Monitoring the Microbiomes of Agricultural and Food Waste Treating Biogas Plants over a One-Year Period
Source abstract
Abstract
The knowledge of the microbiome in the anaerobic digestion (AD) is critical for stabilizing the process and optimizing the biogas yield. This work investigates the microbial ecology in four full-scale biogas plants with different feedstocks and process parameters. The three agricultural plants sharing similar feedstocks’ composition (mostly rich in proteins, cellulose and hemicellulose), have several hydrolytic and methanogenic species in common, suggesting that their substrates specifically shape the microbiomes. Particularly, the hydrolytic and likely syntrophic Defluviitoga tunisiensis was detected as the most abundant species in one reactor, representing 21.2% of the community. On the other hand, the biogas plant treating the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), whose composition was much higher in hash and lower in proteins, displayed a quite different microbiome with a much lower abundance of Bacteroidales sp. much higher of Clostridiaceae. Moreover, this AD was clearly influenced by COVID-19 restrictions as both substrate availability and composition suddenly changed causing the wash-out of most bacterial and methanogenic species and leading to a deep modification of the microbial structure. The abundance of Methanosarcina flavescens greatly increased up to 36.5% of the total operational taxonomic units (OTUs), suggesting a switch from the hydrogenotrophic to the acetoclastic methanogenic pathway. This is the first report on the COVID-19 impact on the AD microbiome of a full-scale anaerobic digestor. Moreover, this paper demonstrated that the feedstock composition can differentially shape both bacterial and archaeal strains of the AD process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Gut microbiota and health
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Agronomy Food Natural Resources Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), Waste to Bioproducts-Lab, University of Padova, Agripolis, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy
Department of Biology (DiBio), University of Padova, Via U. Bassi 58/b, 35121 Padova, PD, Italy
S.E.S.A. S.p.A., Via Comuna 5/b, 35042 Este, PD, Italy
Funding
S.E.S.A. S.p.a.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. A Critical Review of Pretreatment Technologies to Enhance Anaerobic Digestion and Energy Recovery10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117494 ↗
2. Innovative Co-Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates and Methane from Broken Rice10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153931 ↗
3. Enhancement of Methane Production in Anaerobic Digestion Process: A Review10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.243 ↗
4. Revealing Metabolic Mechanisms of Interaction in the Anaerobic Digestion Microbiome by Flux Balance Analysis10.1016/j.ymben.2020.08.013 ↗
5. Deep Insights into the Network of Acetate Metabolism in Anaerobic Digestion: Focusing on Syntrophic Acetate Oxidation and Homoacetogenesis10.1016/j.watres.2020.116774 ↗
6. Marker Microbiome Clusters Are Determined by Operational Parameters and Specific Key Taxa Combinations in Anaerobic Digestion10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.111 ↗
7. Impact of Process Temperature and Organic Loading Rate on Cellulolytic/Hydrolytic Biofilm Microbiomes during Biomethanation of Ryegrass Silage Revealed by Genome-Centered Metagenomics and Metatranscriptomics10.1186/s40793-020-00354-x ↗
8. Evolution of the Microbial Community Structure in Biogas Reactors Inoculated with Seeds from Different Origin10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.144981 ↗
9. New Insights from the Biogas Microbiome by Comprehensive Genome-Resolved Metagenomics of Nearly 1600 Species Originating from Multiple Anaerobic Digesters10.1186/s13068-020-01679-y ↗
10. Effect of Different Microbial Seeds on Batch Anaerobic Digestion of Fish Waste10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126834 ↗
11. Metagenomic Binning Reveals the Functional Roles of Core Abundant Microorganisms in Twelve Full-Scale Biogas Plants10.1016/j.watres.2018.04.043 ↗
12. Microbial Activity Response to Hydrogen Injection in Thermophilic Anaerobic Digesters Revealed by Genome-Centric Metatranscriptomics10.1186/s40168-018-0583-4 ↗
13. Integrative Analyses to Investigate the Link between Microbial Activity and Metabolite Degradation during Anaerobic Digestion10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00251 ↗
14. Hashemi, S., Hashemi, S.E., Lien, K.M., and Lamb, J.J. (2021). Molecular microbial community analysis as an analysis tool for optimal biogas production. Microorganisms, 9.10.3390/microorganisms9061162 ↗
15. Reprint of Organic waste conversion through anaerobic digestion: A critical insight into the metabolic pathways and microbial interactions10.1016/j.ymben.2022.02.001 ↗
16. Bioenergy from anaerobic digestion plants: Energy and environmental assessment of a wide sample of Italian plants10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157012 ↗
17. EBA (2022). EBA Statistical Report 2022, EBA.
18. Costa, P., Basaglia, M., Casella, S., and Favaro, L. (2022). Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production from Fruit and Vegetable Waste Processing. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14245529 ↗
19. Cucchiella, F., D’Adamo, I., and Gastaldi, M. (2019). Sustainable Italian cities: The added value of biomethane from organic waste. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9112221 ↗
20. Czubaszek, R., Wysocka-Czubaszek, A., and Tyborowski, R. (2022). Methane Production Potential from Apple Pomace, Cabbage Leaves, Pumpkin Residue and Walnut Husks. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12126128 ↗
21. Bacterial production of PHAs from lipid-rich by-products
22. Rice waste streams as a promising source of biofuels: Feedstocks, biotechnologies and future perspectives10.1016/j.rser.2022.112673 ↗
23. APHA (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, APHA.
24. Brojanigo, S., Parro, E., Cazzorla, T., Favaro, L., Basaglia, M., and Casella, S. (2020). Conversion of starchy waste streams into polyhydroxyalkanoates using Cupriavidus necator DSM 545. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12071496 ↗
25. [9] TM4 Microarray Software Suite10.1016/S0076-6879(06)11009-5 ↗
26. Heberle, H., Meirelles, G.V., da Silva, F.R., Telles, G.P., and Minghim, R. (2015). InteractiVenn: A Web-Based Tool for the Analysis of Sets through Venn Diagrams. BMC Bioinform., 16.10.1186/s12859-015-0611-3 ↗
27. Identifying Biologically Relevant Differences Between Metagenomic Communities10.1093/bioinformatics/btq041 ↗
28. A year of monitoring 20 mesophilic full-scale bioreactors reveals the existence of stable but different core microbiomes in bio-waste and wastewater anaerobic digestion systems Biotechnol10.1186/s13068-018-1195-8 ↗
29. Liu, T., Goux, X., Calusinska, M., and Westerholm, M. (2022). Assessing the Microbiological Health of Ecosystems, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
30. Metatranscriptomics-Guided Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling of Microbial Communities. Cell Rep
31. Erratum to: Two Novel Species Enterococcus lemanii Sp. Nov. and Enterococcus eurekensis Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Swine-Manure Storage Pit10.1007/s10482-013-9908-2 ↗
32. The microbiome driving anaerobic digestion and microbial analysis10.1016/bs.aibe.2020.04.001 ↗
33. Sposob, M., Moon, H.S., Lee, D., and Yun, Y.M. (2021). Microbiome of seven full-scale anaerobic digestion plants in South Korea: Effect of feedstock and operational parameters. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14030665 ↗
34. Genomic Characterization of Defluviitoga tunisiensis L3, a Key Hydrolytic Bacterium in a Thermophilic Biogas Plant and Its Abundance as Determined by Metagenome Fragment Recruitment10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.05.001 ↗
35. Long-Term Alkaline Volatile Fatty Acids Production from Waste Streams: Impact of PH and Dominance of Dysgonomonadaceae10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126621 ↗
36. Description of Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans Sp. Nov., Petrimonas mucosa Sp. Nov. and Fermentimonas caenicola Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Mesophilic Laboratory-Scale Biogas Reactors, and Emended Description of the Genus Proteiniphilum10.1099/ijsem.0.000902 ↗
37. Effect of Air Mixing on High-Solids Anaerobic Digestion of Cow Manure: Performance and Mechanism10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128545 ↗
38. Aminithiophilus ramosus Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Sulphur-Reducing Bacterium Isolated from a Pyrite-Forming Enrichment Culture, and Taxonomic Revision of the Family Synergistaceae10.1099/ijsem.0.005691 ↗
39. Thermotolerant Cellulolytic Clostridiaceae and Lachnospiraceae Rich Consortium Enhanced Biogas Production from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches by Solid-State Anaerobic Digestion10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121851 ↗
40. Lignocellulolytic Microbiomes for Augmenting Lignocellulose Degradation in Anaerobic Digestion10.1016/j.tim.2021.09.006 ↗
41. Gene-Centric Metagenomics of the Fiber-Adherent Bovine Rumen Microbiome Reveals Forage Specific Glycoside Hydrolases10.1073/pnas.0806191105 ↗
42. Spatial Distribution and Diverse Metabolic Functions of Lignocellulose-Degrading Uncultured Bacteria as Revealed by Genome-Centric Metagenomics10.1128/AEM.01244-18 ↗
43. Defluviitoga tunisiensis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Thermophilic Bacterium Isolated from a Mesothermic and Anaerobic Whey Digester10.1099/ijs.0.033720-0 ↗
44. Halocella cellulolytica Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a New Obligately Anaerobic, Halophilic, Cellulolytic Bacterium10.1016/S0723-2020(11)80270-5 ↗
45. Wohlfahrtiimonas Populi Sp. Nov., Isolated from Symptomatic Bark of a Populus × Euramericana Canker10.1099/ijsem.0.002307 ↗
46. Methanobrevibacter boviskoreani Sp. Nov., Isolated from the Rumen of Korean Native Cattle10.1099/ijs.0.054056-0 ↗
47. Methanosarcina flavescens Sp. Nov., a Methanogenic Archaeon Isolated from a Full-Scale Anaerobic Digester10.1099/ijsem.0.000894 ↗
48. Methanosarcina soligelidi Sp. Nov., a Desiccation- and Freeze-Thaw-Resistant Methanogenic Archaeon from a Siberian Permafrost-Affected Soil10.1099/ijs.0.046565-0 ↗
49. Description of Mediterraneibacter massiliensis, Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., A New Genus Isolated from the Gut Microbiota of an Obese Patient and Reclassification of Ruminococcus faecis, Ruminococcus lactaris, Ruminococcus torques, Ruminococcus gnavus and Clostridium glycyrrhizinilyticum as Mediterraneibacter faecis Comb. Nov., Mediterraneibacter lactaris Comb. Nov., Mediterraneibacter Torques Comb. Nov., Mediterraneibacter gnavus Comb. Nov. and Mediterraneibacter glycyrrhizinilyticus Comb. Nov10.1007/s10482-018-1104-y ↗
50. Succiniclasticum ruminis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Ruminal Bacterium Converting Succinate to Propionate as the Sole Energy-Yielding Mechanism
51. Acetoclastic Methanogenesis Led by Methanosarcina in Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Fats, Oil and Grease for Enhanced Production of Methane10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.047 ↗