An Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Properties and Failure Characteristics of Layered Rock Mass
Source abstract
Abstract
Layered rock mass is a common rock mass structure with diverse forms and complex mechanical properties. Three types of composite layered rock mass prepared using sandstone and shale can be divided into sandwiched type, interbedded type and superimposed type. The total height of the combined rock mass is 50 mm, which is a cylinder composed of sandstone and shale with a diameter of 25 mm and different thickness. Uniaxial compression tests on sandstone, shale and combined rock mass were performed. The results show that, with the increase in the content of soft components, the compressive strength and elastic modulus of the combined rock mass tend to decrease. The mechanical properties of the superimposed rock mass will be between the two components and close to the soft component in numerical value. The mechanical properties of sandwiched rock mass are obviously affected by the properties of the sandwiched rock. When the content of the components is consistent, interbedded rock mass often shows higher strength and elastic modulus. Compared with other rock mass, interbedded rock mass has more stable mechanical properties. The stress–strain curve can be divided into the compaction stage, elastic stage, plastic development stage and post-fracture stage. The composition content of the rock mass plays a decisive role in the compaction stage. The failure modes are mainly shear failure and tensile failure. With the increase in soft rock content, the failure degree of soft rock is gradually weakened, and the failure modes show a trend from tensile failure to shear failure. The experimental results provide theorical guidance for underground engineering construction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Landslides and related hazards · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Road and Railway Engineering Safety Guarantee, Ministry of Education, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
Hebei Metal Mine Safe and Efficient Mining Technology Innovation Center, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Deep Mining: A Rock Engineering Challenge10.1007/s00603-019-01799-4 ↗
2. Layered igneous rocks10.1016/0009-2541(70)90023-9 ↗
3. Suo, Y., Chen, Z., Rahman, S.S., and Chen, X. (2020). Experimental study on mechanical and anisotropic properties of shale and estimation of uniaxial compressive strength. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff.10.1080/15567036.2020.1779873 ↗
4. Effect of the layer orientation on mechanics and energy evolution characteristics of shales under uniaxial loading10.1016/j.ijmst.2016.05.041 ↗
5. Mechanical Characteristics and Failure Mechanism of Siltstone with Different Joint Thickness10.1155/2020/3824538 ↗
6. Abdi, Y., Khanlari, G.-R., and Jamshidi, A. (2018). Correlation between Mechanical Properties of Sandstones and P-Wave Velocity in Different Degrees of Saturation. Geotech. Geol. Eng.10.1007/s10706-018-0721-6 ↗
7. Ma, J., Jiang, N., Wang, X., Jia, X., and Yao, D. (2021). Numerical Study of the Strength and Characteristics of Sandstone Samples with Combined Double Hole and Double Fissure Defects. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13137090 ↗
8. Brittle failure of shale under uniaxial compression10.1007/s12517-014-1373-3 ↗
9. Borehole stability analysis accounting for anisotropies in drilling to weak bedding planes10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.12.025 ↗
10. The influence of rock fabric on excavation damage in the Lac du Bonnett granite10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.09.013 ↗
11. Exploring the effect of engineering parameters on the penetration of hydraulic fractures through bedding planes in different propagation regimes10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104736 ↗
12. Exploring the influence of rock inherent heterogeneity and grain size on hydraulic fracturing using discrete element modeling10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.06.018 ↗
13. Duffaut, P. (1981, January 21–24). Structural Weaknesses in Rocks and Rock Masses Tentative Classification and Behaviour. Proceedings of the Isrm International Symposium, ISRM-IS, Tokyo, Japan.
14. Mechanical properties of oil shale-coal composite samples10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.104120 ↗
15. Mechanical Properties of Shale-Reservoir Rocks Based on Stress–Strain Curves and Mineral Content10.1155/2022/2562872 ↗
16. Research on uniaxial compression strength and failure properties of stratified rock mass10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103499 ↗
17. Hydraulic pressure effect on mechanical properties and permeabilities of layered rock mass: An experimental study10.1080/19648189.2020.1763844 ↗
18. Li, H., Wang, J., Li, H., Wei, S., and Li, X. (2022). Experimental Study on Deformation and Strength Characteristics of Interbedded Sandstone with Different Interlayer Thickness under Uniaxial and Triaxial Compression. Processes, 10.10.3390/pr10020285 ↗
19. Effects of combination mode on mechanical properties of bi-material samples consisting of rock and coal10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.174 ↗
20. The mechanical contrast between layers controls fracture containment in layered rocks10.1016/j.jsg.2019.06.015 ↗
21. Mechanical analysis and failure modes prediction of composite rock under uniaxial compression10.1038/s41598-021-02331-x ↗
22. Constitutive model and elastic parameters for layered rock mass based on combined Hooke spring
23. Anisotropy of deformation parameters of stratified rock mass10.1007/s12517-021-07905-7 ↗
24. Strength of composite flysch samples under uniaxial compression10.1007/s10064-017-1009-4 ↗