A Comparison of Monocular Visual SLAM and Visual Odometry Methods Applied to 3D Reconstruction

Pure monocular 3D reconstruction is a complex problem that has attracted the research community’s interest due to the affordability and availability of RGB sensors. SLAM, VO, and SFM are disciplines formulated to solve the 3D reconstruction problem and estimate the camera’s ego-motion; so, many methods have been proposed. However, most of these methods have not been evaluated on large datasets and under various motion patterns, have not been tested under the same metrics, and most of them have not been evaluated following a taxonomy, making their comparison and selection difficult. In this research, we performed a comparison of ten publicly available SLAM and VO methods following a taxonomy, including one method for each category of the primary taxonomy, three machine-learning-based methods, and two updates of the best methods to identify the advantages and limitations of each category of the taxonomy and test whether the addition of machine learning or updates on those methods improved them significantly. Thus, we evaluated each algorithm using the TUM-Mono dataset and benchmark, and we performed an inferential statistical analysis to identify the significant differences through its metrics. The results determined that the sparse-direct methods significantly outperformed the rest of the taxonomy, and fusing them with machine learning techniques significantly enhanced the geometric-based methods’ performance from different perspectives.