Data-Driven Machine-Learning-Based Seismic Response Prediction and Damage Classification for an Unreinforced Masonry Building
Source abstract
Abstract
Unreinforced masonry buildings are highly vulnerable to earthquake damage due to their limited ability to withstand lateral loads, compared to other structures. Therefore, a detailed assessment of the seismic response and resultant damage associated with such buildings becomes necessary. The present study employs machine learning models to effectively predict the seismic response and classify the damage level for a benchmark unreinforced masonry building. In this regard, eight regression-based models, namely, Linear Regression (LR), Stepwise Linear Regression (SLR), Ridge Regression (RR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Neural Networks (NN), were used to predict the building’s responses. Additionally, eight classification-based models, namely, Naïve Bayes (NB), Discriminant Analysis (DA), K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Adaptive Boosting (AB), DT, RF, SVM, and NN, were explored for the purpose of categorizing the damage states of the building. The material properties of the masonry and the earthquake intensity were considered as the input parameters. The results from the regression models indicate that the GPR model efficiently predicts the seismic response with larger coefficients of determination and smaller root mean square error values than other models. Among the classification-based models, the RF, AB, and NN models effectively classify the damage states with accuracy levels of 92.9%, 91.1%, and 92.6%, respectively. In conclusion, the overall performance of the non-parametric models, such as GPR, NN, and RF, was found to be better than that of the parametric models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · BIM and Construction Integration
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center of Excellence in Interdisciplinary Research for Sustainable Development, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Department of Water Resources Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada
Funding
Ratchadapisek Somphot Fund for Postdoctoral Fellowship, Chulalongkorn University
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Arya, A.S., Boen, T., and Ishiyama, Y. (2014). Guidelines for Earthquake Resistant Non-Engineered Construction, UNESCO.
2. Ravichandran, N., Losanno, D., and Parisi, F. (2021, January 28–30). Low-cost base isolation systems for unreinforced masonry buildings in developing countries. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Eccomas Proceedia, Athens, Greece.10.7712/120121.8482.18963 ↗
3. Comprehensive numerical approaches for the design and safety assessment of masonry buildings retrofitted with steel bands in developing countries: The case of India10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.082 ↗
4. Michalski, R.S., Carbonell, J.G., and Mitchell, T.M. (1984). Machine Learning an Artificial Intelligence Approach, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-12405-5 ↗
5. Machine learning applications for building structural design and performance assessment: State-of-the-art review10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101816 ↗
6. On the application of machine learning techniques to derive seismic fragility curves10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.004 ↗
7. Machine learning for structural engineering: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 ↗
8. Machine learning for risk and resilience assessment in structural engineering: Progress and future trends10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003392 ↗
9. Classification of in-plane failure modes for reinforced concrete frames with infills using machine learning10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100767 ↗
10. Machine learning-based approaches for seismic demand and collapse of ductile reinforced concrete building frames10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101905 ↗
11. Data-driven machine-learning-based seismic failure mode identification of reinforced concrete shear walls10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110331 ↗
12. Classification of failure mode and prediction of shear strength for reinforced concrete beam-column joints using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.008 ↗
13. Machine learning and nonlinear models for the estimation of fundamental period of vibration of masonry infilled RC frame structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110765 ↗
14. Explainable machine learning aided optimization of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.115 ↗
15. A machine-learning method for deriving state-dependent fragility curves of existing steel moment frames with masonry infills10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115345 ↗
16. Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS10.1080/19475705.2017.1294113 ↗
17. A machine learning framework for assessing post-earthquake structural safety10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.12.001 ↗
18. Probabilistic fatigue damage assessment of coastal slender bridges under coupled dynamic loads10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.073 ↗
19. Chomacki, L., Rusek, J., and Słowi, L. (2022). Machine Learning Methods in Damage Prediction of Masonry Development Exposed to the Industrial Environment of Mines. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15113958 ↗
20. Automatic image-based brick segmentation and crack detection of masonry walls using machine learning10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104389 ↗
21. Predicting the compressive strength of unreinforced brick masonry using machine learning techniques validated on a case study of a museum through nondestructive testing10.1007/s13349-020-00391-7 ↗
22. Machine-learning for damage assessment of rubble stone masonry piers based on crack patterns10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104313 ↗
23. Machine learning algorithms for structural performance classifications and predictions: Application to reinforced masonry shear walls10.1016/j.istruc.2019.06.017 ↗
24. Geometrical digital twins of masonry structures for documentation and structural assessment using machine learning10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115256 ↗
25. Utilizing advanced machine learning approaches to assess the seismic fragility of non-engineered masonry structures10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101750 ↗
26. Machine learning (ML) algorithms for seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings in high-intensity seismic zones10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107639 ↗
27. Machine learning network suitable for accurate rapid seismic risk estimation of masonry building stocks10.1007/s11069-022-05553-y ↗
28. Determination of piers shear capacity using numerical analysis and machine learning for generalization to masonry large scale walls10.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.095 ↗
29. Automated defect detection and classification in ashlar masonry walls using machine learning10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102846 ↗
30. Experimental seismic performance evaluation of unreinforced brick masonry buildings10.1193/1.4000073 ↗
31. Comparative assessment of finite element macro-modelling approaches for seismic analysis of non-engineered masonry constructions10.1007/s10518-021-01180-3 ↗
32. CSI (2014). Analysis Reference Manual, Computers and Structures Inc.
33. Mitigation of seismic vulnerability of prototype low-rise masonry building using U-FREIs10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001136 ↗
34. Seismic fragility of base-isolated single-storey unreinforced masonry buildings equipped with classical and recycled rubber bearings in Himalayan regions10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103648 ↗
35. Uniaxial compressive stress–strain model for clay brick masonry
36. Pushover analysis of large scale unreinforced masonry structures by means of a fully 2D non-linear model10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.006 ↗
37. CESMD (2023, October 10). Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data, Strong Motion Virtual Data Center. Available online: www.strongmotioncenter.org.
38. Comparison of methodologies for seismic fragility analysis of unreinforced masonry buildings considering epistemic uncertainty10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110059 ↗
39. Performance evaluation of masonry buildings using a probabilistic approach
40. Experimental and numerical analyses of unreinforced masonry wall components and building10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119599 ↗
41. Analytical fragility curves for masonry school building portfolios in Nepal10.1007/s10518-020-00989-8 ↗
42. Two-step advanced numerical approach for the design of low-cost unbonded fiber reinforced elastomeric seismic isolation systems in new masonry buildings10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.04.002 ↗
43. Seismic fragility reduction of an unreinforced masonry school building through retrofit using ferrocement overlay10.1007/s11803-020-0569-7 ↗
44. Seismic fragility analysis of low-rise unreinforced masonry structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.021 ↗
45. Seismic damage evaluation of unreinforced masonry buildings in high seismic zone using the nonlinear static method10.1007/978-81-322-2193-7_82 ↗
46. Micro-modelling of stone masonry template buildings as a strategy for seismic risk assessment in developing countries10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114910 ↗
47. Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum bearings10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.053 ↗
48. Time-history seismic analysis of masonry buildings: A comparison between two non-linear modelling approaches10.3390/buildings5020597 ↗
49. Friedman, J., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2001). The Elements of Statistical Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 ↗
50. Leo, B., Jerome, F., Charles, J.S., and Olshen, R.A. (2017). Classification and Regression Trees, Routledge. [1st ed.].
51. Induction of decision trees10.1007/BF00116251 ↗
52. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests10.1109/34.709601 ↗
53. Bishop, C.M., and Nasrabadi, N.M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer.
54. Cristianini, N., and Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000). An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801389 ↗
55. Support-vector networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
56. Rasmussen, C.E., and Williams, C.K. (2006). Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
57. Haykin, S. (2004). Neural Networks—A Comprehensive Foundation, Pearson Prentice Hall. [2nd ed.].
58. Bayesian network classifiers10.1023/A:1007465528199 ↗
59. Discriminant analysis10.2307/2529937 ↗
60. Nearest neighbor pattern classification10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 ↗
61. The distance function effect on k-nearest neighbor classification for medical datasets10.1186/s40064-016-2941-7 ↗
62. Multi-class adaboost10.4310/SII.2009.v2.n3.a8 ↗