journal article·2024-01-12Open access

Prediction of Briquette Deformation Energy via Ensemble Learning Algorithms Using Physico-Mechanical Parameters

Onder Kabas, Uğur Ercan, Mirela Nicoleta Dinca

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 2

Abstract

Briquetting is a compaction technology that has been used for many years to produce raw materials that are uniform in size and moisture content and are easy to process, transport and store. The physical and chemical properties of the raw material and the briquetting conditions also affect the density and strength of the briquettes. Nonetheless, assessing the quality of briquettes is challenging and extremely expensive, and necessitates lengthy laboratory investigations. In this study, a fast, cost-effective, and simple method using machine learning was used to evaluate the quality characteristics of briquette samples. The deformation energy, one of the most important briquette quality parameters, was predicted by machine learning methods, considering specific compression force, moisture content, compression resistance, briquette density, tumbler index, water resistance, shatter index and compression stress. For this purpose, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and CatBoost methods, which are among the ensemble learning methods, were used. The RMSE, MAE, MAPE, and R2 metrics were used to evaluate the models. With respect to the training data, the model created using the Extreme Gradient Boosting method was successful on all the metrics. However, for test data, the best RMSE (15.69), MAPE (0.0146), and R2 (0.9715) were obtained from the model established with the CatBoost method. The best MAE (10.63) was obtained from the model established with the Random Forest method. The metric results and the graphs obtained from the prediction values of the models revealed that machine learning methods were successfully able to predict briquette deformation energy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Machine, Technical Science Vocational School, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Türkiye

Department of Informatics, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Türkiye

Department of Biotechnical Systems, Faculty of Biotechnical Systems Engineering, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania

Funding

National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest through PubArt program

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. A Study on Improved Biomass Briquetting10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60317-8 ↗
2. Kocer, A., Kabas, O., and Zabava, B.S. (2023). Estimation of Compressive Resistance of Briquettes Obtained from Groundnut Shells with Different Machine Learning Algorithms. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13179826 ↗
3. Biomass Briquettes as an Alternative Fuel: A Comprehensive Review10.1002/ente.201801011 ↗
4. The Possibility Study Of Briquetting Agricultural Wastes For Alternative Energy
5. Kabaş, Ö., Ünal, İ., Sözer, S., Selvi, K.C., and Ungureanu, N. (2022). Quality Assessment of Biofuel Briquettes Obtained from Greenhouse Waste Using a Mobile Prototype Briquetting Machine with PTO Drive. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15228371 ↗
6. Quality Assessment of Bio-Briquettes Obtained from Nut Fruit Shells
7. A Review of Densified Solid Biomass for Energy Production10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.040 ↗
8. Possibility of Utilizing Agriculture Biomass as a Renewable and Sustainable Future Energy Source10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08905 ↗
9. Design and Fabrication of Biomass Densification Machine for Teaching and Research Purposes. Biomass Convers
10. Comparison of Quality and Production Cost of Briquettes Made from Agricultural and Forest Origin Biomass10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.005 ↗
11. Influence of Binders on Combustion Properties of Biomass Briquettes: A Recent Review10.1007/s12155-019-09973-w ↗
12. Evaluation of Selected Physical and Mechanical Properties of Briquettes Produced from Cones of Three Coniferous Tree Species10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.07.025 ↗
13. Self-Heating Optimization of Integrated System of Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass for Power Generation Using Artificial Neural Network Combined with Process Simulation10.1016/j.energy.2023.127134 ↗
14. Predicting Performance of Briquette Made from Millet Bran: A Neural Network Approach
15. Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Kinetic Inverse Modeling to Predict Biomass Pyrolysis Behavior10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105802 ↗
16. Modeling and Optimization of Biogas Production on Saw Dust and Other Co-Substrates Using Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.027 ↗
17. A Survey of Artificial Neural Network-Based Prediction Models for Thermal Properties of Biomass10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.103 ↗
18. Francik, S., Knapczyk, A., Knapczyk, A., and Francik, R. (2020). Decision Support System for the Production of Miscanthus and Willow Briquettes. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13061364 ↗
19. Prediction of Pellet Quality through Machine Learning Techniques and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy10.1016/j.cie.2020.106566 ↗
20. Model Formulation and Analysis of Total Weight of Briquettes after Mixing for Briquette Making Operation
21. Modeling the Effect of Extrusion Parameters on Density of Biomass Pellet Using Artificial Neural Network10.1186/2251-7715-2-9 ↗
22. Binderless Briquetting Technology for Lignite Briquettes: A Review10.1007/s40974-020-00165-3 ↗
23. (2019). SolidBiofuels—Determination of Moisture Content—Oven Dry Method Part1: Total Moisture (Standard No. EN14774-1).
24. (2002). Moisture Content of a Piece of Sawn Timber—Part 1: Determination by Oven Dry Method (Standard No. EN13183-1).
25. Determination of Solid Biofuel Properties of Hazelnut Husk Briquettes Obtained at Different Compaction Pressures. Biomass Convers
26. Influence of Particle Size on the Physico-Mechanical and Energy Properties of Briquettes Produced with Coffee Husks10.1007/s11356-020-11124-0 ↗
27. (2019). International Standard Test Methods of Compression Testing. Annual Book of ASTM Standards (Standard No. ASTM E9-89).
28. (2019). Testing Concrete in Structures—Part 1: Cored Specimens—Taking, Examining and Testing in Compression (Standard No. EN12504–1).
29. Niño, A., Arzola, N., and Araque, O. (2020). Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties of Biomass Briquettes from a Mixture of Rice Husk and Pine Sawdust. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13051060 ↗
30. Utilization of Brown Coal with Ceara Rubber (Manihot Glaziovii) Binder for Biobriquettes10.56899/152.05.29 ↗
31. Ivanova, T., Kabutey, A., Herák, D., and Demirel, C. (2018). Estimation of Energy Requirement of Jatropha curcas L. Seedcake Briquettes under Compression Loading. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11081980 ↗
32. In-Plane Seismic Behavior of NSM Strengthened Adobe Walls: Experimental Evaluation of Different Reinforcements10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113016 ↗
33. Quality Parameters Relevant for Densification of Bio-Materials: Measuring Methods and Affecting Factors—A Review10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.013 ↗
34. (2000). Cubes, Pellets, and Crumbles Definitions and Methods for Determining Density, Durability, and Moisture Content (Standard No. ASAE S269.4).
35. Preparation and Characterization of Biomass Briquettes Using Sugarcane Bagasse, Corncob and Rice Husk10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.457 ↗
36. Tests of Briquettes for Mechanical Strength10.1007/s11015-021-01154-5 ↗
37. (1998). International Standard Test Method of Drop Shatter Test for Coal. Annual Book of ASTM Standards (Standard No. ASTM D 440-86).
38. Optimization of Binder for Improving Strength and Shatter Index of Briquettes for BOF Dust Using Design of Experiments10.35940/ijeat.A9366.109119 ↗
39. Physical and Combustion Indices of Thermally Treated Cornhusk and Sawdust Briquettes for Heating Applications in Nigeria10.1080/15440478.2020.1764445 ↗
40. Empirical Model for Prediction of Density and Water Resistance of Corn Cob Briquettes10.1504/IJRET.2019.101730 ↗
41. Physical and Mechanical Characteristics of Composite Briquette from Coal and Pretreated Wood Fines10.1007/s40789-021-00438-0 ↗
42. How Many Trees in a Random Forest?10.1007/978-3-642-31537-4_13 ↗
43. Diabetes Type 2 Classification Using Machine Learning Algorithms with Up-Sampling Technique
44. An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach Based on DNN, SVR, Extra Tree, and XGBoost Models for Predicting Daily Pan Evaporation10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116890 ↗
45. Ben CatBoost Model and Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Corporate Failure Prediction10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120658 ↗
46. Distance Estimation from a Monocular Camera Using Face and Body Features10.1007/s13369-021-06003-w ↗
47. Aksoy, E., Kocer, A., Yilmaz, İ., Akçal, A.N., and Akpinar, K. (2023). Assessing Fire Risk in Wildland–Urban Interface Regions Using a Machine Learning Method and GIS Data: The Example of Istanbul’s European Side. Fire, 6.10.3390/fire6100408 ↗
48. Azevedo, A., and Santos, M.F. (2008). KDD, SEMMA and CRISP-DM: A Parallel Overview, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Instituto Superior de Contabilidade e Administração do Porto. IADS-DM.
49. A Survey of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Process Models and Methodologies10.1017/S0269888910000032 ↗
50. Chapman, P., Clinton, J., Kerber, R., Khabaza, T., Reinartz, T., Shearer, C., and Wirth, R. (1999). CRISP-DM 1.0 Step-by-Step Data Mining Guide, Cambridge University Press. CRISP-DM.
51. Integrating Independent Component Analysis and Local Outlier Factor for Plant-Wide Process Monitoring10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.06.004 ↗
52. Kabas, O., Kayakus, M., Ünal, İ., and Moiceanu, G. (2023). Deformation Energy Estimation of Cherry Tomato Based on Some Engineering Parameters Using Machine-Learning Algorithms. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13158906 ↗
53. Multiple Regression in L2 Research: A Methodological Synthesis and Guide to Interpreting R2 Values10.1111/modl.12509 ↗
54. The Coefficient of Determination R-Squared Is More Informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in Regression Analysis Evaluation10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
55. Mean Absolute Percentage Error for Regression Models10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.114 ↗
56. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016). KDD ‘16, Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 August 2016, Association for Computing Machinery.
57. Wen, H.T., Wu, H.Y., and Liao, K.C. (2022). Using XGBoost Regression to Analyze the Importance of Input Features Applied to an Artificial Intelligence Model for the Biomass Gasification System. Inventions, 7.10.3390/inventions7040126 ↗
58. Evaluation of CatBoost Method for Prediction of Reference Evapotranspiration in Humid Regions10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.085 ↗
59. XGBoost Machine Learning Algorism Performed Better Than Regression Models in Predicting Mortality of Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.044 ↗
60. Cherif, I.L., and Kortebi, A. (2019, January 24–26). On Using EXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) Machine Learning Algorithm for Home Network Traffic Classification. Proceedings of the 2019 Wireless Days (WD), Manchester, UK.10.1109/WD.2019.8734193 ↗
61. Comparison between XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost Using a Home Credit Dataset
62. Land Cover and Land Use Classification Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms in a Boreal Landscape Using Sentinel-2 Data10.1080/15481603.2019.1650447 ↗
63. A Comparative Study of Automated Legal Text Classification Using Random Forests and Deep Learning10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102798 ↗
64. Khan, K., Iqbal, M., Salami, B.A., Amin, M.N., Ahamd, I., Alabdullah, A.A., Arab, A.M.A., and Jalal, F.E. (2022). Estimating Flexural Strength of FRP Reinforced Beam Using Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest Prediction Models. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14112270 ↗
65. Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest Regression Models for Modelling Fatty Acid and Tocopherol Content in Oil of Winter Rapeseed10.1016/j.jfca.2022.105020 ↗
66. A Random Forest Guided Tour10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7 ↗
67. Air Write Letter Recognition Using Random Forest Classification on Arduino Dataset
68. Zeini, H.A., Al-Jeznawi, D., Imran, H., Bernardo, L.F.A., Al-Khafaji, Z., Ostrowski, K.A., Kazmi, S., Zeini, H.A., Al-Jeznawi, D., and Imran, H. (2023). Random Forest Algorithm for the Strength Prediction of Geopolymer Stabilized Clayey Soil. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15021408 ↗
69. Sullivan, W. (2017). Machine Learning for Beginners Guide Algorithms, Healthy Pragmatic Solutions Inc.
70. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
71. Vermeulen, A.F. (2019). Industrial Machine Learning: Using Artificial Intelligence as a Transformational Disruptor, Apress.10.1007/978-1-4842-5316-8 ↗
72. Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A.V., and Gulin, A. (2019). Catboost: Unbiased Boosting with Categorical Features. arXiv.
73. OccupancySense: Context-Based Indoor Occupancy Detection & Prediction Using CatBoost Model10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108536 ↗
74. Dorogush, A.V., Ershov, V., and Yandex, A.G. (2018). CatBoost: Gradient Boosting with Categorical Features Support. arXiv.