Comparing Usability of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality for Creating Virtual Bounding Boxes of Real Objects
Source abstract
Abstract
This study conducts a comparative analysis of user experiences of Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) headsets during an interactive semantic mapping task. This task entails the placement of virtual objects onto real-world counterparts. Our investigation focuses on discerning the distinctive features of each headset and their respective advantages within a semantic mapping context. The experiment employs a user interface enabling the creation, manipulation, and labeling of virtual 3D holograms. To ensure parity between the headsets, the VR headset mimics AR by relaying its camera feed to the user. A comprehensive user study, encompassing 12 participants tasked with mapping six tabletop objects, compares interface usability and performance between the headsets. The study participants’ evaluations highlight that the VR headset offers enhanced user-friendliness and responsiveness compared to the AR headset. Nonetheless, the AR headset excels in augmenting environmental perception and interpretation, surpassing VR in this aspect. Consequently, the study underscores that current handheld motion controllers for interacting with virtual environments outperform existing hand gesture interfaces. Furthermore, it suggests potential improvements for VR devices, including an upgraded camera feed integration. Significantly, this experiment unveils the feasibility of leveraging VR headsets for AR applications without compromising user experience. However, it also points to the necessity of future research addressing prolonged usage scenarios for both types of headsets in various interactive tasks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Augmented Reality Applications · Interactive and Immersive Displays
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Australia
Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada
School of Info Technology, Melbourne Burwood Campus, Deakin University, Burwood 3125, Australia
Funding
Australian Research Council (ARC)
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Bozgeyikli, E., and Bozgeyikli, L.L. (April, January 27). Evaluating object manipulation interaction techniques in mixed reality: Tangible user interfaces and gesture. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), Lisbon, Portugal.10.1109/VR50410.2021.00105 ↗
2. MRTouch: Adding Touch Input to Head-Mounted Mixed Reality10.1109/TVCG.2018.2794222 ↗
3. Batmaz, A.U., Machuca, M.D.B., Pham, D.M., and Stuerzlinger, W. (2019, January 23–27). Do head-mounted display stereo deficiencies affect 3D pointing tasks in AR and VR?. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), Osaka, Japan.10.1109/VR.2019.8797975 ↗
4. Gu, M., Cosgun, A., Chan, W.P., Drummond, T., and Croft, E. (2021, January 8–12). Seeing thru walls: Visualizing mobile robots in augmented reality. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515322 ↗
5. Waymouth, B., Cosgun, A., Newbury, R., Tran, T., Chan, W.P., Drummond, T., and Croft, E. (2021, January 8–12). Demonstrating cloth folding to robots: Design and evaluation of a 2d and a 3d user interface. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515469 ↗
6. Szczepanski, R., Bereit, A., and Tarczewski, T. (2021). Efficient Local Path Planning Algorithm Using Artificial Potential Field Supported by Augmented Reality. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14206642 ↗
7. Xu, S., Moore, S., and Cosgun, A. (2022, January 9–11). Shared-control robotic manipulation in virtual reality. Proceedings of the International Congress on human–computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA), Ankara, Turkey.10.1109/HORA55278.2022.9800046 ↗
8. Gu, M., Croft, E., and Cosgun, A. (2022, January 13–16). AR Point & Click: An interface for setting robot navigation goals. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Robotics, Florence, Italy.10.1007/978-3-031-24667-8_4 ↗
9. Arviz: An augmented reality-enabled visualization platform for ros applications10.1109/MRA.2021.3135760 ↗
10. Newbury, R., Cosgun, A., Crowley-Davis, T., Chan, W.P., Drummond, T., and Croft, E.A. (September, January 29). Visualizing robot intent for object handovers with augmented reality. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Naples, Italy.
11. Topp, E.A. (2008). human–robot Interaction and Mapping with a Service Robot: Human Augmented Mapping. [Ph.D. Thesis, KTH].
12. Cosgun, A., and Christensen, H. (2018). Context Aware Robot Navigation using Interactively Built Semantic Maps. arXiv.10.1515/pjbr-2018-0020 ↗
13. Frank, M., Drikakis, D., and Charissis, V. (2020). Machine-learning methods for computational science and engineering. Computation, 8.10.3390/computation8010015 ↗
14. Passthrough+: Real-Time Stereoscopic View Synthesis for Mobile Mixed Reality10.1145/3384540 ↗
15. (2023, July 15). Vuforia Developer Portal. Available online: https://developer.vuforia.com/.
16. Ahmadyan, A., Zhang, L., Ablavatski, A., Wei, J., and Grundmann, M. (2021, January 19–25). Objectron: A large scale dataset of object-centric videos in the wild with pose annotations. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Virtual Online.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00773 ↗
17. Quantitative analysis of the Oculus Rift S in controlled movement10.1080/17483107.2019.1688398 ↗
18. Determining the Accuracy of Oculus Touch Controllers for Motor Rehabilitation Applications Using Quantifiable Upper Limb Kinematics: Validation Study
19. Off-The-Shelf Stylus: Using XR Devices for Handwriting and Sketching on Physically Aligned Virtual Surfaces10.3389/frvir.2021.684498 ↗
20. Lahoud, F., and Susstrunk, S. (2018, January 7–10). Ar in VR: Simulating infrared augmented vision. Proceedings of the 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Athens, Greece.10.1109/ICIP.2018.8451811 ↗
21. Lee, C., Bonebrake, S., Hollerer, T., and Bowman, D.A. (2009, January 19–22). A replication study testing the validity of AR simulation in VR for controlled experiments. Proceedings of the 2009 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/ISMAR.2009.5336464 ↗