Text Mining for Process–Structure–Properties Relationships in Metals

1. Liu Y (2023) The importance of human-labeled data in the era of LLMs, arXiv:2306.14910 [cs]10.24963/ijcai.2023/802 ↗

2. Mysore S, Kim E, Strubell, Emma LA, Chang H-S, Kompella S, Huang K, McCallum A, Olivetti E (2017) Automatically extracting action graphs from materials science synthesis procedures, November arXiv:1711.06872 [cs]

3. Mysore S, Jensen Z, Kim E, Huang K, Chang H-S, Strubell E, Flanigan J, McCallum A, Olivetti E (2019) The materials science procedural text corpus: annotating materials synthesis procedures with shallow semantic structures. arXiv:1905.06939 [cs]10.18653/v1/W19-4007 ↗

4. Weston L, Tshitoyan V, Dagdelen J, Kononova O, Trewartha A, Persson KA, Ceder G, Jain A (2019) Named entity recognition and normalization applied to large-scale information extraction from the materials science literature. J Chem Inf Model 59(9):3692–370210.1021/acs.jcim.9b00470 ↗

5. Rocktäschel T, Weidlich M, Leser U (2012) ChemSpot: a hybrid system for chemical named entity recognition. Bioinformatics 28(12):1633–164010.1093/bioinformatics/bts183 ↗

6. Miguel G-R, Alejandro G-R, David P-R, Diana I (2012) Using nanoinformatics methods for automatically identifying relevant nanotoxicology entities from the literature. Biomed Res Int 2013:e410294

7. He T, Sun W, Huo H, Kononova O, Rong Z, Tshitoyan V, Botari T, Ceder G (2020) Similarity of Precursors in solid-state synthesis as text-mined from scientific literature. Chem Mater 32(18):7861–787310.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02553 ↗

8. Tchoua Roselyne B, Ajith A, Hong Z, Ward LT, Chard K, Belikov A, Audus DJ, Patel S, de Pablo JJ, Foster IT (2019) Creating training data for scientific named entity recognition with minimal human effort. In João M. F. Rodrigues, Pedro J. S. Cardoso, Jânio Monteiro, Roberto Lam, Valeria V. Krzhizhanovskaya, Michael H. Lees, Jack J. Dongarra, and Peter M.A. Sloot, editors, Computational Science – ICCS 2019, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 398–411, Cham, Springer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-030-22734-0_29 ↗

9. Hiszpanski AM, Gallagher B, Chellappan K, Li P, Liu S, Kim H, Han J, Kailkhura B, Buttler DJ, Han Thomas Y-J (2020) Nanomaterial synthesis insights from machine learning of scientific articles by extracting, structuring, and visualizing knowledge. J Chem Inf Model 60(6):2876–288710.1021/acs.jcim.0c00199 ↗

10. Olivetti Elsa A, Cole Jacqueline M, Edward K, Olga K, Gerbrand C, Yong-Jin HT, Hiszpanski Anna M (2020) Data-driven materials research enabled by natural language processing and information extraction. Appl Phys Rev 7(4):04131710.1063/5.0021106 ↗

11. Kononova O, He T, Huo H, Trewartha A, Olivetti EA, Ceder G (2021) Opportunities and challenges of text mining in materials research. iScience 24(3):10215510.1016/j.isci.2021.102155 ↗

12. Lafferty J, McCallum A, Pereira F (2001) Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. Dept Papers (CIS)

13. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–178010.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗

14. Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding

15. Dunn A, Dagdelen J, Walker N, Lee S, Rosen AS, Ceder G, Persson K, Jain A (2022) Structured information extraction from complex scientific text with fine-tuned large language models. arXiv:2212.05238 [cond-mat]

16. Maik JK, Ai Q, Al-Feghali A, Badhwar S, Bocarsly JD, Bran AM, Bringuier S, Catherine BL, Choudhary K, Circi D, Cox S, de Jong Wibe A, Evans Matthew L, Gastellu N, Genzling J, Victoria GM, Gupta Ankur K, Hong Z, Imran A, Kruschwitz S, Labarre A, Lála J, Liu T, Ma S, Majumdar S, Merz Garrett W, Moitessier N, Moubarak E, Mouriño B, Pelkie B, Pieler M, Caldas RM, Ranković B, Rodriques Samuel G, Sanders JN, Schwaller P, Schwarting M, Shi J, Smit B, Smith BE, Herck JV, Völker C, Ward L, Warren S, Weiser B, Zhang S, Zhang X, Ahmad ZG, Scourtas A, Schmidt KJ, Foster I, White AD, Blaiszik B (2023) 14 examples of how LLMs can transform materials science and chemistry: a reflection on a large language model hackathon. Digit Discov 2(5):1233–1250

17. Beltagy Iz, Lo K, Cohan A (2019) SciBERT: a pretrained language model for scientific text. arXiv:1903.10676 [cs]10.18653/v1/D19-1371 ↗

18. Lee J, Yoon W, Kim S, Kim D, Kim S, So Chan H, Kang J (2020) BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining. Bioinformatics 36(4):1234–124010.1093/bioinformatics/btz682 ↗

19. Trewartha A, Walker N, Huo H, Lee S, Cruse K, Dagdelen J, Dunn A, Persson KA, Ceder G, Jain A (2022) Quantifying the advantage of domain-specific pre-training on named entity recognition tasks in materials science. Patterns 3(4)10.1016/j.patter.2022.100488 ↗

20. Shu H, Cole Jacqueline M (2022) BatteryBERT: a pretrained language model for battery database enhancement. J Chem Inf Model 62(24):6365–637710.1021/acs.jcim.2c00035 ↗

21. Bingyin H, Anqi L, Catherine BL (2024) Tackling structured knowledge extraction from polymer nanocomposite literature as an NER/RE task with seq2seq. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 13(3):656–66810.1007/s40192-024-00363-5 ↗

22. Kim E, Huang K, Saunders A, McCallum A, Ceder G, Olivetti E (2017) Materials synthesis insights from scientific literature via text extraction and machine learning. Chem Mater 29(21):9436–944410.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03500 ↗

23. Kononova O, Huo H, He T, Rong Z, Botari T, Sun W, Tshitoyan V, Ceder G (2019) Text-mined dataset of inorganic materials synthesis recipes. Sci Data 6(1):20310.1038/s41597-019-0224-1 ↗

24. Mehrad A, Mohamad MS (2024) Agent-based learning of materials datasets from the scientific literature. Digit Discov 3(12):2607–261710.1039/D4DD00252K ↗

25. Polak Maciej P, Dane M (2024) Extracting accurate materials data from research papers with conversational language models and prompt engineering. Nat Commun 15(1):156910.1038/s41467-024-45914-8 ↗

26. Stenetorp P, Pyysalo S, Topić G, Ohta T, Ananiadou S, Tsujii J (2012) Brat: a web-based tool for NLP-assisted text annotation. In Proceedings of the Demonstrations Session at EACL 2012, Avignon, France, April . Association for Computational Linguistics

27. Zhong Z, Chen D (2021) A frustratingly easy approach for entity and relation extraction. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 50–6110.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.5 ↗

28. Ramshaw L, Marcus M (1995) Text chunking using transformation-based learning. In Third Workshop on Very Large Corpora

29. Viterbi A (1967) Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 13(2):260–26910.1109/TIT.1967.1054010 ↗

30. Qi P, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Bolton J, Manning CD (2020) Stanza: A python natural language processing toolkit for many human languages. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pages 101–10810.18653/v1/2020.acl-demos.14 ↗

31. Liu Y, Ott M, Goyal N, Du J, Joshi M, Chen D, Levy O, Lewis M, Zettlemoyer L, Stoyanov V (2019) Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692

32. Mysore S, Jensen Z, Kim E, Huang K, Chang H-S, Strubell E, Flanigan J, McCallum A, Olivetti E (2019) The materials science procedural text corpus: Annotating materials synthesis procedures with shallow semantic structures. In Proceedings of the 13th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pages 56–6410.18653/v1/W19-4007 ↗

33. Settles B (2009) Active learning literature survey

34. OpenAI Platform

35. John D, Alexander D, Sanghoon L, Nicholas W, Rosen Andrew S, Gerbrand C, Persson Kristin A, Anubhav J (2024) Structured information extraction from scientific text with large language models. Nat Commun 15(1):141810.1038/s41467-024-45563-x ↗

36. Wang S, Sun X, Li X, Ouyang R, Wu F, Zhang T, Li J, Wang G (2023) GPT-NER: Named Entity Recognition via Large Language Models. arXiv:2304.10428 [cs]

37. Peters ME, Neumann M, Iyyer M, Gardner M, Clark C, Lee K, Zettlemoyer L (2018) Deep contextualized word representations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 2227–223710.18653/v1/N18-1202 ↗

38. Kim E, Jensen Z, van Grootel A, Huang K, Staib M, Mysore S, Chang H-S, Strubell E, McCallum A, Jegelka S et al (2020) Inorganic materials synthesis planning with literature-trained neural networks. J Chem Inf Model 60(3):1194–120110.1021/acs.jcim.9b00995 ↗