Compression Index Regression of Fine-Grained Soils with Machine Learning Algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
Soil consolidation, particularly in fine-grained soils like clay, is crucial in predicting settlement and ensuring the stability of structures. Additionally, the compressibility of fine-grained soils is of critical importance not only in civil engineering but also in various other fields of study. The compression index (Cc), derived from soil properties such as the liquid limit (LL), plastic limit (PL), plasticity index (PI), water content (w), initial void ratio (e0), and specific gravity (Gs), plays a vital role in understanding soil behavior. This study employs machine learning algorithms—the random forest regressor (RFR), gradient boosting regressor (GBR), and AdaBoost regressor (ABR)—to predict the Cc values based on a dataset comprising 915 samples. The dataset includes LL, PL, W, PI, Gs, and e0 as the inputs, with Cc as the output parameter. The algorithms are trained and evaluated using metrics such as the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Hyperparameter optimization is performed to enhance the model performance. The best-performing model, the GBR model, achieves a training R2 of 0.925 and a testing R2 of 0.930 with the input combination [w, PL, LL, PI, e0, Gs]. The RFR model follows closely, with a training R2 of 0.970 and a testing R2 of 0.926 using the same input combination. The ABR model records a training R2 of 0.847 and a testing R2 of 0.921 under similar conditions. These results indicate superior predictive accuracy compared to previous studies using traditional statistical and machine learning methods. Machine learning algorithms, specifically the gradient boosting regressor and random forest regressor, demonstrate substantial potential in predicting the Cc value for fine-grained soils based on multiple soil parameters. This study involves leveraging the efficiency and effectiveness of these algorithms in geotechnical engineering applications, offering a promising alternative to traditional oedometer testing methods. Accurately predicting the compression index can significantly aid in the assessment of soil settlement and the design of stable foundations, thereby reducing the time and costs associated with laboratory testing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Landslides and related hazards · Mineral Processing and Grinding
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
Department of Computer Engineering, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34452, Turkey
Geotechnical Department, Terracon Consultants Inc., Midland, TX 79707, USA
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Sridharan, A., and Sivapullaiah, P.V. (1997). Engineering behaviour of soils contaminated with different pollutants. Environmental Geotechnics, CRC Press. [1st ed.].
2. Contaminant migration and the retention behavior of a laterite–bentonite mixture engineered barrier in a landfill10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114338 ↗
3. Numerical modeling of contaminant advection impact on hydrodynamic diffusion in a deformable medium10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.09.009 ↗
4. Relationship between wheel-traffic-induced soil compaction, nutrient availability, and crop growth: A review10.2134/jpa1990.0460 ↗
5. Soil compaction impact and modelling. A review10.1007/s13593-011-0071-8 ↗
6. A review on the effect of soil compaction and its management for sustainable crop production10.1007/s42853-021-00117-7 ↗
7. Das, B.H. (2009). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, Cengage Learning. [7th ed.].
8. Fredlund, D.G., and Rahardjo, H. (1993). Soil Mechanics for Unsaturated Soils, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470172759 ↗
9. Holtz, R.D., Kovacs, W.D., and Sheahan, T.C. (2011). An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering, Prentice-Hall. [2nd ed.].
10. Atkinson, J. (2017). The Mechanics of Soils and Foundations, CRC Press.
11. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R.B., and Mesri, G. (1996). Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, John Wiley & Sons.
12. Sowers, G.B., and Sowers, G.F. (1951). Introductory Soil Mechanics and Foundations, Macmillan.10.1097/00010694-195111000-00014 ↗
13. A brief note on compression index of soil10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000015 ↗
14. Characteristics of alluvial clay
15. Shouka, H. (1964, January 30–31). Relationship of compression index and liquid limit of alluvial clay. Proceedings of the 19th Japan Civil Engineering Conference, Touhoku, Japan.
16. Schofield, A.N., and Wroth, P. (1968). Critical State Soil Mechanics, McGraw-Hill.
17. Ozdikmen, A. (1972). Statistical Forecasting of Compression Index. [Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University].
18. Regression analysis of soil compressibility10.3208/sandf1972.16.2_19 ↗
19. Statistical estimation of compression index10.1520/GTJ10768J ↗
20. Prediction of the preconsolidation pressure and recompression index of soils10.1520/GTJ10538J ↗
21. Critical reappraisal of colloidal activity of clays10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:2(285) ↗
22. Equations for compression index approximation10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:1(148) ↗
23. Liquid limit of soils from equilibrium water content in one-dimensional normal compression10.1680/geng.2000.143.3.165 ↗
24. Nagaraj, T.S., and Miura, N. (2001). Soft Clay Behaviour Analysis and Assessment, CRC Press.10.1201/9780367800345 ↗
25. Regression analysis of soil compressibility
26. Regression analysis of compression index for Kwangyang marine clay10.1007/BF02823980 ↗
27. Evaluation of the compression index of soils using an artificial neural network10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.02.011 ↗
28. Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., and Chau, K.W. (2018). Flood prediction using machine learning models: Literature review. Water, 10.10.20944/preprints201810.0098.v2 ↗
29. Torabi, M., Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., Varkonyi-Koczy, A., and Istvan, V. (2018, January 24–27). A hybrid machine learning approach for daily prediction of solar radiation. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Global Research and Education, INTER-ACADEMIA 2018, Kaunas, Lithuania.10.1007/978-3-319-99834-3_35 ↗
30. An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.064 ↗
31. Modeling the compression index of fine soils using artificial neural network and comparison with the other empirical equations
32. Farkhonde, S., and Bolouri, J. (2010, January 4). Estimation of compression index of clayey soils using artificial neural network. Proceedings of the 5th National Congress on Civil Engineering, Mashhad, Iran.
33. Prediction of compression index of soils using artificial neural networks (ANNs)
34. Alpaydin, E. (2020). Introduction to Machine Learning, MIT Press.
35. Application of deep learning algorithms in geotechnical engineering: A short critical review10.1007/s10462-021-09967-1 ↗
36. A new approach to predict the compression index using artificial intelligence methods10.1080/1064119X.2018.1484533 ↗
37. Tree-based techniques for predicting the compression index of clayey soils
38. Chia, Y.H., Armaghani, D.J., and Lai, S.H. (2023, January 1). Predicting Soil Compression Index Using Random Forest and Gradient Boosting Tree. Proceedings of the Chinese Institute of Engineers (CIE), the Hong Kong Institute of Engineers (HKIE), and the Institution of Engineers Malaysia (IEM) Tripartite Seminar, Taipei, Taiwan.
39. Kim, M., Senturk, M.A., Tan, R.K., Ordu, E., and Ko, J. (2024). Deep Learning Approach on Prediction of Soil Consolidation Characteristics. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14020450 ↗
40. Application of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103991 ↗
41. Qader, Z.B., Karabash, Z., and Cabalar, A.F. (2023). Analyzing geotechnical characteristics of soils in Erbil via GIS and ANNs. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15054030 ↗
42. Sensitivity analysis of effective parameters in borehole failure, using neural network10.1155/2022/4958004 ↗
43. Ongun, Y.A. (2005). Determination of Ankara Clay Compression Index. [Master’s Thesis, Gazi University].
44. Kilic, E. (2007). Statistical Analysis of Consolidation Parameters. [Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Technical University].
45. Satyanarayana, B., and Satyanarayana, R.C.N.V. (2010, January 16–18). Development of empirical Equation for compressibility of marine clays. Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference, IGC 2010, Mumbai, India.
46. Kahraman, E. (2012). Statistical Analysis of Consolidation Parameters with Data Set Increased. [Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Technical University].
47. Prediction of compression index using artificial neural network
48. Hastie, T. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
49. Russell, S.J., and Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Pearson.
50. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
51. Extremely randomized trees10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
52. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
53. Stochastic gradient boosting10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2 ↗
54. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 ↗
55. Drucker, H. (1997, January 8–12). Improving regressors using boosting techniques. Proceedings of the 14th international Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 1997, Nashville, TN, USA.
56. Microsoft (2024, April 15). Visual Studio Code—Code Editing. Redefined. Available online: https://code.visualstudio.com/.
57. Van Rossum, G., and Drake, F.L. (2009). Python 3 Reference Manual, CreateSpace.
58. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python
59. Lespinats, S., Colange, B., and Dutykh, D. (2022). Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction Techniques: A Data Structure Preservation Approach, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-81026-9 ↗
60. Dimensionality reduction: A comparative review