Three-Dimensional Prediction of Lack-of-Fusion Porosity Volume Fraction and Morphology for Powder Bed Fusion Additively Manufactured Ti–6Al–4V
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. Gong H, Rafi K, Gu H et al (2014) Analysis of defect generation in Ti–6Al–4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf 1–4:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.00210.1016/j.addma.2014.08.002 ↗
2. Grasso M, Colosimo BM (2017) Process defects and in situ monitoring methods in metal powder bed fusion: a review. Meas Sci Technol 28:044005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aa5c4f10.1088/1361-6501/aa5c4f ↗
3. Mostafaei A, Zhao C, He Y et al (2022) Defects and anomalies in powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 26:100974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2021.10097410.1016/j.cossms.2021.100974 ↗
4. Biswal R, Syed AK, Zhang X (2018) Assessment of the effect of isolated porosity defects on the fatigue performance of additive manufactured titanium alloy. Addit Manuf 23:433–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.02410.1016/j.addma.2018.08.024 ↗
5. Masuo H, Tanaka Y, Morokoshi S et al (2018) Influence of defects, surface roughness and HIP on the fatigue strength of Ti–6Al–4V manufactured by additive manufacturing. Int J Fatigue 117:163–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.020 ↗
6. Thompson A, Maskery I, Leach R (2016) X-ray computed tomography for additive manufacturing: A review. Meas Sci Technol 27:072001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/7/07200110.1088/0957-0233/27/7/072001 ↗
7. du Plessis A, Yadroitsev I, Yadroitsava I, Le Roux SG (2018) X-ray microcomputed tomography in additive manufacturing: a review of the current technology and applications. 3D Print Addit Manuf 5:227–247. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2018.006010.1089/3dp.2018.0060 ↗
8. Sola A, Nouri A (2019) Microstructural porosity in additive manufacturing: the formation and detection of pores in metal parts fabricated by powder bed fusion. J Adv Manuf Process 1:e10021. https://doi.org/10.1002/amp2.1002110.1002/amp2.10021 ↗
9. Cunningham R, Narra SP, Ozturk T et al (2016) Evaluating the effect of processing parameters on porosity in electron beam melted Ti–6Al–4V via synchrotron X-ray microtomography. JOM 68:765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1802-010.1007/s11837-015-1802-0 ↗
10. Kasperovich G, Haubrich J, Gussone J, Requena G (2016) Correlation between porosity and processing parameters in TiAl6V4 produced by selective laser melting. Mater Des 105:160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.07010.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.070 ↗
11. Cunningham R, Narra SP, Montgomery C et al (2017) Synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography characterization of the effect of processing variables on porosity formation in laser power-bed additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V. JOM 69:479–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2234-110.1007/s11837-016-2234-1 ↗
12. Neikter M, Forsberg F, Pederson R et al (2018) Defect characterization of electron beam melted Ti–6Al–4V and Alloy 718 with X-ray microtomography. Aeronaut Aerosp Open Access J 2:139–14510.15406/aaoaj.2018.02.00044 ↗
13. Kim FH, Moylan SP, Phan TQ, Garboczi EJ (2020) Investigation of the effect of artificial internal defects on the tensile behavior of laser powder bed fusion 17–4 stainless steel samples: simultaneous tensile testing and X-Ray computed tomography. Exp Mech 60:987–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-020-00604-610.1007/s11340-020-00604-6 ↗
14. Brown A, Zachary J, Tilson W (2017) Classification, effects, and prevention of build defects in powder-bed fusion printed Inconel 718. TMS 2017 annual meeting and exhibition
15. Zhang B, Ham K, Shao S et al (2017) Effect of Heat treatment and hot isostatic pressing on the morphology and size of pores in additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V parts. University of Texas at Austin
16. Du L, Pan X, Qian G et al (2021) Crack initiation mechanisms under two stress ratios up to very-high-cycle fatigue regime for a selective laser melted Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Fatigue 149:106294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10629410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106294 ↗
17. Cao M, Liu Y, Dunne FPE (2022) A crystal plasticity approach to understand fatigue response with respect to pores in additive manufactured aluminium alloys. Int J Fatigue 161:106917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10691710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106917 ↗
18. Liu QC, Elambasseril J, Sun SJ et al (2014) The effect of manufacturing defects on the fatigue behaviour of Ti–6Al–4V specimens fabricated using selective laser melting. AMR 891–892:1519–1524. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.151910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.1519 ↗
19. Malefane LB, du Preez W, Maringa M, du Plessis A (2018) Tensile and high cycle fatigue properties of annealed Ti6Al4V (ELI) specimens produced by direct metal laser sintering. S Afr J Ind Eng 29:312–313. https://doi.org/10.7166/29-3-207710.7166/29-3-2077 ↗
20. Benedetti M, Fontanari V, Bandini M et al (2018) Low- and high-cycle fatigue resistance of Ti–6Al–4V ELI additively manufactured via selective laser melting: Mean stress and defect sensitivity. Int J Fatigue 107:96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.021 ↗
21. Beretta S, Romano S (2017) A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes. Int J Fatigue 94:178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.020 ↗
22. Romano S, Beretta S, Miccoli S, Gschweitl M (2020) probabilistic framework for defect tolerant fatigue assessment of additively manufactured parts applied to a space component. In: Structural integrity of additive manufactured parts. ASTM International, pp 526–53910.1520/STP162020180112 ↗
23. Kabir M, Richter H (2017) Modeling of processing-induced pore morphology in an additively-manufactured Ti–6Al–4V Alloy. Materials 10:145. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1002014510.3390/ma10020145 ↗
24. Yeratapally SR, Lang C, Glaessgen EH (2020) A computational study to investigate the effect of defect geometries on the fatigue crack driving forces in powder-bed AM materials. In: AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Orlando, FL10.2514/6.2020-1386 ↗
25. Tang M, Pistorius PC, Beuth JL (2017) Prediction of lack-of-fusion porosity for powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 14:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.12.00110.1016/j.addma.2016.12.001 ↗
26. Mukherjee T, DebRoy T (2018) Mitigation of lack of fusion defects in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process 36:442–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.02810.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.028 ↗
27. Promoppatum P, Yao S-C, Pistorius PC, Rollett AD (2017) A comprehensive comparison of the analytical and numerical prediction of the thermal history and solidification microstructure of Inconel 718 products made by laser powder-bed fusion. Engineering 3:685–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.02310.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.023 ↗
28. Mojumder S, Gan Z, Li Y et al (2023) Linking process parameters with lack-of-fusion porosity for laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 68:103500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.10350010.1016/j.addma.2023.103500 ↗
29. Committee on Integrated Computational Materials Engineering, National Materials Advisory Board, Division of Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council of the National Academies (2008) Integrated computational materials engineering: a transformational discipline for improved competitiveness and national security. National Academies Press, Washington
30. Liu PW, Wang Z, Xiao YH et al (2020) Integration of phase-field model and crystal plasticity for the prediction of process–structure–property relation of additively manufactured metallic materials. Int J Plast 128:102670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10267010.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102670 ↗
31. Agius D, O’Toole P, Wallbrink C et al (2021) Integrating phase field and crystal plasticity finite element models for simulations of titanium alloy Ti-5553. J Phys Mater 4:044014. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ac194f10.1088/2515-7639/ac194f ↗
32. Turner JA, Belak J, Barton N et al (2022) ExaAM: metal additive manufacturing simulation at the fidelity of the microstructure. Int J High Perform Comput Appl 36:13–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342021104255810.1177/10943420211042558 ↗
33. Irwin J, Reutzel EW, Michaleris P et al (2016) Predicting microstructure from thermal history during additive manufacturing for Ti–6Al–4V. J Manuf Sci Eng 138:111007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403352510.1115/1.4033525 ↗
34. Liu S, Shin YC (2020) Integrated 2D cellular automata-phase field modeling of solidification and microstructure evolution during additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V. Comput Mater Sci 183:109889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10988910.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109889 ↗
35. Yang X, Barrett RA, Tong M et al (2020) Prediction of microstructure evolution for additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V. Procedia Manuf 47:1178–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.17010.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.170 ↗
36. Sun W, Shan F, Zong N et al (2021) Simulation of solidified β grain for Ti–6Al–4V during wire laser additive manufacturing by three-dimensional cellular automaton method. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 29:065006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/ac0c2310.1088/1361-651X/ac0c23 ↗
37. Pham M-S, Dovgyy B, Hooper PA et al (2020) The role of side-branching in microstructure development in laser powder-bed fusion. Nat Commun 11:749. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14453-310.1038/s41467-020-14453-3 ↗
38. Karimi P, Sadeghi E, Ålgårdh J et al (2021) Tailored grain morphology via a unique melting strategy in electron beam-powder bed fusion. Mater Sci Eng A 824:141820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14182010.1016/j.msea.2021.141820 ↗
39. Liu J, Li G, Sun Q et al (2022) Understanding the effect of scanning strategies on the microstructure and crystallographic texture of Ti–6Al–4V alloy manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. J Mater Process Technol 299:117366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.11736610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117366 ↗
40. Popovich VA, Borisov EV, Popovich AA et al (2017) Functionally graded Inconel 718 processed by additive manufacturing: crystallographic texture, anisotropy of microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Des 114:441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.07510.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.075 ↗
41. Kok Y, Tan XP, Wang P et al (2018) Anisotropy and heterogeneity of microstructure and mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: a critical review. Mater Des 139:565–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.02110.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.021 ↗
42. Balachandramurthi AR, Moverare J, Hansson T, Pederson R (2020) Anisotropic fatigue properties of alloy 718 manufactured by Electron beam powder bed fusion. Int J Fatigue 141:105898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10589810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105898 ↗
43. Yan W, Lin S, Kafka OL et al (2018) Modeling process–structure–property relationships for additive manufacturing. Front Mech Eng 13:482–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0505-y10.1007/s11465-018-0505-y ↗
44. Kapoor K, Yoo YSJ, Book TA et al (2018) Incorporating grain-level residual stresses and validating a crystal plasticity model of a two-phase Ti–6Al–4V alloy produced via additive manufacturing. J Mech Phys Solids 121:447–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.07.02510.1016/j.jmps.2018.07.025 ↗
45. Geng Y, Harrison N (2020) Functionally graded bimodal Ti6Al4V fabricated by powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: crystal plasticity finite element modelling. Mater Sci Eng A 773:138736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.13873610.1016/j.msea.2019.138736 ↗
46. Yeratapally SR, Lang CG, Cerrone AR et al (2022) Effect of defects on the constant-amplitude fatigue behavior of as-built Ti–6Al–4V alloy produced by laser powder bed fusion process: assessing performance with metallographic analysis and micromechanical simulations. Addit Manuf 52:102639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10263910.1016/j.addma.2022.102639 ↗
47. SPPARKS Kinetic Monte Carlo Simulator. https://spparks.github.io/. Accessed 4 Aug 2022
48. Plimpton S, Battaile C, Chandross M et al (2009) Crossing the mesoscale no-man’s land via parallel kinetic Monte Carlo
49. Rodgers TM, Madison JD, Tikare V (2017) Simulation of metal additive manufacturing microstructures using kinetic Monte Carlo. Comput Mater Sci 135:78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.03.05310.1016/j.commatsci.2017.03.053 ↗
50. Rodgers TM, Moser D, Abdeljawad F et al (2021) Simulation of powder bed metal additive manufacturing microstructures with coupled finite difference-Monte Carlo method. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10195310.1016/j.addma.2021.101953 ↗
51. Groeber MA, Jackson MA (2014) DREAM.3D: a digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3D. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 3:56–72. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9772-3-510.1186/2193-9772-3-5 ↗
52. Wadell H (1935) Volume, shape, and roundness of quartz particles. J Geol 43:250–28010.1086/624298 ↗
53. Dilip JJS, Zhang S, Teng C et al (2017) Influence of processing parameters on the evolution of melt pool, porosity, and microstructures in Ti–6Al–4V alloy parts fabricated by selective laser melting. Prog Addit Manuf 2:157–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-017-0030-210.1007/s40964-017-0030-2 ↗
54. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
55. Rosenthal D (1946) The theory of moving sources of heat and its application of metal treatments. Trans ASME 68:849–866
56. Gordon JV, Narra SP, Cunningham RW et al (2020) Defect structure process maps for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 36:101552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10155210.1016/j.addma.2020.101552 ↗
57. Cepeda-Jiménez CM, Potenza F, Magalini E et al (2020) Effect of energy density on the microstructure and texture evolution of Ti–6Al–4V manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Charact 163:110238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11023810.1016/j.matchar.2020.110238 ↗
58. King WE, Barth HD, Castillo VM et al (2014) Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 214:2915–2925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.005 ↗
59. Rubenchik A, Wu S, Mitchell S et al (2015) Direct measurements of temperature-dependent laser absorptivity of metal powders. Appl Opt 54:7230. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.00723010.1364/AO.54.007230 ↗
60. Boley CD, Mitchell SC, Rubenchik AM, Wu SSQ (2016) Metal powder absorptivity: modeling and experiment. Appl Opt 55:6496. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.55.00649610.1364/AO.55.006496 ↗
61. Yeratapally SR, Cerrone A, Tang M, Glaessgen EH (2020) A 3D model to predict explicit morphologies and volume fraction of lack-of-fusion pores generated in selective laser melting processes. NASA/TM–2020-220579
62. du Plessis A (2019) Effects of process parameters on porosity in laser powder bed fusion revealed by X-ray tomography. Addit Manuf 30:100871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10087110.1016/j.addma.2019.100871 ↗
63. Jolley BR, Uchic MD, Sparkman D et al (2021) Application of serial sectioning to evaluate the performance of x-ray computed tomography for quantitative porosity measurements in additively manufactured metals. JOM 73:3230–3239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-04863-z10.1007/s11837-021-04863-z ↗
64. Brika SE, Letenneur M, Dion CA, Brailovski V (2020) Influence of particle morphology and size distribution on the powder flowability and laser powder bed fusion manufacturability of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Addit Manuf 31:100929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10092910.1016/j.addma.2019.100929 ↗
65. Montalbano T, Briggs BN, Waterman JL et al (2021) Uncovering the coupled impact of defect morphology and microstructure on the tensile behavior of Ti–6Al–4V fabricated via laser powder bed fusion. J Mater Process Technol 294:117113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.11711310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117113 ↗
66. Jin P, Tang Q, Song J et al (2021) Numerical investigation of the mechanism of interfacial dynamics of the melt pool and defects during laser powder bed fusion. Opt Laser Technol 143:107289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.10728910.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107289 ↗
67. Caiazzo F, Alfieri V, Casalino G (2020) On the relevance of volumetric energy density in the investigation of Inconel 718 laser powder bed fusion. Materials 13:538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1303053810.3390/ma13030538 ↗
68. Tang M (2017) Inclusions, porosity, and fatigue of AlSi10Mg parts produced by selective laser melting. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.002 ↗
69. Bogdanor MJ, Mahadevan S, Oskay C (2013) Uncertainty quantification in damage modeling of heterogeneous materials. JMC. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.201300582110.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2013005821 ↗
70. Zhang X, Oskay C (2019) Plastic dissipation sensitivity to mechanical properties in polycrystalline β-HMX subjected to impact loading. Mech Mater 138:103079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.10307910.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103079 ↗
71. Zhang X, Liu Y, Oskay C (2022) Uncertainty quantification for microstructure-sensitive fatigue nucleation and application to titanium alloy, Ti6242. Front Mater 9:89799810.3389/fmats.2022.897998 ↗
72. Zhang S, Oskay C (2017) Reduced order variational multiscale enrichment method for thermo-mechanical problems. Comput Mech 59:887–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1380-910.1007/s00466-017-1380-9 ↗
73. Zhang X, Oskay C (2017) Sparse and scalable eigenstrain-based reduced order homogenization models for polycrystal plasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 326:241–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.07.02710.1016/j.cma.2017.07.027 ↗
74. Zhang X, Liu Y, Oskay C (2022) Multiscale reduced-order modeling of a titanium skin panel subjected to thermomechanical loading. AIAA J 60:302–315. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J06049710.2514/1.J060497 ↗