Modeling and Optimum Design of Carbon Nanotube/Polyvinyl Alcohol Hybrid Nanofibers as Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Material
Source abstract
Abstract
This study intends to optimize the electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effectiveness of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polyvinyl alcohol (MWCNTs/PVA) composite nanofibers based on multiple nonlinear neuro-regression analysis. The effect of MWCNTs content, thickness, and frequency on the shielding properties of MWCNTs/PVA nanofibers has been investigated in the analysis. The parameters were determined from a literature study focused on the designing and production of MWCNTs/PVA nanofibers as an EMI shielding composite material. Within the scope of the present study, 12 unique candidate models for each response were generated to test the accuracy of the predictions. Determination coefficients and boundedness of models have been checked to acquire the most realistic ones. Nelder-Mead, Simulated Annealing, Differential Evolution, and Random Search algorithms were used to attain the optimum parameters for shielding effectiveness of the composite nanofiber structure by maximizing the absorption while maintaining the minimum reflection. The present paper demonstrates that the proposed methodology can significantly contribute to the experimental studies regarding the materials design by predicting the process reliably.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Advanced Energy Technologies and Civil Engineering Innovations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen Z, Xu C, Ma C, Ren W, Cheng HM (2013) Lightweight and flexible graphene foam composites for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv Mater 25(9):1296–1300. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20120419610.1002/adma.201204196 ↗
2. Chung DDL (2001) Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon materials. Carbon 39(2):279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00184-610.1016/S0008-6223(00)00184-6 ↗
3. Ji H, Zhao R, Zhang N, Jin C, Lu X, Wang C (2018) Lightweight and flexible electrospun polymer nanofiber/metal nanoparticle hybrid membrane for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. NPG Asia Mater 10(8):749–760. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-018-0070-110.1038/s41427-018-0070-1 ↗
4. Shahzad F, Alhabeb M, Hatter CB, Anasori B, Hong SM, Koo CN, Gogotsi Y (2016) Electromagnetic interference shielding with 2D transition metal carbides (MXenes). Science 353(6304):1137–1140. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag242110.1126/science.aag2421 ↗
5. Chen Y, Pang L, Li Y, Luo H, Duan G, Mei C, Xu W, Zhou W, Liu K, Jiang S (2020) Ultra-thin and highly flexible cellulose nanofiber/silver nanowire conductive paper for effective electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos A 135:105960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10596010.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105960 ↗
6. Ravindren R, Mondal S, Nath K, Das NC (2019) Investigation of electrical conductivity and electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of preferentially distributed conductive filler in highly flexible polymer blends nanocomposites. Compos A 118:75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.012 ↗
7. Abbasi H, Antunes M, Velasco JI (2019) Recent advances in carbon-based polymer nanocomposites for electromagnetic interference shielding. Prog Mater Sci 103:319–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.02.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.02.003 ↗
8. Kim HR, Fujimori K, Kim BS, Kim IS (2012) Lightweight nanofibrous EMI shielding nanowebs prepared by electrospinning and metallization. Compos Sci Technol 72(11):1233–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.009 ↗
9. Salimbeygi G, Nasouri K, Shoushtari AM (2014) Fabrication of homogeneous multi-walled carbon nanotube/poly (vinyl alcohol) composite films using for microwave absorption application. Fibers Polym 15(3):583–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-0583-310.1007/s12221-014-0583-3 ↗
10. Karimi E, Raisi A, Aroujalian A (2016) TiO2-induced photo-cross-linked electrospun polyvinyl alcohol nanofibers microfiltration membranes. Polymer 99:642–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.07310.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.073 ↗
11. Thong CC, Teo DCL, Ng CK (2016) Application of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) in cement-based composite materials: a review of its engineering properties and microstructure behavior. Constr Build Mater 107:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.18810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.188 ↗
12. Salunkhe AB, Khot VM, Thorat ND, Phadatare MR, Sathish CI, Dhawale DS, Pawar SH (2013) Polyvinyl alcohol functionalized cobalt ferrite nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Appl Surf Sci 264:598–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.10.07310.1016/j.apsusc.2012.10.073 ↗
13. Wang JC, Chang KP, Lin CT, Su CY, Güneş F, Boutchich M, Chen CH, Chen CH, Chen CS, Li LJ, Lai CS (2017) Integration of ammonia-plasma-functionalized graphene nanodiscs as charge trapping centers for nonvolatile memory applications. Carbon 113:318–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.06310.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.063 ↗
14. Aykaç A, Gergeroglu H, Beşli B, Akkaş EÖ, Yavaş A, Güler S, Güneş F, Erol M (2021) An overview on recent progress of metal oxide/graphene/CNTs-based nanobiosensors. Nanoscale Res Lett 16(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-021-03519-w10.1186/s11671-021-03519-w ↗
15. Yao F, Lim SC, Yu WJ, Lee IH, Güneş F, Hwang HR, Yang SB, So KP, Han GH, Lee YH (2010) AC response to gas exposure in vertically aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube electrode. The J Phys Chem C 114(8):3659–3663. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp910678m10.1021/jp910678m ↗
16. Güneş F (2016) A direct synthesis of Si-nanowires on 3D porous graphene as a high performance anode material for Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv 6(2):1678–1685. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA18353G10.1039/C5RA18353G ↗
17. Tunç ID, Erol M, Güneş F, Sütçü M (2020) Growth of ZnO nanowires on carbon fibers for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue aqueous solutions: an investigation on the optimization of processing parameters through response surface methodology/central composite design. Ceram Int 46(6):7459–7474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.24410.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.244 ↗
18. Al-Saleh MH, Saadeh WH, Sundararaj U (2013) EMI shielding effectiveness of carbon based nanostructured polymeric materials: a comparative study. Carbon 60:146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.00810.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.008 ↗
19. Kolanowska A, Janas D, Herman AP, Jędrysiak RG, Giżewski T, Boncel S (2018) From blackness to invisibility–carbon nanotubes role in the attenuation of and shielding from radio waves for stealth technology. Carbon 126:31–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.07810.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.078 ↗
20. Cheng Y, Zhu W, Lu X, Wang C (2021) Recent progress of electrospun nanofibrous materials for electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos Commun 27:100823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2021.10082310.1016/j.coco.2021.100823 ↗
21. Nasouri K, Shoushtari AM (2017) Designing, modeling and manufacturing of lightweight carbon nanotubes/polymer composite nanofibers for electromagnetic interference shielding application. Compos Sci Technol 145:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.04110.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.041 ↗
22. Huo J, Wang L, Yu H (2009) Polymeric nanocomposites for electromagnetic wave absorption. J Mater Sci 44:3917–3927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3561-110.1007/s10853-009-3561-1 ↗
23. Li C, Ge Y, Jiang X, Waterhouse GI, Zhang Z, Yu L (2018) Porous Fe3O4/C microspheres for efficient broadband electromagnetic wave absorption. Ceram Int 44(16):19171–19183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.26410.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.264 ↗
24. Singh SK, Akhtar MJ, Kar KK (2019) Impact of Al2O3, TiO2, ZnO and BaTiO3 on the microwave absorption properties of exfoliated graphite/epoxy composites at X-band frequencies. Compos B 167:135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.012 ↗
25. Wang H, Li S, Liu M, Li J, Zhou X (2021) Review on shielding mechanism and structural design of electromagnetic interference shielding composites. Macromol Mater Eng 306(6):2100032. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20210003210.1002/mame.202100032 ↗
26. Chen J, Liao X, Li S, Wang W, Guo F, Li G (2020) A promising strategy for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding by designing a porous double-percolated structure in MWCNT/polymer-based composites. Compos A 138:106059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10605910.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106059 ↗
27. Zhou T, Song Z, Sundmacher K (2019) Big data creates new opportunities for materials research: A review on methods and applications of machine learning for materials design. Engineering 5(6):1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.02.01110.1016/j.eng.2019.02.011 ↗
28. Himanen L, Geurts A, Foster AS, Rinke P (2019) Data-driven materials science: status, challenges, and perspectives. Adv Sci 6(21):1900808. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20190080810.1002/advs.201900808 ↗
29. Pilania G (2021) Machine learning in materials science: From explainable predictions to autonomous design. Comput Mater Sci 193:110360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11036010.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110360 ↗
30. Morelos-Gomez A, Terrones M, Endo M (2022) Data science applied to carbon materials: synthesis, characterization, and applications. Adv Theory Simul 5(2):2100205. https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.20210020510.1002/adts.202100205 ↗
31. Ling J, Hutchinson M, Antono E, Paradiso S, Meredig B (2017) High-dimensional materials and process optimization using data-driven experimental design with well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6(3):207–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-017-0098-z10.1007/s40192-017-0098-z ↗
32. He Y, Gong R, Nie Y, He H, Zhao Z (2005) Optimization of two-layer electromagnetic wave absorbers composed of magnetic and dielectric materials in gigahertz frequency band. J Appl Phys 98(8):084903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.210815810.1063/1.2108158 ↗
33. Seyed Dorraji MS, Rasoulifard MH, Amani-Ghadim AR, Khodabandeloo MH, Felekari M, Khoshrou MR, Hajimiri I (2016) Microwave absorption properties of polypyrrole-SrFe12O19-TiO2-epoxy resin nanocomposites: optimization using response surface methodology. Appl Surf Sci 383:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.10810.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.108 ↗
34. Toktas A, Ustun D, Tekbas M (2019) Multi-objective design of multi-layer radar absorber using surrogate-based optimization. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Technol 67(8):3318–3329. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2019.292260010.1109/TMTT.2019.2922600 ↗
35. Green M, Van Tran AT, Chen X (2020) Maximizing the microwave absorption performance of polypyrrole by data-driven discovery. Compos Sci Technol 199:108332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10833210.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108332 ↗
36. Huang Y, Fan Q, Chen J, Li L, Chen M, Tang L, Fang D (2020) Optimization of flexible multilayered metastructure fabricated by dielectric-magnetic nano lossy composites with broadband microwave absorption. Compos Sci Technol 191:108066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10806610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108066 ↗
37. Sidi Salah L, Chouai M, Danlée Y, Huynen I, Ouslimani N (2020) Simulation and optimization of electromagnetic absorption of polycarbonate/CNT composites using machine learning. Micromachines 11(8):778. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1108077810.3390/mi11080778 ↗
38. Polatoğlu İ, Aydin L (2020) A new design strategy with stochastic optimization on the preparation of magnetite cross-linked tyrosinase aggregates (MCLTA). Process Biochem 99:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2020.08.01910.1016/j.procbio.2020.08.019 ↗
39. Polatoğlu İ, Aydın L, Nevruz BÇ, Özer S (2020) A novel approach for the optimal design of a biosensor. Anal Lett 53(9):1428–1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2019.170907510.1080/00032719.2019.1709075 ↗
40. Ceylan AB, Aydın L, Nil M, Mamur H, Polatoğlu İ, Sözen H (2021) A new hybrid approach in selection of optimum establishment location of the biogas energy production plant. Biomass Conv and Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01532-810.1007/s13399-021-01532-8 ↗
41. Aydin L, Artem HS, Oterkus S (2020) Designing engineering structures using stochastic optimization methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA. https://doi.org/10.1201/978042928957610.1201/9780429289576 ↗
42. Aydin L, Artem HS (2011) Comparison of stochastic search optimization algorithms for the laminated composites under mechanical and hygrothermal loadings. J Reinf Plast Compos 30(14):1197–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441141513810.1177/0731684411415138 ↗
43. Savran M, Aydin L (2018) Stochastic optimization of graphite-flax/epoxy hybrid laminated composite for maximum fundamental frequency and minimum cost. Eng Struct 174:675–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.04310.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.043 ↗
44. Erten HI, Deveci HA, Artem HS (2020) Stochastic optimization methods. In: Aydin L, Artem HS, Oterkus S (eds) Designing engineering structures using stochastic optimization methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 10–2310.1201/9780429289576-2 ↗
45. Savran M, Sayi H, Aydin L (2020) Mathematica and optimization. In: Aydin L, Artem HS, Oterkus S (eds) Designing engineering structures using stochastic optimization methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 24–4310.1201/9780429289576-3 ↗