Computational Design of Functionally Graded Materials from Sintered Powders
Source abstract
Abstract
A new computational method is presented for the efficient design of alloy systems in functionally graded materials (FGMs), optimized for manufacturability (sintering) as well as performance. The design methodology uses a multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA) integrated with computational thermodynamics and physics-based predictive models to optimize the composition of each alloy in the FGM. Thermodynamic modeling, using the CALPHAD method, is used to establish microstructural constraints and calculate the effective diffusivity in each alloy of the FGM. Physics-based predictive models are used to estimate performance properties. The model is verified by comparing results with data from the literature. A design exercise is also presented for an FGM that combines a ferritic and an austenitic stainless steel to demonstrate the capability of the methodology. It is shown that the mismatch in sintering rate between the two alloys, which causes processing defects during co-sintering, can be minimized while the solution hardening and corrosion resistance in the austenitic alloy can be optimized by independently controlling the composition of both alloys, the initial particle sizes and the sintering temperature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Injection Molding Process and Properties · Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Olson GB (1997) Computational design of hierarchically structured materials. Science 277:1237–124210.1126/science.277.5330.1237 ↗
2. Pollock TM (2016) Alloy design for aircraft engines. Nat Mater 15:809–81510.1038/nmat4709 ↗
3. Deschamps A, Tancret F, Benrabah I-E, De Geuser F, Van Landeghem HP (2018) Combinatorial approaches for the design of metallic alloys. Comptes Rendus Phys 19:737–75410.1016/j.crhy.2018.08.001 ↗
4. Li S, Kattner UR, Campbell CE (2017) A computational framework for material design. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 6:229–24810.1007/s40192-017-0101-8 ↗
5. Molla TT, Liu JZ, Schaffer GB (2018) An ICME framework for design of stainless steel for sintering. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 7:136–14710.1007/s40192-018-0115-x ↗
6. Heaney DF, Suri P, German RM (2003) Defect-free sintering of two material powder injection molded components part I Experimental investigations. J Mater Sci 38:4869–487410.1023/B:JMSC.0000004407.63082.f1 ↗
7. Johnson JL, Tan LK, Suri P, German RM (2003) Design guidelines for processing bi-material components via powder-injection molding. JOM. 55:30–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-003-0172-110.1007/s11837-003-0172-1 ↗
8. Manonukul A, Songkuea S, Moonchaleanporn P, Tange M (2017) Effect of weld line positions on the tensile deformation of two-component metal injection moulding. Int J Miner Metall Mater 24:1384–139310.1007/s12613-017-1531-1 ↗
9. Imgrund P, Rota A, Petzoldt F, Simchi A (2007) Manufacturing of multi-functional micro parts by two-component metal injection moulding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:176–18610.1007/s00170-006-0666-4 ↗
10. Simchi A, Rota A, Imgrund P (2006) An investigation on the sintering behavior of 316L and 17-4PH stainless steel powders for graded composites. Mater Sci Eng A 424:282–28910.1016/j.msea.2006.03.032 ↗
11. Mulser M, Baumann A, Ebert S, Imgrund P, Langer I, Petzoldt F (2014) Materials of high hardness and wear resistance joined to stainless steel by 2C-MIM. Adv Powder Metall & Part Mater 4:140–148
12. Mulser M, Petzoldt F (2016) Two-component metal injection moulding of Ti-6Al-4V and stainless steel bi-material parts. Key Eng Mater 704:148–15410.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.704.148 ↗
13. Firouzdor V, Simchi A (2010) Co-sintering of M2/17-4PH powders for fabrication of functional graded composite layers. J Compos Mater 44:417–43510.1177/0021998309344640 ↗
14. Cai PZ, Green DJ, Messing GL (1997) Constrained densification of alumina/zirconia hybrid laminates, 2. Viscoelastic stress computation. J Am Ceram Soc 80:1940–194810.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03076.x ↗
15. Kanters J, Eisele U, Rodel J (2001) Cosintering simulation and experimentation: case study of nanocrystalline zirconia. J Am Ceram Soc 84:2757–276310.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01091.x ↗
16. Frandsen HL, Olevsky E, Molla TT, Esposito V, Bjork R, Pryds N (2013) Modeling sintering of multilayers under influence of gravity. J Am Ceram Soc 96:80–8910.1111/jace.12070 ↗
17. Molla TT, Frandsen HL, Bjork R, Ni DW, Olevsky E, Pryds N (2013) Modeling kinetics of distortion in porous bi-layered structures. J Eur Ceram Soc 33:1297–130510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.12.019 ↗
18. Olevsky EA (1998) Theory of sintering: from discrete to continuum. Mater Sci Eng R-Reports 23:41–10010.1016/S0927-796X(98)00009-6 ↗
19. Perrut M (2015) Thermodynamic modeling by the calphad method and its applications to innovative materials. J AerospaceLab:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1276/212015.AL09.1010.1276/212015.AL09.10 ↗
20. Rahaman MN (2008) Sintering of ceramics, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton10.1201/b15869 ↗
21. Coble RL (1961) Sintering crystalline solids .1. Intermediate and final state diffusion models. J Appl Phys 32:78710.1063/1.1736107 ↗
22. German RM (2010) Coarsening in sintering: grain shape distribution, grain size distribution, and grain growth kinetics in solid-pore systems. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 35:263–30510.1080/10408436.2010.525197 ↗
23. Walbrühl M, Linder D, Ågren J, Borgenstam A (2017) Modelling of solid solution strengthening in multicomponent alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 700:301–31110.1016/j.msea.2017.06.001 ↗
24. McGuire MF (2008) Stainless steels for design engineers. ASM International, Materials Park10.31399/asm.tb.ssde.9781627082860 ↗
25. Shukla PK, Deb K (2007) On finding multiple Pareto-optimal solutions using classical and evolutionary generating methods. Eur J Oper Res 181:1630–165210.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.002 ↗
26. Jamaludin KR, Muhamad N, Rahman MNA, Amin SYM, Ahmad S, Ibrahim MHI (2009) Sintering Parameter Optimisation of the SS316L metal injection molding (MIM) compacts for final density using Taguchi Method, 3rd South East Asian Tech. Univ Consort Symp:258–262
27. Molla T, Ramachandran D, Esposito V, Ni D, Teocoli F, Olevsky E, Bjork R, Pryds N, Kaiser A, Frandsen H (2015) Constrained sintering of bi-layered tubular structures. J Eur Ceram Soc Ceram Soc 35:941–95010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.10.010 ↗