Investigation of Critical Gap for Pedestrian Crossing Using Fuzzy Logic System
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper assesses pedestrian crossing behavior and critical gaps at a two-way midblock crossing location. A critical gap is the shortest gap that a pedestrian accepts when crossing a road. A dataset was collected in 2017 in Edinburgh (UK). The analysis was performed using the fuzzy logic system. The adopted membership function of the fuzzy logic system is of a triangular form since it has a simple and convenient structure. The input variables that are used in the analysis are the number and length of rejected gaps and length of accepted gaps at the crossing location. The output variables are the critical gaps. The results show that assessing critical gap estimation of pedestrians crossing using fuzzy logic is achievable and produces reasonable values that are comparable to values that are reported in the literature. This outcome improves the understanding of pedestrian crossing behavior and could therefore have implications for transport infrastructure design. Further analysis using additional parameters including waiting time and demographic characteristics and alternative forms for membership functions are strongly encouraged.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Traffic and Road Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Visiting Professor College of Engineering, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 84428, Saudi Arabia
Professor of Transport Engineering School of Engineering and The Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5D, UK
Mechanical Department, Faculty of Engineering-Shoubra, Banha University, Banha 13518, Egypt
Funding
princess nourah university
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Pedestrian risk taking while road crossing: A comparison of observed and declared behaviour10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.357 ↗
2. Patil Critical gap estimation for pedestrians at uncontrolled mid-block crossings on high-speed arterials10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.011 ↗
3. Walk or wait? An empirical analysis of street crossing decisions10.1002/jae.791 ↗
4. Fuzzy logic-based observation and evaluation of pedestrians’ behavioral patterns by age and gender10.1016/j.trf.2016.04.004 ↗
5. Individual differences of pedestrian behaviour in midblock crosswalk and intersection10.1080/13588265.2010.491715 ↗
6. Exploration of pedestrian gap-acceptance behavior at selected locations10.1177/0361198106198200117 ↗
7. Analysis of pedestrians’ behavior at pedestrian crossings10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00058-8 ↗
8. Probit-Based Pedestrian Gap Acceptance Model for Midblock Crossing Locations10.3141/2519-14 ↗
9. Chu, X., and Baltes, M.R. (2001). Pedestrian Mid-Block Crossing Difficulty, National Center for Transit Research, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida. (No. NCTR-392-09).10.5038/CUTR-NCTR-RR-2000-07 ↗
10. Human factors of pedestrian walking and crossing behaviour10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.396 ↗
11. A critical assessment of pedestrian behaviour models Transp10.1016/j.trf.2008.12.004 ↗
12. Modelling pedestrian road crossing behaviour under mixed traffic condition
13. Effect of vehicular lanes on pedestrian gap acceptance behaviour10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.162 ↗
14. Models for pedestrian gap acceptance behaviour analysis at unprotected mid-block crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions10.1016/j.trf.2015.05.006 ↗
15. Oxley, J. (2000). Age Differences in Road Crossing Behaviour. [Ph.D. Thesis, Monash University].
16. Crossing roads safely: An experimental study of age differences in gap selection by pedestrians10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.017 ↗
17. Age-related differences in street-crossing decisions: The effects of vehicle speed and time constraints on gap selection in an estimation task10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.013 ↗
18. High accuracy crash mapping using fuzzy logic10.1016/j.trc.2014.03.002 ↗
19. A Two-Dimensional Optimal Velocity Model for Unidirectional Pedestrian Flow Based on Pedestrian’s Visual Hindrance Field10.1109/TITS.2013.2266340 ↗
20. A Generalised Function for Modeling Bi-Directional Flow Effects on Indoor Walkways in Hong Kong10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00058-2 ↗
21. Modelling Single File Pedestrian Motion Across Cultures10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.164 ↗
22. Vanumu, L.D., Ramachandra Rao, K., and Tiwari, G. (2017). Fundamental diagrams of pedestrian flow characteristics: A review. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., 9.10.1007/s12544-017-0264-6 ↗
23. Analysis of pedestrian-vehicle traffic conflicts in street designs with elements of shared space10.3141/2393-03 ↗
24. Pedestrian gap acceptance for mid-block street crossing10.1080/03081060.2013.818274 ↗
25. Illegal mid-block pedestrian crossings in China: Gap acceptance, conflict and crossing path analysis10.1080/17457300.2011.628751 ↗
26. The effect of age, gender and driver status on pedestrians’ intentions to cross the road in risky situations10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.003 ↗
27. Behavioural issues in pedestrian speed choice and street crossing behaviour: A review10.1080/01441640701365239 ↗
28. A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: Crow search algorithm10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001 ↗
29. Optimisation methodology for cryotanks10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.03.034 ↗
30. Load torque identification in induction motor using neural networks technique10.1016/j.epsr.2006.01.006 ↗
31. Islam, N., Haider, M., and Uddin, M.B. (2019, January 22–23). Fuzzy logic enhanced speed control system of a VSI-fed three phase induction motor. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Rome, Italy.
32. Ansari, A. (1998). The Basics of Fuzzy Logic: A Tutorial Review, Computer Education, Computer Education Group.
33. A survey of efficiency estimation methods for in-service induction motors10.1109/TIA.2006.876065 ↗
34. Illegal road crossing behavior of pedestrians at overpass locations: Factors affecting gap acceptance, crossing times and overpass use10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.018 ↗
35. Saady, G.E., Sharaf, A.M., Makky, A., Sherbiny, M.K., and Mohamed, G. (1994, January 12–14). A high performance induction motor drive system using fuzzy logic controller. Proceedings of the 7th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Antalya, Turkey.
36. Selection of maritime safety control options for NUC ships using a hybrid group decision-making approach10.1016/j.ssci.2016.04.026 ↗
37. The optimality conditions for optimisation problems with fuzzy-values objective functions10.1080/02331930601120037 ↗
38. Parkin, J., Clark, B., Clayton, W., Ricci, M., and Parkhurst, G. (2016). Understanding Interactions between Autonomous Vehicles and Other Road Users: A Literature Review, University of the West of England.
39. Saleh, W., and Grigorova, M. (2020). Pedestrian road crossing at uncontrolled mid-block locations: An investigation of impact of refuge islands on crossing behaviour (Submitted to Journal of Sustainability).10.3390/su12124891 ↗
40. Pedrycz, W. (1993). Why Triangular Membership Function, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Elsevier.10.1016/0165-0114(94)90003-5 ↗