Nonlinearity Analysis and Multi-Model Modeling of an MEA-Based Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Process for Advanced Control Design
Source abstract
Abstract
The monoethanolamine (MEA)-based post-combustion CO2 capture plant must operate flexibly under the variation of the power plant load and the desired CO2 capture rate. However, in the presence of process nonlinearity, conventional linear control strategy cannot achieve the best performance under a wide operation range. Considering this problem, this paper systematically studies the multi-model modeling of the MEA-based CO2 capture process for the purpose of (1) implementing well-developed linear control techniques to the design of an advanced controller and (2) achieving a wide-range flexible operation of the CO2 capture process. The local linear models of the CO2 capture process are firstly established at given operating points using the method of subspace identification. Then the nonlinearity distribution at different loads of an upstream power plant and different CO2 capture rates is investigated via the gap metric. Finally, based on the nonlinearity investigation results, the suitable linear models are selected and combined together to form the multi-model system. The proposed model is validated using the measurement data, which is generated from a post-combustion CO2 capture model developed in the go-carbon capture and storage (gCCS) simulation platform. As the proposed multi-linear model has a simple mathematical expression and high prediction accuracy, it can be directly employed as the control model of a practical advanced control strategy to achieve a wide operating range control of the CO2 capture process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97356, Waco, TX 76798-7356, USA
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Dynamic modelling and optimisation of flexible operation in post-combustion CO2 capture plants—A review10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.11.015 ↗
2. Dynamic modelling and analysis of post-combustion CO2 chemical absorption process for coal-fired power plants10.1016/j.fuel.2010.05.030 ↗
3. Demonstrating full-scale post-combustion CO2 capture for coal-fired power plants through dynamic modelling and simulation10.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.056 ↗
4. Dynamic modelling and control of MEA absorption processes for CO2 capture from power plants10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.031 ↗
5. Dynamic modelling and control strategies for flexible operation of amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture systems10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.007 ↗
6. Flexible operation and simultaneous scheduling and control of a CO2 capture plant using model predictive control10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.10.025 ↗
7. Dynamic behavior of coal-fired power plants with postcombustion CO2 capture10.1021/acs.iecr.6b02752 ↗
8. Dynamic modeling and control of an intercooled absorber for post-combustion CO2 capture10.1016/j.cep.2016.05.012 ↗
9. Dynamic modeling of CO2 absorption from coal-fired power plants into an aqueous monoethanolamine solution10.1016/j.cherd.2012.09.016 ↗
10. Dynamic modeling to minimize energy use for CO2 capture in power plants by aqueous monoethanolamine10.1021/ie801385q ↗
11. Dynamic modelling and analysis of an amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture absorption column10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.10.013 ↗
12. Dynamic modelling and control of a pilot plant for post-combustion CO2 capture10.1016/B978-0-444-63234-0.50076-2 ↗
13. Dynamic modelling of CO2 absorption for post combustion capture in coal-fired power plants10.1016/j.fuel.2008.11.009 ↗
14. Dynamic modelling, identification and preliminary control analysis of an amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture pilot plant10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.054 ↗
15. Dynamics of postcombustion CO2 capture plants: Modeling, validation, and case study10.1021/acs.iecr.6b00034 ↗
16. Control strategies for flexible operation of power plant with CO2 capture plant10.1002/aic.12789 ↗
17. Controllability and optimal scheduling of a CO2 capture plant using model predictive control10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.08.017 ↗
18. Optimal process design of commercial-scale amine-based CO2 capture plants10.1021/ie5023767 ↗
19. Flexible operation of solvent regeneration systems for CO2 capture processes using advanced control techniques: Towards operational cost minimisation10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.09.004 ↗
20. Effects of CO2-absorption control strategies on the dynamic performance of a supercritical pulverized-coal-fired power plant10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04928 ↗
21. Sensitivity analysis of the rate-based CO2 absorber model using amine solutions (MEA, MDEA and AMP) in packed columns10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.03.005 ↗
22. Rate-based process modeling study of CO2 capture with aqueous monoethanolamine solution10.1021/ie900068k ↗
23. Experimental validation of a rate-based model for CO2 capture using an AMP solution10.1016/j.ces.2007.01.034 ↗
24. A rate based model of a packed column for CO2 absorption using aqueous monoethanolamine solution10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.10.012 ↗
25. Experimental studies and rate-based process simulations of CO2 absorption with aqueous ammonia solutions10.1021/ie2030536 ↗
26. Modeling CO2 capture with aqueous monoethanolamine10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.09.017 ↗
27. Comparison of equilibrium and non-equilibrium models of a tray column for post-combustion CO2 capture using DEA-promoted potassium carbonate solution10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.017 ↗
28. Analysis of reboiler heat duty in MEA process for CO2 capture using equilibrium-staged model10.1016/j.seppur.2011.12.029 ↗
29. Qin, S.J., and Badgwell, T.A. (2000). An overview of nonlinear model predictive control applications. Nonlinear Model Predictive Control, Springer.10.1007/978-3-0348-8407-5_21 ↗
30. Development of model and model-predictive control of an MEA-based postcombustion CO2 capture process10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02243 ↗
31. The use of artificial neural network models for CO2 capture plants10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.01.013 ↗
32. Modelling of a post-combustion CO2 capture process using neural networks10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.038 ↗
33. Modelling of a post-combustion CO2 capture process using bootstrap aggregated extreme learning machines10.1016/B978-0-444-63428-3.50339-8 ↗
34. Integrated multilinear model predictive control of nonlinear systems based on gap metric10.1021/ie504170d ↗
35. Multilinear model decomposition of MIMO nonlinear systems and its implication for multilinear model-based control10.1016/j.jprocont.2012.12.007 ↗
36. Process control strategies for flexible operation of post-combustion CO2 capture plants10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.12.017 ↗
37. Activity based kinetics and mass transfer of CO2 absorption into MEA using penetration theory10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.129 ↗
38. SAFT: Equation-of-state solution model for associating fluids10.1016/0378-3812(89)80308-5 ↗
39. Plantwide control of CO2 capture by absorption and stripping using monoethanolamine solution10.1021/ie100771x ↗
40. Optimum settings for automatic controllers
41. Katayama, T. (2006). Subspace Methods for System Identification, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/1-84628-158-X ↗
42. Data-driven modeling and predictive control for boiler-turbine unit using fuzzy clustering and subspace methods10.1016/j.isatra.2013.12.033 ↗
43. Zames, G. (1980, January 8–10). Unstable systems and feedback: The gap metric. Proceedings of the Allerton Conference, Monticello, IL, USA.
44. Feedback stability under simultaneous gap metric uncertainties in plant and controller10.1016/0167-6911(92)90103-Y ↗
45. A gap metric based weighting method for multimodel predictive control of MIMO nonlinear systems10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.06.002 ↗
46. Galan, O., Romagnoli, J.A., Arkun, Y., and Palazoglu, A. (2000, January 28–30). On the use of gap metric for model selection in multilinear model-based control. Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/ACC.2000.876920 ↗
47. Gap-metric-based multiple-model Predictive control with a polyhedral stability region10.1021/ie5042758 ↗
48. Control structure design for CO2-absorption processes with large operating ranges10.1002/ente.201200057 ↗
49. Fuzzy modeling and stable model predictive tracking control of large-scale power plants10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.08.007 ↗
50. Camacho, E.F., and Bordons, C. (2007). Nonlinear model predictive control. Model Predictive Control, Springer.10.1007/978-0-85729-398-5 ↗
51. PID gain scheduling using fuzzy logic10.1016/S0019-0578(00)00024-0 ↗
52. El Ghaoui, L., and Niculescu, S. (2000). Advances in Linear Matrix Inequality Methods in Control, SIAM.10.1137/1.9780898719833 ↗