journal article·2023-11-15Open access

A Numerical Study on the Influence of Transverse Grooves on the Aerodynamic Performance of Micro Air Vehicles Airfoils

Zhiping Li, Yueren Zuo, Haideng Zhang, Long He, Enbo Sun, Yuhan Long, Lifu Zhang, Peng Zhang

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 22

Abstract

Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs) airfoils usually operate at low Reynolds number conditions, where viscous drag will consume a large amount of propulsion power. Due to the small dimensions, many drag reduction methods have failed, resulting in limited current research. To develop an effective method of reducing viscous drag, transverse grooves were placed on the surface of MAVs airfoils in this study, and a numerical investigation was implemented to uncover the corresponding flow control law as well as the mechanism. Research has shown that transverse grooves have an impact on the drag and lift of airfoils. For drag, properly sized transverse grooves have the effect of reducing drag, but under high adverse pressure gradients or when the continuous arrangement of grooves is excessive, the optimal drag reduction effect achieved by the grooves is weakened, and even the drag increases due to the significant increase in pressure difference. In severe cases, it may also cause strong flow separation, which is not conducive to MAV flight. For lift, the boundary vortex in the groove has the ability to reduce the static pressure near the groove. However, high adverse pressure gradients or too many grooves will thicken the boundary layer and increase the blockage effect, resulting in a large static pressure on the grooved side of the airfoil (with an increase in drag). From the perspective of circulation, the static pressure changes on the suction and pressure surfaces have opposite effects on lift. Considering the comprehensive aerodynamic performance of the airfoil, we designed a high lift-to-drag ratio airfoil with grooves, which increased the lift-to-drag ratio by 33.747% compared to the smooth airfoil. Based on the conclusions, we proposed preliminary design criteria for grooved airfoils, providing guidance for subsequent research and applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Institute of Aero-Engine, Beihang University, Beijing 102206, China

College of Aeronatutics and Aerospace, Airforce Engineering University, Xi’an 710038, China

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

Aeronautical Engineering Institute, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Science and Technology Major Project · Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Davis, W.R. (1996, January 15–19). Micro UAV. Proceedings of the Presentation to 23rd AUVSI Symposium, Orlando, FL, USA.
2. Scheduling drone charging for multi-drone network based on consensus time-stamp and game theory10.1016/j.comcom.2019.09.021 ↗
3. Serokhvostov, S.V. (2008, January 8–10). Ways and technologies required for MAV miniaturization. Proceedings of the European Micro Air Vehicle Conference (EMAV’08), Braunschweig, Germany.
4. Keennon, M., and Grasmeyer, J. (2003, January 14–17). Development of two MAVs and vision of the future of MAV design. Proceedings of the AIAA International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition: The Next 100 Years, Dayton, OH, USA.10.2514/6.2003-2901 ↗
5. Goeksel, B., Greenblatt, D., Rechenberg, I., Nayeri, C., and Paschereit, C. (2006, January 5–8). Steady and unsteady plasma wall jets for separation and circulation control. Proceedings of the 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2006-3686 ↗
6. Göksel, B., Greenblatt, D., Rechenberg, I., Kastantin, Y., Nayeri, C.N., and Paschereit, C.O. (2006, January 27–29). Pulsed plasma actuators for active flow control at MAV Reynolds numbers. Proceedings of the Active Flow Control: Papers Contributed to the Conference “Active Flow Control 2006”, Berlin, Germany.
7. Numerical investigation of plasma-based control for low-Reynolds-number airfoil flows10.2514/1.J050755 ↗
8. The effects of rectangular riblets on rectangular micro air vehicles for drag reduction10.1177/0954410016638868 ↗
9. Aircraft viscous drag reduction using riblets10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00048-9 ↗
10. Visualization of flow over a thick airfoil with circular cross-sectional riblets at low Reynolds numbers10.1007/s12650-019-00576-3 ↗
11. Flexible-and rigid-wing micro air vehicle: Lift and drag comparison10.2514/1.15643 ↗
12. Flexible-membrane airfoils at low Reynolds numbers10.2514/1.36438 ↗
13. Ifju, P., Jenkins, D., Ettinger, S., Lian, Y., Shyy, W., and Waszak, M. (2002, January 14–17). Flexible-wing-based micro air vehicles. Proceedings of the 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.2002-705 ↗
14. Optimization of flapping airfoils for maximum thrust and propulsive efficiency10.2514/1.816 ↗
15. Desert, T., Moschetta, J.M., and Bezard, H. (2017, January 3–6). Aerodynamic design of a Martian micro air vehicle. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference for Aeronautics and Aerospace Sciences, Milan, Italy.
16. Bellman, M., Straccia, J., Morgan, B., Maschmeyer, K., and Agarwal, R. (2009, January 5–8). Improving genetic algorithm efficiency with an artificial neural network for optimization of low Reynolds number airfoils. Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2009-1096 ↗
17. Laminar separation bubble characteristics on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers10.2514/3.9739 ↗
18. Mueller, T.J., and Torres, G.E. (2001). Aerodynamics of Low-Aspect Ratio Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers with Applications to Micro Air Vehicle Design and Optimization, University of Notre Dame.10.21236/ADA397533 ↗
19. Configuration optimization of two tandem airfoils at low Reynolds numbers10.1016/j.apm.2021.10.029 ↗
20. Micro-air-vehicles: Can they be controlled better?10.2514/2.2807 ↗
21. A reliability design method for a lithium-ion battery pack considering the thermal disequilibrium in electric vehicles10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.036 ↗
22. Malozyomov, B.V., Martyushev, N.V., Sorokova, S.N., Efremenkov, E.A., and Qi, M. (2023). Mathematical Modeling of Mechanical Forces and Power Balance in Electromechanical Energy Converter. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11102394 ↗
23. Parabolic dune development modes according to shape at the southern fringes of the Hobq Desert, Inner Mongolia, China10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.08.009 ↗
24. Bushnell, D. (1983, January 10–13). Turbulent drag reduction for external flows. Proceedings of the 21st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada.10.2514/6.1983-227 ↗
25. Effect of free-stream turbulence on flow characteristics over a transversely-grooved surface10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.07.001 ↗
26. Drag reduction by microvortexes in transverse microgrooves10.1155/2014/734012 ↗
27. Walsh, M.J. (1980, January 24–25). Drag characteristics of V-groove and transverse curvature riblets. Proceedings of the Symposium on Viscous Flow Drag Reduction, Dallas, TX, USA.
28. Wang, J., Nakata, T., and Liu, H. (2019). Development of mixed flow fans with bio-inspired grooves. Biomimetics, 4.10.3390/biomimetics4040072 ↗
29. An investigation on the drag reduction performance of bioinspired pipeline surfaces with transverse microgrooves10.3762/bjnano.11.3 ↗
30. Dvorchak, M.J., Clouser, M.L., and Harbourne, A.D. (2020, January 8–11). AEROSPACE UV CURED Coatings; Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow. Proceedings of the RadTech 2020 UV & EB Technical Conference Proceedings, Orlando, FL, USA.
31. Li, Z., He, L., and Zheng, Y. (2022). Quasi-Analytical Solution of Optimum and Maximum Depth of Transverse V-Groove for Drag Reduction at Different Reynolds Numbers. Symmetry, 14.10.3390/sym14020342 ↗
32. CFD analysis on MAV NACA 2412 wing in high lift take-off configuration for enhanced lift generation10.4172/2168-9792.1000125 ↗
33. Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients10.2514/8.2938 ↗
34. A parametric study of adverse pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2011.03.004 ↗
35. Li, Z., He, L., Zuo, Y., and Meng, B. (2022). Analytic Solution of Optimal Aspect Ratio of Bionic Transverse V-Groove for Drag Reduction Based on Vorticity Kinetics. Aerospace, 9.10.3390/aerospace9120749 ↗
36. Jones, E.M. (2013). An Experimental Study of Flow Separation over a Flat Plate with 2D Transverse Grooves, The University of Alabama.
37. Influence of wall riblets on diffuser flow10.1007/BF00404819 ↗
38. The reduction of skin friction by riblets under the influence of an adverse pressure gradient10.1007/BF00195591 ↗
39. Drag reduction due to streamwise grooves in turbulent channel flow10.1115/1.4034098 ↗
40. Wokoeck, R., Krimmelbein, N., Ortmanns, J., Ciobaca, V., Radespiel, R., and Krumbein, A. (2006, January 9–12). RANS simulation and experiments on the stall behaviour of an airfoil with laminar separation bubbles. Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Sacramento, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2006-244 ↗
41. Shome, B., and Radle, M. (2013). Assessment of Transitional Model for Prediction of Aerodynamic Performance of Airfoils at Low Reynolds Number Flow Regime, SAE International. SAE Technical Paper.10.4271/2013-01-2314 ↗
42. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications10.2514/3.12149 ↗
43. Numerical study on reduction of aerodynamic noise around an airfoil with biomimetic structures10.1016/j.jsv.2016.11.021 ↗
44. Aerodynamic noise simulation of the flow past an airfoil trailing-edge using a hybrid zonal RANS-LES10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.04.008 ↗
45. Matsson, J.E., Voth, J.A., McCain, C.A., and McGraw, C. (2016, January 26–29). Aerodynamic performance of the NACA 2412 airfoil at Low Reynolds Number. Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA.
46. The effect of wall groove numbers on pressure drop in pipe flows10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.v42.i2.30 ↗
47. Numerical study on the influence of top and valley shape of the transverse groove on the drag reduction rate10.15632/jtam-pl/171470 ↗