journal article·2026-06-02Open access

Mapping Microstructure: Manifold Construction for Accelerated Materials Exploration

Simon A. Mason, Megna N. Shah, Jeffrey P. Simmons, Dennis M. Dimiduk, Stephen R. Niezgoda

Abstract

Abstract Accelerating materials development requires quantitative linkages between processing, microstructure, and properties. In this work, we introduce a framework for mapping microstructure onto a low-dimensional material manifold that is parametrized by processing conditions. A key innovation is treating microstructure as a stochastic process, defined as a distribution of microstructural instances rather than a single image, enabling the extraction of material state descriptors that capture the essential process-dependent features. We leverage the manifold hypothesis to assert that microstructural outcomes lie on a low-dimensional latent space controlled by only a few parameters. Using phase-field simulations of spinodal decomposition as a model material system, we compare multiple microstructure descriptors (two-point statistics, chord-length distributions, and persistent homology) in terms of two criteria: (1) intrinsic dimensionality of the latent space, and (2) invertibility of the processing-to-structure mapping. The results demonstrate that distribution-based descriptors can recover a two-dimensional latent structure aligned with the true processing parameters, yielding an invertible and physically interpretable mapping between processing and microstructure. In contrast, descriptors that do not account for microstructure variability either overestimate dimensionality or lose predictive fidelity. The constructed material manifold is shown to be locally continuous, wherein small changes in process variables correspond to smooth changes in microstructure descriptors. This data-driven manifold mapping approach provides a quantitative foundation for microstructure-informed process design and paves the way toward closed-loop optimization of processing–structure–property relationships in an integrated materials engineering context.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Block Copolymer Self-Assembly

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. National Research Council (2004) Accelerating technology transition: bridging the valley of death for materials and processes in defense systems. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C
2. Niezgoda SR (2010) Stochastic representation of microstructure via higher-order statistics: theory and application. PhD dissertation, Drexel University
3. Fullwood DT, Niezgoda SR, Adams BL, Kalidindi SR (2010) Microstructure sensitive design for performance optimization. Prog Mater Sci 55(6):477–56210.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.08.002 ↗
4. Shim D (2021) Effects of process parameters on additive manufacturing of aluminum porous materials and their optimization using response surface method. J Market Res 15:119–134
5. Bugas D, Runnels B (2024) Grain boundary network plasticity: Reduced-order modeling of deformation-driven shear-coupled microstructure evolution. J Mech Phys Solids 184:10554110.1016/j.jmps.2024.105541 ↗
6. Wodo O, Broderick S, Rajan K (2016) Microstructural informatics for accelerating the discovery of processing–microstructure–property relationships. MRS Bull 41(08):603–60910.1557/mrs.2016.161 ↗
7. Groeber M (2008) A framework for automated analysis and simulation of 3D polycrystalline microstructures. Part 1: statistical characterization. Acta Mater 56(6):1257–127310.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.041 ↗
8. Groeber M (2008) A framework for automated analysis and simulation of 3D polycrystalline microstructures. Part 2: synthetic structure generation. Acta Mater 56(6):1274–128710.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.040 ↗
9. Torquato S (2002) Statistical description of microstructures. Annu Rev Mater Res 32:77–11110.1146/annurev.matsci.32.110101.155324 ↗
10. Kalidindi SR, Niezgoda SR, Salem AA (2011) Microstructure informatics using Higher-order statistics and efficient data-mining Protocols. (Technical report)10.1007/s11837-011-0057-7 ↗
11. Dłotko P, Wanner T (2016) Topological microstructure analysis using persistence landscapes. Physica D 334:60–8110.1016/j.physd.2016.04.015 ↗
12. DeCost BL, Holm EA (2015) A computer vision approach for automated analysis and classification of microstructural image data. Comput Mater Sci 110:126–13310.1016/j.commatsci.2015.08.011 ↗
13. Lenau A (2024) Physics-informed deep learning networks for increased accuracy and reliability of material simulations. The Ohio State University
14. Mueller T, Kusne AG, Ramprasad R (2016) Machine learning in materials science: recent progress and emerging applications. In: Parrill AL, Lipkowitz KB (eds) Reviews in computational chemistry, pp 186–273. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ10.1002/9781119148739.ch4 ↗
15. DeCost BL, Francis T, Holm EA (2017) Exploring the microstructure manifold: image texture representations applied to ultrahigh carbon steel microstructures. Acta Mater 133:30–4010.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.014 ↗
16. Schoeneman F, Chandola V, Napp N, Wodo O, Zola J (2018) Entropy-isomap: manifold learning for high-dimensional dynamic processes. In: 2018 IEEE International conference on big data. IEEE, pp 1655–166010.1109/BigData.2018.8622454 ↗
17. Sundararaghavan V, Megna N, Shah JP, Simmons (2023) Towards microstructural state variables in materials systems
18. Abel E, Steindl AJ, Mazioud S, Schueler E, Ogundipe F, Zhang E, Grinspan Y, Reimann K, Crevasse P, Bhaskar D, Viswanath S, Zhang Y, Rudner TGJ, Adelstein I, Krishnaswamy S (2024)Exploring the manifold of neural networks using diffusion geometry. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12626
19. Kurz W (2001) Solidification microstructure-processing maps: theory and application. Adv Eng Mater 3(7):443–45210.1002/1527-2648(200107)3:7<443::AID-ADEM443>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
20. Simmons JP, Drummy LF, Bouman CA, Graef MD (2019) Statistical methods for materials science: the data science of microstructure characterization. CRC Press10.1201/9781315121062 ↗
21. Callahan PG (2019) Distance measures for quantifying the differences in microstructures. In: Statistical methods for materials science. CRC Press, pp 291–30410.1201/9781315121062-21 ↗
22. Carroll JD, Arabie P (1998) Multidimensional scaling. Measurement, judgment and decision making 179–25010.1016/B978-012099975-0.50005-1 ↗
23. Miley D, Suwandi E, Schweinhart B, Mason JK (2025) Microstructure classification and the polycrystalline microstructure state space. Acta Mater 296:12121910.1016/j.actamat.2025.121219 ↗
24. Chen L-Q, Wang Y (1996) The continuum field approach to modeling microstructural evolution. JOM 48(12):13–1810.1007/BF03223259 ↗
25. Blömker D, Maier-Paape S, Wanner T (2001) Spinodal decomposition for the Cahn–Hilliard–Cook equation. Commun Math Phys 223(3):553–58210.1007/PL00005585 ↗
26. Zomorodian A, Carlsson G (2005) Computing persistent homology. Discrete Comput Geom 33(2):249–27410.1007/s00454-004-1146-y ↗
27. Chazal F, Fasy BT, Lecci F , Rinaldo A, Wasserman L (2014) Stochastic convergence of persistence landscapes and silhouettes. In Proceedings of the thirtieth annual symposium on computational geometry 474–48310.1145/2582112.2582128 ↗
28. The GUDHI Project GUDHI User and Reference Manual GUDHI Editorial Board (3.10.1 edition) (2024)
29. Tauzin G, Lupo U, Tunstall L, Pérez JB, Caorsi M, Medina-Mardones AM, Dassatti A, Hess K (2021) GIOTTO-TDA: a topological data analysis toolkit for machine learning and data exploration. J Mach Learn Res 22(39):1–6
30. Niezgoda SR, Turner DM, Fullwood DT, Kalidindi SR (2010) Optimized structure based representative volume element sets reflecting the ensemble-averaged 2-point statistics. Acta Mater 58(13):4432–444510.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.041 ↗
31. Gostick JT, Khan ZA, Tranter TG, Kok MDR, Agnaou M, Sadeghi M, Jervis R (2019) Porespy: a python toolkit for quantitative analysis of porous media images. J Open Source Softw 4(37):129610.21105/joss.01296 ↗
32. Levina E, Bickel P (2004) Maximum likelihood estimation of intrinsic dimension. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 17
33. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay E (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830
34. Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P (1987) Principal component analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2(1–3):37–5210.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9 ↗
35. Niezgoda SR, Yabansu YC, Kalidindi SR (2011) Understanding and visualizing microstructure and microstructure variance as a stochastic process. Acta Mater 59(16):6387–640010.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.051 ↗
36. Van der Maaten L, Hinton G (2008) Visualizing data using T-SNE. J Mach Learn Res 9(11)
37. Morita Y, Rezaeiravesh S, Tabatabaei N, Vinuesa R, Fukagata K, Schlatter P (2022) Applying Bayesian optimization with Gaussian process regression to computational fluid dynamics problems. J Comput Phys 449:11078810.1016/j.jcp.2021.110788 ↗
38. Liu H, Yucel B, Ganapathysubramanian B, Kalidindi SR, Wheeler D, Wodo O (2024) Active learning for regression of structure-property mapping: the importance of sampling and representation. Digital Discov 3(10):1997–200910.1039/D4DD00073K ↗
39. Gilad Kusne A, Heshan Yu, Changming W, Zhang H, Hattrick-Simpers J, DeCost B, Sarker S, Oses C, Toher C, Curtarolo S, Davydov AV, Agarwal R, Bendersky LA, Li M, Mehta A, Takeuchi I (2020) On-the-fly closed-loop materials discovery via Bayesian active learning. Nat Commun 11(1):596610.1038/s41467-020-19597-w ↗
40. Mason S, Shah M, Simmons J, Dimiduk D, Niezgoda S (2025) Dataset for mapping microstructure: Manifold construction for accelerated materials exploration