journal article·2024-06Open access

Multi-objective Optimization-Oriented Generative Adversarial Design for Multi-principal Element Alloys

Z. Li, N. Birbilis

Abstract

Abstract The discovery of novel alloys, such as multi-principal element alloys (MPEAs)—inclusive of the so-called high-entropy alloys—remains essential for technological advancement. Multi-principal element alloys can manifest uniquely favorable mechanical properties, but the complexity of their compositions results in their design and performance being challenging to understand. With the emergence of the materials genome concept, there is potential to pursue novel materials using computational design approaches. However, the complexity of such design often requires immense computational power and sophisticated data analysis. In an attempt to address this, we introduce the application of a new framework, the non-dominant sorting optimization-based generative adversarial networks (NSGAN) in the discovery and exploration of novel MPEAs. By harnessing the power of genetic algorithms and generative adversarial networks (GANs), NSGANs offer an effective solution for high-dimensional multi-objective optimization challenges in alloy design. The framework is demonstrated to generate MPEAs according to specific alloy properties. Furthermore, an online web tool/software applies the NSGAN framework to disseminate the methodology to the broader scientific arena (along with the supporting code made available).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High Entropy Alloys Studies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Machine Learning in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Yeh JW et al (2004) Nanostructured high-entropy alloys with multiple principal elements: novel alloy design concepts and outcomes. Adv Eng Mater 6(5):299–30310.1002/adem.200300567 ↗
2. Tsai MH, Yeh JW (2014) High-entropy alloys: a critical review. Mater Res Lett 2(3):107–12310.1080/21663831.2014.912690 ↗
3. Ye Y et al (2016) High-entropy alloy: challenges and prospects. Mater Today 19(6):349–36210.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.026 ↗
4. Cantor B et al (2004) Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 375:213–21810.1016/j.msea.2003.10.257 ↗
5. Miracle DB, Senkov ON (2017) A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts. Acta Mater 122:448–51110.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.081 ↗
6. Diao H et al (2017) Fundamental deformation behavior in high-entropy alloys: an overview. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 21(5):252–26610.1016/j.cossms.2017.08.003 ↗
7. Tsai M-H (2013) Physical properties of high entropy alloys. Entropy 15(12):5338–534510.3390/e15125338 ↗
8. de Pablo JJ et al (2019) New frontiers for the materials genome initiative. npj Comput Mater 5(1):4110.1038/s41524-019-0173-4 ↗
9. Jain A et al (2013) Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
10. Greeley J et al (2006) Computational high-throughput screening of electrocatalytic materials for hydrogen evolution. Nat Mater 5(11):909–91310.1038/nmat1752 ↗
11. Conway PL et al (2022) High entropy alloys towards industrial applications: high-throughput screening and experimental investigation. Mater Sci Eng A 830:14229710.1016/j.msea.2021.142297 ↗
12. Saal JE et al (2013) Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 65:1501–150910.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
13. Shen C et al (2019) Physical metallurgy-guided machine learning and artificial intelligent design of ultrahigh-strength stainless steel. Acta Mater 179:201–21410.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.033 ↗
14. Lee SY et al (2021) Deep learning-based phase prediction of high-entropy alloys: optimization, generation, and explanation. Mater Des 197:10926010.1016/j.matdes.2020.109260 ↗
15. Lee K et al (2023) Genetic design of new aluminum alloys to overcome strength-ductility trade-off dilemma. J Alloy Compd 947:16954610.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169546 ↗
16. Li Z et al (2022) cardiGAN: a generative adversarial network model for design and discovery of multi principal element alloys. J Mater Sci Technol 125:81–9610.1016/j.jmst.2022.03.008 ↗
17. Islam N, Huang W, Zhuang HL (2018) Machine learning for phase selection in multi-principal element alloys. Comput Mater Sci 150:230–23510.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.003 ↗
18. Fiedler L et al (2022) Deep dive into machine learning density functional theory for materials science and chemistry. Phys Rev Mater 6(4):04030110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.040301 ↗
19. Pederson R, Kalita B, Burke K (2022) Machine learning and density functional theory. Nat Rev Phys 4(6):357–35810.1038/s42254-022-00470-2 ↗
20. Wen C et al (2019) Machine learning assisted design of high entropy alloys with desired property. Acta Mater 170:109–11710.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.010 ↗
21. Bundela AS, Rahul M (2022) Machine learning-enabled framework for the prediction of mechanical properties in new high entropy alloys. J Alloy Compd 908:16457810.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164578 ↗
22. Li Z, Li S, Birbilis N (2023) A machine learning-driven framework for the property prediction and generative design of multiple principal element alloys. Mater Today Commun 38:10794010.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107940 ↗
23. Li Z, Birbilis N (2024) NSGAN: a non-dominant sorting optimisation-based generative adversarial design framework for alloy discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.1249510.1038/s41524-024-01294-7 ↗
24. Li Z et al (2023) A database of mechanical properties for multi principal element alloys. Chem Data Collect 47:10106810.1016/j.cdc.2023.101068 ↗
25. Nagelkerke NJ (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78(3):691–69210.1093/biomet/78.3.691 ↗
26. Gulrajani I et al. (2017) Improved training of Wasserstein GANs. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/892c3b1c6dccd52936e27cbd0ff683d6-Paper.pdf
27. Van der Maaten L, Hinton G (2008) Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res 9(11):2579–2605
28. Deb K et al (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–19710.1109/4235.996017 ↗
29. Ngatchou P, Zarei A, El-Sharkawi A (2005) Pareto multi objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on, intelligent systems application to power systems, IEEE
30. Blank J, Deb K (2020) Pymoo: multi-objective optimization in python. IEEE Access 8:89497–8950910.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990567 ↗
31. Ketkar N et al (2021) Introduction to pytorch. Deep learning with python: learn best practices of deep learning models with PyTorch. Apress, Berkeley, pp 27–9110.1007/978-1-4842-5364-9_2 ↗