Reconstructing Microstructures From Statistical Descriptors Using Neural Cellular Automata
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The problem of generating microstructures of complex materials in silico has been approached from various directions including simulation, Markov, deep learning and descriptor-based approaches. This work presents a hybrid method that is inspired by all four categories and has interesting scalability properties. A neural cellular automaton is trained to evolve microstructures based on local information. Unlike most machine learning-based approaches, it does not directly require a data set of reference micrographs, but is trained from statistical microstructure descriptors that can stem from a single reference. This means that the training cost scales only with the complexity of the structure and associated descriptors. Since the size of the reconstructed structures can be set during inference, even extremely large structures can be efficiently generated. Similarly, the method is very efficient if many structures are to be reconstructed from the same descriptor for statistical evaluations. The method is formulated and discussed in detail by means of various numerical experiments, demonstrating its utility and scalability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen W, Iyer A, Bostanabad R (2022) Data-centric design of microstructural materials systems, engineering. p S209580992200056X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.05.022. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S209580992200056X10.1016/j.eng.2021.05.022 ↗
2. Bargmann S, Klusemann B, Markmann J, Schnabel JE, Schneider K, Soyarslan C, Wilmers J (2018) Generation of 3D representative volume elements for heterogeneous materials: a review. Progress Mater Sci 96:32210.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.003 ↗
3. Bostanabad R, Zhang Y, Li X, Kearney T, Brinson LC, Apley DW, Liu WK, Chen W (2018) Computational microstructure characterization and reconstruction: review of the state-of-the-art techniques. Progress Mater Sci 95:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.01.00510.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.01.005 ↗
4. Sahimi M, Tahmasebi P (2021) Reconstruction, optimization, and design of heterogeneous materials and media: basic principles, computational algorithms, and applications. Phys Rep 939:110.1016/j.physrep.2021.09.003 ↗
5. Doškář M, Zeman J, Krysl P, Novák J (2021) Microstructure-informed reduced modes synthesized with Wang tiles and the generalized finite element method. Comput Mech 68(2):23310.1007/s00466-021-02028-y ↗
6. Cahn JW, Hilliard JE (1958) Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy. J Chem Phys 28(2):25810.1063/1.1744102 ↗
7. Wight CL, Zhao J (2021) Solving Allen-Cahn and Cahn-Hilliard equations using the adaptive physics informed neural networks. Commun Comput Phys 29:93010.4208/cicp.OA-2020-0086 ↗
8. Prakasha D, Veeresha P, Baskonus H (2019) Two novel computational techniques for fractional Gardner and Cahn-Hilliard. Comp Math Methods 1(2):102110.1002/cmm4.1021 ↗
9. Risthaus L, Schneider M (2022) Solving phase-field models in the tensor train format to generate microstructures of bicontinuous composites. Appl Numer Math 178:26210.1016/j.apnum.2022.04.002 ↗
10. Zhao X, Wu X, Wang L, Hou P, Li Q, Zhang Y, Yang B (2022) Three-dimensional microstructural image synthesis from 2D backscattered electron image of cement paste. arXiv:2204.01645 [cs, eess]
11. Winkler P, Sadaghiani M, Jentsch H, Witt K (2014) Granular packing generation using DEM-modified force-biased-algorithm. Scour and Erosion. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 345–34910.1201/b17703-43 ↗
12. Vlassis NN, Sun W, Alshibli KA, Regueiro RA (2023) Synthesizing realistic sand assemblies with denoising diffusion in latent space, arXiv:2306.0441 [cs:CE]10.1002/nag.3818 ↗
13. Kawasaki K, Nagai T, Nakashima K (1989) Vertex models for two-dimensional grain growth. Philos Mag B 60(3):39910.1080/13642818908205916 ↗
14. Brakke KA (1992) The surface evolver. Exp Math 1(2):14110.1080/10586458.1992.10504253 ↗
15. Anderson MP, Grest GS, Srolovitz DJ (1989) Computer simulation of normal grain growth in three dimensions. Philos Mag B 59(3):29310.1080/13642818908220181 ↗
16. Janssens KGF (2010) An introductory review of cellular automata modeling of moving grain boundaries in polycrystalline materials. Math Comput Simul (MATCOM) 80(7):136110.1016/j.matcom.2009.02.011 ↗
17. Zhan X, Wei Y, Dong Z (2008) Cellular automaton simulation of grain growth with different orientation angles during solidification process. J Mater Process Technol 208(1):110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.130 ↗
18. Ghumman UF, Fang L, Wagner GJ, Chen W (2023) Calibration of cellular automaton model for microstructure prediction in additive manufacturing using dissimilarity score. J Manuf Sci Eng 145:061002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.405669010.1115/1.4056690 ↗
19. Tang J, Kumar S, De Lorenzis L, Hosseini E (2023) Neural cellular automata for solidification microstructure modelling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 414:116197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.11619710.1016/j.cma.2023.116197 ↗
20. Boettinger WJ, Warren JA, Beckermann C, Karma A (2002) Phase-field simulation of solidification. Ann Rev Mater Res 32(1):16310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.101901.155803 ↗
21. Tourret D, Liu H, Lorca J (2022) Phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution: recent applications, perspectives and challenges. Progress Mater Sci 123:10081010.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100810 ↗
22. Skogvoll V, Salvalaglio M, Angheluta L (2022) Hydrodynamic phase field crystal approach to interfaces, dislocations, and multi-grain networks. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 30:08400210.1088/1361-651X/ac9493 ↗
23. Tegeler M, Shchyglo O, Kamachali RD, Monas A, Steinbach I, Sutmann G (2017) Parallel multiphase field simulations with OpenPhase. Comput Phys Commun 215:17310.1016/j.cpc.2017.01.023 ↗
24. Tan JHK, Sing SL, Yeong WY (2020) Microstructure modelling for metallic additive manufacturing: a review. Virtual Phys Prototyp 15(1):8710.1080/17452759.2019.1677345 ↗
25. Körner C, Markl M, Koepf JA (2020) Modeling and simulation of microstructure evolution for additive manufacturing of metals: a critical review. Metall Mater Trans A 51(10):497010.1007/s11661-020-05946-3 ↗
26. Li J, Zhou X, Brochu M, Provatas N, Zhao YF (2020) Solidification microstructure simulation of Ti-6Al-4V in metal additive manufacturing: a review. Additive Manuf 31:100989
27. Yan W, Lin S, Kafka OL, Lian Y, Yu C, Liu Z, Yan J, Wolff S, Wu H, Ndip-Agbor E, Mozaffar M, Ehmann K, Cao J, Wagner GJ, Liu WK (2018) Data-driven multi-scale multi-physics models to derive process–structure–property relationships for additive manufacturing. Comput Mech 61(5):52110.1007/s00466-018-1539-z ↗
28. Wei LY, Lefebvre S, Kwatra V, Turk G (2009) State of the art in example-based texture synthesis, Eurographics. State of the Art Report, EG-STAR, pp 93–117
29. Sundararaghavan V (2014) Reconstruction of three-dimensional anisotropic microstructures from two-dimensional micrographs imaged on orthogonal planes. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 3(1):24010.1186/s40192-014-0019-3 ↗
30. Liu X, Shapiro V (2015) Random heterogeneous materials via texture synthesis. Comput Mater Sci 99:17710.1016/j.commatsci.2014.12.017 ↗
31. Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math Geol 34:2110.1023/A:1014009426274 ↗
32. Tahmasebi P, Sahimi M (2013) Cross-correlation function for accurate reconstruction of heterogeneous media. Phys Rev Lett 110(7):07800210.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078002 ↗
33. Tahmasebi P, Sahimi M (2016) Enhancing multiple-point geostatistical modeling: 1 graph theory and pattern adjustment: enhancing geostatistical modeling. Water Resour Res 52(3):207410.1002/2015WR017806 ↗
34. Tahmasebi P, Sahimi M (2016) Enhancing multiple-point geostatistical modeling: 2. Iterative simulation and multiple distance function: enhancing geostatistical modeling. Water Resour Res 52(3):209910.1002/2015WR017807 ↗
35. Tahmasebi P, Sahimi M (2018) A stochastic multiscale algorithm for modeling complex granular materials. Granul Matter 20(3):4510.1007/s10035-018-0816-z ↗
36. Straubhaar J, Renard P, Mariethoz G, Froidevaux R, Besson O (2011) An improved parallel multiple-point algorithm using a list approach. Math Geosci 43(3):30510.1007/s11004-011-9328-7 ↗
37. Mariethoz G, Renard P, Straubhaar J (2010) The direct sampling method to perform multiple-point geostatistical simulations. Water Resour Res 45:85. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR00762110.1029/2008WR007621 ↗
38. Hansen TM, Vu LT, Bach T (2016) MPSLIB: a C++ class for sequential simulation of multiple-point statistical models. SoftwareX 5:12710.1016/j.softx.2016.07.001 ↗
39. Fu J, Wang M, Xiao D, Zhong S, Ge X, Wu M, Evans B (2023) Hierarchical reconstruction of 3D well-connected porous media from 2D exemplars using statistics-informed neural network. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 410:116049
40. Bostanabad R, Bui AT, Xie W, Apley DW, Chen W (2016) Stochastic microstructure characterization and reconstruction via supervised learning. Acta Materialia 103:89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.04410.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.044 ↗
41. Latka K, Doskar M, Zeman J (2021) Microstructure reconstruction via artificial neural networks: a combination of causal and non-causal approach. Acta Polytechnica. arXiv:2110.09815v110.14311/APP.2022.34.0032 ↗
42. Noguchi S, Inoue J (2021) Stochastic characterization and reconstruction of material microstructures for establishment of process-structure-property linkage using the deep generative model. Phys Rev E 104(2):02530210.1103/PhysRevE.104.025302 ↗
43. Bostanabad R, Chen W, Apley D (2016) Characterization and reconstruction of 3D stochastic microstructures via supervised learning. J Micros 264(3):282. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.1244110.1111/jmi.12441 ↗
44. Cang R, Xu Y, Chen S, Liu Y, Jiao Y, Ren M.Y (2017) Microstructure representation and reconstruction of heterogeneous materials via deep belief network for computational material design. arXiv:1612.07401 [cond-mat, stat] pp 1–2910.1115/1.4036649 ↗
45. Faraji Niri M, Mafeni Mase J, Marco (2022) Performance evaluation of convolutional auto encoders for the reconstruction of li-ion battery electrode microstructure. Energies 15(12):4489. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1512448910.3390/en15124489 ↗
46. Mosser L, Dubrule O, Blunt MJ (2017) Reconstruction of three-dimensional porous media using generative adversarial neural networks. Phys Rev E 96(4):1. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.04330910.1103/PhysRevE.96.043309 ↗
47. Li X, Yang Z, Brinson LC, Choudhary A, Agrawal A, Chen W (2018) A deep adversarial learning methodology for designing microstructural material systems. In: Vol 2B: 44th design automation conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, pp 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-8563310.1115/DETC2018-85633 ↗
48. Iyer A, Dey B, Dasgupta A, Chen W, Chakraborty A (2019) A conditional generative model for predicting material microstructures from processing methods, arXiv:1910.02133 [cond-mat, stat]
49. Feng J, He X, Teng Q, Ren C, Honggang C, Li Y (2019) Reconstruction of porous media from extremely limited information using conditional generative adversarial networks. Phys Rev E 100:033308. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32567.9872710.13140/RG.2.2.32567.98727 ↗
50. Fokina D, Muravleva E, Ovchinnikov G, Oseledets I (2020) Microstructure synthesis using style-based generative adversarial networks. Phys Rev E 101(4):1. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.04330810.1103/PhysRevE.101.043308 ↗
51. Li Y, He X, Zhu W, Kwak H (2022) Digital rock reconstruction using Wasserstein GANs with gradient penalty, IPTC. In: International petroleum technology conference, p D012S123R001
52. Lee JW, Goo NH, Park WB, Pyo M, Sohn KS (2021) Virtual microstructure design for steels using generative adversarial networks. Eng Rep. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.1227410.1002/eng2.12274 ↗
53. Amiri H, Vasconcelos I, Jiao Y, Chen PE, Plümper O (2022) Quantifying complex microstructures of earth materials: reconstructing higher-order spatial correlations using deep generative adversarial networks. Reconstructing higher-order spatial correlations using deep generative adversarial networks. preprint, Geology, Quantifying complex microstructures of earth materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10510988.110.1002/essoar.10510988.1 ↗
54. Hsu T, Epting WK, Kim H, Abernathy HW, Hackett GA, Rollett AD, Salvador PA, Holm EA (2020) Microstructure generation via generative adversarial network for heterogeneous, topologically complex 3D materials. arXiv:2006.13886 [cond-mat]10.1007/s11837-020-04484-y ↗
55. Henkes A, Wessels H (2022) Three-dimensional microstructure generation using generative adversarial neural networks in the context of continuum micromechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 400:11549710.1016/j.cma.2022.115497 ↗
56. Coiffier G, Renard P, Lefebvre S (2020) 3D geological image synthesis from 2D examples using generative adversarial networks. Front Water 2:56059810.3389/frwa.2020.560598 ↗
57. Kench S, Cooper SJ (2021) Generating 3D structures from a 2D slice with GAN-based dimensionality expansion. Nat Mach Intell 3:299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00322-110.1038/s42256-021-00322-1 ↗
58. Zhang F, He X, Teng Q, Wu X, Cui J, Dong X (2023) PM-ARNN: 2D-TO-3D reconstruction paradigm for microstructure of porous media via adversarial recurrent neural network. Knowl-Based Syst 264:11033310.1016/j.knosys.2023.110333 ↗
59. Shams R, Masihi M, Boozarjomehry RB, Blunt MJ (2020) Coupled generative adversarial and auto-encoder neural networks to reconstruct three-dimensional multi-scale porous media. J Petrol Sci Eng 186:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.10679410.1016/j.petrol.2019.106794 ↗
60. Feng J, Teng Q, Li B, He X, Chen H, Li Y (2020) An end-to-end three-dimensional reconstruction framework of porous media from a single two-dimensional image based on deep learning. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 368:113043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.11304310.1016/j.cma.2020.113043 ↗
61. Zhang F, Teng Q, Chen H, He X, Dong X (2021) Slice-to-voxel stochastic reconstructions on porous media with hybrid deep generative model. Comput Mater Sci 186:110018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.11001810.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110018 ↗
62. Zhang Y, Seibert P, Otto A, Raßloff A, Ambati M, Kastner M (2023) DA-VEGAN: differentially augmenting VAE-GAN for microstructure reconstruction from extremely small data sets, arXiv:0904.3664 [cs]10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112661 ↗
63. Chamani H, Rabbani A, Russell KP, Zydney AL, Gomez ED, Hattrick-Simpers J, Werber JR (2023) Rapid reconstruction of 3-D membrane pore structure using a single 2-D Micrograph, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.1060110.1016/j.memsci.2023.121673 ↗
64. Zhang T, Xia P, Lu F (2022) 3D stochastic reconstruction of porous media based on attention mechanisms and residual networks. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 36(4):106310.1007/s00477-021-02092-z ↗
65. Zheng Q, Zhang D (2022) RockGPT: reconstructing three-dimensional digital rocks from single two-dimensional slice with deep learning. Comput Geosci 26(3):67710.1007/s10596-022-10144-8 ↗
66. Phan J, Ruspini L, Kiss G, Lindseth F (2022) Size-invariant 3D generation from a single 2D rock image. J Petrol Sci Eng 215:11064810.1016/j.petrol.2022.110648 ↗
67. Düreth C, Seibert P, Rücker D, Handford S, Kästner M, Gude M (2023) Conditional diffusion-based microstructure reconstruction. Mater Today Commun 35:105608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10560810.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105608 ↗
68. Lee KH, Yun GJ (2023) Microstructure reconstruction using diffusion-based generative models. Mech Adv Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2023.219852810.1080/15376494.2023.2198528 ↗
69. Lim HJ, Lee KH, Yun GJ (2023) Microstructure design of multifunctional particulate composite materials using conditional diffusion models. arXiv:2301.09051
70. Vlassis NN, Sun W (2023) Denoising diffusion algorithm for inverse design of microstructures with fine-tuned nonlinear material properties. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 413:11612610.1016/j.cma.2023.116126 ↗
71. Li X, Zhang Y, Zhao H, Burkhart C, Brinson LC, Chen W (2018) A transfer learning approach for microstructure reconstruction and structure-property predictions. Sci Rep 8(1):13461. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31571-710.1038/s41598-018-31571-7 ↗
72. Robertson AE, Kelly C, Buzzy M, Kalidindi SR (2023) Local-Global decompositions for conditional microstructure generation, local-global decompositions for conditional microstructure generation. preprint, SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.438821410.2139/ssrn.4388214 ↗
73. Torquato S (2002) Random heterogeneous materials. Interdisciplinary applied mathematics, vol 16. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6355-310.1007/978-1-4757-6355-3 ↗
74. Jiao Y, Stillinger FH, Torquato S (2007) Modeling heterogeneous materials via two-point correlation functions: basic principles. Phys Rev E 76(3):1. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.03111010.1103/PhysRevE.76.031110 ↗
75. Jiao Y, Stillinger FH, Torquato S (2008) Modeling heterogeneous materials via two-point correlation functions. II. Algorithmic details and applications. Phys Rev E 77(3):1. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.03113510.1103/PhysRevE.77.031135 ↗
76. Feng J, Teng Q, He X, Qing L, Li Y (2018) Reconstruction of three-dimensional heterogeneous media from a single two-dimensional section via co-occurrence correlation function. Comput Mater Sci 144:18110.1016/j.commatsci.2017.11.030 ↗
77. Piasecki R, Olchawa W (2018) Statistical reconstruction of microstructures using entropic descriptors. Trans Porous Media 125(1):105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1012-710.1007/s11242-018-1012-7 ↗
78. Gerke KM, Karsanina MV, Vasilyev RV, Mallants D (2014) Improving pattern reconstruction using directional correlation functions. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 106(6):6600210.1209/0295-5075/106/66002 ↗
79. Seibert P, Raßloff A, Kalina K, Safi A, Reck P, Peterseim D, Kästner M (2023) On the relevance of descriptor fidelity in microstructure reconstruction. PAMM 23(3):e20230011610.1002/pamm.202300116 ↗
80. Adam A, Wang F, Li X (2022) Efficient reconstruction and validation of heterogeneous microstructures for energy applications. Int J Energy Res 85:8578. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.857810.1002/er.8578 ↗
81. Alexander SK, Fieguth P, Ioannidis MA, Vrscay ER (2009) Hierarchical annealing for synthesis of binary images. Math Geosci 41(4):357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9209-x10.1007/s11004-008-9209-x ↗
82. Pant LM, Mitra SK, Secanell M (2015) Multigrid hierarchical simulated annealing method for reconstructing heterogeneous media. Phys Rev E 92(6):063303
83. Karsanina MV, Gerke KM (2018) Hierarchical optimization: fast and robust multiscale stochastic reconstructions with rescaled correlation functions. Phys Rev Lett 121(26):26550110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.265501 ↗
84. Chen D, Xu Z, Wang X, He H, Du Z, Nan J (2022) Fast reconstruction of multiphase microstructures based on statistical descriptors. Phys Rev E 105(5):055301
85. Seibert P, Raßloff A, Kalina KA, Gussone J, Bugelnig K, Diehl M, Kästner M (2023) Two-stage 2D-to-3D reconstruction of realistic microstructures: implementation and numerical validation by effective properties. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 412:11609810.1016/j.cma.2023.116098 ↗
86. Pant LM, Mitra SK, Secanell M (2014) Stochastic reconstruction using multiple correlation functions with different-phase-neighbor-based pixel selection. Phys Rev E 90(2):1. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.02330610.1103/PhysRevE.90.023306 ↗
87. Rozman MG, Utz M (2001) Efficient reconstruction of multiphase morphologies from correlation functions. Phys Rev E 63(6):1. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.63.06670110.1103/PhysRevE.63.066701 ↗
88. Xu H, Dikin DA, Burkhart C, Chen W (2014) Descriptor-based methodology for statistical characterization and 3D reconstruction of microstructural materials. Comput Mater Sci 85:206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.12.04610.1016/j.commatsci.2013.12.046 ↗
89. Scheunemann L, Balzani D, Brands D, Schröder J (2015) Design of 3D statistically similar representative volume elements based on Minkowski functionals. Mech Mater 90:185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.03.00510.1016/j.mechmat.2015.03.005 ↗
90. Seibert P, Husert M, Wollner MP, Kalina KA (2024) Kästner M (2023) Fast reconstruction of microstructures with ellipsoidal inclusions using analytical descriptors. Comput-Aided Design 166:10363510.1016/j.cad.2023.103635 ↗
91. Groeber M (2008) A framework for automated analysis and simulation of 3D polycrystalline microstructures. Part 1: statistical characterization. Acta Materialia 56(6):125710.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.041 ↗
92. Quey R, Kasemer M (2022) The Neper/FEPX project: free / open-source polycrystal generation, deformation simulation, and post-processing. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1249(1):01202110.1088/1757-899X/1249/1/012021 ↗
93. Prasad M, Vajragupta N, Hartmaier A (2019) Kanapy: a Python package for generating complex synthetic polycrystalline microstructures. J Open Source Softw 4(43):1732. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.0173210.21105/joss.01732 ↗
94. Seibert P, Ambati M, Raßloff A, Kästner M (2021) Reconstructing random heterogeneous media through differentiable optimization. Comput Mater Sci 196:11045510.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110455 ↗
95. Seibert P, Raßloff A, Ambati M, Kästner M (2022) Descriptor-based reconstruction of three-dimensional microstructures through gradient-based optimization. Acta Materialia 227:11766710.1016/j.actamat.2022.117667 ↗
96. Bostanabad R (2020) Reconstruction of 3D microstructures from 2D images via transfer learning. Comput-Aided Design 128:102906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2020.10290610.1016/j.cad.2020.102906 ↗
97. Bhaduri A, Gupta A, Olivier A, Graham-Brady L (2021) An efficient optimization based microstructure reconstruction approach with multiple loss functions. Comput Mater Sci 199:11070910.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110709 ↗
98. Zhou XP, Xiao N (2018) 3D numerical reconstruction of porous sandstone using improved simulated annealing algorithms. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(7):213510.1007/s00603-018-1451-z ↗
99. Xiao N, Zhou X, Berto F (2021) Fracture analysis of rock reconstruction models based on cooling-solidification annealing algorithms. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 44(9):2503–252310.1111/ffe.13531 ↗
100. Talukdar M, Torsaeter O, Ioannidis M, Howard J (2002) Stochastic reconstruction, 3D characterization and network modeling of chalk. J Petrol Sci Eng 35(1–2):1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(02)00160-210.1016/S0920-4105(02)00160-2 ↗