journal article·2023-10-27Open access

MMTD: A Multilingual and Multimodal Spam Detection Model Combining Text and Document Images

Ziqi Zhang, Zhaohong Deng, Wei Zhang, Lingchao Bu

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 21

Abstract

Spam detection has been a topic of extensive research; however, there has been limited focus on multimodal spam detection. In this study, we introduce a novel approach for multilingual multimodal spam detection, presenting the Multilingual and Multimodal Spam Detection Model combining Text and Document Images (MMTD). Unlike previous methods, our proposed model incorporates a document image encoder to extract image features from the entire email, providing a holistic understanding of both textual and visual content through a single image. Additionally, we employ a multilingual text encoder to extract textual features, enabling our model to process multilingual text content found in emails. To fuse the multimodal features, we employ a multimodal fusion module. Addressing the challenge of scarce large multilingual multimodal spam datasets, we introduce a new multilingual multimodal spam detection dataset comprising over 30,000 samples, which stands as the largest dataset of its kind to date. This dataset facilitates a rigorous evaluation of our proposed method. Extensive experiments were conducted on this dataset, and the performance of our model was validated using a five-fold cross-validation approach. The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our approach, with our model achieving state-of-the-art performance, boasting an accuracy of 99.8% when compared to other advanced methods in the field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Text and Document Classification Technologies · Spam and Phishing Detection · Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The School of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China

The Tianjin R & D Center, Beijing Eyou Information Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100023, China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. A semantic-based classification approach for an enhanced spam detection10.1016/j.cose.2020.101716 ↗
2. Sharma, V.D., Yadav, S.K., Yadav, S.K., Singh, K.N., and Sharma, S. (Mater. Today Proc., 2021). An effective approach to protect social media account from spam mail—A machine learning approach, Mater. Today Proc., Withdrawn Article in Press.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.377 ↗
3. Spam filtering using a logistic regression model trained by an artificial bee colony algorithm10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106229 ↗
4. Gao, Y., Yang, M., Zhao, X., Pardo, B., Wu, Y., Pappas, T.N., and Choudhary, A. (April, January 31). Image spam hunter. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
5. Convolutional neural networks for image spam detection10.1080/19393555.2020.1722867 ↗
6. Chavda, A., Potika, K., Di Troia, F., and Stamp, M. (2018, January 26–28). Support vector machines for image spam analysis. Proceedings of the the 15th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications, Porto, Portugal.10.5220/0006921405970607 ↗
7. Yang, H., Liu, Q., Zhou, S., and Luo, Y. (2019). A Spam Filtering Method Based on Multi-Modal Fusion. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061152 ↗
8. Hnini, G., Riffi, J., Mahraz, M.A., Yahyaouy, A., and Tairi, H. (2021). MMPC-RF: A Deep Multimodal Feature-Level Fusion Architecture for Hybrid Spam E-mail Detection. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112411968 ↗
9. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2019, January 2–7). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
10. Li, J., Xu, Y., Lv, T., Cui, L., Zhang, C., and Wei, F. (2022, January 10–14). Dit: Self-supervised pre-training for document image transformer. Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Lisbon, Portugal.10.1145/3503161.3547911 ↗
11. Kraidia, I., Ghenai, A., and Zeghib, N. (2022, January 3–5). A Multimodal Spam Filtering System for Multimedia Messaging Service. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Science and Applications (CAISA), Galala, Egypt.10.1007/978-3-031-28106-8_9 ↗
12. Robust multimedia spam filtering based on visual, textual, and audio deep features and random forest10.1007/s11042-023-15170-x ↗
13. Evaluating the effectiveness of machine learning methods for spam detection10.1016/j.procs.2021.06.056 ↗
14. Mansoor, R., Jayasinghe, N.D., and Muslam, M.M.A. (2021, January 13–16). A comprehensive review on email spam classification using machine learning algorithms. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), IEEE, Bangkok, Thailand.
15. Smart material to build mail spam filtering technique using Naive Bayes and MRF methodologies10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.630 ↗
16. Spam email detection using deep learning techniques10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.107 ↗
17. Ma, J., Gao, W., Mitra, P., Kwon, S., Jansen, B.J., Wong, K.F., and Cha, M. (2016, January 9–15). Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-16), New York, NY, USA.
18. A Spam Transformer Model for SMS Spam Detection10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3081479 ↗
19. Distributed classification for image spam detection10.1007/s11042-017-4944-y ↗
20. Kim, B., Abuadbba, S., and Kim, H. (December, January 30). DeepCapture: Image spam detection using deep learning and data augmentation. Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Security and Privacy, Perth, Australia.
21. PROTECTOR: An optimized deep learning-based framework for image spam detection and prevention10.1016/j.future.2021.06.026 ↗
22. Opinion spam detection by incorporating multimodal embedded representation into a probabilistic review graph10.1016/j.neucom.2019.08.013 ↗
23. Kraidia, I., Ghenai, A., and Zeghib, N. (2022, January 16–17). HST-Detector: A Multimodal Deep Learning System for Twitter Spam Detection. Proceedings of the Computational Intelligence, Data Analytics and Applications: Selected papers from the International Conference on Computing, Intelligence and Data Analytics (ICCIDA), Online.10.1007/978-3-031-27099-4_8 ↗
24. Cui, L., Xu, Y., Lv, T., and Wei, F. (2021). Document ai: Benchmarks, models and applications. arXiv.
25. Jain, R., and Wigington, C. (2021, January 5–10). Multimodal document image classification. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), IEEE, Sydney, Australia.10.1109/ICDAR.2019.00021 ↗
26. Xu, Y., Lv, T., Cui, L., Wang, G., Lu, Y., Florencio, D., Zhang, C., and Wei, F. (2021). Layoutxlm: Multimodal pre-training for multilingual visually-rich document understanding. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.253 ↗
27. Huang, Y., Lv, T., Cui, L., Lu, Y., and Wei, F. (2022, January 10–14). Layoutlmv3: Pre-training for document ai with unified text and image masking. Proceedings of the MM ’22: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Lisboa, Portugal.10.1145/3503161.3548112 ↗
28. Kim, G., Hong, T., Yim, M., Nam, J., Park, J., Yim, J., Hwang, W., Yun, S., Han, D., and Park, S. (2022, January 23–27). Ocr-free document understanding transformer. Proceedings of the ECCV 2022, Tel Aviv, Israel.10.1007/978-3-031-19815-1_29 ↗
29. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention is all you need. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA.
30. Lewis, D., Agam, G., Argamon, S., Frieder, O., Grossman, D., and Heard, J. (2006, January 6–11). Building a test collection for complex document information processing. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/1148170.1148307 ↗
31. Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., and Clark, J. (2016, January 19–24). Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, New York, NY, USA.
32. Kim, W., Son, B., and Kim, I. (2016, January 19–24). Vilt: Vision-and-language transformer without convolution or region supervision. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, New York, NY, USA.