Stress Intensity Factors for Pressurized Pipes with an Internal Crack: The Prediction Model Based on an Artificial Neural Network
Source abstract
Abstract
During pipeline operation, internal cracks may occur. The severity around the crack tip can be quantified by the stress intensity factor (KI), which is a linear–elastic fracture mechanics parameter. For pressurized pipes featuring infinitely long internal surface cracks, KI can be interpolated from a function considering pressure, geometry, and crack size, as presented in API 579-1/ASME FFS-1. To enhance KI prediction accuracy, an artificial neural network (ANN) model was developed for such pressurized pipes. Predictions from the ANN model and API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 were compared with precise finite element analysis (FEA). The ANN model with an eight-neuron sub-layer outperformed others, displaying the lowest mean squared error (MSE) and minimal validation discrepancies. Nonlinear validation data improved both MSE and testing performance compared to uniform validation. The ANN model accurately predicted normalized KI, with differences of 2.2% or lower when compared to FEA results. Conversely, API 579-1/ASME FFS-1′s bilinear interpolation predicted inaccurately, exhibiting disparities of up to 4.3% within the linear zone and 24% within the nonlinearity zone. Additionally, the ANN model effectively forecasted the critical crack size (aC), differing by 0.59% from FEA, while API 579-1/ASME FFS-1′s bilinear interpolation underestimated aC by 4.13%. In summary, the developed ANN model offers accurate forecasts of normalized KI and critical crack size for pressurized pipes, providing valuable insights for structural assessments in critical engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Thammasat School of Engineering, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
Funding
National Research Council of Thailand · Thammasat Postdoctoral Fellowship
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Li, Z., Jiang, X., and Hopman, H. (2020). Surface crack growth in offshore metallic pipes under cyclic loads: A literature review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8050339 ↗
2. Pipe cracks detection methods—A review
3. (2016). API 579-1/ASME FFS-1: Fitness-For-Service, API Publishing Services.
4. Anderson, T.L. (1994). Fracture Mechanics: Fundamental and Applications, CRC Press. [2nd ed.].
5. Stress-intensity factors for internal surface cracks in cylindrical pressure vessels10.1115/1.3263343 ↗
6. Stress intensity factors for single and multiple semi-elliptical surface cracks in pressurized thick-walled cylinders10.1016/0308-0161(91)90102-8 ↗
7. Rahman, S., Gao, M., and Krishnamurthy, R. (2013, January 16–21). API 579 G-factors for K calculations and improvements for assessment of crack-like flaws in pipelines. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Fracture 2013, ICF 2013, Beijing, China.
8. Machine learning models for predicting the compressive strength of concrete containing nano silica
9. Predicting elemental stiffness matrix of FG nanoplates using Gaussian process regression based surrogate model in framework of layerwise model10.1016/j.enganabound.2022.08.001 ↗
10. Combined approach using mathematical modelling and artificial neural network for chemical industries: Steam methane reformer10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113809 ↗
11. Klyuev, R.V., Morgoev, I.D., Morgoeva, A.D., Gavrina, O.A., Martyushev, N.V., Efremenkov, E.A., and Mengxu, Q. (2022). Methods of forecasting electric energy consumption: A literature review. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15238919 ↗
12. An artificial neural network for fuel efficiency analysis for cargo vessel operation10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112437 ↗
13. Fracture mechanics and mechanical fault detection by artificial intelligence methods: A review10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.07.011 ↗
14. The application of artificial intelligence in fracture mechanics—Crack indentification, diagnosos and prediction
15. Haykin, S. (2007). Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
16. Prediction of the mixed mode I/II fracture toughness of PMMA by an artificial intelligence approach10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102910 ↗
17. Predicting the fracture toughness of PNCs: A stochastic approach based on ANN and ANFIS10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.02.045 ↗
18. Predicting mode-I fracture toughness of rocks using soft computing and multiple regression
19. Artificial neural network application to study quantitative relationship between silicide and fracture toughness of Nb-Si alloys10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.027 ↗
20. Stress intensity factor estimation for unbalanced rotating cracked shafts by artificial neural networks10.1111/ffe.12237 ↗
21. Prediction of stress intensity factors in pavement cracking with neural networks based on semi-analytical FEA10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.063 ↗
22. Prediction model of stress intensity factor of circumferential through crack in elbow based on neural network
23. (2016). ABAQUS User’s Manual, ABAQUS Inc.
24. (2010). MATLAB: Neural Network Toolbox 7 User’s Guide, The MathWorks, Inc.
25. (2004). API 5L: Specification for Line Pipe, API Publishing Services.
26. Davis, J.R. (1998). Metals Handbook, ASM International. [2nd ed.].10.31399/asm.hb.mhde2.9781627081993 ↗
27. Interpolation method for the calculation of API-579-1/ASME FFS-1 stress intensity factor for a longitudinal internal surface crack in pipeline under internal pressure