journal article·2023-10-02Open access

On the Arrays Distribution, Scan Sequence and Apodization in Coherent Dual-Array Ultrasound Imaging Systems

Laura Peralta, Daniele Mazierli, Kirsten Christensen-Jeffries, Alessandro Ramalli, Piero Tortoli, Joseph V. Hajnal

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 19

Abstract

Coherent multi-transducer ultrasound (CoMTUS) imaging creates an extended effective aperture through the coherent combination of multiple arrays, which results in images with enhanced resolution, extended field-of-view, and higher sensitivity. However, this also creates a large discontinuous effective aperture that presents additional challenges for current beamforming methods. The discontinuities may increase the level of grating and side lobes and degrade contrast. Also, direct transmissions between multiple arrays, happening at certain transducer relative positions, produce undesirable cross-talk artifacts. Hence, the position of the transducers and the scan sequence play key roles in the beamforming algorithm and imaging performance of CoMTUS. This work investigates the role of the distribution of the individual arrays and the scan sequence in the imaging performance of a coherent dual-array system. First, the imaging performance for different configurations was assessed numerically using the point-spread-function, and then optimized settings were tested on a tissue mimicking phantom. Finally, a subset of the proposed optimum imaging schemes was experimentally validated on two synchronized ULA OP-256 systems equipped with identical linear arrays. Results show that CoMTUS imaging performance can be enhanced by optimizing the relative position of the arrays and the scan sequence together, and that the use of apodization can reduce cross-talk artifacts without degrading spatial resolution. Adding weighted compounding further decreases artifacts and helps to compensate for the differences in the brightness across the image. Setting the maximum steering angle according to the spatial configuration of the arrays reduces the sidelobe energy up to 10 dB plus an extra 4 dB reduction is possible when increasing the number of PWs compounded.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Surgical & Interventional Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK

Department of Information Engineering, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy

Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK

Funding

Royal Society · Wellcome Trust/EPSRC iFIND project · European Union—NextGenerationEU— · PRIN 2020—CONUS · Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Point-of-Care Ultrasound: An Emerging Clinical Tool to Enhance Physical Assessment10.1097/01.NPR.0000841944.00536.b2 ↗
2. Obesity and the Challenges of Ultrasound Fetal Abnormality Diagnosis10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.08.011 ↗
3. Cobbold, R.S. (2006). Foundations of Biomedical Ultrasound, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195168310.001.0001 ↗
4. Medical Ultrasound Imaging10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.025 ↗
5. Feasibility of Swept Synthetic Aperture Ultrasound Imaging10.1109/TMI.2016.2524992 ↗
6. Bottenus, N. (2023). Implementation of Constrained Swept Synthetic Aperture Using a Mechanical Fixture. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13084797 ↗
7. Autofocusing Ultrasonic Imagery for Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation of Specimens with Complicated Geometries10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.09.001 ↗
8. The Inspection of Curved Components Using Flexible Ultrasonic Arrays and Shape Sensing Fibres10.1016/j.csndt.2014.03.003 ↗
9. Shape Estimation Algorithm for Ultrasound Imaging by Flexible Array Transducer10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3004052 ↗
10. Deep Learning for Ultrasound Beamforming in Flexible Array Transducer10.1109/TMI.2021.3087450 ↗
11. Coherent Multi-Transducer Ultrasound Imaging10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2921103 ↗
12. Multiperspective Bistatic Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography of the Ex Vivo Abdominal Aorta10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3128227 ↗
13. Improving Plane Wave Ultrasound Imaging through Real-Time Beamformation across Multiple Arrays10.1038/s41598-022-16961-2 ↗
14. Multiperspective Ultrasound Strain Imaging of the Abdominal Aorta10.1109/TMI.2020.3003430 ↗
15. Coherent Bistatic 3-D Ultrasound Imaging Using Two Sparse Matrix Arrays10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3233158 ↗
16. Peralta, L., Ramalli, A., Reinwald, M., Eckersley, R.J., and Hajnal, J.V. (2020). Impact of Aperture, Depth, and Acoustic Clutter on the Performance of Coherent Multi-Transducer Ultrasound Imaging. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10217655 ↗
17. 3-D Coherent Multitransducer Ultrasound Imaging with Sparse Spiral Arrays10.1109/TUFFC.2023.3241774 ↗
18. Biomedical Ultrasound Beam Forming10.1016/0301-5629(94)90097-3 ↗
19. Demi, L. (2018). Practical Guide to Ultrasound Beam Forming: Beam Pattern and Image Reconstruction Analysis. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8091544 ↗
20. Coherent Plane-Wave Compounding for Very High Frame Rate Ultrasonography and Transient Elastography10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1067 ↗
21. Ultrasound Image Enhancement: A Review10.1016/j.bspc.2012.02.002 ↗
22. Multi-Transmit Beam Forming for Fast Cardiac Imaging-a Simulation Study10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2753 ↗
23. Multi-Transmit Beam Forming for Fast Cardiac Imaging-Experimental Validation and in Vivo Application10.1109/TMI.2014.2302312 ↗
24. 2D and 3D High Frame Rate Imaging with Limited Diffraction Beams10.1109/58.655200 ↗
25. Calculation of Pressure Fields from Arbitrarily Shaped, Apodized, and Excited Ultrasound Transducers10.1109/58.139123 ↗
26. Jensen, J.A., and Jensen, J.A. (1996, January 9–13). FIELD: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems. Proceedings of the 10th Nordicbaltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging, Tampere, Finland.
27. Architecture of an Ultrasound System for Continuous Real-Time High Frame Rate Imaging10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2727980 ↗
28. Tortoli Architecture for an Ultrasound Advanced Open Platform with an Arbitrary Number of Independent Channels10.1109/TBCAS.2021.3077664 ↗
29. Comparison of Conventional Parallel Beamforming with Plane Wave and Diverging Wave Imaging for Cardiac Applications: A Simulation Study10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2371 ↗
30. The Generalized Contrast-to-Noise Ratio: A Formal Definition for Lesion Detectability10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2956855 ↗
31. Coherent Plane Wave Compounding for Very High Frame Rate Ultrasonography of Rapidly Moving Targets10.1109/TMI.2013.2255310 ↗
32. Synthetic Aperture Imaging for Small Scale Systems10.1109/58.384453 ↗
33. Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound10.1109/T-SU.1983.31405 ↗
34. Chau, G., Lavarello, R., and Dahl, J. (2016, January 18–21). Short-Lag Spatial Coherence Weighted Minimum Variance Beamformer for Plane-Wave Images. Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS, Tours, France.10.1109/ULTSYM.2016.7728889 ↗
35. Resolution and Brightness Characteristics of Short-Lag Spatial Coherence (SLSC) Images10.1109/TUFFC.2014.006909 ↗
36. The Delay Multiply and Sum Beamforming Algorithm in Ultrasound B-Mode Medical Imaging10.1109/TMI.2014.2371235 ↗
37. Gap-Filling Method for Suppressing Grating Lobes in Ultrasound Imaging: Theory and Simulation Results10.1121/1.5094337 ↗
38. An Aberration Correction Approach for Single and Dual Aperture Ultrasound Imaging of the Abdomen10.1016/j.ultras.2023.106936 ↗
39. Enhancing Lateral Contrast Using Multi-Perspective Ultrasound Imaging of Abdominal Aortas10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.09.023 ↗
40. High-Contrast Ultrafast Imaging of the Heart10.1109/TUFFC.2014.6722614 ↗
41. Moign, G.L., Quaegebeur, N., Masson, P., Basset, O., Robini, M., and Liebgott, H. (2019, January 6–9). Optimization of Virtual Sources Distribution in 3D Echography. Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS, Glasgow, UK.10.1109/ULTSYM.2019.8925839 ↗