Mining Multimodal Fatigue Data Using Reasoning Foundation Models and Formalized Domain Knowledge
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The scarcity and expense of fatigue data limits optimal design of components and constrains companies to a few well-qualified materials when safety-critical applications are concerned. This research investigates different strategies to improve extraction of structured information from unstructured scientific literature—to date the largest corpus of fatigue information. Successful generative extraction is within reach considering latest foundation vision and reasoning language model (VLM/RLM) developments. In this work, a schema-based extraction is attempted for which an object-oriented fatigue data schema is designed. The schema provides labels, definitions and type constraints for the target entities as contextual domain knowledge to the VLM/RLM model. The importance of nuanced target field definitions within the schema and constrained decoding is explored. Furthermore, the schema-based approach is gradually extended to form two agentic language model systems, one which utilizes a stepwise, human-inspired approach to first determine discriminative cues from fatigue S-N diagrams and one further applying dynamic knowledge augmentation. The latter dynamic workflow exploits the synergy of reasoning language models and ontologies by performing logical reasoning and web searches for dynamic knowledge augmentation and hallucination detection. On this rather complex fatigue data extraction task, requiring hierarchical pattern recognition and multimodal extraction, an overall F1-score of 0.82 is achieved, while fields contained in the narrative text modality are extracted with an F1-score of 0.92. The strengths and weaknesses of all models and methodologies are thoroughly discussed, and extensions to our workflows are proposed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topic Modeling · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining · Text and Document Classification Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. Furuya Y, Nishikawa H, Hirukawa H, Nagashima N, Takeuchi E (2019) Catalogue of nims fatigue data sheets. Sci Technol Adv Mater 20(1):1055–107210.1080/14686996.2019.1680574 ↗
2. Ellmer F, Esderts A, Eulitz KG (2011) and K Hinkelmann. Datenbank und auswertesystem betriebsfestigkeit, Forschungskuratorium maschinenbau
3. Fliegener S, Rosenberger J, Luke M, Domínguez JM, Francisco Morgado J, Kobialka HU, Kraft T, Tlatlik J (2025) Digital methods for the fatigue assessment of engineering steels. Adv Eng Mater 27(8):240099210.1002/adem.202400992 ↗
4. Shetty P, Rajan AC, Kuenneth C, Gupta S, Panchumarti LP, Holm L, Zhang C, Ramprasad R (2023) A general-purpose material property data extraction pipeline from large polymer corpora using natural language processing. npj Comput Mater 9(1):5210.1038/s41524-023-01003-w ↗
5. Foppiano L, Castro PB, Ortiz Suarez P, Terashima K, Takano Y, Ishii M (2023) Automatic extraction of materials and properties from superconductors scientific literature. Sci Technol Adv Mater Methods 3(1):2153633
6. Yan R, Jiang X, Wang W, Dang D, Yanjing S (2022) Materials information extraction via automatically generated corpus. Sci Data 9(1):40110.1038/s41597-022-01492-2 ↗
7. Kim E, Huang K, Tomala A, Matthews S, Strubell E, Saunders A, McCallum A, Olivetti E (2017) Machine-learned and codified synthesis parameters of oxide materials. Sci data 4(1):1–910.1038/sdata.2017.127 ↗
8. Olivetti EA, Cole JM, Kim E, Kononova O, Ceder G, Yong-Jin Han T, Hiszpanski AM (2020) Data-driven materials research enabled by natural language processing and information extraction. Appl Phys Rev, 7(4):04131710.1063/5.0021106 ↗
9. Jessop DM, Adams SE, Willighagen EL, Hawizy L, Murray-Rust P (2011) Oscar4: a flexible architecture for chemical text-mining. J cheminf 3(1):4110.1186/1758-2946-3-41 ↗
10. Vaucher AC, Zipoli F, Geluykens J, Nair VH, Schwaller P, Laino T (2020) Automated extraction of chemical synthesis actions from experimental procedures. Nature Commun 11(1):360110.1038/s41467-020-17266-6 ↗
11. Swain MC, Cole JM (2016) Chemdataextractor: a toolkit for automated extraction of chemical information from the scientific literature. J Chem Inf Model 56(10):1894–190410.1021/acs.jcim.6b00207 ↗
12. Wang J, Shen Z, Liao Y, Yuan Z, Li S, He G, Lan M, Qian X, Zhang K, Li H (2022) Multi-modal chemical information reconstruction from images and texts for exploring the near-drug space. Brief Bioinf 23(6):bbac46110.1093/bib/bbac461 ↗
13. Fan V, Qian Y, Wang A, Wang A, Coley CW, Barzilay R (2024) Openchemie: an information extraction toolkit for chemistry literature. J Chem Inf Model 64(14):5521–553410.1021/acs.jcim.4c00572 ↗
14. Songlin Yu, Ran N, Liu J (2024) Large-language models: the game-changers for materials science research. Artif Intel Chem 2(2):10007610.1016/j.aichem.2024.100076 ↗
15. Choi J, Lee B (2024) Accelerating materials language processing with large language models. Commun Mater 5(1):1310.1038/s43246-024-00449-9 ↗
16. Lei G, Docherty R, Cooper SJ (2024) Materials science in the era of large language models: a perspective. Digital Discovery 3(7):1257–127210.1039/D4DD00074A ↗
17. Jiang X, Wang W, Tian S et al (2025) Applications of natural language processing and large language models in materials discovery. npj Comput Mater 11(1):7910.1038/s41524-025-01554-0 ↗
18. Yan Y, Wang S, Huo J, Ye J, Chu Z, Xuming H, Yu PS, Gomes C, Selman B (2025) and Qingsong Wen. Multimodal large language models can significantly advance scientific reasoning, Position. arXiv:2502.02871
19. Buehler MJ (2024) Cephalo: multi-modal vision-language models for bio-inspired materials analysis and design. Adv Function Mater 34(49):240953110.1002/adfm.202409531 ↗
20. Schilling-Wilhelmi M, Ríos-García M, Shabih S, Gil MV, Miret S, Koch CT, Márquez JA, Jablonka KM (2025) From text to insight: large language models for chemical data extraction. Chemical Society Reviews10.1039/D4CS00913D ↗
21. Bordes F, Pang RY, Ajay A et al (2024) An introduction to vision-language modeling. arXiv:2405.17247
22. Wang S, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Li J, Wang Z, Liu Y, Ji X (2025) Towards understanding how knowledge evolves in large vision-language models. In: Proceedings of the computer vision and pattern recognition conference, pp 29858–2986810.1109/CVPR52734.2025.02779 ↗
23. Leong SX, Pablo-García S, Zhang Z, Aspuru-Guzik A (2024) Automated electrosynthesis reaction mining with multimodal large language models (mllms). Chem Sci 15(43):17881–1789110.1039/D4SC04630G ↗
24. Circi D, Khalighinejad G, Chen A, Dhingra B, Brinson LC (2024) How well do large language models understand tables in materials science?. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 13(3):669–68710.1007/s40192-024-00362-6 ↗
25. Schilling-Wilhelmi M, Jablonka KM (2024) Using machine-learning and large-language-model extracted data to predict copolymerizations. In: AI for accelerated materials design-Vienna 2024
26. Besta M, Barth J, Schreiber E, Kubicek A, Catarino A, Gerstenberger R, Nyczyk P, Iff P, Li Y, Houliston S, et al(2025) Reasoning language models: a blueprint. arXiv:2501.11223
27. Qin C, Chen X, Wang C et al (2025) Scihorizon: benchmarking ai-for-science readiness from scientific data to large language models. arXiv:2503.1350310.1145/3711896.3737403 ↗
28. Wei J, Wang X, Schuurmans D et al (2022) Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 35:24824–24837
29. Long J (2023) Large language model guided tree-of-thought. arXiv:2305.08291
30. Besta M, Blach N, Kubicek A, Gerstenberger R, Podstawski M, Gianinazzi L, Gajda J, Lehmann T, Niewiadomski H, Nyczyk P et al (2024) Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pp 17682–1769010.1609/aaai.v38i16.29720 ↗
31. Zaki M, Anoop Krishnan NM et al (2024) Mascqa: investigating materials science knowledge of large language models. Digit Discov 3(2):313–32710.1039/D3DD00188A ↗
32. Foppiano L, Lambard G, Amagasa T, Ishii M (2024) Mining experimental data from materials science literature with large language models: an evaluation study. Sci Technol Adv Mater Methods 4(1):2356506
33. Munnangi M, Feldman S, Wallace BC, Amir S, Hope T, Naik A (2024) On-the-fly definition augmentation of llms for biomedical ner. arXiv:2404.00152,10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.212 ↗
34. Potu ST, Niranjan Murthy R, Thomas A, Mishra L, Prange N, Durmaz AR (2025) Ontology-conformal recognition of materials entities using language models. Sci Rep 15(1):1–1610.1038/s41598-025-03619-y ↗
35. Sayeed HM, Mohanty T, Sparks TD (2024) Annotating materials science text: a semi-automated approach for crafting outputs with gemini pro. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 13(2):445–45210.1007/s40192-024-00356-4 ↗
36. Ghosh S, Brodnik NR, Frey C, Holgate C, Pollock TM, Daly S, Carton S (2024)Toward reliable ad-hoc scientific information extraction: a case study on two materials datasets. arXiv:2406.0534810.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.897 ↗
37. Vatsal S, Dubey H (2024) A survey of prompt engineering methods in large language models for different nlp tasks. arXiv:2407.12994
38. Polak MP, Morgan D (2024) Extracting accurate materials data from research papers with conversational language models and prompt engineering. Nature Commun 15(1):156910.1038/s41467-024-45914-8 ↗
39. Chiang Y, Hsieh E, Chou CH, Riebesell J (2024) Llamp: Large language model made powerful for high-fidelity materials knowledge retrieval and distillation10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1280 ↗
40. Harry Caufield J, Hegde H, Emonet V, Harris NL, Joachimiak MP, Matentzoglu N, Kim H, Moxon S, Reese JT, Haendel MA et al (2024) Structured prompt interrogation and recursive extraction of semantics (spires): A method for populating knowledge bases using zero-shot learning. Bioinformatics 40(3):btae10410.1093/bioinformatics/btae104 ↗
41. Lairgi Y, Moncla L, Cazabet R, Benabdeslem K, Cléau P (2024) itext2kg: Incremental knowledge graphs construction using large language models. In: International conference on web information systems engineering. Springer, pp 214–22910.1007/978-981-96-0573-6_16 ↗
42. Bai F, Kang J, Stanovsky G, Freitag D, Dredze M, Ritter A(2023) Schema-driven information extraction from heterogeneous tables. arXiv:2305.14336,10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.600 ↗
43. Ai Q, Meng F, Shi J, Pelkie B, Coley CW (2024) Extracting structured data from organic synthesis procedures using a fine-tuned large language model. Digital Discovery 3(9):1822–183110.1039/D4DD00091A ↗
44. Huang L, Weijiang Yu, Ma W, Zhong W, Feng Z, Wang H, Chen Q, Peng W, Feng X, Qin B et al (2025) A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions. ACM Trans Inf Syst 43(2):1–5510.1145/3703155 ↗
45. OH B (1910) The exponential law of endurance tests. In: Proc am soc test mater, pp 625–630
46. Lee J, Park S-Y, Choi B-H (2021) Evaluation of fatigue characteristics of aluminum alloys and mechanical components using extreme value statistics and c-specimens. Metals 11(12):191510.3390/met11121915 ↗
47. Moxon SAT, Solbrig H, Unni DR, Jiao D, Bruskiewich RM, Balhoff JP, Vaidya G, Duncan WD, Hegde H, Miller M et al (2021) The linked data modeling language (linkml): A general-purpose data modeling framework grounded in machine-readable semantics. ICBO 3073:148–151
48. Morgado JF, Ghedini E, Goldbeck G, Hashibon A, Schmitz GJ, Friis J, De Baas AF et al (2020) Mechanical testing ontology for digital-twins: a roadmap based on emmo. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS, pp 1–10
49. Nostro PD, Friis J, Ghedini E, Goldbeck G, Holtz O, Maria Roscioni O, Zaccarini FA, Toti D (2024) Elementary multiperspective material ontology: Leveraging perspectives via a showcase of emmo-based domain and application ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 16th international joint conference on knowledge discovery, knowledge engineering and knowledge management, pp 135–14210.5220/0012910200003838 ↗
50. OpenAI (2025) The chain of command. https://model-spec.openai.com/2025-02-12.html#chain_of_command. Accessed 25 June 2025
51. Durmaz AR, Thomas A, Mishra L, Murthy RN, Straub T (2024) An ontology-based text mining dataset for extraction of process-structure-property entities. Scientific data 11(1):111210.1038/s41597-024-03926-5 ↗
52. Mueller AC (2023) Wordcloud. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1032188210.5281/zenodo.10321882 ↗
53. Reimers N, Gurevych I (2019) Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. In: Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. association for computational linguistics, pp 1110.18653/v1/D19-1410 ↗
54. Trewartha A, Walker N, Huo H, Lee S, Cruse K, Dagdelen J, Dunn A, Persson KA, Ceder G, Jain A (2022) Quantifying the advantage of domain-specific pre-training on named entity recognition tasks in materials science. Patterns 3(4):10048810.1016/j.patter.2022.100488 ↗
55. Gupta T, Zaki M, Krishnan NMA, Mausam (2022). Matscibert: a materials domain language model for text mining and information extraction. npj Comput Mater 8(1):10210.1038/s41524-022-00784-w ↗
56. Kuhn HW (1955) The hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Res Logistics Quarterly 2(1–2):83–9710.1002/nav.3800020109 ↗
57. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE et al (2020) SciPy: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 17:261–27210.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
58. Wang B, Chao X, Zhao X, Ouyang L, Fan W, Zhao Z, Rui X, Liu K, Yuan Q, Shang F, Zhang B, Wei L, Sui Z, Li W, Botian Shi Yu, Qiao DL (2024) and Conghui He. An open-source solution for precise document content extraction, Mineru. arXiv:2305.13971
59. Geng S, Josifoski M, Peyrard M, West R (2023) Grammar-constrained decoding for structured nlp tasks without finetuning. arXiv:2409.1883910.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.674 ↗
60. Beurer-Kellner L, Fischer M, Vechev M (2024) Guiding llms the right way: fast, non-invasive constrained generation. arXiv:2403.06988
61. Choi S, Fang T, Wang Z, Song Y (2023) KCTS: knowledge-constrained tree search decoding with token-level hallucination detection. arXiv:2310.0904410.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.867 ↗
62. ggml-org. json-schema-to-grammar.cpp in llama.cpp. GitHub repository, 2025. https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/b5822/common/json-schema-to-grammar.cpp
63. Lamy J-B (2017) Owlready: Ontology-oriented programming in python with automatic classification and high level constructs for biomedical ontologies. Artif Intell Med 80:11–2810.1016/j.artmed.2017.07.002 ↗
64. Krech D, Grimnes GA, Higgins G, Car N, Hees J, Aucamp I, Lindström N, Arndt N, Sommer A, Chuc E, Herman I, Nelson A, McCusker J, Gillespie T, Kluyver T, Ludwig F, Champin PA, Watts M, Holzer U, Summers E, Morriss W, Winston D, Perttula D, Kovacevic F, Chateauneu R, Solbrig H, Cogrel B, Stuart V (2025) RDFLib. https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib
65. Sommer A, Car N (2025) pySHACL. https://github.com/RDFLib/pySHACL, Apache-2.0 License
66. Lee T, Yoon C, Jang K, Lee D, Song M, Kim H, Kang J (2024) Ethic: Evaluating large language models on long-context tasks with high information coverage. arXiv:2410.1684810.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.283 ↗
67. Levy M, Jacoby A, Goldberg Y (2024) Same task, more tokens: the impact of input length on the reasoning performance of large language models. arXiv:2402.1484810.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.818 ↗
68. Bertsch A, Ivgi M, Xiao E, Alon U, Berant J, Gormley MR, Neubig G (2024) In-context learning with long-context models: An in-depth exploration. arXiv:2405.0020010.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.605 ↗
69. Hong K, Troynikov A, Huber J (2025) Context rot: How increasing input tokens impacts llm performance. https://research.trychroma.com/context-rot. Accessed 24 July 2025
70. Zhang J, Huang J, Jin S (2024) and Shijian Lu. A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vision-language models for vision tasks10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3369699 ↗
71. Ghafarollahi A, Buehler MJ (2025) Sparks: Multi-agent artificial intelligence model discovers protein design principles. arXiv:2504.19017
72. Zhang Z, You W, Wu T, Wang X, Li J, Zhang M (2025) A survey of generative information extraction. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on computational linguistics, pp 4840–4870
73. Khattab O, Singhvi A, Maheshwari P, Zhang Z, Santhanam K, Vardhamanan S, Haq S, Sharma A, Joshi TT, Moazam H et al (2023) Dspy: Compiling declarative language model calls into self-improving pipelines. arXiv:2310.03714
74. Yuksekgonul M, Bianchi F, Boen J, Liu S, Huang Z, Guestrin C, Zou J (2024) Textgrad: Automatic differentiation via text. arXiv:2406.07496