journal article·2023-12-29Open access

Machine Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of the Seismic Response of Rigid Rocking Blocks

Ioannis Karampinis, Kosmas E. Bantilas, Ioannis E. Kavvadias, Lazaros Iliadis, Anaxagoras Elenas

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

A variety of structural members and non-structural components, including bridge piers, museum artifacts, furniture, or electrical and mechanical equipment, can uplift and rock under ground motion excitations. Given the inherently non-linear nature of rocking behavior, employing machine learning algorithms to predict rocking response presents a notable challenge. In the present study, the performance of supervised ML algorithms in predicting the maximum seismic response of free-standing rigid blocks subjected to ground motion excitations is evaluated. As such, both regression and classification algorithms were developed and tested, aiming to model the finite rocking response and rocking overturn. From this point of view, it is essential to estimate the maximum rocking rotation and to efficiently classify its magnitude by successfully assigning respective labels. To this end, a dataset containing the response data of 1100 rigid blocks subjected to 15,000 ground motion excitations, was employed. The results showed high accuracy in both the classification (95% accuracy) and regression (coefficient of determination R2=0.89) tasks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Dam Engineering and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Lab of Mathematics and Informatics (ISCE), Department of Civil Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 67100 Xanthi, Greece

Institute of Structural Statics and Dynamics, Department of Civil Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 67100 Xanthi, Greece

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes10.1785/BSSA0530020403 ↗
2. A half-century of rocking isolation10.12989/eas.2014.7.6.1187 ↗
3. Rocking isolation of low-rise frame structures founded on isolated footings10.1002/eqe.1182 ↗
4. Comparative assessment of two rocking isolation techniques for a motorway overpass bridge10.3389/fbuil.2017.00047 ↗
5. Seismic performance of rocking frames with flag-shaped hysteretic behavior10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001206 ↗
6. The dynamics of an elastic structure coupled with a rocking wall10.1002/eqe.2838 ↗
7. Development of a bidirectional rocking isolation bearing system (Bi-RIBS) to control excessive seismic response of bridge structures10.1002/eqe.3913 ↗
8. Seismic retrofit of existing SRC frames using rocking walls and steel dampers10.1007/s11709-011-0114-x ↗
9. New rocking column with control of negative stiffness displacement range and its application to RC frames10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110133 ↗
10. Dynamics of rocking podium structures10.1002/eqe.2915 ↗
11. Seismic response of elastic multidegree of freedom oscillators placed on the top of rocking storey10.1002/eqe.3400 ↗
12. Analytical investigation of the seismic response of elastic oscillators placed on the top of rocking storey10.1007/s10518-020-01019-3 ↗
13. Analytical modeling and seismic performance of a novel energy dissipative kinematic isolation for building structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116777 ↗
14. Seismic response distribution expressions for rocking building contents under ordinary ground motions10.1007/s10518-022-01424-w ↗
15. Experimental study on rocking blocks subjected to bidirectional ground and floor motions via shaking table tests10.1002/eqe.3918 ↗
16. Fragility and risk assessment of freestanding building contents10.1002/eqe.3276 ↗
17. Acceleration demands in single-storey RC buildings with flexible diaphragms10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115276 ↗
18. Vukobratović, V., and Ruggieri, S. (2021). Floor acceleration demands in a twelve-storey RC shear wall building. Buildings, 11.10.3390/buildings11020038 ↗
19. The interaction of elasticity and rocking in flexible structures allowed to uplift10.1002/eqe.2181 ↗
20. An analytical model of a deformable cantilever structure rocking on a rigid surface: Development and verification10.1002/eqe.2608 ↗
21. Planar rocking response and stability analysis of an array of free-standing columns capped with a freely supported rigid beam10.1002/eqe.2222 ↗
22. Seismic response analysis of the planar rocking frame10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000939 ↗
23. Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes10.1002/eqe.4290080606 ↗
24. Is rocking motion predictable?10.1002/eqe.2978 ↗
25. Rocking amplification and strong-motion duration10.1002/eqe.3058 ↗
26. Statistical property parameterization of simple rocking block response10.1002/eqe.3765 ↗
27. Intensity measures, fragility analysis and dimensionality reduction of rocking under far-field ground motions10.1002/eqe.3740 ↗
28. Seismic response parametric study of ancient rocking columns10.1080/15583058.2017.1298009 ↗
29. Dimensionless fragility curves for rocking response to near-fault excitations10.1002/eqe.2571 ↗
30. Fragility curves and seismic demand hazard analysis of rocking walls restrained with elasto-plastic ties10.1002/eqe.3524 ↗
31. Rocking spectrum intensity measures for seismic assessment of rocking rigid blocks10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.07.021 ↗
32. Rapid seismic response prediction of RC frames based on deep learning and limited building information10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114638 ↗
33. Lazaridis, P.C., Kavvadias, I.E., Demertzis, K., Iliadis, L., and Vasiliadis, L.K. (2023). Interpretable Machine Learning for Assessing the Cumulative Damage of a Reinforced Concrete Frame Induced by Seismic Sequences. Sustainability, 15.10.20944/preprints202305.0737.v1 ↗
34. Machine learning-based approaches for seismic demand and collapse of ductile reinforced concrete building frames10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101905 ↗
35. Hybrid data-driven hazard-consistent drift models for SMRF10.1002/eqe.3807 ↗
36. Prediction of seismic drift responses of planar steel moment frames using artificial neural network and extreme gradient boosting10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112518 ↗
37. Predicting seismic response of SMRFs founded on different soil types using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114953 ↗
38. Interpretable machine learning models for the estimation of seismic drifts in CLT buildings10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106365 ↗
39. Probabilistic seismic analysis of bridges through machine learning approaches10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.006 ↗
40. Deng, Z., Huang, M., Wan, N., and Zhang, J. (2023). The Current Development of Structural Health Monitoring for Bridges: A Review. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13061360 ↗
41. Classifying earthquake damage to buildings using machine learning10.1177/8755293019878137 ↗
42. Rapid seismic damage state assessment of RC frames using machine learning methods10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105797 ↗
43. A neural network-based multivariate seismic classifier for simultaneous post-earthquake fragility estimation and damage classification10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113918 ↗
44. On the application of machine learning techniques to derive seismic fragility curves10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.004 ↗
45. A machine learning-based analysis for predicting fragility curve parameters of buildings10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105367 ↗
46. ANN-based rapid seismic fragility analysis for multi-span concrete bridges10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.063 ↗
47. Neural network analysis of overturning response under near-fault type excitation10.1007/s11803-005-0004-0 ↗
48. Pan, X., Wen, Z., and Yang, T. (2021). Dynamic analysis of nonlinear civil engineering structures using artificial neural network with adaptive training. arXiv.
49. Achmet, Z., Diamantopoulos, S., and Fragiadakis, M. (2023). Rapid seismic response prediction of rocking blocks using machine learning. Bull. Earthq. Eng., 1–19.10.1007/s10518-023-01680-4 ↗
50. Shen, Y., and Málaga-Chuquitaype, C. (2023). Physics-informed AI models for the seismic response prediction of rocking structures. Data-Centric Eng., under publication.
51. Brown, L.T., Diehl, J.G., and Nigbor, R.L. (February, January 30). A simplified procedure to measure average shear-wave velocity to a depth of 30 meters (VS30). Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
52. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion
53. A review on class imbalance problem: Analysis and potential solutions10.20943/01201706.4351 ↗
54. An exhaustive literature review on class imbalance problem
55. Meskouris, K. (2000). Structural Dynamics: Models, Methods, Examples, Ernst & Sohn.
56. Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:2(150) ↗
57. Kramer, S.L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Pearson Education India.
58. Seismic intensity measures optimized for low-rise reinforced concrete frame structures10.1080/13632469.2021.1964650 ↗
59. Dimensional analysis of yielding and pounding structures for records without distinct pulses10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.02.006 ↗
60. Arias, A. (1970). A Measure of Earthquake Intensity, MIT Press.
61. Reliability bases for seismic safety assessment and design
62. A measure of earthquake motion capacity to damage medium-period structures10.1016/S0267-7261(05)80002-8 ↗
63. An approach to the measurement of the potential structural damage of earthquake ground motions10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199701)26:1<79::AID-EQE624>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
64. Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques
65. An extensive experimental survey of regression methods10.1016/j.neunet.2018.12.010 ↗
66. Cilimkovic, M. (2015). Neural Networks and Back Propagation Algorithm, Institute of Technology Blanchardstown.
67. Vanschoren, J. (2018). Meta-learning: A survey. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-030-05318-5_2 ↗
68. What are decision trees?10.1038/nbt0908-1011 ↗
69. Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021 ↗
70. Ramjee, S., and Wornow, M. (2023, December 25). Histogram-Based Gradient Boosting Trees for Efficient Graph Learning with Wasserstein Embeddings. Available online: https://sharanramjee.github.io/files/projects/cs224w.pdf.
71. Alsabti, K., Ranka, S., and Singh, V. (1998, January 27–31). CLOUDS: A Decision Tree Classifier for Large Datasets. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD-98), New York, NY, USA.
72. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree
73. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
74. Classification and regression trees10.1002/widm.8 ↗
75. Ahsan, M.M., Mahmud, M.P., Saha, P.K., Gupta, K.D., and Siddique, Z. (2021). Effect of Data Scaling Methods on Machine Learning Algorithms and Model Performance. Technologies, 9.10.3390/technologies9030052 ↗
76. On hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms: Theory and Practice10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.061 ↗
77. Raschka, S. (2014). An overview of general performance metrics of binary classifier systems. arXiv.