DataVXIntegrating Materials and Manufacturing InnovationPaper
journal article·2024-09

An Explainable Deep Learning Model Based on Multi-scale Microstructure Information for Establishing Composition–Microstructure–Property Relationship of Aluminum Alloys

Jiale Ma, Wenchao Zhang, Zhiqiang Han, Qingyan Xu, Haidong Zhao

Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation· Volume 13· Issue 3
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Metals & alloys

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. William YW, Jinshan L, Weimin L, Zi-Kui L (2019) Integrated computational materials engineering for advanced materials: a brief review. Comput Mater Sci 158:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.11.00110.1016/j.commatsci.2018.11.001 ↗
2. Xie JX (2023) Materials genome engineering advances: a new journal dedicated to digital and intelligent materials research and development. MGE Adv 1:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgea.910.1002/mgea.9 ↗
3. Chanda T, Zhou J, Duszczyk J (2001) A comparative study on iso-speed extrusion and isothermal extrusion of 6061 Al alloy using 3D FEM simulation. J Mater Process Technol 114:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00724-510.1016/S0924-0136(01)00724-5 ↗
4. El Mahallawy N, Shehata FA, El Hameed MA, El Aal MIA, Kim HS (2010) 3D FEM simulations for the homogeneity of plastic deformation in Al–Cu alloys during ECAP. Mater Sci Eng A 527:1404–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.10.03210.1016/j.msea.2009.10.032 ↗
5. Michailidis N, Stergioudi F, Omar H, Tsipas DN (2010) An image-based reconstruction of the 3D geometry of an Al open-cell foam and FEM modeling of the material response. Mech Mater 42:142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.10.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2009.10.006 ↗
6. Yamakov V, Wolf D, Phillpot SR, Gleiter H (2002) Deformation twinning in nanocrystalline Al by molecular-dynamics simulation. Acta Mater 50:5005–5020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00318-X10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00318-X ↗
7. Yamakov V, Wolf D, Phillpot SR, Mukherjee AK, Gleiter H (2002) Dislocation processes in the deformation of nanocrystalline aluminium by molecular-dynamics simulation. Nat Mater 1:45–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat70010.1038/nmat700 ↗
8. Samiri A, Khmich A, Haouas H, Hassani A, Hasnaoui A (2020) Structural and mechanical behaviors of Mg–Al metallic glasses investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. Comput Mater Sci 184:109895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10989510.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109895 ↗
9. Carling KM, Carter EA (2003) Orbital-free density functional theory calculations of the properties of Al, Mg and Al–Mg crystalline phases. Model Simul Mater Sci 11:339. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/11/3/30710.1088/0965-0393/11/3/307 ↗
10. Majumder C, Kulshreshtha SK (2004) Influence of Al substitution on the atomic and electronic structure of Si clusters by density functional theory and molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Rev B 69:115432. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.11543210.1103/PhysRevB.69.115432 ↗
11. Guo FY, Long CG, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Liu CH, Yu L (2015) Adsorption and dissociation of H2O on Al (1 1 1) surface by density functional theory calculation. Appl Surf Sci 324:584–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.04110.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.041 ↗
12. Li JY, Qiu XC, Kong SN, Zhang Z (2023) Molecular dynamics simulation of interaction between edge dislocations and stable β-phase precipitates in aluminum alloy. Phys Status Solidi B 260:2300246. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.20230024610.1002/pssb.202300246 ↗
13. Mojumder S, Thakur MSH, Islam M, Mahboob M, Motalab M (2021) Numerical investigation of mechanical properties of aluminum-copper alloys at nanoscale. J Nanopart Res 23:3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-05137-610.1007/s11051-020-05137-6 ↗
14. Klenam DEP, Asumadu TK, Vandadi M et al (2023) Data science and material informatics in physical metallurgy and material science: an overview of milestones and limitations. Results Mater 19:100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2023.10045510.1016/j.rinma.2023.100455 ↗
15. Agrawal A, Choudhary A (2016) Perspective: materials informatics and big data: realization of the “fourth paradigm” of science in materials science. Appl Mater 4:053208. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.494689410.1063/1.4946894 ↗
16. Lan Q, Wang XC, Sun JW et al (2022) Artificial neural network approach for mechanical properties prediction of as-cast A380 aluminum alloy. Mater Today Commun 31:103301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10330110.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103301 ↗
17. Zhang SJ, Yi W, Zhong J, Gao JB, Lu Z, Zhang LY (2023) Computer alloy design of Ti modified Al–Si–Mg–Sr casting alloys for achieving simultaneous enhancement in strength and ductility. Materials 16:306. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1601030610.3390/ma16010306 ↗
18. Soofi YJ, Rahman MA, Gu YJ, Liu JL (2022) A feasibility study of machine learning-assisted alloy design using wrought aluminum alloys as an example. Comput Mater Sci 215:111783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.11178310.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111783 ↗
19. Liang H, Sun X, Sun Y, Yuan G (2017) Text feature extraction based on deep learning: a review. J Wirel Commun Netw. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-017-0993-110.1186/s13638-017-0993-1 ↗
20. Dai DB, Xu T, Wei X et al (2020) Using machine learning and feature engineering to characterize limited material datasets of high-entropy alloys. Comput Mater Sci 175:109618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10961810.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109618 ↗
21. Xiang SL, Chen XD, Fan ZC, Chen T, Lian XM (2022) A deep learning-aided prediction approach for creep rupture time of Fe–Cr–Ni heat-resistant alloys by integrating textual and visual features. J Mater Res Technol 18:268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.09910.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.099 ↗
22. Ren D, Wang CC, Wei XL, Lai QQ, Xu W (2023) Building a quantitative composition-microstructure–property relationship of dual-phase steels via multimodal data mining. Acta Mater 252:118954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2023.11895410.1016/j.actamat.2023.118954 ↗
23. Zhao PL, Wang YW, Jiang BY, Zhang HM, Cheng XW, Fan QB (2023) Neural network modeling of titanium alloy composition-microstructure–property relationships based on multimodal data. Mater Sci Eng A 879:145202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2023.14520210.1016/j.msea.2023.145202 ↗
24. Lombardo S, Rosso M (2017) Heat treatments for aluminum alloys: when, why and how. Matls Perform Charact 6:807–822. https://doi.org/10.1520/MPC2017001110.1520/MPC20170011 ↗
25. Guo BX, Chang L, Dai JH et al (2022) Effect of heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–9Si–0.4Mg–0.1Cu alloy. Adv Eng Mater 24:2200569. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20220056910.1002/adem.202200569 ↗
26. Lados DA, Apelian D, Wang L (2011) Solution treatment effects on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-(1 to 13 pct)Si–Mg cast alloys. Metall Mater Trans B 42:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-010-9437-610.1007/s11663-010-9437-6 ↗
27. Chen JA, Niu W, Ren B, Wang YZ, Shen XP (2023) Survey: exploiting data redundancy for optimization of deep learning. ACM Comput Surv 55:1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/356466310.1145/3564663 ↗
28. Chowdhury A, Kautz E, Yener B, Lewis D (2016) Image driven machine learning methods for microstructure recognition. Comput Mater Sci 123:176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.05.03410.1016/j.commatsci.2016.05.034 ↗
29. Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. CoRR abs https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.155610.48550/arXiv.1409.1556 ↗
30. Wei XL, Van der Zwaag S, Jia ZX, Wang CC, Xu W (2022) On the use of transfer modeling to design new steels with excellent rotating bending fatigue resistance even in the case of very small calibration datasets. Acta Mater 235:118103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11810310.1016/j.actamat.2022.118103 ↗
31. Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, Li LJ, Li K, Fei-Fei L (2009) ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Miami, pp 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.520684810.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 ↗
32. Singla S, Singla S, Feizi S (2022) Improved deterministic l2 robustness on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. In: International conference on learning representations. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.0406210.48550/arXiv.2108.04062 ↗
33. Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D (2017) Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV), pp 618–626. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.7410.1109/ICCV.2017.74 ↗
34. Beroual S, Boumerzoug Z, Paillard P, Borjon-Piron Y (2019) Effects of heat treatment and addition of small amounts of Cu and Mg on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Si–Cu and Al–Si–Mg cast alloys. J Alloys Compd 784:1026–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.36510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.365 ↗
35. Prach O, Trudonoshyn O, Randelzhofer P, Körner C, Durst K (2019) Effect of Zr, Cr and Sc on the Al–Mg–Si–Mn high-pressure die casting alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 759:603–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.05.03810.1016/j.msea.2019.05.038 ↗
36. Lodgaard L, Ryum N (2000) Precipitation of dispersoids containing Mn and/or Cr in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 283:144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00734-610.1016/S0921-5093(00)00734-6 ↗
37. Ibrahim MF, Samuel AM, Doty HW, Samuel FH (2017) Effect of aging conditions on precipitation hardening in Al–Si–Mg and Al–Si–Cu–Mg alloys. Int Metalcast 11:274–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-016-0057-z10.1007/s40962-016-0057-z ↗
38. Österreicher JA, Kumar M, Schiffl A, Schwarz S, Bourret GR (2017) Secondary precipitation during homogenization of Al–Mg–Si alloys: influence on high temperature flow stress. Mater Sci Eng A 687:175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.07410.1016/j.msea.2017.01.074 ↗
39. Österreicher JA, Kumar M, Schiffl A, Schwarz S, Hillebrand D, Bourret GR (2016) Sample preparation methods for scanning electron microscopy of homogenized Al–Mg–Si billets: a comparative study. Mater Charact 122:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2016.10.02010.1016/j.matchar.2016.10.020 ↗
40. Abid T, Boubertakh A, Hamamda S (2010) Effect of pre-aging and maturing on the precipitation hardening of an Al–Mg–Si alloy. J Alloys Compd 490:166–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.09610.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.096 ↗
41. Abdelaziz MH, Elgallad EM, Doty HW, Samuel FH (2021) Strengthening precipitates and mechanical performance of Al–Si–Cu–Mg cast alloys containing transition elements. Mater Sci Eng A 820:141497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14149710.1016/j.msea.2021.141497 ↗
42. Yıldırım M, Özyürek D (2013) The effects of Mg amount on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Si–Mg alloys. Mater Des 51:767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.08910.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.089 ↗
43. Klenam DEP, Asumadu TK, Vandadi M, Rahbar N, McBagonluri F, Soboyejo WO (2023) Data science and material informatics in physical metallurgy and material science: an overview of milestones and limitations. Results Mater 19:100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2023.10045510.1016/j.rinma.2023.100455 ↗
44. Xie G (2020) Redundancy-aware pruning of convolutional neural networks. Neural Comput 32:2532–2556. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_0133010.1162/neco_a_01330 ↗
45. Hao T, Ding X, Han J, Guo YC, Ding GG (2023) Manipulating identical filter redundancy for efficient pruning on deep and complicated CNN, pp 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2023.329826310.1109/TNNLS.2023.3298263 ↗