Steady-Speed Traffic Capacity Analysis for Autonomous and Human-Driven Vehicles
Source abstract
Abstract
As the automotive industry transitions towards the era of autonomous vehicles, it is imperative to assess and compare the following distances maintained by vehicles equipped with adaptive cruise control (ACC) systems against those of traditional human-driven vehicles. This study aims to provide insights into the future use of autonomous vehicles by empirically examining the following distances achieved under different driving conditions. Controlled experiments were conducted using three vehicles equipped with various types of ACC sensors, and comparable scenarios were replicated with human drivers. The experiments involved driving at multiple constant speeds to evaluate the efficacy of ACC in maintaining safe following distances. Our findings indicate that ACC systems consistently converge on optimal following distances, demonstrating their ability to regulate spacing between vehicles effectively. However, a notable downside emerged in terms of their adverse impact on road capacities, where the results indicate a mitigation in capacity percentages of 7.6%, 9.3%, and 15.6% for the three types of ACC-equipped vehicles compared to human drivers. This study sheds light on the intricate interplay between ACC systems and human driving behaviors, emphasizing the need to consider both factors when envisioning the future of autonomous vehicles. While ACC systems provide a standardized and reliable approach to following distances, the shorter distances observed in human-driven scenarios suggest a potential trade-off between safety and traffic capacity. These insights contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics involved in autonomous driving, facilitating informed decision making for the integration of autonomous vehicles into future transportation systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic control and management · Traffic and Road Safety · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Duhok, Duhok 1006, Iraq
Department of Transport, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Györ, Hungary
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.025 ↗
2. Evaluation of the impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on reducing rear-end collision risks on freeways10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.015 ↗
3. Luo, L., Liu, M., Mei, J., Chen, Y., and Bi, L. (2023). A Visual-Based Approach for Drivers Environment Perception and Quantification in Different Weather Conditions. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132212176 ↗
4. Aloufi, N., Alnori, A., Thayananthan, V., and Basuhail, A. (2023). Object Detection Performance Evaluation for Autonomous Vehicles in Sandy Weather Environments. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131810249 ↗
5. Adaptive Cruise Control Strategies Implemented on Experimental Vehicles: A Review10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.09.004 ↗
6. Vlacic, L., Parent, M., and Harashima, F. (2001). Intelligent Vehicle Technologies, Butterworth-Heinemann.
7. Improvement of adaptive cruise control performance10.1155/2010/295016 ↗
8. Towards reducing the number of crashes during hurricane evacuation: Assessing the potential safety impact of adaptive cruise control systems10.1016/j.trc.2021.103188 ↗
9. The impact of adaptive cruise control systems on highway safety and traffic flow10.1243/095440704772913918 ↗
10. Shladover, S.E., Su, D., and Lu, X.Y. (2012). Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow. Transp. Res. Rec., 2324.10.3141/2324-08 ↗
11. Investigation of Automated Vehicle Effects on Driver’s Behavior and Traffic Performance10.1016/j.trpro.2016.06.063 ↗
12. The impact of autonomous vehicles on urban traffic network capacity: An experimental analysis by microscopic traffic simulation10.1080/19427867.2019.1662561 ↗
13. On the road safety benefits of advanced driver assistance systems in different driving contexts
14. Ju, P., and Song, J. (2023). An Improved Advanced Driver-Assistance System: Model-Free Prescribed Performance Adaptive Cruise Control. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132011499 ↗
15. The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics10.1109/TITS.2006.884615 ↗
16. Multiplatooning leaders positioning and cooperative behavior algorithms of communicant automated vehicles for high traffic capacity10.1109/TITS.2014.2352858 ↗
17. Harwood, N., and Reed, N. (2014, January 6–7). Modelling the impact of platooning on motorway capacity. Proceedings of the IET Conference, London, UK.10.1049/cp.2014.0808 ↗
18. Borneo, A., Zerbato, L., Miretti, F., Tota, A., Galvagno, E., and Misul, D.A. (2023). Platooning Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control for Dynamic Performance and Energy Saving: A Comparative Study of Linear Quadratic and Reinforcement Learning-Based Controllers. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131810459 ↗
19. Mohammed, D., and Horváth, B. (2023). Vehicle Automation Impact on Traffic Flow and Stability: A Review of Literature. Acta Polytech. Hung., 20.10.12700/APH.20.5.2023.5.9 ↗
20. Kesting, A., Treiber, M., Schönhof, M., Kranke, F., and Helbing, D. (2007). Traffic and Granular Flow’05, Springer.
21. Empirical study on car-following characteristics of commercial automated vehicles with different headway settings10.1016/j.trc.2021.103134 ↗
22. Exploring the effects of cooperative adaptive cruise control on highway traffic flow using microscopic traffic simulation10.1080/03081060.2013.870791 ↗
23. The Impact of Automated Vehicles on Traffic Flow and Road Capacity on Urban Road Networks10.1155/2021/8404951 ↗
24. Effects of adaptive cruise control systems on highway traffic flow capacity10.3141/1800-10 ↗
25. Will automated vehicles negatively impact traffic flow?10.1155/2017/3082781 ↗
26. Characterizing the impact of production adaptive cruise control on traffic flow: An investigation
27. Effect of Autonomous Vehicles on Performance of Signalized Intersections10.1061/JTEPBS.0000297 ↗
28. Ploeg, J., Scheepers, B.T., Nunen, E.V., Wouw, N.V.D., and Nijmeijer, H. (2011, January 5–7). Design and experimental evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems—ITSC, Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2011.6082981 ↗
29. Are Commercially Implemented Adaptive Cruise Control Systems String Stable?10.1109/TITS.2020.3000682 ↗
30. Car-Following Properties of a Commercial Adaptive Cruise Control System: A Pilot Field Test10.1177/03611981221077085 ↗
31. Empirical Study on the Properties of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems and Their Impact on Traffic Flow and String Stability10.1177/0361198120911047 ↗
32. Garber, N.J., and Hoel, L.A. (2014). Traffic and Highway Engineering, Cengage Learning.
33. Impacts of commercially available adaptive cruise control vehicles on highway stability and throughput10.1016/j.trc.2020.102897 ↗