An Online Multicriteria—Spatial Decision Support System for Public Services Planning
Source abstract
Abstract
Dynamic processes in society and demographics require a rapid response and adaptation of the existing public service infrastructure. Responsible planners must be able to analyse the situation, identify gaps in provision and derive decisions. The paper presents a web application that supports finding answers to various questions and planning decisions in the context of public service infrastructures (e.g., schools, pharmacies, supermarkets). Due to the high complexity, the combination of multi-criteria decision analysis and geographical information systems, especially in the web context, is still rarely implemented. With this spatial decision support system, we are pursuing an approach that makes multi-criteria analyses with spatially explicit methods available to the planning domain. By using this application, the user can select and adjust input parameters independently and thus strongly influence the analysis process and results—without a deep knowledge of decision-making methods or software skills. With such a centrally provided online multi-criteria spatial decision support system, the transparency and the quality of the analysis increase, while the workload for the planners is reduced, since they no longer have to spend time on preliminary data search and integration or on building complex methods and models themselves.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soil and Land Suitability Analysis · Geographic Information Systems Studies · Data Management and Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Chair of Geoinformatics, Technical University Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany
Funding
Lower Saxony Ministry of the Interior and Sport · the Lower Saxony Ministry of Federal · European Affairs and Regional Development
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Lutz, W. (2010). The New Generations of Europeans: Demography and Families in the Enlarged European Union, Taylor and Francis.
2. Lutz, W. (2010). The New Generations of Europeans: Demography and Families in the Enlarged European Union, Taylor and Francis.
3. Nübel, K., Bühler, M.M., and Jelinek, T. (2021). Federated Digital Platforms: Value Chain Integration for Sustainable Infrastructure Planning and Delivery. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13168996 ↗
4. Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J.R., and Greco, S. (2010). Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1 ↗
5. Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J.R., and Greco, S. (2010). Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1 ↗
6. Keeney, R.L., and Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174084 ↗
7. Malczewski, J., and Rinner, C. (2015). Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Geographic Information Science, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-74757-4 ↗
8. Ishizaka, A., and Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software, Wiley.10.1002/9781118644898 ↗
9. Subject review Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in Forest Operations—An Introductional Review
10. Making Good Decisions in Healthcare with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: The Use, Current Research and Future Development of MCDA10.1007/s40258-015-0203-4 ↗
11. Abdullah, M.F., Siraj, S., and Hodgett, R.E. (2021). An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Application in Managing Water-Related Disaster Events: Analyzing 20 Years of Literature for Flood and Drought Events. Water, 13.10.3390/w13101358 ↗
12. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature10.1080/13658810600661508 ↗
13. Bridging decision-making process and environmental needs in corridor planning10.1108/14777830910990744 ↗
14. Vogel, R. (2010). GIS-basierte multikriterielle Bewertung der Retentionseignung von Auenflächen—Am Beispiel der Elbe. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Rostock].
15. Application of Geospatial Technologies in the COVID-19 Fight of Ghana10.1007/s41403-020-00145-3 ↗
16. Dry port location optimization to foster sustainable regional development10.18472/SustDeb.v11n2.2020.27073 ↗
17. Flood-prone area mapping using GIS -based analytical hierarchy frameworks for Ibadan city, Nigeria10.1002/mcda.1759 ↗
18. Application of spatial multicriteria decision analysis in healthcare: Identifying drivers and triggers of infectious disease outbreaks using ensemble learning10.1002/mcda.1732 ↗
19. A model for the use of urban treated wastewater in agriculture using multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) and geographic information system (GIS)10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106490 ↗
20. Emerging trends and research frontiers in spatial multicriteria analysis10.1080/13658816.2020.1712403 ↗
21. Internet tools for supporting of lay stakeholders in the framework of the democratic paradigm of environmental decision making10.1002/mcda.353 ↗
22. Ostländer, N. (2008). Creating Specific Decision Support Systems in Spatial Data Infrastructures: An Approach for Conceptualisation, Design and Implementation. [Ph.D. Thesis, Wästfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster].
23. Using Distributed Map Overlay and Layer Opacity for Visual Multi-Criteria Analysis10.5623/cig2014-202 ↗
24. Towards generic online multicriteria decision support in patient-centred health care10.1111/hex.12111 ↗
25. A review of GIS methodologies to analyze the dynamics of COVID-19 in the second half of 202010.1111/tgis.12792 ↗
26. Geographical tracking and mapping of coronavirus disease COVID-19/severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic and associated events around the world: How 21st century GIS technologies are supporting the global fight against outbreaks and epidemics10.1186/s12942-020-00202-8 ↗
27. Plataforma de información geográfica de la UNAM sobre COVID-19 en México
28. Analysen raumzeitlicher Ausbreitungsmuster von COVID-19 mit Corona Regional, dem Analysetool des BBSR
29. Risk of the Brazilian health care system over 5572 municipalities to exceed health care capacity due to the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139144 ↗
30. Geospatial mapping of COVID-19 cases, risk and agriculture hotspots in decision-making of lockdown relaxation in Nepal10.3126/asta.v1i1.30263 ↗
31. Study on soybean potential productivity and food security in China under the influence of COVID-19 outbreak
32. Milstein, A. (2018). Handwörterbuch der Stadt- und Raumentwicklung, Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung. [2018th ed.].
33. Schäfer, M. (2014). Kommunalwirtschaft: Eine Gesellschaftspolitische und Volkswirtschaftliche Analyse, Springer Gabler.10.1007/978-3-658-05839-5 ↗
34. Neu, C. (2009). Daseinsvorsorge: Eine Gesellschaftswissenschaftliche Annäherung, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. [1st ed.].
35. Hecht, R., Büttner, B., Jehle, U., Klaus, M., Krügel, F., McCormick, B., Pajares, E., Reiter, D., Rieche, T., and Seisenberger, S. (2022). Erreichbarkeits- und Analyseinstrumente für die Daseinsvorsorgeplanung, Rhombos-Verlag.
36. Daseinsvorsorge sichern und überwachen: Der Daseinsvorsorge-Atlas Niedersachsen
37. (2023, November 09). MasterPortal Hamburg. Available online: https://bitbucket.org/geowerkstatt-hamburg/masterportal/src/dev/.
38. Bodily, S.E. (1985). Modern Decision Making: A Guide to Modeling with Decision Support Systems, McGraw-Hill.
39. HeiGIT (2023, November 09). Openrouteservice. Available online: https://openrouteservice.org/.
40. A Web-Application for Measuring Spatial Accessibility in Health Planning
41. An integrated approach based on two-objective optimization and 2SFCA model for health-care facility location-allocation problems10.1088/1742-6596/1883/1/012114 ↗