Lateral Ultimate Capacity of Monopile Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines: Effects of Monopile Geometry and Soil Stiffness Properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Offshore Wind Turbines (OWT) with increasingly higher energy output are being developed to meet energy demands, posing greater challenges for their foundation design. Several foundation types are used to support these turbines, with monopiles (MPs) accounting for 80% of the installed capacity. In this study, three-dimensional (3D) nonlinear finite element models (FEM) were employed to investigate the behaviour of a monopile foundation supporting a 5MW wind turbine subjected to lateral loading. The results indicate that the MP behaviour depends on the pile length to diameter (L/D) ratio and the soil shear strength. Inspection of the bending-moment profiles at the lateral ultimate capacity indicated that the monopiles can behave in a flexible manner, even with low L/D ratios. The L/D ratio affected the MP normalized lateral ultimate capacity to varying degrees, and the biggest effect was for soft clays, amounting to an approximately five-fold increase for L/D values of 3.33 to 13.33. Lesser effects were found for stiff clays.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, King Abdulaziz rd., Qassim 52571, Saudi Arabia
Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Queen’s University at Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Centrifuge Testing of Improved Monopile Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbines
2. Alsharedah, Y.A. (2022). Behavior of Hybrid and Monopile Foundation Systems for OWT: Centrifuge Testing and Numerical Modelling. [Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario]. Available online: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/8580.
3. Alsharedah, Y., Black, J.A., Newson, T., and El Naggar, M.H. (2022, January 19–23). Monopile and Hybrid Foundation Comparisons under Lateral Loading. Proceedings of the International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (ICPMG 2022), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
4. Examination of the reduction in natural frequency of laterally loaded piles due to strain-dependence of soil shear modulus10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111614 ↗
5. (2023, October 29). National Wind Energy Associations. Offshore Wind in Europe—Key Trends and Statistics 2020. Report 2020. Available online: https://windeurope.org/intelligence-platform/product/offshore-wind-in-europe-key-trends-and-statistics-2020/.
6. Abdelkader, A.M. (2016). Investigation of Hybrid Foundation System for Offshore Wind Turbine. [Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario].
7. Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines10.1098/rsta.2003.1286 ↗
8. El-Marassi, M. (2011). Investigation of Hybrid Monopile-Footing Foundation Systems Subjected to Combined Loading, The University of Western Ontariol.
9. Tall building foundations: Design methods and applications10.1007/s41062-016-0010-2 ↗
10. New design methods for large diameter piles under lateral loading for offshore wind applications10.1201/b18442-96 ↗
11. Dynamic analysis of offshore wind turbine in clay considering soil-monopile-tower interaction10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.03.006 ↗
12. Soil modulus for laterally loaded piles10.1061/TACEAT.0007599 ↗
13. (2023, October 29). PY-2014/01/14SP—SN—978-1-138-00152-7T1; Haigh, Stuart—Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stuart-Haigh/publication/275538646_Foundations_for_offshore_wind_turbines/links/55433ed10cf24107d3949628/Foundations-for-offshore-wind-turbines.pdf.
14. Cyclic lateral loading of a large-scale pile group10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:11(1326) ↗
15. Matlock, H. (1970, January 22–24). Correlations for Design of Laterally Loaded Piles in Soft Clay. Proceedings of the 2nd Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA.10.4043/1204-MS ↗
16. Reese, L.C., Cox, W.R., and Koop, F.D. (1975, January 5–8). Field testing and analysis of laterally loaded piles in stiff clay. Proceedings of the 7th Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA.10.4043/2312-MS ↗
17. Byrne, B.W., McAdam, R., Burd, H.J., Houlsby, G.T., Martin, C.M., Gavin, K., Doherty, P., Igoe, D., Zdravković, L., and Taborda DM, G. (2015, January 13–17). Field testing of large diameter piles under lateral loading for offshore wind applications. Proceedings of the XVI European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Edinburgh, UK.
18. Philippe, J. (2009, January 4). Re-assessment of P-Y curves for soft clays from centrifuge testing and finite element modeling. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA.
19. Meyer, B.J., and Reese, L.C. (1979). Analysis of Single Piles under Lateral Loading, Center for Highway Research, University of Texas at Austin. FHWA report/TX-79/38+244-l.
20. Lau, B. (2015). Cyclic Behaviour of Monopile Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines in Clay. [Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge].
21. Cyclic lateral response and failure mechanisms of semi-rigid pile in soft clay: Centrifuge tests and numerical modelling10.1139/cgj-2016-0356 ↗
22. Field Tests of Offshore Driven Piles Subjected to Lateral Monotonic and Cyclic Loads in Soft Clay10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000399 ↗
23. Nonlinear cyclic behavior of laterally loaded pile in cohesive soil10.1139/cgj-2013-0099 ↗
24. API (1993). Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms, American Petroleum Institute (API). API, RPT2A-WSD.
25. Bayton, S., Black, J., and Klinkvort, R. (2018). Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Routledge. [1st ed.].
26. Lateral Resistance of Piles in Cohesive Soils10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000611 ↗
27. Rapid lateral load testing of deep foundations10.1179/dfi.2007.005 ↗
28. Cherchia, M. (2016). Centrifuge Modeling of Hybrid Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines. [Doctoral Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute].
29. Generalised failure envelope for laterally loaded piles: Analytical formulation, numerical verification and experimental validation10.1680/jgeot.18.P.051 ↗
30. Lehane, B., Powrie, W., and Doherty, J. (2010). Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics II, CRC Press.
31. Centrifuge modeling of embedded retaining walls with stabilizing bases10.1680/geot.2007.57.6.485 ↗
32. Feasibility study of offshore wind turbines with hybrid monopile foundation based on centrifuge modeling10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.107 ↗
33. A centrifuge study of the seismic response of pile–raft systems embedded in soft clay10.1680/jgeot.15.P.099 ↗
34. The hardening soil model: Formulation and verification
35. Centrifuge modeling of the cyclic lateral behavior of large-diameter monopiles in soft clay: Effects of episodic cycling and reconsolidation10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107048 ↗
36. Dao, T.P.T. (2011). Validation of PLAXIS Embedded Piles for Lateral Loading, Delft University of Technology.