journal article·2019-06

Bayesian Framework for Inverse Inference in Manufacturing Process Chains

Avadhut Sardeshmukh, Sreedhar Reddy, B. P. Gautham

Publisher page

Abstract

Process-property relations are central to ICME. Engineers are often interested in using these relations to make decisions on process configurations to achieve desired properties. This is known as the inverse problem and is typically solved using forward models (physics-based or data-based) in an optimization loop, which can sometimes be expensive and error prone, especially when used on process chains with multiple unit steps. We propose a Bayesian networks-based approach for modeling process-property relations that can be used for inverse inference directly. The solutions thus found can serve as good starting points for a more detailed simulation-based search. We also discuss how unit process models can be composed to do inverse inference on the process chain as a whole. We demonstrate this in a wire-drawing process where a wire is drawn in multiple passes to achieve desired properties. We learn a Bayesian network for a unit pass and compose it multiple times to infer process parameters of all passes together.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Business Process Modeling and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. LeSar R (2009) Materials informatics: an emerging technology for materials development. Statist Anal Data Mining 1(6):372– 37410.1002/sam.10034 ↗
2. Rajan K (2012) Materials informatics. Mater Today 15(11):470–47110.1016/S1369-7021(12)70204-3 ↗
3. Ramprasad R, Batra R, Pilania G, Mannodi-Kanakkithodi A, Chiho PY (2017) Kim machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects npj. Comput Mater 3(1):2017
4. Dimiduk DM, Holm EA, Niezgoda S (2018) Perspectives on the impact of machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence on materials, processes, and structures engineering. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 1–16:08
5. Kondo R, Yamakawa S, Masuoka Y, Tajima S, Asahi R (2017) Microstructure recognition using convolutional neural networks for prediction of ionic conductivity in ceramics. Acta Mater 141:29–3810.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.004 ↗
6. Cecen A, Dai H, Yabansu YC, Kalidindi SR, Le S (2018) Material structure-property linkages using three-dimensional convolutional neural networks. Acta Mater 146:76–8410.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.053 ↗
7. DeCost BL, Francis T, Holm EA (2017) Exploring the microstructure manifold: image texture representations applied to ultrahigh carbon steel microstructures. Acta Mater 133:30–4010.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.014 ↗
8. Sun K, Hong K, Yuan L, Shen Z, Ni X (2014) Inversion of functional graded materials elastic properties from ultrasonic lamb wave phase velocity data using genetic algorithm. J Nondestruct Eval 33(1):34–42
9. Atkinson S, Zabaras N (2018) Structured Bayesian Gaussian process latent variable model arXiv e-prints, arXiv: 1805.08665
10. Tsilifis P, Bilionis I, Katsounaros I, Zabaras N (2016) Computationally efficient variational approximations for Bayesian inverse problems. J Verif Valid Uncert Quantif 1(3):031004–031004–1310.1115/1.4034102 ↗
11. Singh SK, Gautham BP, Goyal S, Joshi A, Gudadhe D (2009) Optimization of multi-pass wire drawing operation. Wire J Int 42(9):82–88
12. Pandita P, Bilionis I, Panchal J, Bp G, Joshi A, Zagade P (2017) Stochastic multi-objective optimization on a budget: application to multi-pass wire drawing with quantified uncertainties. Int J Uncertain Quantif 8:06
13. Sardeshmukh A, Reddy S, Gautham BP, Joshi A, Panchal JH (2017) A data science approach for analysis of multi-pass wire drawing. In: ASME International design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference (IDETC/CIE 2017). Cleveland. ASME10.1115/DETC2017-67839 ↗
14. Sardeshmukh A, Reddy S, Gautham BP, Joshi A (2017) Bayesian networks for inverse inference in manufacturing. In: 2017 16th IEEE International conference on machine learning and applications (ICMLA), pp 626–63110.1109/ICMLA.2017.00-91 ↗
15. Koller D, Friedman N (2009) Probabilistic graphical models - principles and techniques. MIT Press, Cambridge
16. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2001) The elements of statistical learning. Springer series in statistics. Springer New York Inc., New York
17. Murphy KP (2012) Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. The MIT Press, Cambridge
18. Scutari M (2017) Bayesian network constraint-based structure learning algorithms: parallel and optimized implementations in the bnlearn R package. J Stat Softw 77(2):1–2010.18637/jss.v077.i02 ↗
19. Brooks S, Gelman A, Jones G, Meng X-L (2011) Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/b10905 ↗
20. Celeux G, Hurn M, Robert CP (2000) Computational and inferential difficulties with mixture posterior distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 95(451):957–97010.1080/01621459.2000.10474285 ↗
21. Geyer CJ (1991) Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood. In: Proceedings of the 23rd symposium on the interface, pp 156–163. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/58440
22. Earl DJ, Deem MW (2005) Parallel tempering: theory, applications, and new perspectives. Phys Chem Chem Phys 7(23):3910–391610.1039/b509983h ↗
23. Koller D, Pfeffer A (1997) Object-oriented Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, UAI’97. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, San Francisco, pp 302–313
24. Singh SK, Gautham BP, Goyal S, Joshi A, Gudadhe D (2007) Development of a virtual wire drawing tool for process analysis and optimisation. Wire J Int 40(10):72–78
25. Scutari M (2010) Learning Bayesian networks with the bnlearn R package. J Stat Softw 35(3):1–2210.18637/jss.v035.i03 ↗
26. Murphy K (2001) The Bayes net toolbox for matlab. Comput Sci Statist 33:11
27. Salvatier J, Wiecki TV, Fonnesbeck C (2016) Probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3. PeerJ Comput Sci, 2:e55 apr10.7717/peerj-cs.55 ↗
28. Foreman-Mackey D, Hogg D, Lang D, Goodman J (2012) emcee: the MCMC Hammer10.1086/670067 ↗
29. Raftery AE, Lewis SM (1995) The number of iterations, convergence diagnostics and generic metropolis algorithms. In: Gilks WR, Spiegelhalter DJ (eds) Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo. Chapman and Hall, pp 115–130
30. Tak H, Meng X-L, van Dyk DA (2017) A repelling-attracting metropolis algorithm for multimodality. J Comput Graph Stat 27(3):479–49010.1080/10618600.2017.1415911 ↗