deep Residual Long Short-Term Memory Network10.1109/JSEN.2023.3273279 ↗
30. Jeon, W.S., and Rhee, S.Y. (2024). Tool Wear Monitoring System Using Seq2Seq. Machines, 12.10.3390/machines12030169 ↗
31. Multimodal 1D CNN for delamination prediction in CFRP drilling process with industrial robots10.1016/j.cie.2024.110074 ↗
32. Deep learning based multi-source heterogeneous information fusion framework for online monitoring of surface quality in milling process10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108043 ↗
33. A data-driven approach to RUL prediction of tools10.1007/s40436-023-00464-y ↗
34. Chan, A.D., and Green, G.C. (2007, January 28–30). Myoelectric control development toolbox. Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the Canadian Medical & Biological Engineering Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.
35. Ye, J., Janardan, R., Li, Q., and Park, H. (2004, January 4–8). Feature extraction via generalized uncorrelated linear discriminant analysis. Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/1015330.1015348 ↗
36. Time-domain protection of superconducting cables based on artificial intelligence classifiers10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142534 ↗
37. Frequency-domain features for ECG beat discrimination using grey relational analysis-based classifier10.1016/j.camwa.2007.04.035 ↗
38. Signal frequency domain analysis and sensor fault diagnosis based on artificial intelligence10.1016/j.comcom.2020.05.034 ↗
39. Bergmann, S., Moussa, D., Brand, F., Kaup, A., and Riess, C. (2023, January 19–20). Frequency-Domain Analysis of Traces for the Detection of AI-based Compression. Proceedings of the 2023 11th International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF), Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/IWBF57495.2023.10157489 ↗
40. Wang, M., Fan, P., and Yang, T. (2023, January 11–13). Fake face detection based on deep learning and frequency domain processing. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 5th International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT), Dali, China.10.1109/ICCASIT58768.2023.10351655 ↗
41. Prince, A.A., Ganesh, S., Verma, P.K., George, P., and Raju, D. (2016, January 24–27). Efficient implementation of empirical mode decomposition in FPGA Using Xilinx System Generator. Proceedings of the IECON 2016—42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Florence, Italy.10.1109/IECON.2016.7793218 ↗
42. Planetary Gearbox Fault Diagnosis Using Envelope Manifold Demodulation
43. Palani, P., Sompur, V., and Thondiyath, A. (2023, January 24–27). Characterisation of Physiological Tremor using Multivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition and Hilbert Transform. Proceedings of the 2023 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Sydney, Australia.10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10341148 ↗
44. Seizure prediction algorithm based on simulated annealing and machine learning