Investigation of Laser Ablation Quality Based on Data Science and Machine Learning XGBoost Classifier
Source abstract
Abstract
This work proposes a matching data science approach for the laser ablation quality, reb, the study of Si3N4 film based on supervised machine learning classifiers in the CMOS-MEMS process. The study demonstrates that there exists an energy threshold, Eth, for laser ablation. If the laser energy surpasses this threshold, increasing the interval time will not contribute significantly to the recovery of pulse laser energy. Thus, reb enhancement is limited. When the energy is greater than 0.258 mJ, there exists a critical value of interval time at which the reb value is relatively low for each energy level, respectively. In addition, the variation of reb, Δreb, is independent of the interval time at the invariant point of energy between 0.32 mJ and 0.36 mJ. Energy and interval time exhibit a Pearson correlation of 0.82 and 0.53 with reb, respectively. To maintain Δreb below 0.15, green laser ablation of Si3N4 at operating energies of 0.258–0.378 mJ can adopt a baseline interval time of the initial baseline multiplied by 1/∜2. Additionally, for operating energies of 0.288–0.378 mJ during Si3N4 laser ablation, Δreb can be kept below 0.1. With the forced partition methods, namely, the k-means method and percentile method, the XGBoost (v 2.0.3) classifier maintains a competitive accuracy across test sizes of 0.20–0.40, outperforming the machine learning algorithms Random Forest and Logistic Regression, with the highest accuracy of 0.78 at a test size of 0.20.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser Material Processing Techniques · Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma · Ocular and Laser Science Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Semiconductor and Electro-Optical Technology, Minghsin University of Science and Technology, Hsinchu 30401, Taiwan
Funding
National Science and Technology Council, R. O. C.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Investigation of ablation mechanisms for selective laser ablation of silicon nitride layers10.1016/j.egypro.2011.06.188 ↗
2. Mazalan, M., Johari, S., Ng, B.P., and Wahab, Y. (2014, January 27–29). Characterization of MEMS Structure on Silicon Wafer using KrF Excimer Laser Micromachining. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics (ICSE2014), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1109/SMELEC.2014.6920835 ↗
3. Fabrication of a Cost-Effective MEMS-Based Piezoresistive Cantilever Sensor for Gait Movement Analysis10.4103/2600-9404.323120 ↗
4. Laser Ablation Mechanism of Silicon Nitride Layers in A Nanosecond UV Regime10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.103 ↗
5. Noncontact thermal mapping method based on local temperature data using deep neural network regression10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122236 ↗
6. Rapid monitoring of indoor air quality for efficient HVAC systems using fully convolutional network deep learning model10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110191 ↗
7. Decoupling thermal effects in GaN photodetectors for accurate measurement of ultraviolet intensity using deep neural network10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106309 ↗
8. Deep Neural Network Regression-Assisted Pressure Sensor for Decoupling Thermal Variations at Different Operating Temperatures10.1002/aisy.202300186 ↗
9. Prediction of Equivalence Ratio in Combustion Flame Using Chemiluminescence Emission and Deep Neural Network10.1155/2023/3889951 ↗
10. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
11. The Regression Analysis of Binary Sequences10.1111/j.2517-6161.1958.tb00292.x ↗
12. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
13. Live imaging of laser machining via plasma deep learning10.1364/OE.507708 ↗
14. Acoustic and plasma sensing of laser ablation via deep learning10.1364/OE.494700 ↗
15. A deep learning-based predictive simulator for the optimization of ultrashort pulse laser drilling10.1038/s44172-022-00048-x ↗
16. Ultrafast laser ablation simulator using deep neural networks10.1038/s41598-022-09870-x ↗
17. Tsai, C.-C., and Lin, C.-H. (2014). Chip Level Microelectromechanical Humidity Switch. R. O. (No. M479441), C. Patent.
18. Wang, L., Suess-Wolf, R., Ulm, M., and Franke, J. (2018, January 17–21). Investigation of the laser ablation threshold for optimizing Laser Direct Structuring in the 3D-MID Technology. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Electronics Packaging and iMAPS All Asia Conference (ICEP-IAAC), Mie, Japan.10.23919/ICEP.2018.8374339 ↗
19. Tsai, C.-C., and Chan, C.-C. (2022, January 28–30). Ensemble and Unsupervised Machine Learning Applied on Laser Ablation Quality Study of Silicon Nitride during CMOS-MEMS Post Processing. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 4th Eurasia Conference on IOT, Communication and Engineering (ECICE), Yunlin, Taiwan.10.1109/ECICE55674.2022.10042858 ↗
20. Tsai, C.-C., and Chan, C.-C. (2021, January 29–31). Laser Ablation Quality Study of Silicon Nitride during CMOS-MEMS post Processing by Using Machine Learning and Data Science. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Eurasia Conference on IOT, Communication and Engineering, Yunlin, Taiwan.10.1109/ECICE52819.2021.9645695 ↗
21. (2023, December 21). XGBoost: The Definitive Guide (Part 1). Medium. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/xgboost-the-definitive-guide-part-1-cc24d2dcd87a.
22. (2023, November 30). Pearson Correlation Coefficient. Wikipedia. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_correlation_coefficient.