GA-PSO Algorithm for Microseismic Source Location
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate source location is a critical component of microseismic monitoring and early warning systems. To improve the accuracy of microseismic source location, this manuscript proposes a GA-PSO algorithm that combines the Genetic Algorithm (GA) with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The GA-PSO algorithm enhances the PSO algorithm by dynamically adjusting the balance between global exploration and local exploitation through a sinusoidal function for the nonlinear adjustment of both learning factors, and an adaptive inertia weight that decreases quadratically with iterations. Additionally, the precision of the solutions is further improved through the crossover and mutation operations of the GA. In the simulated location model, the GA-PSO algorithm demonstrated the smallest error value, outperforming both the GA and PSO algorithm in terms of accuracy. Furthermore, the GA-PSO algorithm exhibited minimal sensitivity to wave speed fluctuations of ±1%, ±3%, and ±5%, maintaining the error within 0.5 m. The validation through the blasting experiment at the Shizhuyuan mine further confirmed the enhanced accuracy of the GA-PSO algorithm, with a location error of 20.08 m, representing an improvement of 59% over the GA and 43% over the PSO algorithm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Geophysical Exploration Equipment, Ministry of Education, College of Instrumentation and Electrical Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
Funding
National Science and Technology Major Project of China for Deep Earth
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicentres from the arrival time only
2. Microearthquake location: A nonlinear approach that makes use of a simplex stepping procedure10.1785/BSSA0780020799 ↗
3. Microseismic source location methods based on different initial values
4. Omran, M.G., and Clerc, M. (2015, January 7–9). The adaptive population-based simplex method. Proceedings of the 2015 Fifth International Conference on Digital Information Processing and Communications (ICDIPC), Sierre, Switzerland.10.1109/ICDIPC.2015.7323012 ↗
5. Gravitational search algorithm for microseismic source location in tunneling: Performance analysis and engineering case study10.1007/s00603-019-01809-5 ↗
6. A distributed principal component analysis compression for smart seismic acquisition networks10.1109/TGRS.2018.2789354 ↗
7. Locating micro-seismic events based on interferometric traveltime inversion
8. Phase-amplitude-based polarized direct envelope inversion in the time-frequency domain10.1190/geo2020-0956.1 ↗
9. Intelligent location of microseismic events based on a fully convolutional neural network (FCNN)10.1007/s00603-022-02911-x ↗
10. Huang, L., Li, X., and Liu, D. (2016, January 28–29). Microseismic location method using Ω penalty function based ant colony optimization. Proceedings of the 2016 12th International Computer Engineering Conference (ICENCO), Cairo, Egypt.
11. Research on a nonlinear hybrid optimal PSO microseismic positioning method
12. Yao, J., Luo, X., Li, F., Li, J., Dou, J., and Luo, H. (2024). Research on hybrid strategy Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm and its applications. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-76010-y ↗
13. Yang, X.-S., and Deb, S. (2009, January 9–11). Cuckoo search via Lévy flights. Proceedings of the 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC), Coimbatore, India.10.1109/NABIC.2009.5393690 ↗
14. Seagull optimization algorithm: Theory and its applications for large-scale industrial engineering problems10.1016/j.knosys.2018.11.024 ↗
15. Novianty, A., Meilano, I., Machbub, C., Widiyantoro, S., and Susilo, S. (2021). Rapid estimation of earthquake magnitude and source parameters using genetic algorithms. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112411852 ↗
16. A review of geophysical modeling based on particle swarm optimization10.1007/s10712-021-09638-4 ↗
17. Microeismic source localization method based on hybrid algorithm of MOPSO-SA
18. Liao, Z., Feng, T., Yu, W., Cui, D., and Wu, G. (2022). Microseismic source location method and application based on NM-PSO algorithm. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178796 ↗
19. PSO-ACO-based bi-phase lightweight intrusion detection system combined with GA optimized ensemble classifiers10.1007/s10586-024-04673-3 ↗
20. Guo, E., Gao, Y., Hu, C., and Zhang, J. (2023). A hybrid PSO-DE intelligent algorithm for solving constrained optimization problems based on feasibility rules. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11030522 ↗
21. Li, Y., Sui, Q., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Jia, L., Wang, H., Shen, S., and Du, B. (2017, January 20–22). Localization of microseismic source based on genetic-simplex hybrid algorithm. Proceedings of the 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Jinan, China.10.1109/CAC.2017.8243480 ↗
22. Liu, X., Qu, H., Meng, L., Huang, C., Chen, Q., and Wang, Q. (2023). A sliding mode control of the bearingless permanent magnet slice motor for the blood pump based on the GAPSO. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-45891-w ↗
23. Sheikholeslami, A., and Atlasbaf, Z. (2021). Novel phase distributions for large electronically beam-scanning reflectarrays. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-00883-6 ↗
24. Hybrid modified particle swarm optimization with genetic algorithm (GA) based workflow scheduling in cloud-fog environment for multi-objective optimization10.1007/s10586-023-04071-1 ↗
25. Concurrent scheduling of jobs and AGVs in a flexible job shop system: A parallel hybrid PSO-GA meta-heuristic10.1007/s10696-022-09453-y ↗
26. A hybrid genetic algorithm (GA)–particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm for demand side management in smart grid considering wind power for cost optimization10.1007/s12046-021-01626-z ↗
27. Predicting slope failure with intelligent hybrid modeling of ANFIS with GA and PSO10.1007/s41939-024-00492-6 ↗
28. Double event joint location method considering P-wave arrival time system errors10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106890 ↗
29. Holland, J.H. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 ↗
30. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. (December, January 27). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, Australia.
31. An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive weighted delay velocity10.1080/21642583.2021.1891153 ↗
32. A survey on particle swarm optimization with emphasis on engineering and network applications10.1007/s12065-019-00210-z ↗
33. Improved affinity propagation clustering algorithms: A PSO-based approach10.1007/s10115-024-02260-x ↗
34. Jain, M., Saihjpal, V., Singh, N., and Singh, S.B. (2022). An overview of variants and advancements of PSO algorithm. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178392 ↗
35. Simultaneously optimizing inertia weight and acceleration coefficients via introducing new functions into PSO algorithm10.1088/1742-6596/1754/1/012195 ↗
36. A hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for multimodal functions10.1016/j.asoc.2007.07.002 ↗
37. Particle swarm optimization: A comprehensive survey10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142859 ↗
38. Research on mining earthquake source localization method based on improved cuckoo search algorithm