journal article·2024-03

Robust, Co-design Exploration of Multilevel Product, Material, and Manufacturing Process Systems

Mathew Baby, Rashmi Rama Sushil, Palaniappan Ramu, Janet K. Allen, Farrokh Mistree, Anand Balu Nellippallil

Publisher page

Abstract

Achieving targeted product performance requires the integrated exploration of design spaces across multiple levels of decision-making in systems comprising products, materials, and manufacturing processes—product-material-manufacturing process (PMMP) systems. This demands the capability to co-design PMMP systems, that is, share ranged sets of design solutions among distributed product, material, and manufacturing process designers. PMMP systems are subject to uncertainties in processing, microstructure, and models employed. Facilitating co-design requires support for simultaneously exploring high-dimensional design spaces across multiple levels under uncertainty. In this paper, we present the Co-Design Exploration of Multilevel PMMP systems under Uncertainty (CoDE-MU) framework to facilitate the simultaneous exploration of high-dimensional design spaces across multiple levels under uncertainty. The CoDE-MU framework is a machine learning-enhanced, robust co-design exploration framework that integrates robust, coupled compromise Decision Support Problem (rc-cDSP) construct with interpretable Self-Organizing Maps (iSOM). The framework supports multidisciplinary designers to (i) understand the multilevel interactions, (ii) identify the process mechanisms that affect material and product responses, and (iii) provide decision support for problems involving many goals with different behaviors across multiple levels and uncertainty. We use an industry-inspired hot rod rolling (HRR) steel manufacturing process chain problem to showcase the CoDE-MU framework’s efficacy in facilitating the simultaneous exploration of the product, material, and manufacturing process design spaces across multiple levels under uncertainty. The framework is generic and facilitates the co-design of multilevel PMMP systems characterized by hierarchical product-material-manufacturing process relations and many goals with different behaviors that must be realized simultaneously at individual levels.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Product Development and Customization · Sustainable Supply Chain Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Nellippallil AB, Allen JK, Gautham BP, Singh AK, Mistree F (2020) Robust concept exploration of materials, products, and associated manufacturing processes. In: Architecting robust co-design of materials, products, and manufacturing processes. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 263–29610.1007/978-3-030-45324-4_7 ↗
2. Arróyave R, McDowell DL (2019) Systems approaches to materials design: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Mater Res 49(1):103–12610.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-125955 ↗
3. Choi H, McDowell DL, Allen JK, Rosen D, Mistree F (2008) An Inductive design exploration method for robust multiscale materials design. J Mech Des 130(3):03140210.1115/1.2829860 ↗
4. Olson GB (1997) Computational design of hierarchically structured materials. Science 277(5330):1237–124210.1126/science.277.5330.1237 ↗
5. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (2015) Modeling across scales: a roadmapping study for connecting materials models and simulations across length and time scales. TMS, Warrendale, PA
6. Pollock TM, Allison JE et al (2008) Integrated computational materials engineering: a transformational discipline for improved competitiveness and national security. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
7. McDowell DL (2018) Microstructure-sensitive computational structure-property relations in materials design. In: Computational materials system design. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–25
8. Simpson T, Toropov V, Balabanov V, and Viana F (2008) Design and analysis of computer experiments in multidisciplinary design optimization: a review of how far we have come - or not. In: 12th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Paper No. 2008–580210.2514/6.2008-5802 ↗
9. Mistree F, Smith W, Bras B, Allen JK, Muster D (1990) Decision-Based Design: a contemporary paradigm for ship design. Trans Soc Naval Arch Mar Eng 98:565–597
10. Simon HA (1947) Administrative behavior. Macmillan, New York
11. Simon HA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol Rev 63(2):129–13810.1037/h0042769 ↗
12. Mistree F, Hughes OF, Bras B (1993) Compromise decision support problem and the adaptive linear programming algorithm. Struct Optimiz: Status Promise 1993:251–290
13. Sharma G, Allen JK, Mistree F (2023) Exploring robust decisions in the design of coupled engineered systems. J Mech Des 145:1–3510.1115/1.4063157 ↗
14. Chen W, Simpson T, Allen J, Mistree F (1999) Satisfying ranged sets of design requirements using design capability indices as metrics. Eng Optim 31:615–63910.1080/03052159908941389 ↗
15. Choi HJ, Austin R, Allen JK, McDowell DL, Mistree F, Benson DJ (2005) An approach for robust design of reactive power metal mixtures based on non-deterministic micro-scale shock simulation. J Comput Aided Mater Des 12(1):57–8510.1007/s10820-005-1056-1 ↗
16. Adams B, Kalidindi S, Fullwood DT (2013) Microstructure sensitive design for performance optimization. Butterworth-Heinemann, Waltham, MA
17. Kalidindi SR, Niezgoda SR, Landi G, Vachhani SJ, Fast T (2010) A novel framework for building materials knowledge systems. Comput Mater Contin 17(2):103–126
18. Kalidindi SR, Niezgoda SR, Salem AA (2011) "Microstructure informatics using higher-order statistics and efficient data-mining protocols. JOM 63(4):34–4110.1007/s11837-011-0057-7 ↗
19. Ghosh S, Anantha Padmanabha G, Peng C, Andreoli V, Atkinson S, Pandita P, Vandeputte T, Zabaras N, Wang L (2021) Inverse aerodynamic design of gas turbine blades using probabilistic machine learning. J Mech Des 144(2):021706
20. Sui F, Guo R, Zhang Z, Gu GX, Lin L (2021) Deep reinforcement learning for digital materials design. ACS Mater Lett 3(10):1433–143910.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00390 ↗
21. Chen CT, Gu GX (2020) Generative deep neural networks for inverse materials design using backpropagation and active learning. Adv Sci 7:190260710.1002/advs.201902607 ↗
22. Kumar S, Tan S, Zheng L, Kochmann DM (2020) Inverse-designed spinodoid metamaterials. npj Comput Mater 6(1):7310.1038/s41524-020-0341-6 ↗
23. Tsai K-M, Luo H-J (2017) An inverse model for injection molding of optical lens using artificial neural network coupled with genetic algorithm. J Intell Manuf 28(2):473–48710.1007/s10845-014-0999-z ↗
24. Qian C, Tan RK, Ye W (2022) Design of architectured composite materials with an efficient, adaptive artificial neural network-based generative design method. Acta Mater 225:11754810.1016/j.actamat.2021.117548 ↗
25. Martins JRRA, Lambe AB (2013) Multidisciplinary design optimization: a survey of architectures. AIAA J 51(9):2049–207510.2514/1.J051895 ↗
26. Wang P, Bai Y, Fu C, Lin C (2023) Lightweight design of an electric bus body structure with analytical target cascading. Front Mech Eng 18(1):210.1007/s11465-022-0718-y ↗
27. Kroo I, Altus S, Braun R, Gage P, and Sobieski I (1994) Multidisciplinary optimization methods for aircraft preliminary design. In: proceedings of the 5th symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, September 1994, Panama City Beach, FL, U.S.A, Paper No. AIAA-1994–432510.2514/6.1994-4325 ↗
28. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Kodiyalam S (2001) BLISS/S: a new method for two-level structural optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 21(1):1–1310.1007/s001580050163 ↗
29. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Agte J, and Robert Sandusky J (1998) Bi-level integrated system synthesis (BLISS). In: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, St. Louis, MO, USA, Paper No. AIAA-98–4916, pp 1543–155710.2514/6.1998-4916 ↗
30. Flores Ituarte I, Panicker S, Nagarajan HPN, Coatanea E, Rosen DW (2022) Optimisation-driven design to explore and exploit the process–structure–property–performance linkages in digital manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 34:219–24110.1007/s10845-022-02010-2 ↗
31. Shahan DW, Seepersad CC (2012) Bayesian network classifiers for set-based collaborative design. J Mech Des 134(7):07100110.1115/1.4006323 ↗
32. Baby M, Nellippallil AB (2024) An information-decision framework for the multilevel co-design of products, materials, and manufacturing processes. Adv Eng Inf 59:10227110.1016/j.aei.2023.102271 ↗
33. Thole SP, Ramu P (2020) Design space exploration and optimization using self-organizing maps. Struct Multidiscip Optim 62(3):1071–108810.1007/s00158-020-02665-6 ↗
34. McDowell DL, Panchal JH, Choi H-J, Seepersad CC, Allen JK, Mistree F (2010) Chapter 8–integrated design of materials and products—robust design methods for multilevel systems. In: Integrated design of multiscale multifunctional materials and products. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 179–24010.1016/B978-1-85617-662-0.00008-9 ↗
35. Richardson T, Kannan H, Bloebaum C, and Winer E (2014) Incorporating value-driven design into the visualization of design spaces using contextual self-organizing maps: a case study of satellite design. In: 15th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, Paper No. AIAA 2014–272810.2514/6.2014-2728 ↗
36. Kohonen T, Somervuo P (1998) Self-organizing maps of symbol strings. Neurocomputing 21(1):19–3010.1016/S0925-2312(98)00031-9 ↗
37. Vesanto J (1999) SOM-based data visualization methods. Intell Data Anal 3(2):111–12610.3233/IDA-1999-3203 ↗
38. Sushil RR, Baby M, Sharma G, Balu Nellippallil A, and Ramu P (2022) Data driven integrated design space exploration using iSOM. In: ASME 2022 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Paper. No. DETC2022–8989510.1115/DETC2022-89895 ↗
39. Nagar D, Pannerselvam K, Ramu P (2022) A novel data-driven visualization of n-dimensional feasible region using interpretable self-organizing maps (iSOM). Neural Netw 155:398–41210.1016/j.neunet.2022.08.019 ↗
40. Nagar D, Ramu P, Deb K (2023) Visualization and analysis of pareto-optimal fronts using interpretable self-organizing map (iSOM). Swarm Evol Comput 76:10120210.1016/j.swevo.2022.101202 ↗
41. Yadav D, Nagar D, Ramu P, Deb K (2023) Visualization-aided multi-criteria decision-making using interpretable self-organizing maps. Eur J Oper Res 309(3):1183–120010.1016/j.ejor.2023.01.062 ↗
42. Gladman TMI, Pickering F (1972) Some aspects of the structure-property relationships in high-C ferrite-pearlite steels. J Iron Steel Inst 210(12):916–930
43. Hodgson P, Gibbs R (1992) A mathematical model to predict the mechanical properties of hot rolled C-Mn and microalloyed steels. ISIJ Int 32(12):1329–133810.2355/isijinternational.32.1329 ↗
44. Kuziak R, Cheng Y-W, Glowacki M, Pietrzyk M (1997) Modeling of the microstructure and mechanical properties of steels during thermomechanical processing. NIST Tech Note (USA) 1393:72
45. Yada H (1988) Prediction of microstructural changes and mechanical properties in hot strip rolling. In: Proceedings of the Metallurgical Society of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Elsevier, pp 105–11910.1016/B978-0-08-035770-6.50012-X ↗