journal article·2019-06Open access

Accurate Prediction of Melt Pool Shapes in Laser Powder Bed Fusion by the Non-Linear Temperature Equation Including Phase Changes

Stefan Kollmannsberger, Massimo Carraturo, Alessandro Reali, Ferdinando Auricchio

Abstract

In this contribution, we validate a physical model based on a transient temperature equation (including latent heat), w.r.t. the experimental set AMB2018-02 provided within the additive manufacturing benchmark series, established at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA. We aim at predicting the following quantities of interest, width, depth, and length of the melt pool by numerical simulation, and report also on the obtainable numerical results of the cooling rate. We first assume the laser to possess a double-ellipsoidal shape and demonstrate that a well-calibrated, purely thermal model based on isotropic thermal conductivity is able to predict all the quantities of interest, up to a deviation of maximum 7.3% from the experimentally measured values. However, it is interesting to observe that if we directly introduce, whenever available, the measured laser profile in the model (instead of the double-ellipsoidal shape), the investigated model returns a deviation of 19.3% from the experimental values. This motivates a model update by introducing anisotropic conductivity, which is intended to be a simplistic model for heat material convection inside the melt pool. Such an anisotropic model enables the prediction of all quantities of interest mentioned above with a maximum deviation from the experimental values of 6.5%. We note that, although more predictive, the anisotropic model induces only a marginal increase in computational complexity.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. AM Bench benchmark challenge CHAL-AMB2018-02-MP. https://www.nist.gov/ambench/amb2018-02-description
2. Special metals corporation. http://www.specialmetals.com
3. Box G (1976) Science and Statistics. J Am Stat Assoc 71(356):791–799. https://doi.org/10.2307/228684110.1080/01621459.1976.10480949 ↗
4. Celentano D, Oñate E, Oller S (1994) A temperature-based formulation for finite element analysis of generalized phase-change problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 37(20):3441–346510.1002/nme.1620372004 ↗
5. Chiumenti M, Neiva E, Salsi E, Cervera M, Badia S, Moya J, Chen Z, Lee C, Davies C (2017) Numerical modelling and experimental validation in Selective Laser Melting. Addit Manuf 18:171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.09.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.09.002 ↗
6. D’Angella D, Kollmannsberger S, Rank E, Reali A (2018) Multi-level bézier extraction for hierarchical local refinement of Isogeometric Analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 328:147–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.01710.1016/j.cma.2017.08.017 ↗
7. Denlinger ER, Jagdale V, Srinivasan G, El-Wardany T, Michaleris P (2016) Thermal modeling of Inconel 718 processed with powder bed fusion and experimental validation using in situ measurements. Addit Manuf 11:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.03.003.0000510.1016/j.addma.2016.03.003.00005 ↗
8. Fotovvati B, Wayne SF, Lewis G, Asadi E (2018) A review on melt-pool characteristics in laser welding of metals. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/492071810.1155/2018/4920718 ↗
9. Ghosh S, Ma L, Levine LE, Ricker RE, Stoudt MR, Heigel JC, Guyer JE (2018) Single-track melt-pool measurements and microstructures in inconel 625. JOM 70:1011–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-2771-x10.1007/s11837-018-2771-x ↗
10. Goldak J, Chakravarti A, Bibby M (1984) A new finite element model for welding heat sources. Metall Trans B 15(2):299–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0266733310.1007/BF02667333 ↗
11. Goldak JA, Akhlaghi M (2005) Computational welding mechanics. Springer, New York
12. Khairallah SA, Anderson AT, Rubenchik A, King WE (2016) Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: Physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Mater 108:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.01410.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 ↗
13. Kollmannsberger S, Özcan A, Carraturo M, Zander N, Rank E (2018) A hierarchical computational model for moving thermal loads and phase changes with applications to selective laser melting. Comput Math Appl 75(5):1483–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2017.11.01410.1016/j.camwa.2017.11.014 ↗
14. Körner C, Attar E, Heinl P (2011) Mesoscopic simulation of selective beam melting processes. J Mater Process Technol 211(6):978–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.01610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.016 ↗
15. Lindgren LE (2007) Computational welding mechanics: Thermomechanical and microstructural simulations. Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC10.1201/9781439824092 ↗
16. Lu X, Lin X, Chiumenti M, Cervera M, Li J, Ma L, Wei L, Hu Y, Huang W (2018) Finite element analysis and experimental validation of the thermomechanical behavior in laser solid forming of Ti-6Al-4V. Addit Manuf 21:30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.02.00310.1016/j.addma.2018.02.003 ↗
17. Mahmoudi M, Tapia G, Karayagiz K, Franco B, Ma J, Arroyave R, Karaman I, Elwany A (2018) Multivariate calibration and experimental validation of a 3D finite element thermal model for laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 7(3):116–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-018-0113-z10.1007/s40192-018-0113-z ↗
18. Megahed M, Mindt HW, N’Dri N, Duan H, Desmaison O (2016) Metal additive-manufacturing process and residual stress modeling. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-016-0047-210.1186/s40192-016-0047-2 ↗
19. Mills KC (2002) Recommended values of thermophysical properties for selected commercial alloys. Woodhead, Cambridge. OCLC: ocm4767767410.1533/9781845690144 ↗
20. Riedlbauer D, Scharowsky T, Singer RF, Steinmann P, Körner C, Mergheim J (2017) Macroscopic simulation and experimental measurement of melt pool characteristics in selective electron beam melting of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(5-8):1309–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8819-610.1007/s00170-016-8819-6 ↗
21. Schoinochoritis B, Chantzis D, Salonitis K (2017) Simulation of metallic powder bed additive manufacturing processes with the finite element method: A critical review. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 231(1):96–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440541456752210.1177/0954405414567522 ↗
22. Smith J, Xiong W, Yan W, Lin S, Cheng P, Kafka OL, Wagner GJ, Cao J, Liu W (2016) Linking process, structure, property, and performance for metal-based additive manufacturing: Computational approaches with experimental support. Comput Mech 57(4):583–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-015-1240-410.1007/s00466-015-1240-4 ↗
23. Svenungsson J, Choquet I, Kaplan AF (2015) Laser welding process – A review of keyhole welding modelling. Phys Procedia 78:182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2015.11.04210.1016/j.phpro.2015.11.042 ↗
24. Tanaka M (2004) An introduction to physical phenomena in arc welding processes. Weld Int 18(11):845–851. https://doi.org/10.1533/wint.2004.334210.1533/wint.2004.3342 ↗
25. Yan Z, Liu W, Tang Z, Liu X, Zhang N, Li M, Zhang H (2018) Review on thermal analysis in laser-based additive manufacturing. Opt Laser Technol 106:427–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.04.03410.1016/j.optlastec.2018.04.034 ↗
26. Zhang Z, Huang Y, Rani Kasinathan A, Imani Shahabad S, Ali U, Mahmoodkhani Y, Toyserkani E (2019) 3-Dimensional heat transfer modeling for laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing with volumetric heat sources based on varied thermal conductivity and absorptivity. Opt Laser Technol 109:297–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.01210.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.012 ↗