Multi-Scale Temporal Convolutional Networks for Effluent COD Prediction in Industrial Wastewater
Source abstract
Abstract
To identify the complex time patterns in the process data and monitor the effect of wastewater treatment by predicting effluent chemical oxygen demand more accurately, a soft-sensor modeling method based on the multi-scale temporal convolutional network (MSTCN) was proposed in this paper. Data at different time scales are reconstructed according to the main frequencies determined by the Fourier transform approach, and the correlations between variables during that period are calculated and stored in the corresponding adjacency matrix. The specific temporal convolutional network (TCN) is built to learn the temporal dependencies within each sequence at the current scale, while the graph convolutional layer (GCN) captures the relationships among variables. Finally, predictions with less error can be obtained by integrating output features from GCN and TCN layers. The proposed model is validated on an annual dataset collected from a wastewater treatment plant employing biological processes for organic matter removal. The experimental results indicate that the proposed MSTCN reduces RMSE by 35.71% and 22.56% compared with the convolutional neural network and TCN, respectively. Moreover, MSCTN shortens the training period by 6.3 s and improves RMSE by 30.41% when compared to the long short-term memory network, which is outperformed in extracting temporal dynamic characteristics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis · Water Quality Monitoring Technologies · Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
Shandong Huatai Paper Co., Ltd., Dongying 257335, China
Shandong Yellow Triangle Biotechnology Industry Research Institute Co., Ltd., Dongying 257399, China
Funding
Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial Universities, China
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Chemical fingerprinting of organic micropollutants in different industrial treated wastewater effluents and their effluent-receiving river10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156399 ↗
2. Persistent organic and inorganic pollutants in the effluents from the textile dyeing industries: Ecotoxicology appraisal via a battery of biotests10.1016/j.envres.2021.110956 ↗
3. Li, L.L., Shi, Y.B., Huang, Y., Xing, A.L., and Xue, H. (2022). The Effect of Governance on Industrial Wastewater Pollution in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19159316 ↗
4. Industrial waste water treatment using advanced oxidation process–A review
5. Toxicity evaluation of pharmaceutical wastewaters using the alga Scenedesmus obliquus and the bacterium Vibrio fischeri10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.012 ↗
6. Data-driven performance analyses of wastewater treatment plants: A review10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.030 ↗
7. Soft-sensor modeling of papermaking wastewater treatment process based on Gaussian process
8. Chemical oxygen demand: Historical perspectives and future challenges10.1016/j.aca.2017.01.009 ↗
9. Development of a wide-range soft sensor for predicting wastewater BOD5 using an eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine10.1016/j.envres.2022.112953 ↗
10. Singh, N.K., Yadav, M., Singh, V., Padhiyar, H., Kumar, V., Bhatia, S.K., and Show, P.L. (2023). Artificial intelligence and machine learning-based monitoring and design of biological wastewater treatment systems. Bioresour. Technol., 369.10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128486 ↗
11. A new insight for real-time wastewater quality prediction using hybridized kernel-based extreme learning machines with advanced optimization algorithms10.1007/s11356-021-17190-2 ↗
12. Predicting wastewater treatment plant quality parameters using a novel hybrid linear-nonlinear methodology10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.137 ↗
13. Deep learning approach for sustainable WWTP operation: A case study on data-driven influent conditions monitoring10.1016/j.scs.2019.101670 ↗
14. Wongburi, P., and Park, J.K. (2023). Prediction of Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Water Quality Using Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) Models. Water, 15.10.3390/w15193325 ↗
15. Prediction of a full scale WWTP activated sludge SVI test using an LSTM neural network10.1039/D2EW00025C ↗
16. A deep learning based dynamic COD prediction model for urban sewage10.1039/C9EW00505F ↗
17. A prediction method of electrocoagulation reactor removal rate based on Long Term and Short Term Memory-Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model10.1016/j.psep.2021.06.020 ↗
18. Deep learning-based intelligent management for sewage treatment plants10.1007/s11771-022-5036-3 ↗
19. Deep learning model based on urban multi-source data for predicting heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Ni, Cr) in industrial sewer networks10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128732 ↗
20. Predicting the ammonia nitrogen of wastewater treatment plant influent via integrated model based on rolling decomposition method and deep learning algorithm10.1016/j.scs.2023.104541 ↗
21. Liu, X., and Wang, W. (2024). Deep Time Series Forecasting Models: A Comprehensive Survey. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12101504 ↗
22. Water quality prediction for smart aquaculture using hybrid deep learning models10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3180482 ↗
23. A hybrid deep learning approach to improve real-time effluent quality prediction in wastewater treatment plant10.1016/j.watres.2023.121092 ↗
24. Exploiting dynamic spatio-temporal graph convolutional neural networks for citywide traffic flows prediction10.1016/j.neunet.2021.10.021 ↗
25. A systematic approach to data-driven modeling and soft sensing in a full-scale plant10.2166/wst.2009.346 ↗
26. Fast Fourier transforms: A tutorial review and a state of the art10.1016/0165-1684(90)90158-U ↗
27. Weisstein, E.W. (2004, February 03). Fourier Transform. Available online: https://mathworld.wolfram.com.
28. Fourier transforms and the fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm
29. Bai, S., Kolter, J.Z., and Koltun, V. (2018). An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling. arXiv.
30. A hybrid prediction method for realistic network traffic with temporal convolutional network and LSTM10.1109/TASE.2021.3077537 ↗
31. Graph convolutional networks: A comprehensive review10.1186/s40649-019-0069-y ↗
32. Root-mean-square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): When to use them or not10.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022 ↗
33. Di Bucchianico, A. (2008). Coefficient of determination (R2). Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality and Reliability, Wiley.
34. Laumanns, M., and Ocenasek, J. (2002, January 7–11). Bayesian optimization algorithms for multi-objective optimization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, Granada, Spain.10.1007/3-540-45712-7_29 ↗
35. A review on the attention mechanism of deep learning10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.091 ↗
36. Exploring potential machine learning application based on big data for prediction of wastewater quality from different full-scale wastewater treatment plants10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154930 ↗
37. Wu, J., and Wang, Z. (2022). A hybrid model for water quality prediction based on an artificial neural network, wavelet transform, and long short-term memory. Water, 14.10.3390/w14040610 ↗