Constraint Active Search in Process Window Optimization for Powder Feed Directed Energy Deposition
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Optimizing process parameters for directed energy deposition is crucial to achieve high-quality printed parts. However, this optimization process often entails significant time and cost investments. An initial investigation into the process window can be conducted through the examination of single tracks. In this work, we investigate the utility of constraint active search (CAS) to efficiently identify process window that yield 4340 low-alloy steel single tracks with desired geometrical features. The effectiveness of the CAS method was assessed through experiments with physical and interpolated measurement. Fifty single tracks from randomly sampled process parameter combinations with different power, scan velocity, and laser spot size and ten single tracks from CAS-generated parameters were produced and analyzed. The results demonstrate that our search method outperforms random search, with 80% of parameter sets identified as desirable compared to only 4% in the case of random search. Moreover, an interpolated ground truth in input spaces of various dimensionalities was built in order to assess repeatability without excessive experimental cost. The results indicate that the CAS achieves higher precision compared to grid search and random search, especially in higher-dimensional process parameter spaces.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Dass A, Moridi A (2019) State of the art in directed energy deposition: from additive manufacturing to materials design. Coatings 9(7):1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/COATINGS907041810.3390/COATINGS9070418 ↗
2. Dilberoglu UM, Gharehpapagh B, Yaman U, Dolen M (2017) The role of additive manufacturing in the era of industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf 11:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.14810.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.148 ↗
3. Wong KV, Hernandez A (2012) A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mech Eng 2012:1–10. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/20876010.5402/2012/208760 ↗
4. Piscopo G, Iuliano L (2022) Current research and industrial application of laser powder directed energy deposition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08596-w10.1007/s00170-021-08596-w ↗
5. Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A, Bian L, Thompson SM (2015) An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; Part II: mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control. Addit Manuf 8:12–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.00210.1016/j.addma.2015.07.002 ↗
6. Gockel J, Sheridan L, Koerper B, Whip B (2019) The influence of additive manufacturing processing parameters on surface roughness and fatigue life. Int J Fatigue. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.02510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.025 ↗
7. Carrozza A, Mazzucato F, Aversa A, Lombardi M, Bondioli F, Biamino S, Valente A, Fino P (2021) Single scans of Ti-6Al-4V by directed energy deposition: a cost and time effective methodology to assess the proper process window. Metals Mater Int 27(9):3590–3602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00930-310.1007/s12540-020-00930-3 ↗
8. Kiani P, Dupuy AD, Ma K, Schoenung JM (2020) Directed energy deposition of AlSi10Mg: single track nonscalability and bulk properties. Mater Des 194:108847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10884710.1016/j.matdes.2020.108847 ↗
9. Katagiri J, Kusano M, Minamoto S, Kitano H, Daimaru K, Tsujii M, Watanabe M (2023) Melt pool shape evaluation by single-track experiments and finite-element thermal analysis: balling and lack of fusion criteria for generating process window of inconel738LC. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1604172910.3390/ma16041729 ↗
10. Graf B, Ammer S, Gumenyuk A, Rethmeier M (2013) Design of experiments for laser metal deposition in maintenance, repair and overhaul applications. Procedia CIRP 11:245–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.07.03110.1016/j.procir.2013.07.031 ↗
11. Sreekanth S, Ghassemali E, Hurtig K, Joshi S (2020) Effect of direct energy deposition process parameters. Metals 10(1):9610.3390/met10010096 ↗
12. Alafaghani A, Qattawi A, Alrawi B, Guzman A (2017) Experimental optimization of fused deposition modelling processing parameters: a design-for-manufacturing approach. Procedia Manuf 10:791–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.07910.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.079 ↗
13. Chockalingam K, Jawahar N, Ramanathan KN, Banerjee PS (2006) Optimization of stereolithography process parameters for part strength using design of experiments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29(1–2):79–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2307-010.1007/s00170-004-2307-0 ↗
14. Nancharaiah T (2011) Optimization of process parameters in FDM process using design of experiments. Int J Emerg Technol 2(1):100–102
15. Arackal Narayanan J, Kaji F, Zimny M, Toyserkani E (2023) Laser directed energy deposition-based additive manufacturing of Fe20Cr5.5AlY from single tracks to bulk structures: statistical analysis, process optimization, and characterization. Machines. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines1101005810.3390/machines11010058 ↗
16. Wang C, Tan XP, Du Z, Chandra S, Sun Z, Lim CW, Tor SB, Lim CS, Wong CH (2019) Additive manufacturing of NiTi shape memory alloys using pre-mixed powders. J Mater Process Technol 271:152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.02510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.025 ↗
17. Olakanmi EO, Cochrane RF, Dalgarno KW (2011) Densification mechanism and microstructural evolution in selective laser sintering of Al-12Si powders. J Mater Process Technol 211(1):113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.09.00310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.09.003 ↗
18. Wang C, Tan X, Liu E, Tor SB (2018) Process parameter optimization and mechanical properties for additively manufactured stainless steel 316L parts by selective electron beam melting. Mater Des 147:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.03510.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.035 ↗
19. Jin Z, Zhang Z, Demir K, Gu GX (2020) Machine learning for advanced additive manufacturing. Matter 3(5):1541–1556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.08.02310.1016/j.matt.2020.08.023 ↗
20. Wang C, Tan XP, Tor SB, Lim CS (2020) Machine learning in additive manufacturing: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Addit Manuf 36(January):101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10153810.1016/j.addma.2020.101538 ↗
21. Vaghefi E, Hosseini S, Afsharinejad AH, Prorok B, Mirkoohi E (2024) Additive manufacturing process parameter design for variable component geometries using reinforcement learning. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.10412110.1016/j.addma.2024.104121 ↗
22. Mojumder S, Gan Z, Li Y, Amin AA, Liu WK (2023) Linking process parameters with lack-of-fusion porosity for laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 68(March):103500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.10350010.1016/j.addma.2023.103500 ↗
23. Zhang B, Liu S, Shin YC (2019) In-process monitoring of porosity during laser additive manufacturing process. Addit Manuf 28(May):497–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.03010.1016/j.addma.2019.05.030 ↗
24. Liu Q, Wu H, Paul MJ, He P, Peng Z, Gludovatz B, Kruzic JJ, Wang CH, Li X (2020) Machine-learning assisted laser powder bed fusion process optimization for AlSi10Mg: new microstructure description indices and fracture mechanisms. Acta Mater 201:316–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.01010.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.010 ↗
25. Diao Y, Yan L, Gao K (2022) A strategy assisted machine learning to process multi-objective optimization for improving mechanical properties of carbon steels. J Mater Sci Technol 109:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.00410.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.004 ↗
26. Chen Y, Tian Y, Zhou Y, Fang D, Ding X, Sun J, Xue D (2020) Machine learning assisted multi-objective optimization for materials processing parameters: a case study in Mg alloy. J Alloys Compoun 844:156159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15615910.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156159 ↗
27. Tamura R, Osada T, Minagawa K, Kohata T, Hirosawa M, Tsuda K, Kawagishi K (2021) Machine learning-driven optimization in powder manufacturing of Ni-Co based superalloy. Mater Des 198:109290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10929010.1016/j.matdes.2020.109290 ↗
28. van Houtum GJ, Vlasea ML (2021) Active learning via adaptive weighted uncertainty sampling applied to additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10241110.1016/j.addma.2021.102411 ↗
29. Li Y, Sun Y, Han Q, Zhang G, Horváth I (2018) Enhanced beads overlapping model for wire and arc additive manufacturing of multi-layer multi-bead metallic parts. J Mater Process Technol 252:838–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.10.01710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.10.017 ↗
30. Aoyagi K, Wang H, Sudo H, Chiba A (2019) Simple method to construct process maps for additive manufacturing using a support vector machine. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.01310.1016/j.addma.2019.03.013 ↗
31. Tapia G, Elwany AH, Sang H (2016) Prediction of porosity in metal-based additive manufacturing using spatial Gaussian process models. Addit Manuf 12:282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.00910.1016/j.addma.2016.05.009 ↗
32. Tapia G, Khairallah S, Matthews M, King WE, Elwany A (2018) Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling framework for process planning in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(9–12):3591–3603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1045-z10.1007/s00170-017-1045-z ↗
33. Lim JS, Oh WJ, Lee CM, Kim DH (2021) Selection of effective manufacturing conditions for directed energy deposition process using machine learning methods. Scientific Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03622-z10.1038/s41598-021-03622-z ↗
34. Kim SI, Gee K, Hart AJ (2024) A Bayesian sampling framework for constrained optimisation of build layouts in additive manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 62(16):5772–5790. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.229847710.1080/00207543.2023.2298477 ↗
35. Sattari K, Wu Y, Chen Z, Mahjoubnia A, Su C, Lin J (2024) Physics-constrained multi-objective bayesian optimization to accelerate 3d printing of thermoplastics. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.10420410.1016/j.addma.2024.104204 ↗
36. Chepiga T, Zhilyaev P, Ryabov A, Simonov AP, Dubinin ON, Firsov DG, Kuzminova YO, Evlashin SA (2023) Process parameter selection for production of stainless steel 316L using efficient multi-objective bayesian optimization algorithm. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1603105010.3390/ma16031050 ↗
37. Malkomes G, Cheng B, Lee EH, Mccourt M (2021) Beyond the pareto efficient frontier: constraint active search for multiobjective experimental design. ICML conference 7423–7434. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/malkomes21a.html
38. Lin PY, Shen FC, Wu KT, Hwang SJ, Lee HH (2020) Process optimization for directed energy deposition of SS316L components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111(5–6):1387–140010.1007/s00170-020-06113-z ↗
39. Song M, Lin X, Yang G, Cui X, Yang H, Huang W (2014) Influence of forming atmosphere on the deposition characteristics of 2Cr13 stainless steel during laser solid forming. J Mater Process Technol 214(3):701–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.09.02310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.09.023 ↗
40. Zhang K, Liu W, Shang X (2007) Research on the processing experiments of laser metal deposition shaping. Optics Laser Technol 39(3):549–55710.1016/j.optlastec.2005.10.009 ↗
41. Seeger M (2004) Gaussian processes for machine learning. Int J Neural Syst 14(02):69–10610.1142/S0129065704001899 ↗
42. Gardner J, Pleiss G, Weinberger KQ, Bindel D, Wilson AG (2018) Gpytorch: Blackbox matrix-matrix gaussian process inference with gpu acceleration. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 31
43. Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G, Killeen T, Lin Z, Gimelshein N, Antiga L, et al (2019) Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 32
44. Balandat M, Karrer B, Jiang D, Daulton S, Letham B, Wilson AG, Bakshy E (2020) Botorch: a framework for efficient monte-carlo bayesian optimization. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 33:21524–21538
45. Loli J (2023) New alloy process development emphasizing high-strength low-alloy steels in laser powder-feed directed energy deposition. Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/24129720.v110.1184/R1/24129720.v1 ↗