journal article·2025-06Open access

Importance of Hyper-Parameter Optimization During Training of Physics-Informed Deep Learning Networks

Ashley Lenau, Dennis Dimiduk, Stephen R. Niezgoda

Abstract

Abstract Incorporating scientific knowledge into deep learning (DL) models for materials-based simulations can constrain the network’s predictions to be within the boundaries of the material system. Altering loss functions or adding physics-based regularization (PBR) terms to reflect material properties informs a network about the physical constraints the simulation should obey. The training and tuning process of a DL network greatly affects the quality of the model, but how this process differs when using physics-based loss functions or regularization terms is not commonly discussed. In this manuscript, several PBR methods are implemented to enforce stress equilibrium on a network predicting the stress fields of a high elastic contrast composite. Models with PBR enforced the equilibrium constraint more accurately than a model without PBR, and the stress equilibrium converged more quickly. More importantly, it was observed that independently fine-tuning each implementation resulted in more accurate models. More specifically, each loss formulation and dataset required different learning rates and loss weights for the best performance. This result has important implications on assessing the relative effectiveness of different DL models and highlights important considerations when making a comparison between DL methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Neural Networks and Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. Mozaffar M, Bostanabad R, Chen W, Ehmann K, Cao J, Bessa M (2019) Deep learning predicts path-dependent plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116:201911815. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191181511610.1073/pnas.1911815116 ↗
2. Croom BP, Berkson M, Mueller RK, Presley M, Storck S (2022) Deep learning prediction of stress fields in additively manufactured metals with intricate defect networks. Mech Mater 165:104191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.10419110.1016/j.mechmat.2021.104191 ↗
3. Peivaste I, Siboni NH, Alahyarizadeh G, Ghaderi R, Svendsen B, Raabe D, Mianroodi JR (2022) Machine-learning-based surrogate modeling of microstructure evolution using phase-field. Comput Mater Sci 214:111750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.11175010.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111750 ↗
4. Teichert GH, Garikipati K (2019) Machine learning materials physics: surrogate optimization and multi-fidelity algorithms predict precipitate morphology in an alternative to phase field dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 344:666–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.02510.1016/j.cma.2018.10.025 ↗
5. Sepasdar R, Karpatne A, Shakiba M (2021) A data-driven approach to full-field damage and failure pattern prediction in microstructure-dependent composites using deep learning. CoRR abs/2104.04485, https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.04485
6. Herriott C, Spear AD (2020) Predicting microstructure-dependent mechanical properties in additively manufactured metals with machine- and deep-learning methods. Comput Mater Sci 175:109599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10959910.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109599 ↗
7. Mishra SP, Rahul MR (2021) A comparative study and development of a novel deep learning architecture for accelerated identification of microstructure in materials science. Comput Mater Sci 200:110815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11081510.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110815 ↗
8. Pokharel R, Pandey A, Scheinker A (2021) Physics-informed data-driven surrogate modeling for full-field 3d microstructure and micro-mechanical field evolution of polycrystalline materials. JOM. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36771.1744610.13140/RG.2.2.36771.17446 ↗
9. Frankel AL, Jones RE, Alleman C, Templeton JA (2019) Predicting the mechanical response of oligocrystals with deep learning. Comput Mater Sci 169:10909910.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109099 ↗
10. Zhang E, Yin M, Karniadakis GE (2020) Physics-informed neural networks for nonhomogeneous material identification in elasticity imaging. CoRR abs/2009.04525, https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04525
11. Shukla K, Jagtap AD, Blackshire JL, Sparkman D, Em Karniadakis G (2022) A physics-informed neural network for quantifying the microstructural properties of polycrystalline nickel using ultrasound data: a promising approach for solving inverse problems. IEEE Signal Process Mag 39(1):68–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/msp.2021.311890410.1109/msp.2021.3118904 ↗
12. Pun GPP, Batra R, Ramprasad R, Mishin Y (2019) Physically-informed artificial neural networks for atomistic modeling of materials. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10343-510.1038/s41467-019-10343-5 ↗
13. Goswami S, Anitescu C, Rabczuk T (2020) Adaptive fourth-order phase field analysis using deep energy minimization. Theor Appl Fract Mech 107:102527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10252710.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102527 ↗
14. Shah V, Joshi A, Ghosal S, Pokuri BSS, Sarkar S, Ganapathysubramanian B, Hegde C (2019) Encoding invariances in deep generative models. CoRR abs/1906.01626, https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01626
15. Singh R, Shah V, Pokuri B, Sarkar S, Ganapathysubramanian B, Hegde C (2018) Physics-aware deep generative models for creating synthetic microstructures. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.09669
16. Cang R, Li H, Yao H, Jiao Y, Ren Y (2017) Improving direct physical properties prediction of heterogeneous materials from imaging data via convolutional neural network and a morphology-aware generative model. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.0381110.1016/j.commatsci.2018.03.074 ↗
17. Yang Z, Li X, Catherine Brinson L, Choudhary AN, Chen W, Agrawal A (2018) Microstructural materials design via deep adversarial learning methodology. J Mech Des. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404137110.1115/1.4041371 ↗
18. Bhaduri A, Gupta A, Olivier A, Graham-Brady L (2021) An efficient optimization based microstructure reconstruction approach with multiple loss functions. Comput Mater Sci 199:110709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11070910.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110709 ↗
19. Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE (2017) Physics informed deep learning (part I): data-driven solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations. CoRR abs/1711.10561, https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10561
20. Li H, Chaudhari P, Yang H, Lam M, Ravichandran A, Bhotika R, Soatto S (2020) Rethinking the hyperparameters for fine-tuning
21. Hoffer JG, Geiger BC, Ofner P, Kern R (2021) Mesh-free surrogate models for structural mechanic fem simulation: a comparative study of approaches. Appl Sci 11(20):9411. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1120941110.3390/app11209411 ↗
22. Nabian MA, Meidani H (2019) Physics-driven regularization of deep neural networks for enhanced engineering design and analysis. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 20(1):011006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404450710.1115/1.4044507 ↗
23. Bischof R, Kraus M (2021) Multi-objective loss balancing for physics-informed deep learning. ArXiv abs/2110.09813
24. Xiang Z, Peng W, Liu X, Yao W (2022) Self-adaptive loss balanced physics-informed neural networks. Neurocomputing 496:11–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.05.01510.1016/j.neucom.2022.05.015 ↗
25. Karniadakis GE, Kevrekidis IG, Lu L, Perdikaris P, Wang S, Yang L (2021) Physics-informed machine learning. Nat Rev Phys 3:422–44010.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
26. Nosrati H, Niri ME (2023) Manipulating the loss calculation to enhance the training process of physics-informed neural networks to solve the 1d wave equation. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01881-010.1007/s00366-023-01881-0 ↗
27. Krishnapriyan A, Gholami A, Zhe S, Kirby R, Mahoney MW (2021) Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 34:26548–26560
28. Deaton JD, Grandhi RV (2014) A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49:1–3810.1007/s00158-013-0956-z ↗
29. Wu J, Sigmund O, Groen JP (2021) Topology optimization of multi-scale structures: a review. Struct Multidiscip Optim 63:1455–148010.1007/s00158-021-02881-8 ↗
30. Chi H, Zhang Y, Tang TLE, Mirabella L, Dalloro L, Song L, Paulino GH (2021) Universal machine learning for topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 375:11273910.1016/j.cma.2019.112739 ↗
31. Allison J, Backman D, Christodoulou L (2006) Integrated computational materials engineering: a new paradigm for the global materials profession. JOM 58:25–2710.1007/s11837-006-0223-5 ↗
32. Panchal JH, Kalidindi SR, McDowell DL (2013) Key computational modeling issues in integrated computational materials engineering. Comput Aided Des 45(1):4–2510.1016/j.cad.2012.06.006 ↗
33. Wang WY, Li J, Liu W, Liu Z-K (2019) Integrated computational materials engineering for advanced materials: a brief review. Comput Mater Sci 158:42–4810.1016/j.commatsci.2018.11.001 ↗
34. Chen Y, Dodwell T, Chuaqui T, Butler R (2023) Full-field prediction of stress and fracture patterns in composites using deep learning and self-attention. Eng Fract Mech 286:109314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10931410.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109314 ↗
35. Xu H, Fan W, Taylor AC, Zhang D, Ruan L, Shi R (2023) Crack-Net: prediction of crack propagation in composites
36. Yang Z, Yabansu YC, Jha D, Liao W-K, Choudhary AN, Kalidindi SR, Agrawal A (2019) Establishing structure-property localization linkages for elastic deformation of three-dimensional high contrast composites using deep learning approaches. Acta Materialia 166:335–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.04510.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.045 ↗
37. Yang Z, Yu C-H, Guo K, Buehler MJ (2021) End-to-end deep learning method to predict complete strain and stress tensors for complex hierarchical composite microstructures. J Mech Phys Solids 154:104506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2021.10450610.1016/j.jmps.2021.104506 ↗
38. Yang Z, Yu C-H, Buehler MJ (2021) Deep learning model to predict complex stress and strain fields in hierarchical composites. Sci Adv 7(15):7416. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd741610.1126/sciadv.abd7416 ↗
39. Feng H, Prabhakar P (2021) Difference-based deep learning framework for stress predictions in heterogeneous media. Compos Struct 269:113957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11395710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113957 ↗
40. Raj M, Thakre S, Annabattula RK, Kanjarla A (2021) Estimation of local strain fields in two-phase elastic composite materials using unet-based deep learning. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10:444–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00227-210.1007/s40192-021-00227-2 ↗
41. Bhaduri A, Gupta A, Graham-Brady L (2022) Stress field prediction in fiber-reinforced composite materials using a deep learning approach. Compos Part B Eng 238:109879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10987910.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109879 ↗
42. Gupta S, Mukhopadhyay T, Kushvaha V (2023) Microstructural image based convolutional neural networks for efficient prediction of full-field stress maps in short fiber polymer composites. Def Technol 24:58–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2022.09.00810.1016/j.dt.2022.09.008 ↗
43. Shokrollahi Y, Nikahd MM, Gholami K, Azamirad G (2023) Deep learning techniques for predicting stress fields in composite materials: a superior alternative to finite element analysis. J Compos Sci 7(8):311. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs708031110.3390/jcs7080311 ↗
44. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.0459710.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
45. Nie Z, Jiang H, Kara LB (2019) Stress field prediction in cantilevered structures using convolutional neural networks. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 20(1):011002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404409710.1115/1.4044097 ↗
46. Isola P, Zhu J-Y, Zhou T, Efros AA (2018) Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07004
47. Yu C-H, Tseng B-Y, Yang Z, Tung C-C, Zhao E, Ren Z-F, Yu S-S, Chen P-Y, Chen C-S, Buehler MJ (2022) Hierarchical multiresolution design of bioinspired structural composites using progressive reinforcement learning. Adv Theory Simul 5(11):2200459. https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.20220045910.1002/adts.202200459 ↗
48. Chen L-Q, Wang Y (1996) The continuum field approach to modeling microstructural evolution. JOM 48:13–1810.1007/BF03223259 ↗
49. Lebensohn RA, Kanjarla AK, Eisenlohr P (2012) An elasto-viscoplastic formulation based on fast Fourier transforms for the prediction of micromechanical fields in polycrystalline materials. Int J Plast 32:59–6910.1016/j.ijplas.2011.12.005 ↗
50. Patil CS, Chakraborty S, Niezgoda SR (2021) Comparison of full field predictions of crystal plasticity simulations using the voce and the dislocation density based hardening laws. Int J Plast 147:10309910.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103099 ↗
51. Pang Y, Lin J, Qin T, Chen Z (2022) Image-to-image translation: methods and applications. IEEE Trans Multimed 24:3859–3881. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2021.310941910.1109/TMM.2021.3109419 ↗
52. Goodfellow IJ, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y (2014) Generative adversarial networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661
53. Mirza M, Osindero S (2014) Conditional generative adversarial nets. https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1784
54. Bolandi H, Sreekumar G, Li X, Lajnef N, Boddeti VN (2022) Physics informed neural network for dynamic stress prediction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16190
55. Yonekura K, Maruoka K, Tyou K, Suzuki K (2023) Super-resolving 2d stress tensor field conserving equilibrium constraints using physics-informed u-net. Finite Elem Anal Design 213:103852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2022.10385210.1016/j.finel.2022.103852 ↗
56. Carslaw HS (1930) Introduction to the theory of Fourier’s series and integrals, Chapter IX. 3rd edn. Dover Publications Inc, New York
57. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–53610.1038/323533a0 ↗
58. Kingma DP, Ba J (2017) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980
59. Basir S, Senocak I (2022) Critical investigation of failure modes in physics-informed neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.0996110.2514/6.2022-2353 ↗
60. Smith LN (2017) Cyclical learning rates for training neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.0118610.1109/WACV.2017.58 ↗
61. Wang AY-T, Murdock RJ, Kauwe SK, Oliynyk AO, Gurlo A, Brgoch J, Persson KA, Sparks TD (2020) Machine learning for materials scientists: an introductory guide toward best practices. Chem Mater 32(12):4954–4965. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0190710.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01907 ↗
62. Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Chen Z, Citro C, Corrado GS, Davis A, Dean J, Devin M, Ghemawat S, Goodfellow I, Harp A, Irving G, Isard M, Jia Y, Jozefowicz R, Kaiser L, Kudlur M, Levenberg J, Mané D, Monga R, Moore S, Murray D, Olah C, Schuster M, Shlens J, Steiner B, Sutskever I, Talwar K, Tucker P, Vanhoucke V, Vasudevan V, Viégas F, Vinyals O, Warden P, Wattenberg M, Wicke M, Yu Y, Zheng X (2015) TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. Software available from tensorflow.org https://www.tensorflow.org/
63. Center OS (1987) Ohio supercomputer center. http://osc.edu/ark:/19495/f5s1ph73
64. Scheinker A, Pokharel R (2023) Physics-constrained 3D convolutional neural networks for electrodynamics10.1063/5.0132433 ↗
65. Choi S, Jung I, Kim H, Na J, Min Lee J (2022) Physics-informed deep learning for data-driven solutions of computational fluid dynamics. Korean J Chem Eng 39:515–52810.1007/s11814-021-0979-x ↗
66. Chowdhury A, Kautz E, Yener B, Lewis D (2016) Image driven machine learning methods for microstructure recognition. Comput Mater Sci 123:176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.05.03410.1016/j.commatsci.2016.05.034 ↗
67. Li X, Zhang Y, Zhao H, Burkhart C, Brinson LC, Chen W (2018) A transfer learning approach for microstructure reconstruction and structure-property predictions10.1038/s41598-018-31571-7 ↗
68. Lubbers N, Lookman T, Barros K (2017) Inferring low-dimensional microstructure representations using convolutional neural networks. Phys Rev E 96:052111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.05211110.1103/PhysRevE.96.052111 ↗
69. Cohn R, Holm E (2021) Unsupervised machine learning via transfer learning and k-means clustering to classify materials image data. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10(2):231–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00205-810.1007/s40192-021-00205-8 ↗
70. Goetz A, Durmaz AR, Müller M, Thomas A, Britz D, Kerfriden P, Eberl C (2022) Addressing materials’ microstructure diversity using transfer learning. npj Comput Mater 8(1):2710.1038/s41524-022-00703-z ↗
71. Liashchynskyi P, Liashchynskyi P (2019) Grid search, random search, genetic algorithm: a big comparison for NAS
72. Sharma P, Chung WT, Akoush B, Ihme M (2023) A review of physics-informed machine learning in fluid mechanics. Energies 16(5):2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1605234310.3390/en16052343 ↗
73. Hao Z, Liu S, Zhang Y, Ying C, Feng Y, Su H, Zhu J (2023) Physics-informed machine learning: a survey on problems, methods and applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08064
74. Wang S, Wang H, Perdikaris P (2021) Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed deeponets. Sci Adv 7(40):8605. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abi860510.1126/sciadv.abi8605 ↗
75. Daw A, Thomas RQ, Carey CC, Read JS, Appling AP, Karpatne A (2020) Physics-guided architecture (PGA) of neural networks for quantifying uncertainty in lake temperature modeling. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.0268210.1137/1.9781611976236.60 ↗